2026-04-292025/26:FöU12 · p.2FöUDefence
Conditions for the feasibility of the bill
Impact assessment of costs and responsibilities in implementing the strengthened civil-population protection
What's at stake: New tasks around evacuation, lodging and protected spaces bring increased costs and responsibility for municipalities and risk making building-permit processes more expensive and drawn out, which affects both municipal finances and the pace of housing construction.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should return with a more comprehensive impact assessment of costs and division of responsibility for municipalities, regions and property owners before implementing the bill on strengthened civil-population protection, or whether the existing basis is already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee endorses the government's bill and considers the basis for implementing the strengthened civil-population protection to be sufficient, and therefore rejects the motion calling for a more comprehensive impact assessment of costs and division of responsibility.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V)
The reservation holds that strengthened civil-population protection must be built on realistic conditions and points out that several consultation bodies called for a more thorough impact assessment, since the new tasks around evacuation, lodging and protected spaces, together with integrating shelter matters into the planning process, entail substantial new costs for municipalities and risk making housing construction more expensive; the government should set out how responsibility and costs will be divided and ensure realistic conditions for municipalities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 181–107Ja 165–123
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/13/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/1/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 9/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 57/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 60/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motion 2025/26:3935 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) demands 1 and 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3935 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2.
Riksdag decision: The Government wishes to strengthen protection for the civilian population during heightened alert. Parliament approved the Government's proposal for a new law on shelters and protected spaces. Today there are approximately 64,000 shelters with capacity for 7 million individuals in Sweden. However, this is not sufficient to provide the population with adequate protection. Now the Government wishes to ensure that Sweden has modern protection for the civilian population during heightened alert or armed attack. The Government has therefore proposed a new law on shelters and protected spaces. The new law provides, among other things, regulations for a new protection option beyond shelters, the so-called protected spaces. A protected space is a space for protecting the population that provides limited protection compared to shelters. The law amendments enter into force on 1 June 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to conduct a comprehensive impact and cost analysis and ensure realistic conditions for municipalities and regions. (S, V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that municipal self-governance is a significant part of democracy and that income and costs shall be distributed fairly across the country, with the state as overall responsible.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that municipal self-governance is a significant part of democracy and that income and costs shall be distributed fairly across the country, with the state as overall responsible. New tasks regarding eviction, accommodation and protected premises without clarified cost and responsibility distribution place the cost burden on municipalities that already have weak economy. A thorough impact analysis is therefore the order the plan presupposes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av demokratin och att inkomster och kostnader ska fördelas solidariskt över landet, med staten som övergripande ansvarig. Nya uppgifter kring utrymning, inkvartering och skyddade utrymmen utan klarlagd kostnads- och ansvarsfördelning lastar över kostnaden på kommuner som redan har svag ekonomi. En genomarbetad konsekvensanalys är därför den ordning planen förutsätter.
- fair cost distributiondecisive»Inkomster och kostnader behöver fördelas solidariskt över landet.« (party programme ↗)“Income and costs need to be distributed fairly across the country.”
- municipal self-governance»Det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av den svenska demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-governance is a significant part of Swedish democracy.”
- state funding of municipalities»Omfördelningen från stat till region och kommun måste öka och särskild hänsyn ska tas till de många kommuner och regioner som idag inte får ihop sin ekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Redistribution from state to region and municipality must increase and special attention shall be paid to the many municipalities and regions that today cannot make their economy work”
- reasonable building costs for rental apartments»Vi vill prioritera att bygga hyresrätter med rimliga hyror.« (party programme ↗)“We want to prioritise building rental apartments at reasonable rents.”
The election manifesto promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions and the party programme a greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions and municipal self-government.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions and the party programme a greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions and municipal self-government. The counter-proposal's demand for a thorough consequence analysis of costs and responsibility distribution for new tasks in civil protection precisely values the municipalities' conditions. The plan embraces expanded civil defense at the same time, but that does not contradict the requirement for realistic conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar fortsatt ökade statsbidrag till kommuner och regioner och partiprogrammet ett större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar samt kommunalt självstyre. Motförslagets krav på en genomarbetad konsekvensanalys av kostnader och ansvarsfördelning för nya uppgifter i befolkningsskyddet värnar just kommunernas förutsättningar. Planen bejakar samtidigt utbyggt civilt försvar, men det motsäger inte kravet på realistiska förutsättningar.
- state financing of municipalitiesdecisive»Vi vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue increasing the state's grants to municipalities and regions.”
- municipal self-government»Kommunalt och regionalt självstyre med beskattningsrätt.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal and regional self-government with taxation rights.”
- state responsibility for equivalence»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
- strengthened civil defense»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work to strengthen civil defense and disaster preparedness must continue”
The plan admittedly wants to strengthen civil defense, but it simultaneously sets explicit requirements that responsibility distribution between state and municipality is clarified and that major undertakings receive stable financing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan admittedly wants to strengthen civil defense, but it simultaneously sets explicit requirements that responsibility distribution between state and municipality is clarified and that major undertakings receive stable financing. The Green Party also establishes that municipalities cannot bear the entire economic responsibility for major societal transitions. The counter-proposal's requirement for a thorough consequence analysis of costs and responsibility distribution for municipalities, regions and property owners thus aligns with the plan, particularly since the plan values continued building of housing with reasonable rents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill visserligen stärka det civila försvaret, men den ställer samtidigt uttryckliga krav på att ansvarsfördelningen mellan stat och kommun tydliggörs och att stora åtaganden får stabil finansiering. Miljöpartiet slår också fast att kommuner inte kan bära hela det ekonomiska ansvaret för stora samhällsomställningar. Motförslagets krav på en genomarbetad konsekvensanalys av kostnader och ansvarsfördelning för kommuner, regioner och fastighetsägare ligger därför i linje med planen, särskilt eftersom planen värnar fortsatt byggande av bostäder med rimliga hyror.
- clear responsibility distribution and financingdecisive»Vi vill tydliggöra ansvarsfördelningen mellan stat, kommuner och andra aktörer, och se till att viktiga klimatanpassningsåtgärder får stabil finansiering.« (party programme ↗)“We want to clarify responsibility distribution between state, municipalities and other actors, and ensure that important climate adaptation measures receive stable financing.”
- the state shall bear municipalities' costs»Kommuner kan inte bära hela det ekonomiska ansvaret för en sådan omställning – staten måste bidra.« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities cannot bear the entire economic responsibility for such a transition – the state must contribute.”
- strengthened civil defense»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defense funds to civil defense, and increase appropriations for crisis preparedness.”
- cheap housing construction is valued»Statliga stöd ska underlätta byggandet av bostäder med rimliga hyror, särskilt för unga och hushåll med låg inkomst.« (party programme ↗)“State support shall facilitate the building of housing with reasonable rents, particularly for young people and households with low income.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to develop civil defense, but it also stipulates that state ambitions should not be dumped as costs on municipalities and that nothing should make it more expensive to live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to develop civil defense, but it also stipulates that state ambitions should not be dumped as costs on municipalities and that nothing should make it more expensive to live. The counter-proposal's requirement for a comprehensive analysis of costs and responsibility distribution for municipalities, regions, and property owners therefore aligns with the plan. That decisions should be made close to those affected also requires realistic conditions for the municipal level.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill rusta civilförsvaret, men den slår också fast att statliga ambitioner inte ska vältras över som kostnader på kommunerna och att inget ska göra det dyrare att bo. Motförslagets krav på en genomarbetad konsekvensanalys av kostnader och ansvarsfördelning för kommuner, regioner och fastighetsägare ligger därför i linje med planen. Att beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs förutsätter dessutom realistiska förutsättningar för den kommunala nivån.
- state reforms must not burden municipalitiesdecisive»Vi vill göra förskola och fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla, utan att dessa kostnader drabbar kommunerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make preschool and after-school activities available for all, without these costs affecting municipalities”
- develop civil defense»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defense is also vital. We must develop civil defense and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
- housing must not become more expensive»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that harm jobs, personal savings, or make it more expensive to live.”
- decisions close to those affected»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should be allowed to decide more for themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants total defence to be strengthened considerably, but it also requires stable public finances and that municipalities' economic conditions be equalized for factors they cannot influence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants total defence to be strengthened considerably, but it also requires stable public finances and that municipalities' economic conditions be equalized for factors they cannot influence. An account of how new costs and responsibilities for evacuation, accommodation and protected spaces shall be distributed follows from these commitments, as does the demand for simplified and cheaper building regulations. The plan however does not address civil defence legislation in particular.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att totalförsvaret stärks kraftigt, men den kräver också stabila offentliga finanser och att kommunernas ekonomiska villkor utjämnas för faktorer de inte kan påverka. En redovisning av hur nya kostnader och ansvar för utrymning, inkvartering och skyddade utrymmen ska fördelas följer av dessa åtaganden, liksom av kravet på förenklade och billigare byggregler. Planen behandlar dock inte skyddsrumslagstiftningen särskilt.
- equalized municipal conditionsdecisive»regioner behöver därför utjämnas med avseende på faktorer som inte går att påverka.« (party programme ↗)“regions therefore need to be equalized with respect to factors that cannot be influenced.”
- stable public finances»Stabila offentliga finanser och låg statsskuld skapar utrymme för Sverige att möta kriser utan« (party programme ↗)“Stable public finances and low state debt create room for Sweden to meet crises without”
- strengthened total defence»behöver Sveriges totalförsvar stärkas kraftigt.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's total defence needs to be strengthened considerably.”
- cheaper housing construction»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save up for the first deposit, abolish the increased amortization requirement, shorten appeal processes and continue to simplify building regulations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires that the financing principle is respected when the state places new tasks on municipalities, and that municipal self-governance is strong.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that the financing principle is respected when the state places new tasks on municipalities, and that municipal self-governance is strong. New tasks around evacuation, accommodation and protected spaces are exactly such requirements. The counter-proposal's demand for a thoroughly worked-out impact analysis of costs and responsibility division therefore follows from the plan, which also wants impact assessments to be made before planning decisions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att finansieringsprincipen respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter, och att den kommunala självstyrelsen är stark. Nya uppgifter kring utrymning, inkvartering och skyddade utrymmen är just sådana ålägganden. Motförslagets krav på en genomarbetad konsekvensanalys av kostnader och ansvarsfördelning följer därför av planen, som också vill att konsekvensbeskrivningar görs inför planbeslut.
- the financing principledecisive»Finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger« (party programme ↗)“The financing principle must be respected when the state imposes”
- municipal self-governance»Kommunal demokrati förutsätter kommunal självstyrelse.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal democracy presupposes municipal self-governance.”
- impact assessments»Inför planbeslut ska konsekvensbeskrivningar göras, som« (party programme ↗)“Before planning decisions, impact assessments shall be made, which”
- municipality's housing supply responsibility»Krångel och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun att leva upp till sitt« (party programme ↗)“Red tape and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality to live up to its”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan demands order and discipline in the economy, that new reforms are financed and that public waste is combated, which supports documenting costs and responsibility distribution before new tasks are placed on municipalities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands order and discipline in the economy, that new reforms are financed and that public waste is combated, which supports documenting costs and responsibility distribution before new tasks are placed on municipalities. The plan also wants to build up civil defence long-term and increase housing construction, two goals that a clear impact assessment should secure. The support is derived because the plan does not address civil protection financing.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ordning och reda i ekonomin, att nya reformer är finansierade och att offentligt slöseri bekämpas, vilket talar för att kostnader och ansvarsfördelning redovisas innan nya uppgifter läggs på kommunerna. Planen vill samtidigt bygga ut det civila försvaret långsiktigt och öka bostadsbyggandet, två mål som en tydlig konsekvensanalys ska säkra. Stödet är härlett eftersom planen inte behandlar befolkningsskyddets finansiering.
- reforms must be financeddecisive»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – for example our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- respect for tax revenues»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms must be combated.”
- long-term civil defence planning»Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure long-term planning for civil defence”
- increase housing construction»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase the construction of both rental and owner-occupied housing.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes the municipal finance principle as fundamental to the relationship between state and municipal sector, which directly bears the counter-proposal's requirement that costs and responsibility distribution for municipalities are presented before strengthened population protection is implemented.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes the municipal finance principle as fundamental to the relationship between state and municipal sector, which directly bears the counter-proposal's requirement that costs and responsibility distribution for municipalities are presented before strengthened population protection is implemented. The plan certainly wants to strengthen crisis preparedness, but simultaneously requires clear results for every public spending initiative and that housing costs are not driven up. The requirement for a well-developed impact analysis therefore follows from the plan's own commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast den kommunala finansieringsprincipen som grundläggande för relationen mellan stat och kommunsektor, vilket direkt bär motförslagets krav på att kostnader och ansvarsfördelning för kommunerna redovisas innan ett stärkt befolkningsskydd genomförs. Planen vill visserligen stärka krisberedskapen, men kräver samtidigt tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning och att boendekostnaderna inte drivs upp. Kravet på en genomarbetad konsekvensanalys följer därmed av planens egna åtaganden.
- municipal finance principledecisive»Den kommunala finansieringsprincipen är grundläggande för de ekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The municipal finance principle is fundamental to the economic”
- results requirements for spending»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public spending initiative”
- dampened housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to brake the soaring housing costs so that more people can afford a home.”
- strengthened crisis preparedness»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka samhällets beredskap för alla typer av kriser som kan uppstå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises that can arise.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FöU12)
- Committee report full text (HD01FöU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:182 — Tillträde till skyddsrum för sällskapsdjur av Victoria Tiblom (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1965 — Plan för skyddsrum av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1969 — Tillgång till skyddsrum av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:227 — Operativa skyddsrum i Sverige av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3336 — Skyddsrum och husdjur i beredskapsplaneringen av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3556 — Totalförsvarets beredskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3931 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3935 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3938 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Mikael Larsson och Kerstin Lundgren (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:3944 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Ulf Holm m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:142 — Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap
Source: The Swedish Parliament