2023-04-122022/23:CU10 · p.1CUCivil law & housing
Measures on the housing market
Overall measures for the housing market
What's at stake: The issue concerns the overall direction of housing policy: how housing construction should increase and which forms of housing should be prioritised. It affects housing supply and living costs for households across the country, especially in major cities where the shortage is greatest.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should issue a formal call on the government for a more assertive housing policy with more rental housing and reduced cost gaps between renting and owning, or whether the government's already announced direction of simplified building rules, type approval and increased planning readiness is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee opposes all motions on overall housing market measures. The committee welcomes the government's announced reforms for more owned housing, simplified building rules, type approval of houses, and increased municipal planning readiness, especially for detached housing, and considers that this direction already meets the needs that exist.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
(S) wants the Riksdag to call for an assertive housing policy in which the state and municipalities share responsibility, with more mixed housing areas, more rental housing at reasonable rents, and reduced differences in housing costs between renting and owning, based on the view that decent housing is a social right for everyone.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 1/0/20/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/15 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 64/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VNooshi Dadgostar (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:64 by Martin Westmont (SD) demands 1 and 2, 2022/23:562 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) demand 1, 2022/23:564 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) demands 1 and 2, 2022/23:683 by Yasmine Bladelius (S), 2022/23:762 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demands 9 and 10, 2022/23:910 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demands 1, 6, 7, 11 and 13, 2022/23:1009 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) demands 6-8, 2022/23:1215 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 8, 2022/23:1249 by Malcolm Momodou Jallow et al. (V) demand 29, 2022/23:1333 by Matilda Ernkrans and Karin Sundin (both S), 2022/23:1339 by Amalia Rud Pedersen and Adrian Magnusson (both S) demand 4, 2022/23:1655 by Anders Ådahl (C), 2022/23:1963 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S), 2022/23:2026 by Mattias Vepsä et al. (S) demand 2, 2022/23:2028 by Mattias Vepsä et al. (S) demand 11, 2022/23:2171 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) demand 3, 2022/23:2175 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) demand 59 and 2022/23:2217 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) demands 1-3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:64 av Martin Westmont (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:562 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkande 1, 2022/23:564 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:683 av Yasmine Bladelius (S), 2022/23:762 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 9 och 10, 2022/23:910 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1, 6, 7, 11 och 13, 2022/23:1009 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 6-8, 2022/23:1215 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 8, 2022/23:1249 av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V) yrkande 29, 2022/23:1333 av Matilda Ernkrans och Karin Sundin (båda S), 2022/23:1339 av Amalia Rud Pedersen och Adrian Magnusson (båda S) yrkande 4, 2022/23:1655 av Anders Ådahl (C), 2022/23:1963 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S), 2022/23:2026 av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S) yrkande 2, 2022/23:2028 av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S) yrkande 11, 2022/23:2171 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3, 2022/23:2175 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 59 och 2022/23:2217 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-3.
Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to approximately 120 proposals in motions that were submitted during the regular motion period 2022. The proposals deal with, among other things, measures for increased housing construction, financing of housing construction, housing provision, publicly owned municipal housing corporations, reduced segregation and overcrowding, housing placement and priority to housing for certain groups, and innovative, environmentally friendly and sustainable construction. Parliament refers to, among other things, ongoing work or announced reforms in the area.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants state and municipalities to jointly work toward building more mixed residential areas and reducing housing cost differences between rented and owned housing. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's next step in housing policy is massive house building and lower rents, carried out with a state building company, investment support, and active land policy — that is, a shared state and municipal responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's next step in housing policy is massive house building and lower rents, carried out with a state building company, investment support, and active land policy — that is, a shared state and municipal responsibility. The party programme wants to promote rental housing and build mixed neighbourhoods that counteract segregation. The counter-proposal's demands for more rental apartments at reasonable rents and housing as a social right are therefore the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planens nästa steg i bostadspolitiken är massivt bostadsbyggande och sänkta hyror, genomfört med statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd och aktiv markpolitik — det vill säga ett delat statligt och kommunalt ansvar. Programmet vill främja hyresrätten och bygga blandade områden som motverkar segregation. Motförslagets krav på fler hyresrätter till rimliga hyror och bostaden som social rättighet är därmed planens egen linje.
- massive building and lower rentsdecisive»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is a policy of massive house building, climate-smart renovations, and lower rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”
- state responsibility for building»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state building company, investment support for increased house building, and active land policy.”
- promote rental housing»Hyresrätten med stärkt boendeinflytande och delaktighet ska främjas och kooperativa bostadsformer utan vinstsyfte ges möjlighet att utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Rental housing with strengthened tenant influence and participation shall be promoted and co-operative housing forms without profit motive given opportunity to develop.”
- mixed housing neighbourhoods»Genom en blandning av hustyper, lägenhetsstorlekar och upplåtelseformer ska alla miljöer främja jämställdhet och gemenskap och motverka segregation, slutenhet och kategoriboende.« (party programme ↗)“Through a mix of building types, apartment sizes, and forms of tenure, all environments shall promote equality and community and counteract segregation, exclusion, and category housing.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal repeats the plan's own housing policy: mixed dwelling and tenure forms, more rental apartments that ordinary people can afford and shared responsibility where all municipalities should take their share.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal repeats the plan's own housing policy: mixed dwelling and tenure forms, more rental apartments that ordinary people can afford and shared responsibility where all municipalities should take their share. The party programme sees housing as a social right and housing provision as a societal responsibility, with non-profit housing as a tool to keep costs down. The plan thus speaks directly against the committee's direction towards primarily owner-occupied housing.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget upprepar planens egen bostadspolitik: blandade boende- och upplåtelseformer, fler hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med och ett delat ansvar där alla kommuner ska ta sin del. Partiprogrammet ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadsförsörjningen som ett samhälleligt ansvar, med allmännyttan som verktyg för att hålla nere kostnaderna. Planen talar därmed direkt mot utskottets inriktning på i första hand ägt boende.
- mixed tenure formsdecisive»Boende- och upplåtelseformer ska vara blandade. Trångboddheten ska bekämpas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Dwelling and tenure forms should be mixed. Overcrowding should be fought.”
- housing as a social right»socialdemokrater ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“Social Democrats see housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- the state's responsibility for housing provision»Därför anser vi att det är ett samhälleligt ansvar att trygga« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, we believe it is a societal responsibility to secure”
- strong non-profit housing»Starka allmännyttiga och kooperativa företag är nödvändiga för att« (party programme ↗)“Strong non-profit and cooperative companies are necessary to”
The election manifesto requires more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents and expanded investment support, and the party programme establishes that everyone has the right to housing, that housing forms shall be mixed in all areas and that rental housing and regulation of the housing market shall be valued.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents and expanded investment support, and the party programme establishes that everyone has the right to housing, that housing forms shall be mixed in all areas and that rental housing and regulation of the housing market shall be valued. The counter-proposal's offensive housing policy with shared state and municipal responsibility is exactly that direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror och ett utökat investeringsstöd, och partiprogrammet slår fast att alla har rätt till en bostad, att boendeformer ska blandas i alla områden och att hyresrätten och en reglering av hyresmarknaden ska värnas. Motförslagets offensiva bostadspolitik med delat statligt och kommunalt ansvar är just den inriktningen.
- more rental apartments with reasonable rentsdecisive»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand the investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more can own their home.”
- housing as a right»Alla har rätt till en bostad.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to a home.”
- mixed housing areas»Olika boendeformer bör blandas och finnas tillgängliga i alla områden.« (party programme ↗)“Different housing forms should be mixed and be available in all areas.”
- value rental housing»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att värna hyresrätten och en reglering av hyresmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore it is particularly important to value rental housing and regulation of the housing market.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's housing line is built on simple rules and strong incentives to invest, a market with mobility and low thresholds and growing homeownership, not on a shared state and municipal responsibility for steering forward rental housing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's housing line is built on simple rules and strong incentives to invest, a market with mobility and low thresholds and growing homeownership, not on a shared state and municipal responsibility for steering forward rental housing. The party programme moreover rejects planned economy directives in the economy. The counter-proposal's requirement for a state-driven housing policy with housing as a social right therefore gets no support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bostadslinje bygger på enkla regler och starka drivkrafter att investera, en marknad med rörlighet och låga trösklar och ett växande ägt boende, inte på ett delat statligt och kommunalt ansvar för att styra fram hyresrätter. Partiprogrammet avvisar dessutom planekonomiska pekpinnar i ekonomin. Motförslagets krav på en statligt driven bostadspolitik med bostaden som social rättighet får därför inte stöd i planen.
- drivkrafter framför statlig styrningdecisive»starka drivkrafter att investera i bostäder, kan byggandet öka i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“strong incentives to invest in housing, building can increase across the country.”
- rörlig bostadsmarknad»präglas av rörlighet, låga trösklar, långsiktighet och mångfald.« (party programme ↗)“characterized by mobility, low thresholds, long-term thinking and diversity.”
- ägt boende i centrum»Boendet är den största investeringen många människor gör.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing is the largest investment many people make.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's housing line is more market, free rent-setting in new construction and abolished building subsidies, not an expanded state and municipal responsibility for rental housing with politically held rents.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's housing line is more market, free rent-setting in new construction and abolished building subsidies, not an expanded state and municipal responsibility for rental housing with politically held rents. The counter-proposal's view that housing is a social right that the state shall provide therefore goes against the plan. The plan recognizes however special needs housing for vulnerable groups, which is a limited qualification.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bostadslinje är mer marknad, fri hyressättning i nyproduktion och avskaffade byggsubventioner, inte ett utbyggt statligt och kommunalt ansvar för hyresrätter med politiskt hållna hyror. Motförslagets synsätt att bostaden är en social rättighet som staten ska tillhandahålla går därför emot planen. Planen erkänner däremot särskilda behovsbostäder för svaga grupper, vilket är en avgränsad kvalificering.
- free rent-setting in new constructiondecisive»hyran i nybyggda hyresrätter ska få avtalas fritt mellan hyresvärd och hyresgäst« (2022 manifesto ↗)“rent in newly built rental housing shall be freely negotiated between landlord and tenant”
- no to building subsidies»Dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished”
- more market in housing policy»Vi vill skapa en bostadsmarknad med fler bostäder och mer marknad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create a housing market with more housing and more market”
- needs housing for vulnerable»ett nytt system med behovsbostäder ska införas för grupper med särskilt stora bostadsbehov« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a new system with needs housing shall be introduced for groups with especially large housing needs”
The plan places on both state and municipality the responsibility to secure housing provision for everyone, regardless of social and economic circumstances, and wishes to have varying tenure forms in all residential areas to prevent segregation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places on both state and municipality the responsibility to secure housing provision for everyone, regardless of social and economic circumstances, and wishes to have varying tenure forms in all residential areas to prevent segregation. Legislation shall be designed fairly between housing forms and protect tenants from unreasonable rent increases. A housing policy with shared state and municipal responsibility, mixed areas and reasonable rents thereby follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ålägger både stat och kommun att trygga bostadsförsörjningen åt alla, oavsett sociala och ekonomiska förutsättningar, och vill ha varierande upplåtelseformer i alla bostadsområden för att motverka segregation. Lagstiftningen ska utformas rättvist mellan boendeformer och skydda hyresgäster från oskäliga hyreshöjningar. En bostadspolitik med delat statligt och kommunalt ansvar, blandade områden och rimliga hyror följer därmed av planen.
- housing for alldecisive»bostadsförsörjningen åt alla, i olika åldrar och med olika sociala och ekonomiska förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“housing provision for everyone, in different ages and with different social and economic circumstances.”
- mixed tenure forms»i alla stadsdelar och bostadsområden ska finnas varierande upplåtelseformer« (party programme ↗)“in all city districts and residential areas shall there be varying tenure forms”
- neutrality between housing forms»viktigt att lagstiftning utformas rättvist med hänsyn« (party programme ↗)“important that legislation is designed fairly taking into account”
- protection against unreasonable rents»Någon form av hyresreglering som skyddar de boende från oskäliga hyreshöjningar bör finnas.« (party programme ↗)“Some form of rent regulation that protects residents from unreasonable rent increases should exist.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds housing policy on home ownership and rents that reflect tenants' own valuation of housing, not politically determined reasonable rent levels and equalized housing costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds housing policy on home ownership and rents that reflect tenants' own valuation of housing, not politically determined reasonable rent levels and equalized housing costs. More housing should come through simplifications and reforms that increase construction, not through expanded state responsibility for housing supply. The counter-proposal's view that housing is a social right that the state should guarantee is outside the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger bostadspolitiken på ägt boende och på hyror som speglar hyresgästernas egen värdering av boendet, inte på politiskt bestämda rimliga hyresnivåer och utjämnade boendekostnader. Fler bostäder ska komma genom förenklingar och reformer som ökar byggandet, inte genom ett utvidgat statligt ansvar för bostadsförsörjningen. Motförslagets synsätt att bostaden är en social rättighet som staten ska garantera ligger utanför planens linje.
- market-based rent settingdecisive»Möjliggöra mer rättvisa hyror genom att potentiella hyresgästers värdering av boendet ges större vikt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Enable fairer rents by giving potential tenants' valuation of housing greater weight”
- home ownership in focus»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the Moderates' Sweden, everyone should dare to dream of owning their own home.”
- increased building through reforms»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to carry out reforms that increase the construction of both rental and cooperative housing.”
- limited state role in the economy»Statens roll i ekonomin är att värna dess grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in the economy is to protect its fundamental”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan establishes that everyone shall have access to housing of good standard and that measures are needed to brake soaring housing costs; the party programme additionally places shared responsibility on state and municipality so that resource-poor groups also get dignified housing.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone shall have access to housing of good standard and that measures are needed to brake soaring housing costs; the party programme additionally places shared responsibility on state and municipality so that resource-poor groups also get dignified housing. The counter-proposal's requirement for shared state and municipal responsibility and reasonable housing costs therefore aligns with the plan's direction, even though the plan's own tools are primarily more building and simplified rules.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla ska ha tillgång till en bostad med god standard och att åtgärder behövs för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna; partiprogrammet lägger dessutom ett gemensamt ansvar på stat och kommun för att även resurssvaga grupper ska få ett värdigt boende. Motförslagets krav på delat statligt och kommunalt ansvar och rimliga boendekostnader ligger därför i planens riktning, även om planens egna verktyg främst är mer byggande och förenklade regler.
- lower housing costsdecisive»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to brake the soaring housing costs so that more people can afford a home.”
- shared responsibility for housing»Sverigedemokraternas bedömning är att marknaden inte ensam kan garantera alla medborgare« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats' assessment is that the market alone cannot guarantee all citizens”
- housing of good standard»Alla ska ha tillgång till en bostad med god standard och kunna leva i en säker, trygg och trivsam miljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone shall have access to housing of good standard and be able to live in a safe, secure and pleasant environment.”
- more building»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase housing construction”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 12 per cent and policy rate 3.0 per cent — Rapidly rising housing costs increase the weight of the plan's commitment to brake housing costs.
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:CU10)
- Committee report full text (HA01CU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1009 — Ansvarsfull bostadspolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1032 — Bostadspolitik av Lars Mejern Larsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1215 — Bostadspolitik, planering och byggande av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1249 — Hyresrätt och allmännytta av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1311 — Kvinnor som lever under hot av Alexandra Völker och Azadeh Rojhan (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1333 — Bostadsbyggande i hela landet av Matilda Ernkrans och Karin Sundin (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1339 — Bostadssituationen för studenter av Amalia Rud Pedersen och Adrian Magnusson (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1454 — Cirkulärt byggande av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1655 — Bostadsförsörjning av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1701 — Friare vardag genom säkrad förvaring av elrullstolar av Lina Nordquist (L)
- Motion 2022/23:1880 — Integration av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1963 — Åtgärder för en fungerande bostadsmarknad av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2026 — En arbetsmarknad med goda villkor och en skola utan marknadskrafter av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2028 — Stockholmsregionen som Sveriges gröna motor av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2171 — Lands- och glesbygd med stark samhällsutveckling av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2175 — En klimatpolitik som står upp för Parisavtalet av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2190 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2217 — Bostadspolitik av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament