2026-03-182025/26:NU14 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
Measures against unscrupulous companies
Measures against companies used as tools for crime
What's at stake: Disreputable companies that win public contracts on lowest price risk driving down wages and working conditions, and criminal actors have established themselves in the welfare sector after winning public contracts. Without national coordination, a company stopped in one municipality can continue operating elsewhere, which affects both employees and legitimate competitors.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether dedicated new tools should be created — such as a blacklist of disreputable companies and a coordination mandate for register checks at the companies registration authority — to stop companies being used as tools for crime, or whether measures already adopted, such as expanded business bans and a strengthened beneficial-ownership register, are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that parliament has already adopted expanded powers to impose business bans due to crime, and that work against money laundering has been strengthened by giving the companies registration authority funds to develop the register of beneficial owners and a service for digital filing of annual reports. Since equivalent motions on a blacklist and coordinated register checks were already considered and rejected in spring 2025, the committee sees no reason to revisit its position and recommends rejecting all the motions in this section.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (V)
The reservation points out that lowest price is often decisive in public procurement, allowing disreputable and sometimes criminal companies to win contracts at the expense of good working conditions, and that a lack of national coordination lets such companies keep operating in other parts of the country. The government should investigate a shared vetting system for contracting authorities and the creation of a blacklist of disreputable companies.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 260–18Ja 168–110
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/15/0/7 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/1/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 10/0/0/6 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SBlåvitt Elofsson (S, Värmlands län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:307 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 27, 2025/26:1941 by Mattias Jonsson and Amalia Rud Stenlöf (both S) and 2025/26:2831 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demand 42.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:307 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 27, 2025/26:1941 av Mattias Jonsson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S) och 2025/26:2831 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 42.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 138 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025 concerning business policy. The proposals deal with, among other things, business promotion, measures against unscrupulous companies, competition issues, efforts for an equal business environment and certain industries and sectors. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to current policy, previous positions and that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to instruct Vinnova to terminate the innovation collaboration and close its office in Tel Aviv. (V) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly requires collective agreements in public procurement and points out wage dumping and economic crime as central threats.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires collective agreements in public procurement and points out wage dumping and economic crime as central threats. It notes that cheating wipes out honest businesses and wants greater public oversight to combat it. A common control system and a blacklist of dishonest businesses in procurement are tools that respond to the plan's requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ställer uttryckligen krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar och pekar ut lönedumpning och ekonomisk brottslighet som centrala hot. Den konstaterar att fusket slår ut seriösa företag och vill ha större samhällelig insyn för att stävja det. Ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista över oseriösa företag i upphandlingar är verktyg som svarar mot planens krav.
- requirement at public procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party explicitly requires collective agreements in public procurement.”
- against wage dumping and economic crime»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
- protect honest businesses»fifflet leder till att seriösa företag slås ut och skatteintäkter uteblir.« (party programme ↗)“cheating leads to honest businesses being wiped out and tax revenue being lost.”
- oversight of companies»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater public oversight”
The plan makes clear that public procurers shall be exemplars in working for fair competition and that workplace crime shall not exist on the Swedish labour market, which directly bears the requirement for a common inspection system and a blacklist of unscrupulous companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes clear that public procurers shall be exemplars in working for fair competition and that workplace crime shall not exist on the Swedish labour market, which directly bears the requirement for a common inspection system and a blacklist of unscrupulous companies. The plan explicitly states that it shall never pay to gain competitive advantages by neglecting employees' conditions. The requirement for national coordination follows from the commitment to combat criminality on the labour market.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att offentliga upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för sund konkurrens och att arbetslivskriminalitet inte ska finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad, vilket direkt bär kravet på ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista över oseriösa företag. Planen säger uttryckligen att det aldrig ska löna sig att skaffa konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas villkor. Kravet på nationell samordning följer av åtagandet att bekämpa kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden.
- fair competition in procurementdecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Workplace crime shall not exist on the Swedish labour market and public employers and procurers shall be exemplars in working for fair competition.”
- no competitive advantage from crime»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall never pay to commit crime or gain competitive advantage by neglecting employees' right to a safe working environment.”
- combat workplace crime»Bekämpande av kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Combating criminality on the labour market.”
- stop economic crime»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's central commitment is to strengthen agency coordination so that the agencies can strike against organized crime's companies from several directions — a shared control system and a blacklist are precisely such tools.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's central commitment is to strengthen agency coordination so that the agencies can strike against organized crime's companies from several directions — a shared control system and a blacklist are precisely such tools. The plan also wants to set clearer requirements in public procurement and take strong measures against employers who exploit labor. Welfare crime shall be prioritized highly.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att stärka myndighetssamverkan så att myndigheterna kan slå till mot den organiserade brottslighetens företag från flera håll — ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista är just sådana verktyg. Planen vill också ställa tydligare krav vid offentlig upphandling och ta krafttag mot arbetsgivare som exploaterar arbetskraft. Välfärdsbrott ska prioriteras högt.
- agency coordination against criminal enterprisesdecisive»stoppa finansieringen av de kriminella gängen genom att stärka myndighetssamverkan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“stop the financing of criminal gangs by strengthening agency coordination”
- requirements in public procurement»ska det ställas tydligare hållbarhetskrav« (party programme ↗)“clearer sustainability requirements shall be set”
- against labor exploitation»Det krävs krafttag mot arbetsgivare som exploaterar utländsk« (party programme ↗)“Strong measures are required against employers who exploit foreign”
- welfare crime is prioritized»Välfärdsbrott – där gemensamma resurser utnyttjas och« (party programme ↗)“Welfare crime – where common resources are exploited and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires forceful action against crime affecting businesses and wants to investigate how the proceeds of the criminal economy can be cut off.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires forceful action against crime affecting businesses and wants to investigate how the proceeds of the criminal economy can be cut off. It also builds on the idea that business shall take place on equal terms with sound competition, which unserious actors in public procurement put out of action. Investigating a joint control system and a blacklist is in line with this, even though the plan does not mention the measures.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver krafttag mot brott som drabbar företag och vill utreda hur den kriminella ekonomins inkomster kan strypas. Den bygger också på att företagande ska ske på lika villkor med sund konkurrens, vilket oseriösa aktörer i offentlig upphandling sätter ur spel. Att utreda ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista ligger i linje med detta, även om planen inte nämner åtgärderna.
- strypa kriminella inkomsterdecisive»Dessutom bör en utredning om gängens inkomster och hur dessa kan strypas genomföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In addition, an investigation into gang income and how this can be cut off should be conducted.”
- krafttag mot brott mot företag»För att Sveriges företag även fortsättningsvis ska kunna leverera produkter, tjänster och jobb i världsklass krävs en pålitlig infrastruktur i hela landet, satsningar på forskning och utveckling och krafttag mot brott emot företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For Sweden's businesses to continue to deliver world-class products, services and jobs requires a reliable infrastructure across the country, investments in research and development and forceful action against crime against businesses.”
- sund konkurrens»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driver for the development of the market economy.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that public procurement secures high quality and equal treatment and not only low costs, and that laws and regulations guard against competition on equal terms.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public procurement secures high quality and equal treatment and not only low costs, and that laws and regulations guard against competition on equal terms. A joint control system and an inspection of unscrupulous companies aims precisely at maintaining sound competition. That the question is investigated lies therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att offentlig upphandling säkrar hög kvalitet och likabehandling och inte enbart låga kostnader, och att lagar och regler slår vakt om konkurrens på lika villkor. Ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en granskning av oseriösa företag syftar just till att sund konkurrens upprätthålls. Att frågan utreds ligger därmed i planens linje.
- quality in public procurementdecisive»ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och« (party programme ↗)“occur in a way that gives taxpayers low costs, high quality, secures equal treatment and”
- competition on equal terms»regler ska slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“rules shall guard against property rights, competition on equal terms, legal certainty”
- rules against abuse of power»Marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att« (party programme ↗)“The market economy requires rules in order to”
- coordinated crime-fighting»Sverige ska delta fullt ut i EU:s brottsbekämpning och den europeiska polismyndigheten Europol ska ges ett tydligare operativt mandat att bekämpa internationell brottslighet och terrorism.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall participate fully in the EU's crime-fighting efforts and the European police agency Europol shall be given a clearer operative mandate to combat international crime and terrorism.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands effective competition policy that counters disloyal competition, which is precisely the problem the counter-proposal points to when unscrupulous enterprises win procurements at the lowest price.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands effective competition policy that counters disloyal competition, which is precisely the problem the counter-proposal points to when unscrupulous enterprises win procurements at the lowest price. It also establishes that all crimes shall be vigorously and without exception prosecuted and that integrity is a foundation for the market economy. To investigate a joint control system and a blacklist follows from these commitments, with the proviso that the plan at the same time wishes to counter bureaucracy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en effektiv konkurrenspolitik som motverkar illojal konkurrens, vilket är precis det problem motförslaget pekar på när oseriösa företag vinner upphandlingar på lägsta pris. Den slår också fast att alla brott effektivt och utan undantag ska beivras och att hederlighet är ett fundament för marknadsekonomin. Att utreda ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista följer av dessa åtaganden, med förbehållet att planen samtidigt vill motverka byråkrati.
- against disloyal competitiondecisive»konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“competition policy prevents oligopolies, monopolies and disloyal competition.”
- all crimes shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be vigorously and without exception prosecuted”
- integrity in business»Hederlighet och personligt ansvarstagande är viktiga fundament.« (party programme ↗)“Integrity and personal responsibility are important foundations.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complex rules shall be countered.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to stop tax money from ending up with criminals and payments going to actors who do not belong in the system.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to stop tax money from ending up with criminals and payments going to actors who do not belong in the system. A common control system and an investigated blacklist in public procurement serves the same purpose and also protects honest businessmen from criminal competition. However, the plan does not speak about procurement as such, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stoppa att skattepengar hamnar hos kriminella och att utbetalningar går till aktörer som inte hör hemma i systemet. Ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en utredd svart lista vid offentlig upphandling tjänar samma syfte och skyddar dessutom seriösa företagare mot kriminell konkurrens. Planen talar dock inte om upphandling som sådan, så stödet är härlett.
- tax money for the right purposedecisive»Moderaterna tänker ta kontroll över folkbokföringen för att stoppa bidragsbrotten och se till att de skattepengar du betalar in används till det de är avsedda för.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party intends to take control of population registration to stop benefit fraud and ensure that the tax money you pay in is used for its intended purpose.”
- stop payments to disreputable actors»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to extremists”
- protect honest businessmen»Det är ett grundläggande politiskt ansvar att rättsstaten finns där med sin fulla kraft när företagare blir utsatta för brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a fundamental political responsibility that the rule of law is there with its full force when businessmen are subjected to crime.”
- combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms should be combated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to investigate a joint control system and a blacklist against unscrupulous companies in public procurement.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to investigate a joint control system and a blacklist against unscrupulous companies in public procurement. The plan points out the public sector's problem with procurement as a cost in the multi-billion class and requires that fraud and corruption-driving systems be countered as well as criminality that affects entrepreneurs being combated. The plan simultaneously warns against procurement conditions that exclude smaller actors.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill utreda ett gemensamt kontrollsystem och en svart lista mot oseriösa företag i offentlig upphandling. Planen pekar ut den offentliga sektorns problem med upphandlingar som en kostnad i multimiljardklass och kräver att fusk och korruptionsdrivande system motverkas samt att brottslighet som drabbar företagare bekämpas. Planen varnar samtidigt för villkor i upphandlingar som stänger ute mindre aktörer.
- deficient public procurementdecisive»Den offentliga sektorn har dels problem med upphandlingar, ekonomistyrning och uppföljning, dels med bristande ledarskap och felaktiga prioriteringar som sammantaget leder till kostnader i multimiljardklass.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The public sector has both problems with procurement, financial management and follow-up, as well as with lacking leadership and wrong priorities which together lead to costs in the multi-billion class.”
- counter fraud and corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and such systems as tend to encourage fraud and corruption shall be countered.”
- protect serious entrepreneurs»Bekämpa brottslighet som drabbar företagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat criminality that affects entrepreneurs”
- procurement shall not exclude small enterprises»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procurement must not exclude small businesses”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU14)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1 — Kommission mot brott mot företag samt företag som brottsverktyg av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1025 — En nyanserad bild av invandring av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1077 — En nationell dataspelspolitik för kultur och innovation av Sofia Skönnbrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1122 — Stöd till affärsutveckling för kulturella och kreativa branscher, särskilt spelindustrin av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1166 — Destinationsutveckling av östra Skåne av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1175 — Nationell samordnare för dataspelsbranschen av Mona Smedman (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1245 — Turistavgift av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Hanna Westerén (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1276 — Reformer för ökad tillväxt i Stockholmsregionen av Josefin Malmqvist m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:128 — Inrättande av en chief technology officer för Sverige av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1320 — Utvärdering av bryggerilånens påverkan på krogmarknaden och småbryggeriernas möjligheter av Petter Löberg och Joakim Järrebring (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1387 — Stärkta förutsättningar för kooperativt företagande av Karin Sundin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1417 — Statligt ansvar vid industrietableringar av Åsa Karlsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1447 — Bättre förutsättningar för en modern industri av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1448 — Stärkt entreprenörskap i hela landet av Johan Büser (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1925 — Svenska trähus för Ukrainas återuppbyggnad av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1941 — Stopp för kriminaliteten inom offentlig upphandling av Mattias Jonsson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2095 — Regelbunden översyn av svensk konkurrenskraft av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2181 — Forskning, innovation och teknikutveckling inom safetech och blåljusverksamhet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2236 — Ökad turism av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2358 — Svensk och europeisk trä- och möbelindustri av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament