2023-04-192022/23:CU6 · p.5CUCivil law & housing
Consideration period for divorce
Exemptions from the mandatory waiting period for divorce
What's at stake: The issue concerns whether couples with minor children should have to wait out a mandatory reflection period before a divorce is granted even when there has been violence or threats in the relationship. It affects how quickly a spouse can leave a harmful marriage.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for more situations, particularly cases involving violence or threats within the marriage, to be exempted from the mandatory waiting period for divorce, while the committee was not prepared to propose any action on the matter.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee is not prepared to propose an initiative to the government on the waiting-period issue for divorce, and rejects the motions, referring to its previous positions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) wants more situations to be exempted from the mandatory waiting period for divorce than today — both when only one spouse requests the divorce and there are no children under 16 involved, and when there has been violence, threats or harassment within the marriage, so that the affected spouse can divorce immediately.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/1/20/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/16 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/64/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VHåkan Svenneling (V, Värmlands län) | No — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:245 by Nadja Awad et al. (V) item 8, 2022/23:949 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) items 21 and 22, and 2022/23:958 by Michael Rubbestad et al. (SD) item 11.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:245 av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V) yrkande 8, 2022/23:949 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 21 och 22 samt 2022/23:958 av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD) yrkande 11.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag directed a formal request, a so-called formal directive (tillkännagivande), to the government to take measures for a better-functioning, more efficient and legally secure process for property division. For the party in the worse economic position, the completion of property division usually has very significant economic importance. Often, however, one party benefits from the property division process being prolonged, as has been established in an investigation. The Riksdag notes that the government is to begin mapping the extent of the problem with prolonged property division processes. The Riksdag views this positively and considers it high time for the government to proceed with this matter. Among other things, the government should review the possibility of introducing a reasonable outer time limit for when a property division should be completed. This directive is based on several proposals in motions submitted during the general 2022 motion period. In total, the Riksdag has addressed approximately 130 proposals in various family law matters, which also concern, inter alia, the legal regulation of parenthood, consideration periods for divorce, and various custody matters. The Riksdag rejected the other motions, citing inter alia that the government is already working on these issues.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants faith communities and marriage celebrants to apply zero tolerance against forced marriage, to eliminate the loophole for polygamy and to dissolve previously registered polygamous marriages. (SD) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that most violence against women occurs in the home and that many women cannot leave destructive relationships, and that it shall be a right to get help to leave violence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that most violence against women occurs in the home and that many women cannot leave destructive relationships, and that it shall be a right to get help to leave violence. Removing the consideration period when violence, threats or harassment occur follows from that. The programme also demands a family law that treats everyone equally, which speaks for more situations being exempted.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att det mesta våldet mot kvinnor sker i hemmet och att många kvinnor inte kan lämna destruktiva förhållanden, samt att det ska vara en rättighet att få hjälp att lämna våldsutsatthet. Att slopa betänketiden när våld, hot eller trakasserier förekommit följer av det. Programmet kräver dessutom en familjerätt som behandlar alla lika, vilket talar för att fler situationer undantas.
- the violence occurs in the homedecisive»Vi vet att det mesta våldet mot kvinnor sker i hemmet.« (party programme ↗)“We know that most violence against women occurs in the home.”
- barriers to leaving the relationship»Många kvinnor kan inte lämna destruktiva förhållanden för att deras ekonomi är för dålig« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many women cannot leave destructive relationships because their finances are too bad”
- right to exit violence»Vänsterpartiet anser att det därutöver måste vara en rättighet att få hjälp med en långsiktig trygg boendelösning för den som behöver det för att lämna våldsutsatthet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that beyond this it must be a right to get help with a long-term secure housing solution for those who need it to leave violence.”
- equal treatment in family law»Det innebär till exempel att äktenskapslagstiftning, arvsrätt och familjerätt ska behandla alla lika.« (party programme ↗)“This means for example that marriage law, inheritance law and family law shall treat everyone equally.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that people shall be free to have control over their own lives and shape their existence according to their own wishes, and the election manifesto promises action against violence and violations in intimate relationships.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that people shall be free to have control over their own lives and shape their existence according to their own wishes, and the election manifesto promises action against violence and violations in intimate relationships. Abolishing the consideration period when violence or threats have occurred, and when only one spouse wishes to divorce and there are no small children, follows from these commitments. The reflection period rules are not explicitly addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att människan ska vara fri att råda över sitt eget liv och forma sin tillvaro efter egna önskningar, och valmanifestet lovar krafttag mot våld och kränkningar i nära relationer. Att slopa betänketiden när våld eller hot förekommit, och när bara en make vill skiljas och det saknas små barn, följer av dessa åtaganden. Betänketidsreglerna behandlas inte uttryckligen.
- protection from violence in intimate relationshipsdecisive»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor. Vi vill fort sätta den politiska riktning som skärpt straffen för våld och andra kränkningar i nära relationer, och som ökat resurserna till kvinno- och tjejjourernas viktiga arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Action to stop honour-related violence, sexual crimes and men's violence against women. We want to continue the political direction that has strengthened penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships, and increased resources to women's and girls' organisations' important work.”
- the individual's freedom over their life»Människan ska vara fri att utvecklas som individ, råda över sitt eget liv, forma sin tillvaro« (party programme ↗)“People shall be free to develop as individuals, have control over their own lives, shape their existence”
- feminist party»Med denna grundsyn är socialdemokratin ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“With this fundamental view, Social Democracy is a feminist party.”
- right to freedom and security»människors rätt till liv i frihet och säkerhet måste alltid försvaras.« (party programme ↗)“people's right to life in freedom and security must always be defended.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that women who have broken free from destructive relationships get their lives back, that violence survivors receive coordinated support immediately after leaving and that intimate violence is handled quickly.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that women who have broken free from destructive relationships get their lives back, that violence survivors receive coordinated support immediately after leaving and that intimate violence is handled quickly. A reflection period that forces the victim to remain married counters this, which is why more exceptions are supported. The reflection period is not explicitly addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att kvinnor som brutit sig loss från destruktiva relationer får sina liv tillbaka, att våldsutsatta får samordnat stöd direkt efter uppbrottet och att våld i nära relationer hanteras snabbt. En betänketid som tvingar den utsatta att kvarstå i äktenskapet motverkar detta, varför fler undantag stöds. Betänketiden behandlas inte uttryckligen i planen.
- life back after leavingdecisive»Kvinnor som brutit sig loss från destruktiva relationer ska få sina liv tillbaka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women who have broken free from destructive relationships shall get their lives back.”
- quick way out of violence»skapa en dörr ut för våldsutsatta i hela landet, så att ansvaret för skydd, boende och vård samordnas direkt efter uppbrottet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“create a way out for violence survivors throughout the country, so that responsibility for protection, housing and care is coordinated immediately after leaving.”
- quick handling of violence»Våld i nära relationer ska behandlas på ett snabbt, samordnat och konsekvent sätt i ett samarbete mellan myndighet och organisationer.« (party programme ↗)“Intimate violence shall be handled in a quick, coordinated and consistent manner in cooperation between government agencies and organisations.”
- family based on consent»En familj bygger på kärlek, trygghet och respekt, inte på föreställningar om hur en familj ska vara.« (party programme ↗)“A family is built on love, security and respect, not on ideas about how a family should be.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is built on the principle that every person shall be able to shape their own life through their own free choices, without the state standing in the way, which speaks for someone who wants to divorce not being forced to wait out a thinking period.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on the principle that every person shall be able to shape their own life through their own free choices, without the state standing in the way, which speaks for someone who wants to divorce not being forced to wait out a thinking period. For someone who has been subjected to violence or threats in marriage the plan's commitment to a society free from violence in the home also weighs heavily. Rules on thinking periods are not mentioned, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att varje människa själv ska få forma sitt liv genom egna och fria val, utan att staten står i vägen, vilket talar för att den som vill skiljas inte tvingas vänta ut en betänketid. För den som utsatts för våld eller hot i äktenskapet väger dessutom planens åtagande om ett samhälle fritt från våld i hemmet tungt. Reglerna om betänketid nämns inte, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- right to shape one's lifedecisive»Centerpartiet kommer alltid försvara din rätt att forma ditt eget liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party will always defend your right to shape your own life.”
- own self-determination»Alla ska kunna bestämma över sina egna liv genom egna och fria val.« (party programme ↗)“All shall be able to determine their own lives through their own free choices.”
- freedom from violence in the home»vill se ett samhälle fritt från våld i hemmet, människohandel och prostitution.« (party programme ↗)“want to see a society free from violence in the home, human trafficking and prostitution.”
- protection for those subjected to violence»Vi ska leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor. Män som slår ska inte komma undan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall lead Sweden toward an end to men's violence against women. Men who hit shall not get away.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan puts the individual person's self-determination first and requires that violence in close relationships is prevented and that the victim is protected from the perpetrator.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan puts the individual person's self-determination first and requires that violence in close relationships is prevented and that the victim is protected from the perpetrator. That the person who has been subjected to violence or threats should be able to divorce immediately, without compulsory deliberation period, follows from that. The plan's requirement for safety at home strengthens the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter den enskilda människans självbestämmande först och kräver att våld i nära relationer förebyggs och att den utsatta skyddas från förövaren. Att den som utsatts för våld eller hot ska kunna skiljas omgående, utan tvingande betänketid, följer av det. Planens krav på trygghet i hemmet stärker slutsatsen.
- safety at homedecisive»Kvinnor ska vara trygga både hemma och ute.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women shall be safe both at home and out.”
- prevent relationship violence»Alla former av våld i relationer och könsrelaterat våld ska förebyggas.« (party programme ↗)“All forms of violence in relationships and gender-related violence shall be prevented.”
- individual self-determination»Den enskilda människan är liberalismens utgångspunkt.« (party programme ↗)“The individual person is liberalism's starting point.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan asserts that society must show a conscious will toward stable family life and that marriage is the most secure legal form for cohabitation, with easily accessible family counseling as support.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts that society must show a conscious will toward stable family life and that marriage is the most secure legal form for cohabitation, with easily accessible family counseling as support. According to the plan, legislation's task is to provide a space for reflection before difficult decisions, which is precisely the committee deliberation period's function. To exempt more situations from deliberation time thus contradicts the plan, although its requirement for protection against violence speaks in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att samhället ska framhålla en medveten vilja till stabil familjegemenskap och att äktenskapet är den tryggaste juridiska formen för samlevnad, med lättillgänglig familjerådgivning som stöd. Lagstiftningens uppgift är enligt planen att ge rådrum inför svåra beslut, vilket är just betänketidens funktion. Att undanta fler situationer från betänketid strider därför mot planen, även om dess krav på skydd vid våld talar i motsatt riktning.
- stable family lifedecisive»Samhället ska framhålla en medveten vilja till stabil« (party programme ↗)“Society must show a conscious will toward stable”
- legislation shall provide space for reflection»ange önskad inriktning och ge rådrum inför beslut.« (party programme ↗)“indicate desired direction and provide a space for reflection before decisions.”
- family counseling before separation»För att stödja familjestabilitet ska familjerådgivning« (party programme ↗)“To support family stability, family counseling shall be”
- protection against violence in close relationships»nära relation ska ges adekvat stöd och skydd.« (party programme ↗)“close relationship must be given adequate support and protection.”
The plan establishes that family, relatives or clan may never make the decisions that every woman or man has the right to make themselves, and wants to criminalize unlawful deprivation of liberty within its zero tolerance for honor-related crimes.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that family, relatives or clan may never make the decisions that every woman or man has the right to make themselves, and wants to criminalize unlawful deprivation of liberty within its zero tolerance for honor-related crimes. To avoid waiting time when violence or threats have occurred, and when only one spouse wants divorce, gives the individual precisely that possibility to leave. The waiting time as such is not addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att familj, släkt eller klan aldrig får fatta de beslut som varje kvinna eller man har rätt att fatta själv, och vill kriminalisera olaga frihetsbegränsning inom sin nolltolerans mot hedersbrott. Att slippa betänketid när våld eller hot förekommit, och när bara en make vill skiljas, ger den enskilde just den möjligheten att lämna. Betänketiden som sådan berörs inte i planen.
- the individual's right to choose themselvesdecisive»acceptera att familj, släkt eller klan fattar de beslut som« (party programme ↗)“accept that family, relatives or clan make the decisions that”
- protection against restricted liberty»Införa ett särskilt brott – olaga frihetsbegränsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a special crime – unlawful deprivation of liberty”
- swift protection against violence»Införa kontaktförbud och fotboja direkt för en man som utsätter en kvinna för våld, om en riskbedömning visar att det finns behov« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce contact ban and ankle bracelet directly for a man who subjects a woman to violence, if a risk assessment shows that there is need”
- zero tolerance for honor oppression»Moderaterna vill införa en nolltolerans mot hedersbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moderates want to introduce zero tolerance for honor-related crimes.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants anyone subjected to honour oppression or intimate partner violence to receive appropriate help to break with the oppression, which speaks for betänkande period not forcing an abused spouse to remain in the marriage.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants anyone subjected to honour oppression or intimate partner violence to receive appropriate help to break with the oppression, which speaks for betänkande period not forcing an abused spouse to remain in the marriage. The plan also establishes that families should be free to make their own decisions about their daily lives. At the same time, the plan emphasizes the best interests of the child, which pulls in the opposite direction when children are present in the family.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att den som utsätts för hedersförtryck eller våld i nära relation får ändamålsenlig hjälp att bryta med förtrycket, vilket talar för att betänketid inte ska tvinga en våldsutsatt make att kvarstå i äktenskapet. Planen slår också fast att familjer ska vara fria att fatta egna beslut om sin vardag. Samtidigt betonar planen barnets bästa, vilket drar åt motsatt håll när barn finns i familjen.
- help to break free from oppressiondecisive»Ändamålsenlig hjälp bör erbjudas till den som vill bryta med en kultur eller religion under vilken de utsätts för hedersförtryck av familj eller bredare kollektiv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Appropriate help should be offered to anyone who wants to break free from a culture or religion under which they are subjected to honour oppression by family or wider collective.”
- support to leave honour environment»Stödja dem som vill bryta sig loss från hedersförtryck« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support those who want to break free from honour oppression”
- protection from intimate partner violence»Upprätta en handlingsplan för den som utsätts för våld i nära relation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an action plan for anyone subjected to intimate partner violence”
- family self-determination»Familjer ska vara fria att fatta egna beslut om sin vardag där barn ska ha tillgång till båda sina föräldrar och förhållandena vara goda.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Families should be free to make their own decisions about their daily lives where children should have access to both their parents and conditions should be good.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:CU6)
- Committee report full text (HA01CU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1057 — Våldsutövande föräldrars rätt till vårdnad av Azadeh Rojhan och Alexandra Völker (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1060 — Ökat barnrättsperspektiv i mål om vårdnad av Sanne Lennström och Ardalan Shekarabi (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1096 — Rätten att själv bestämma över sin kvarlåtenskap av Alexandra Anstrell och Mats Green (båda M)
- Motion 2022/23:1115 — Införande av registrering av testamenten och framtidsfullmakter av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1188 — Internationell solidaritet - en stark röst för hbtq-plus-personers rättigheter av Anna Wallentheim m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1311 — Kvinnor som lever under hot av Alexandra Völker och Azadeh Rojhan (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1680 — Situationen för kvinnor som tvingas leva gömda av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1682 — Arvode för vigselförrättare av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1731 — Tidsgräns vid bodelning av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1836 — Krav på bodelningsprocessen av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson och Helena Bouveng (båda M)
- Motion 2022/23:1980 — Borgerlig vigselförrättare av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson och Ulrika Heindorff (båda M)
- Motion 2022/23:2070 — Ekonomiskt våld mot kvinnor av Robert Hannah (L)
- Motion 2022/23:2090 — En familjepolitik för alla barns rätt till sina föräldrar av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2117 — Förbud mot kusingifte av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:2139 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2218 — Familjerätt av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2250 — Identifiera föräldraalienation och umgängessabotage av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2277 — Jämställdhetspolitik av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:245 — Våld och vårdnad av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament