2023-12-132023/24:CU1 · p.1CUCivil law & housing
Housing Policy Target
Housing policy goal for expenditure area 18
What's at stake: The housing policy goal steers the direction of the government's housing policy; a new goal could put clearer focus on reasonable housing costs and social needs, but changing it also risks breaking the broad support the current goal enjoys.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current housing policy goal should remain unchanged, in order to retain broad political support, or whether a new goal should be formulated that more clearly addresses housing shortages, segregation and housing costs.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee maintains its previous position that it should continue to be an aim for the housing policy goal to command broad support in parliament, and therefore rejects the motion calling for a new goal.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V)
The reservation holds that housing is a fundamental right and that current housing policy is neither active nor extensive enough to address housing shortages, segregation and the climate transition, and wants the government to formulate a new housing policy goal stating that everyone should be able to live in good housing at reasonable cost in a safe and sustainable environment.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 278–19Ja 262–35
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motion 2023/24:2320 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2320 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal on how funds should be allocated within the budget area for urban planning, housing supply, construction, and consumer policy. In total, this involves just over 6 billion kronor from the state budget for 2024. The largest amount, 3.7 billion kronor, goes to investment support for the arrangement of rental housing and housing for students. The investment support is being phased out. Parliament decided that the budget allocation for energy efficiency improvements of multi-dwelling buildings shall be allocated 840,000 million kronor and that the Consumer Agency shall receive 178,972 million kronor. Parliament makes decisions on the state budget in two stages. First, decisions are made on the frameworks for the 27 budget areas. Parliament decided this on November 29, 2023. Subsequently, Parliament determines in a second stage how the funds shall be allocated within each budget area. This decision concerns stage two of the decision-making process.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants a new housing policy goal establishing everyone's right to good housing at reasonable costs. (V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that the market cannot provide everyone with a good home at affordable cost, that society must reclaim responsibility for housing provision and that policy shall strengthen people's right to a secure home in a climate-smart society.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the market cannot provide everyone with a good home at affordable cost, that society must reclaim responsibility for housing provision and that policy shall strengthen people's right to a secure home in a climate-smart society. A new housing policy goal for good homes at reasonable costs in a safe and sustainable environment is exactly this commitment. The plan says nothing, however, about the committee's reason that the goal should win broad support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att marknaden inte kan förse alla med en god bostad till överkomlig kostnad, att samhället måste återta ansvaret för bostadsförsörjningen och att politiken ska stärka människors rätt till en trygg bostad i ett klimatsmart samhälle. Ett nytt bostadspolitiskt mål om goda bostäder till rimliga kostnader i en trygg och hållbar miljö är precis detta åtagande. Planen säger däremot inget om utskottets skäl att målet bör vinna bred uppslutning.
- social responsibility for housingdecisive»Samhället måste återta initiativet och återupprätta det demokratiska inflytandet över och ansvaret för bostadsförsörjningen.« (party programme ↗)“Society must reclaim the initiative and restore democratic influence over and responsibility for housing provision.”
- right to a secure home»Så bygger vi samhället och stärker människors rätt till en trygg bostad, samtidigt som vi lägger grunden för ett hållbart klimatsmart samhälle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“So we build the society and strengthen people's right to a secure home, while laying the foundation for a sustainable climate-smart society.”
- massive housing construction»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and lowered rents that go hand in hand with the green transformation.”
- the market does not solve housing shortage»efter att också bostäderna lämnats åt marknaden ökar bostadsbristen, boendekostnader och segregation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“after housing has also been left to the market increases housing shortages, housing costs and segregation”
The party programme regards housing as a social right and housing policy as part of welfare policy, and the election manifesto promises continued construction of rental apartments that ordinary people can afford as well as mixed housing forms against segregation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme regards housing as a social right and housing policy as part of welfare policy, and the election manifesto promises continued construction of rental apartments that ordinary people can afford as well as mixed housing forms against segregation. A new housing policy goal of good housing at reasonable costs in a safe and sustainable environment expresses exactly these commitments. The plan says nothing about whether the goal should instead gain broad support.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av välfärdspolitiken, och valmanifestet lovar fortsatt byggande av hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med samt blandade boendeformer mot segregation. Ett nytt bostadspolitiskt mål om goda bostäder till rimliga kostnader i en trygg och hållbar miljö uttrycker precis dessa åtaganden. Att målet i stället bör vinna bred uppslutning säger planen inget om.
- housing as a social rightdecisive»socialdemokrater ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“Social Democrats regard housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- reasonable housing costs»Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall continue to build rental apartments that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
- mixed housing forms against segregation»Boende- och upplåtelseformer ska vara blandade. Trångboddheten ska bekämpas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing and tenure forms shall be mixed. Overcrowding shall be combated.”
- sustainable and safe residential environment»framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande som skapar integrerade, variationsrika och transportsnåla« (party programme ↗)“future-oriented urban planning that creates integrated, diverse and transport-efficient”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that everyone has the right to housing, that housing policy shall counteract segregation and promote equal rights, and wants to build more climate-smart rental apartments at reasonable rents.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that everyone has the right to housing, that housing policy shall counteract segregation and promote equal rights, and wants to build more climate-smart rental apartments at reasonable rents. A new housing policy goal of good housing at reasonable costs in a safe and sustainable environment is a direct formulation of these commitments. The counter-proposal's demand is therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla har rätt till en bostad, att bostadspolitiken ska motverka segregation och främja lika rättigheter, och vill bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror. Ett nytt bostadspolitiskt mål om goda bostäder till rimliga kostnader i en trygg och hållbar miljö är en direkt formulering av dessa åtaganden. Motförslagets krav stöds därför.
- right to housingdecisive»Alla har rätt till en bostad. I Sverige är tillgången« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to housing. In Sweden the availability”
- housing policy against segregation»Miljöpartiets bostadspolitik ska motverka segregation och främja lika rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens' housing policy shall counteract segregation and promote equal rights.”
- rental apartments at reasonable rents»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments at reasonable rents”
- national strategy against homelessness»minska hemlösheten, genom en nationell strategi som på riktigt minskar hemlösheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce homelessness, through a national strategy that truly reduces homelessness”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan counts housing among the basic needs we have a common responsibility to ensure everyone has access to and requires that there is sufficient housing throughout the country, which lies close to the goal the counter-proposal wants to establish.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan counts housing among the basic needs we have a common responsibility to ensure everyone has access to and requires that there is sufficient housing throughout the country, which lies close to the goal the counter-proposal wants to establish. At the same time the plan's means are deregulation and stronger incentives to build, not a more comprehensive housing policy, which makes support weak and uncertain. The conclusion is based on derivation from the closest principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen räknar boende till de grundläggande behov vi har ett gemensamt ansvar för att alla ska ha tillgång till och kräver att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet, vilket ligger nära det mål motförslaget vill fastställa. Samtidigt är planens medel avreglering och starkare drivkrafter att bygga, inte en mer omfattande bostadspolitik, vilket gör stödet svagt och osäkert. Slutsatsen bygger på härledning ur närmast liggande princip.
- housing as basic needdecisive»Människor har en rad grundläggande behov: mat, kläder, boende och vård.« (party programme ↗)“People have a number of basic needs: food, clothing, housing and care.”
- housing throughout the country»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there is sufficient housing throughout the country.”
- housing's importance to households»Boendet är den största investeringen många människor gör.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing is the largest investment many people make.”
- easier rules for building»Strandskyddet ska reformeras så att det blir lättare att bygga och bo på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Beach protection shall be reformed so that it becomes easier to build and live in rural areas.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's housing policy is based on power over one's own housing and more market: more should be able to own, rent-setting in new construction freer and today's expensive building subsidies abolished.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's housing policy is based on power over one's own housing and more market: more should be able to own, rent-setting in new construction freer and today's expensive building subsidies abolished. A new goal built on housing as a right and requiring a more active and comprehensive housing policy points in the opposite direction. The plan already has its own goal that everyone should be able to have housing that suits their own life situation and requires nothing new.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bostadspolitik utgår från makt över det egna boendet och mer marknad: fler ska kunna äga, hyressättningen i nybyggnation friare och dagens dyra byggsubventioner avskaffas. Ett nytt mål som bygger på bostaden som rättighet och kräver en mer aktiv och omfattande bostadspolitik pekar i motsatt riktning. Planen har redan ett eget mål om att alla ska kunna ha en bostad som passar den egna livssituationen och kräver inget nytt.
- no to building subsidiesdecisive»Dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas och ett nytt system med behovsbostäder ska införas för grupper med särskilt stora bostadsbehov, såsom våldsutsatta och familjer med mycket svag ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished and a new system with need-based housing shall be introduced for groups with particularly large housing needs, such as victims of violence and families with very weak economic conditions.”
- more market in housing market»Vi vill skapa en bostadsmarknad med fler bostäder och mer marknad, där fler vill bygga och fler har råd att flytta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create a housing market with more housing and more market, where more want to build and more can afford to move.”
- power over own housing»Att ha makt över det egna boendet är viktigt för den enskildes frihetskänsla.« (party programme ↗)“Having power over one's own housing is important for the individual's sense of freedom.”
- free rent-setting in new production»Fri hyressättning ska tillåtas i nybyggnation.« (party programme ↗)“Free rent-setting shall be allowed in new construction.”
The plan asserts that housing is a fundamental human need and that state and municipality must secure housing provision for all, including low-income families with children, pensioners and students.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts that housing is a fundamental human need and that state and municipality must secure housing provision for all, including low-income families with children, pensioners and students. This corresponds in substance to the counter-proposal's goal of good housing at reasonable cost. The plan moreover requires that community building achieves social, ecological and economic sustainability simultaneously and prevents segregation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att boende är ett grundläggande mänskligt behov och att stat och kommun måste trygga bostadsförsörjningen åt alla, även för lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande. Det motsvarar i sak motförslagets mål om goda bostäder till rimliga kostnader. Planen kräver dessutom att samhällsbyggandet klarar social, ekologisk och ekonomisk hållbarhet samtidigt och motverkar segregation.
- housing as fundamental needdecisive»Att ha någonstans att bo är ett grundläggande behov« (party programme ↗)“Having somewhere to live is a fundamental need”
- good housing standard for all»Lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande måste ges möjligheter till en god bostadsstandard.« (party programme ↗)“Low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given opportunities for a good housing standard.”
- sustainable community building»Utmaningen är att klara hållbarhetsbegreppets tre dimensioner samtidigt; social, ekologisk och ekonomisk hållbarhet.« (party programme ↗)“The challenge is to achieve the three dimensions of sustainability at once; social, ecological and economic sustainability.”
- more housing»FLER BOSTÄDER« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE HOUSING”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to the housing shortage is deregulation and increased private ownership: abolished coastal protection, simpler building plans and reforms that increase construction of both rental and condominium housing.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to the housing shortage is deregulation and increased private ownership: abolished coastal protection, simpler building plans and reforms that increase construction of both rental and condominium housing. A new housing political goal that builds on housing as a right and a more active and comprehensive state housing policy points in the opposite direction. The plan therefore provides no support for the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på bostadsbristen är avreglering och ökat eget ägande: avskaffat strandskydd, enklare byggplaner och reformer som ökar byggandet av både hyres- och bostadsrätter. Ett nytt bostadspolitiskt mål som bygger på bostaden som rättighet och en mer aktiv och omfattande statlig bostadspolitik pekar i motsatt riktning. Planen ger därför inget stöd för motförslagets krav.
- increased construction through reformsdecisive»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase construction of both rental and condominium housing.”
- deregulation increases construction»Avskaffa dagens strandskydd för att möjliggöra ökat byggande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish today's coastal protection to enable increased construction”
- private ownership of housing»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In Moderates' Sweden shall everyone dare to dream of owning their own home.”
- limited state ambition»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The counter-proposal wants to set a new housing policy goal that everyone should be able to live in good housing at reasonable costs in a safe environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to set a new housing policy goal that everyone should be able to live in good housing at reasonable costs in a safe environment. The plan formulates essentially the same objective: everyone should have access to housing with good standards and be able to live in a safe, secure and pleasant environment, and housing costs must be slowed. The plan further argues that the market alone cannot guarantee everyone housing, which supports an active housing policy goal.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill sätta ett nytt bostadspolitiskt mål om att alla ska kunna leva i goda bostäder till rimliga kostnader i en trygg miljö. Planen formulerar i praktiken samma målsättning: alla ska ha tillgång till en bostad med god standard och kunna leva i en säker, trygg och trivsam miljö, och boendekostnaderna måste bromsas. Planen menar dessutom att marknaden inte ensam kan garantera alla en bostad, vilket stöder ett aktivt bostadspolitiskt mål.
- housing with good standards for alldecisive»Alla ska ha tillgång till en bostad med god standard och kunna leva i en säker, trygg och trivsam miljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone should have access to housing with good standards and be able to live in a safe, secure and pleasant environment.”
- reasonable housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to slow the soaring housing costs so more people can afford a home.”
- public responsibility for housing»ansvar för att förse även resurssvaga grupper med ett värdigt boende.« (party programme ↗)“responsibility for providing dignified housing even for resource-poor groups.”
- increased housing construction»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase housing construction”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:CU1)
- Committee report full text (HB01CU1)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2320 — Bostadspolitik, planering och byggande av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2333 — Utgiftsområde 18 Samhällsplanering, bostadsförsörjning och byggande samt konsumentpolitik av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2637 — Bostadspolitik av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2638 — Konsumentpolitik av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2639 — Utgiftsområde 18 Samhällsplanering, bostadsförsörjning och byggande samt konsumentpolitik av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2702 — Utgiftsområde 18 Samhällsplanering, bostadsförsörjning och byggande samt konsumentpolitik av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2738 — Utgiftsområde 18 Samhällsplanering, bostadsförsörjning och byggande samt konsumentpolitik av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2023/24:413 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:903 — Klimatanpassa Sverige av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:996 — Grön samhällsomställning av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2023/24:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2024
Source: The Swedish Parliament