2025-05-142024/25:AU10 · p.8AULabour market

Amendments to the Discrimination Act

The grounds for discrimination in the Discrimination Act

What's at stake: How the grounds of discrimination are defined determines which complaints to the Equality Ombudsman can be examined. A narrower list risks leaving certain vulnerable groups without protection, while a broader or open-ended list could make the law harder to apply predictably.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Discrimination Act's current list of seven specified grounds of discrimination should be replaced by a broader, general provision against improper differential treatment, or whether the current system of a defined list of grounds should be kept, possibly supplemented with new grounds such as language.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects all the motions in the section. It notes that the proposals point in different directions - from abolishing the catalogue of discrimination grounds altogether to adding language as a new ground - and that the question of which grounds the law should cover may be worth examining further, but the committee is not currently prepared to advocate any initiative. The committee also rejects proposals to clarify protection against discrimination on grounds of ethnicity to more explicitly cover skin colour, language or religion, as well as proposals for an intersectional perspective, referring among other things to the Equality Ombudsman's ongoing government assignment on discrimination linked to multiple grounds.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 14 (SD)

The reservation (SD) calls for the seven listed grounds of discrimination in the Discrimination Act to be replaced with a broader provision on improper differential treatment, which would capture all forms of discrimination. The reasoning is that many complaints to the Equality Ombudsman are currently dismissed because they are not considered to meet the criteria of any of the seven grounds, and that continually revising a fixed list risks excluding groups not yet covered.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 14 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDown reservationNoNo 0/63/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:46 by Martina Johansson (C) motion 4, 2024/25:1260 by Dzenan Cisija (S), 2024/25:1310 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) motions 1 and 2, 2024/25:1412 by Michael Rubbestad et al. (SD) motion 28, 2024/25:1745 by Jan Riise et al. (MP) motion 10, 2024/25:1747 by Jan Riise et al. (MP) motion 4, 2024/25:1754 by Jan Riise et al. (MP) motion 12, 2024/25:1929 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) motion 5, 2024/25:1935 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) motion 2 and 2024/25:2643 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) motions 2-5.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:46 av Martina Johansson (C) yrkande 4, 2024/25:1260 av Dzenan Cisija (S), 2024/25:1310 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:1412 av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD) yrkande 28, 2024/25:1745 av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP) yrkande 10, 2024/25:1747 av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP) yrkande 4, 2024/25:1754 av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP) yrkande 12, 2024/25:1929 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 5, 2024/25:1935 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 2 och 2024/25:2643 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2-5.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to approximately 60 proposals in motions on gender equality and measures against discrimination. Parliament refers primarily to work that is already underway in the field. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and concern among other things the goals and methods of gender equality policy, equality data, discrimination on various grounds, amendments to the Discrimination Act, and the work of the Discrimination Ombudsman.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan is built on the understanding that different kinds of racism and oppression take different forms and that specific historical knowledge about them is needed for the patterns to be broken.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan is built on the understanding that different kinds of racism and oppression take different forms and that specific historical knowledge about them is needed for the patterns to be broken. Replacing the listed discrimination grounds with a general provision on improper differential treatment blurs exactly that specificity and risks weakening protection for the groups the plan wants to protect. The plan demands active work against discrimination, not a watered-down general clause.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger på att olika sorters rasism och förtryck tar sig olika uttryck och att det krävs specifika historiska kunskaper om dem för att mönstren ska kunna brytas. Att ersätta de uppräknade diskrimineringsgrunderna med en allmän bestämmelse om otillbörlig särbehandling suddar ut just den specificiteten och riskerar att försvaga skyddet för de grupper planen vill värna. Planen kräver ett aktivt arbete mot diskriminering, inte en urvattnad generalklausul.

  • specific knowledge of different racismsdecisive»Därför behöver vi specifika historiska kunskaper om olika« (party programme ↗)“Therefore we need specific historical knowledge about different”
  • active work against discrimination»Det kräver ett aktivt arbete med att förebygga och« (party programme ↗)“It requires active work to prevent and”
  • stopped discrimination in the workplace»Diskrimineringen och rasismen på arbetsmarknaden måste stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination and racism in the job market must be stopped.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme requires that equality policy be directed at all forms of hierarchy and describes how different power structures reinforce each other in double or multiple subordination.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that equality policy be directed at all forms of hierarchy and describes how different power structures reinforce each other in double or multiple subordination. A broader provision that captures all improper differential treatment lies closer to that stance than a closed list of seven grounds. The plan does not comment on the structure of the discrimination law, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att jämlikhetspolitiken riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning och beskriver hur olika maktstrukturer förstärker varandra i dubbel eller flerdubbel underordning. En bredare bestämmelse som fångar all otillbörlig särbehandling ligger närmare den hållningen än en sluten lista med sju grunder. Planen uttalar sig inte om diskrimineringslagens konstruktion, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • all forms of subordinationdecisive»Jämlikhetspolitik måste riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning, och dessa måste« (party programme ↗)“Equality policy must be directed at all forms of hierarchy, and these must”
  • multiple subordination»underordning, där olika maktstrukturer förstärker varandra.« (party programme ↗)“subordination, where different power structures reinforce each other.”
  • oppose discrimination»Diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden ska motarbetas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination on the labour market shall be opposed.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires more effective work against all forms of discrimination and stronger anti-discrimination legislation, which suggests that protection should not depend on a vulnerable group being missing from a fixed list.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires more effective work against all forms of discrimination and stronger anti-discrimination legislation, which suggests that protection should not depend on a vulnerable group being missing from a fixed list. At the same time the plan wants to add lack of accessibility as a new ground for discrimination, which presupposes a catalogue of grounds. Support for a broader provision is therefore derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver ett effektivare arbete mot alla former av diskriminering och en starkare diskrimineringslagstiftning, vilket talar för att skyddet inte ska falla på att en utsatt grupp saknas i en fast uppräkning. Samtidigt vill planen lägga till bristande tillgänglighet som en ny diskrimineringsgrund, vilket förutsätter en katalog av grunder. Stödet för en bredare bestämmelse är därför härlett och osäkert.

  • against all forms of discriminationdecisive»arbete mot alla former av diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“work against all forms of discrimination.”
  • strengthened anti-discrimination legislation»stärka lagstiftningen mot diskriminering och se över rätten till rättshjälp i diskrimineringsfall.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen anti-discrimination legislation and review the right to legal aid in discrimination cases.”
  • new ground for discrimination»Bristande tillgänglighet är i sig en typ av« (party programme ↗)“Lack of accessibility is in itself a type of”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's principled starting point is that all structures that oppress or discriminate shall be fought, regardless of the grounds, and that discrimination in all its forms shall be countered.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's principled starting point is that all structures that oppress or discriminate shall be fought, regardless of the grounds, and that discrimination in all its forms shall be countered. This speaks for a broader provision that doesn't leave groups outside protection. At the same time the plan works concretely with named grounds when it wants to add gender and disability as hate crime grounds, so the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planens principiella utgångspunkt är att alla strukturer som förtrycker eller diskriminerar ska bekämpas, oavsett på vilken grund det sker, och att diskriminering i alla dess former ska motverkas. Det talar för en bredare bestämmelse som inte lämnar grupper utanför skyddet. Samtidigt arbetar planen konkret med namngivna grunder när den vill lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder, varför slutsatsen är osäker.

  • all discrimination is foughtdecisive»Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“We fight all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate people.”
  • all forms of discrimination»Diskriminering, strukturell rasism och intolerans, i alla dess former, ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination, structural racism and intolerance, in all its forms, shall be countered.”
  • expanded discrimination grounds»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen authorities' work against discrimination and raise compensation for those victimised, as well as add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
  • individual before group belonging»Varje individ har rätt att skapa sin egen identitet.« (party programme ↗)“Every individual has the right to create their own identity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan commits that discrimination law should be modernized and that the state with force should combat all kinds of discrimination, with the stated measure that the person affected should be able to get redress.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits that discrimination law should be modernized and that the state with force should combat all kinds of discrimination, with the stated measure that the person affected should be able to get redress. That complaints are dismissed because they do not fit into any of the seven grounds speaks against that measure, which gives support for a broader provision on improper discrimination. At the same time the plan is built on named prohibitions, for example against gender and age discrimination, which makes the support uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen åtar sig att modernisera diskrimineringslagen och att staten med kraft ska bekämpa all slags diskriminering, med den uttalade måttstocken att den som drabbas ska kunna få upprättelse. Att anmälningar avskrivs för att de inte passar in i någon av de sju grunderna talar mot den måttstocken, vilket ger stöd åt en bredare bestämmelse om otillbörlig särbehandling. Samtidigt bygger planen själv på namngivna förbud, till exempel mot köns- och åldersdiskriminering, vilket gör stödet osäkert.

  • combat all kinds of discriminationdecisive»Därför ska staten med kraft bekämpa all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the state should with force combat all kinds of racism, discrimination and intolerance.”
  • modernize discrimination law»Vi vill modernisera diskrimineringslagen, prioritera polisens hatbrottsverksamhet och säkerställa att alla skolor står upp för alla människors lika värde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernize discrimination law, prioritize police hate crime work and ensure that all schools stand up for all people's equal value.”
  • redress for those affected»kosta att diskriminera och den som drabbas ska kunna få hjälp att få upprättelse.« (party programme ↗)“cost to discriminate and the person affected should be able to get help to get redress.”
  • maintained discrimination bans»Förbudet mot könsdiskriminering ska upprätthållas på alla samhällsområden.« (party programme ↗)“The ban on gender discrimination shall be maintained on all areas of society.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires well-functioning laws against all discrimination and is based on every person having the same inalienable value regardless of sex, age, social position, functional variations, sexual identity or ethnic and religious affiliation — an enumeration broader than the seven grounds.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires well-functioning laws against all discrimination and is based on every person having the same inalienable value regardless of sex, age, social position, functional variations, sexual identity or ethnic and religious affiliation — an enumeration broader than the seven grounds. This speaks for a provision that captures all improper differential treatment rather than a closed catalog. However, the plan does not take a position on the discrimination law's technical construction, so the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering och bygger på att varje människa har samma okränkbara värde oavsett kön, ålder, social position, funktionsvariationer, sexuell identitet eller etnisk och religiös tillhörighet - en uppräkning som är bredare än de sju grunderna. Det talar för en bestämmelse som fångar upp all otillbörlig särbehandling snarare än en sluten katalog. Planen tar dock inte ställning till diskrimineringslagens tekniska konstruktion, varför slutsatsen är osäker.

  • laws against all discriminationdecisive»Väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering i arbetslivet ska finnas.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning laws against all discrimination in working life must exist.”
  • equal value regardless of ground»har samma absoluta och okränkbara värde oavsett kön, ålder, social position, funktionsvariationer, sexuell identitet, etnisk eller religiös tillhörighet.« (party programme ↗)“have the same absolute and inalienable value regardless of sex, age, social position, functional variations, sexual identity, ethnic or religious affiliation.”
  • negative differentiation is combated»Personer med funktionsnedsättning riskerar att i olika sammanhang bli negativt särbehandlade.« (party programme ↗)“Persons with functional disabilities risk being negatively differentiated in various contexts.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's overarching principle is that freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never to collectives and that everyone shall be judged based on their person and their actions, not based on background, sex or sexual orientation.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's overarching principle is that freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never to collectives and that everyone shall be judged based on their person and their actions, not based on background, sex or sexual orientation. A broad provision against improper differential treatment instead of a fixed list of groups lies closer to that principle than today's enumeration. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demands, albeit derived from general principles.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande princip är att fri- och rättigheter tillhör individer och aldrig kollektiv och att var och en ska bedömas utifrån sin person och sina handlingar, inte utifrån bakgrund, kön eller läggning. En bred bestämmelse om otillbörlig särbehandling i stället för en fast katalog över grupper ligger närmare den principen än dagens uppräkning. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav, om än härlett ur allmänna principer.

  • judgment based on person not groupdecisive»allas rätt att bli bedömda utifrån sin person« (party programme ↗)“everyone's right to be judged based on their person”
  • rights belong to individuals»Fri- och rättigheter tillhör individer och aldrig« (party programme ↗)“Freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never”
  • the individual before the collective»kommer alltid hävda individen mot kollektivismen« (party programme ↗)“will always assert the individual against collectivism”
  • equal treatment and non-discrimination»utövas godtyckligt, eller på ett sätt som diskriminerar« (party programme ↗)“exercised arbitrarily, or in a way that discriminates”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that neither negative nor positive unequal treatment shall be permitted and that all citizens shall be equal before the law with the same rights and responsibilities.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that neither negative nor positive unequal treatment shall be permitted and that all citizens shall be equal before the law with the same rights and responsibilities. A broad provision on improper unequal treatment instead of a closed catalogue of seven grounds comes close to that principle, since the protection then does not depend on what group the person subjected to it belongs to. However, the plan does not directly address the construction of the discrimination act.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att varken negativ eller positiv särbehandling ska vara tillåten och att alla medborgare ska vara lika inför lagen med samma rättigheter och skyldigheter. En bred bestämmelse om otillbörlig särbehandling i stället för en sluten katalog över sju grunder ligger nära den principen, eftersom skyddet då inte hänger på vilken grupp den utsatte tillhör. Planen behandlar dock inte diskrimineringslagens konstruktion direkt.

  • no unequal treatment at alldecisive»Vare sig negativ eller positiv särbehandling på basis av kön, ålder, sexuell läggning« (party programme ↗)“Neither negative nor positive unequal treatment on the basis of gender, age, sexual orientation”
  • equality before the law»skall vara lika inför lagen och ha samma rättigheter och skyldigheter« (party programme ↗)“shall be equal before the law and have the same rights and responsibilities”
  • counter unequal treatment»Motverka diskriminering och särbehandling p.g.a. kön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Counter discrimination and unequal treatment because of gender”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament