2026-04-222025/26:SoU17 · p.8SoUHealth & social services
Gender identity legislation
The new gender-recognition legislation
What's at stake: The decision concerns how easy or difficult it should be to change one's legal gender, which directly affects transgender people and 16- to 17-year-olds, while also raising questions of patient safety and possible regret over surgical procedures.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the recently adopted legislation on changing legal gender - which lowered the age limit to 16 and introduced a simplified process without a requirement for a gender dysphoria diagnosis - should be repealed and replaced with the earlier, stricter requirements, or remain as it stands.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. It does not share the demand to repeal the new gender-recognition law, raise the age limit for legal gender change, or reinstate the requirement for a gender dysphoria diagnosis and Social Board authorization for surgical procedures.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (SD, KD)
The reservation wants to repeal the new gender-recognition law and return to a rule where legal gender must match biological sex. It opposes the lowered age limit of 16 for legal gender change and the possibility of changing gender without a gender dysphoria diagnosis, and wants to reinstate the requirement for a diagnosis and Social Board approval, including for surgical procedures on the genitals. The reasoning is precautionary: the cause of the rising number of people seeking care for gender dysphoria is unknown, and there are examples of people regretting a gender change. It also wants placement in remand and prison to be based on biological sex as a starting point.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by SD, KD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/6 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | Yes | Yes 89/1/0/16 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| MP | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 11/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | No 0/14/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 54/1/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | No 0/60/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SPatrik Björck (S, Västra Götalands läns östra) | No — party line: Yes |
| MEllen Juntti (M, Västra Götalands läns västra) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:206 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:269 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:580 by Erik Hellsborn (SD), 2025/26:2768 by Niels Paarup-Petersen and Helena Vilhelmsson (both C), 2025/26:3089 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) and 2025/26:3463 by Christian Carlsson et al. (KD).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:206 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:269 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:580 av Erik Hellsborn (SD), 2025/26:2768 av Niels Paarup-Petersen och Helena Vilhelmsson (båda C), 2025/26:3089 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) och 2025/26:3463 av Christian Carlsson m.fl. (KD).
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 172 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals dealt with healthcare priorities and other medical-ethical issues. Parliament considers that it is the responsibility of healthcare authorities to assess the need for resources for individual diseases and how care for patients with these diseases should be organized. Furthermore, parliament refers to ongoing work and previous decisions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the new gender identity law to be repealed and the requirement for gender dysphoria diagnosis to be restored for legal gender change. (SD, KD) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme requires a gender recognition law based on self-determination and a third legal gender, and sees it as decisive to strengthen LGBTQIA+ people's rights when authoritarian right-wing forces attack them.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires a gender recognition law based on self-determination and a third legal gender, and sees it as decisive to strengthen LGBTQIA+ people's rights when authoritarian right-wing forces attack them. The counter-proposal's demands to repeal the law and reinstate diagnosis requirements and government approval go directly against this. The plan also expresses strong confidence in young people's own decisions.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver en könstillhörighetslag som baseras på självbestämmande och ett tredje juridiskt kön, och ser det som avgörande att stärka hbtqia+-personers rättigheter när auktoritära högerkrafter angriper dem. Motförslagets krav på att riva upp lagen och återinföra diagnoskrav och myndighetsgodkännande går rakt emot detta. Planen uttrycker dessutom starkt förtroende för unga människors egna beslut.
- gender identity based on self-determinationdecisive(party programme)
- strengthened LGBTQIA+ rights»Vi ser det som avgörande att stärka hbtqia+-personers rättigheter i en tid där auktoritära högerkrafter försöker angripa dem.« (party programme ↗)“We see it as decisive to strengthen LGBTQIA+ people's rights at a time when authoritarian right-wing forces are trying to attack them.”
- youth self-determination»Vi har ett starkt förtroende för unga människors förmåga att fatta självständiga beslut om sina liv.« (party programme ↗)“We have strong confidence in young people's ability to make independent decisions about their lives.”
- bodily autonomy»Starka sexuella och reproduktiva rättigheter är avgörande för människors kroppsliga autonomi och makt över sina liv.« (party programme ↗)“Strong sexual and reproductive rights are decisive for people's bodily autonomy and power over their lives.”
flags: citat_korrigerat, citat_ej_verifierat
The party programme establishes that gender identity must not determine people's freedom and rejects all tendencies to divide up and make distinctions between people based on their background.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that gender identity must not determine people's freedom and rejects all tendencies to divide up and make distinctions between people based on their background. The counter-proposal wants to tear up gender-identity legislation, reinstate diagnosis requirements and government approval and raise the age limit, which restricts exactly that right and that protection for personal integrity the plan requires. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att könsidentitet inte får avgöra människors frihet och avvisar alla tendenser att dela upp och göra skillnad på människor utifrån deras bakgrund. Motförslaget vill riva upp könstillhörighetslagstiftningen, återinföra diagnoskrav och myndighetsgodkännande och höja åldersgränsen, vilket inskränker just den rätten och det skydd för den personliga integriteten planen kräver. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- gender identity must not limit freedomdecisive»och trosuppfattning, sexuell läggning, könsidentitet, funktionsnedsättningar och ålder.« (party programme ↗)“and faith, sexual orientation, gender identity, disabilities and age.”
- no division of people»Socialdemokratin avvisar alla tendenser att dela upp och göra skillnad på människor utifrån deras« (party programme ↗)“The Social Democrats reject all tendencies to divide up and make distinctions between people based on their”
- personal integrity»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection for personal integrity.”
- civil liberties and rights»Skydd för medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Protection for civil liberties and rights.”
The election manifesto promises to strengthen the rights of transgender people through a new gender identity law and to introduce a third legal gender, thus the opposite of dismantling the legislation and reintroducing requirements for diagnosis and government approval.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to strengthen the rights of transgender people through a new gender identity law and to introduce a third legal gender, thus the opposite of dismantling the legislation and reintroducing requirements for diagnosis and government approval. The party programme also wants gender identity to be protected in the constitution. The counter-proposal's requirements therefore directly contradict the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att stärka transpersoners rättigheter genom en ny könstillhörighetslag och att införa ett tredje juridiskt kön, alltså motsatsen till att riva upp lagstiftningen och återinföra krav på diagnos och myndighetsgodkännande. Partiprogrammet vill dessutom att könsidentitet skyddas i grundlagen. Motförslagets krav strider därför direkt mot planen.
- new gender identity lawdecisive»stärka transpersoners rättigheter genom en ny könstillhörighetslag, och införa ett tredje juridiskt kön.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen the rights of transgender people through a new gender identity law, and introduce a third legal gender.”
- strengthened protection for transgender people»Det skulle stärka skyddet för transpersoner i Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“This would strengthen protection for transgender people in Sweden.”
- strengthened LGBTQI+ rights»Miljöpartiet kommer aktivt att delta i kampen för att stärka rättigheterna för« (party programme ↗)“the Greens will actively participate in the struggle to strengthen the rights for”
- right to own gender identity»Alla människor ska kunna uttrycka sin kärlek, sexualitet och identitet« (party programme ↗)“All people should be able to express their love, sexuality and identity”
The party programme establishes that every individual has the right to create their own identity, that all shall be able to determine their own lives through their own free choices and that structures that discriminate based on gender identity and gender expression shall be fought.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that every individual has the right to create their own identity, that all shall be able to determine their own lives through their own free choices and that structures that discriminate based on gender identity and gender expression shall be fought. The election manifesto additionally warns against forces that want to restrict LGBTQ people's rights. The counter-proposal's requirement to tear up the law and reintroduce diagnostic and authority requirements goes directly against this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att varje individ har rätt att skapa sin egen identitet, att alla ska kunna bestämma över sina egna liv genom egna och fria val och att strukturer som diskriminerar på grund av könsidentitet och könsuttryck ska bekämpas. Valmanifestet varnar dessutom för krafter som vill inskränka HBTQI-personers rättigheter. Motförslagets krav på att riva upp lagen och återinföra diagnos- och myndighetskrav går rakt emot detta.
- right to own identitydecisive»Varje individ har rätt att skapa sin egen identitet.« (party programme ↗)“Every individual has the right to create their own identity.”
- prohibition on discrimination»Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“We fight all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate people.”
- safeguard LGBTQ rights»I land efter land försöker auktoritära rörelser flytta fram positionerna, inskränka kvinnors, minoriteters och HBTQI-personers rättigheter samt attackera den fria pressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In country after country authoritarian movements advance positions, restrict the rights of women, minorities and LGBTQ people and attack freedom of the press.”
- individual self-determination»Alla ska kunna bestämma över sina egna liv genom egna och fria val.« (party programme ↗)“All shall be able to determine their own lives through their own free choices.”
The party programme explicitly establishes that no laws may disadvantage persons on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, and the election manifesto sets the goal that Sweden should be the world's best country to live in as an LGBTQI person.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that no laws may disadvantage persons on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, and the election manifesto sets the goal that Sweden should be the world's best country to live in as an LGBTQI person. Abolishing the gender identity law and reintroducing the requirement for diagnosis and government approval would do precisely the opposite. The counter-proposal's requirements therefore go directly counter to the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att inga lagar får missgynna personer med avseende på sexuell läggning, könsidentitet eller könsuttryck, och valmanifestet sätter målet att Sverige ska vara världens bästa land att leva i som hbtqi-person. Att riva upp könstillhörighetslagen och återinföra krav på diagnos och myndighetsgodkännande skulle göra just det motsatta. Motförslagets krav går därför rakt emot planen.
- no law may disadvantage gender identitydecisive»Inga lagar får missgynna personer med avseende på sexuell läggning, könsidentitet eller könsuttryck.« (party programme ↗)“No laws may disadvantage persons on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.”
- LGBTQI rights»Sverige ska vara världens bästa land att leva i som hbtqi-person.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should be the world's best country to live in as an LGBTQI person.”
- respect for gender identity»Liberaler verkar för ett öppet samhällsklimat där ingen känner sig tvungen att dölja sin sexuella läggning, sin könsidentitet eller sitt könsuttryck, och där alla visas samma respekt oavsett sexuell läggning.« (party programme ↗)“Liberals work for an open social climate where no one feels compelled to hide their sexual orientation, their gender identity or their gender expression, and where everyone is shown the same respect regardless of sexual orientation.”
- strengthened LGBTQI reforms»Hbtqi-kompetensen i vård, skola och omsorg ska stärkas och ett lagskydd mot omvändelseterapi ska införas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“LGBTQI competence in healthcare, schools and care shall be strengthened and legal protection against conversion therapy shall be introduced.”
The plan requires that the child's best interest is decisive in all decisions concerning children and that care is safe for patients and based on knowledge and proven experience.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the child's best interest is decisive in all decisions concerning children and that care is safe for patients and based on knowledge and proven experience. The counter-proposal's caution arguments about a lowered age limit and requirements for diagnosis and government approval are connected to these commitments. At the same time, the plan requires that no one is discriminated against because of gender or sexual identity, which is why support is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att barnets bästa är styrande vid alla beslut som rör barn och att vården är säker för patienterna och baserad på kunskap och beprövad erfarenhet. Motförslagets försiktighetsargument om en sänkt åldersgräns och krav på diagnos och myndighetsgodkännande knyter an till dessa åtaganden. Samtidigt kräver planen att ingen diskrimineras på grund av kön eller sexuell identitet, varför stödet är osäkert.
- child's best interest decisivedecisive»vara styrande i all familjepolitik och vid alla beslut som rör barn« (party programme ↗)“be decisive in all family policy and in all decisions concerning children”
- evidence-based and safe care»kostnadseffektiv, säker för patienterna och baserad på kunskap och beprövad erfarenhet, det« (party programme ↗)“cost-effective, safe for patients and based on knowledge and proven experience, it”
- prohibition against discrimination»Grundlagen ska även säkerställa att ingen diskrimineras på grund av kön, ålder,« (party programme ↗)“The Constitution shall also ensure that no one is discriminated against because of gender, age,”
- patient's self-determination»Utredning och behandling får inte ske mot patientens« (party programme ↗)“Investigation and treatment shall not take place against the patient's”
The plan stands up for LGBTQ+ persons' right to live freely and wants to ban conversion therapy that aims to change an individual's gender identity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan stands up for LGBTQ+ persons' right to live freely and wants to ban conversion therapy that aims to change an individual's gender identity. Repealing the gender recognition law, reintroducing diagnosis and authority requirements and tying legal gender to biological sex goes against that position and against the plan's requirement for gender-neutral family legislation. The plan's tolerance principle speaks for openness to people's different paths in life.
Original (Swedish)
Planen står upp för hbtq-personers rätt att leva fritt och vill förbjuda konverteringsterapi som syftar till att ändra en individs könsidentitet. Att riva upp könstillhörighetslagen, återinföra diagnos- och myndighetskrav och binda juridiskt kön till biologiskt kön går emot den hållningen och emot planens krav på könsneutral familjelagstiftning. Planens toleransprincip talar för öppenhet inför människors olika vägar i livet.
- freedom regardless of orientationdecisive»I Sverige ska du kunna leva ett fritt liv, och öppet kunna visa din kärlek, bilda familj och få ett tryggt bemötande av det offentliga, oavsett vilken sexuell läggning du har.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In Sweden you should be able to live a free life, openly show your love, form a family and receive safe treatment from the public, regardless of your sexual orientation.”
- protection for gender identity»Förbjuda konverteringsterapi, som syftar till att ändra en individs sexuella läggning eller könsidentitet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ban conversion therapy that aims to change an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity”
- gender-neutral legislation»Se till att all familjelagstiftning är könsneutral« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that all family legislation is gender-neutral”
- tolerance for different choices»Toleransen handlar om öppenhet för människors olika vägar« (party programme ↗)“Tolerance is about openness to people's different paths”
The plan characterizes hormone treatment that changes children's natural puberty and surgical gender-change interventions as particularly serious and requires that society's handling of children with gender dysphoria and its long-term consequences be investigated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan characterizes hormone treatment that changes children's natural puberty and surgical gender-change interventions as particularly serious and requires that society's handling of children with gender dysphoria and its long-term consequences be investigated. It wants to end political experiments on children and young people and opposes questioning humanity's biological gender. The counter-proposal's requirement for reintroduced diagnosis and authority requirements and a precautionary principle follow from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen betecknar hormonbehandling som ändrar barns naturliga pubertet och kirurgiska könsbytesingrepp som särskilt allvarliga och kräver att samhällets hantering av barn med könsdysfori och dess långsiktiga konsekvenser utreds. Den vill avsluta de politiska experimenten på barn och unga och vänder sig mot att människans biologiska kön ifrågasätts. Motförslagets krav på återinförda diagnos- och myndighetskrav samt en försiktighetsprincip följer av dessa åtaganden.
- caution regarding gender transitions in childrendecisive»Särskilt allvarlig är användning av hormonbehandling för att ändra barns naturliga pubertet och kirurgiska ingrepp för att ”byta kön”.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Particularly serious is the use of hormone treatment to change children's natural puberty and surgical interventions to 'change gender'.”
- investigation of gender dysphoria care»Samhällets hantering av barn med könsdysfori och dess långsiktiga konsekvenser ska utredas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society's handling of children with gender dysphoria and its long-term consequences should be investigated.”
- biological gender as starting point»Människans biologiska kön ifrågasätts och barns naturliga utveckling och intressen har problematiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Humanity's biological gender is questioned and children's natural development and interests have been problematized.”
- stop for experiments on young people»Avsluta de politiska experimenten på Sveriges barn och unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“End the political experiments on Sweden's children and young people”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SoU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01SoU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1081 — Tillgång till profylaxkurs för alla blivande föräldrar av Sofia Skönnbrink (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1095 — Intersexpersoners rätt till samtycke av Anna Lasses (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1188 — Nationella riktlinjer för EDS och HSD av Ulrika Heindorff (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1190 — Fortsatt ökning av kunskapen om ME/CFS av Ulrika Heindorff (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1198 — Nationella riktlinjer för diagnostik och behandling av lipödem av Ulrika Heindorff (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1206 — Enhetliga rutiner för igångsättning - vård på lika villkor av Caroline Högström (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1222 — Ge fler möjligheten att donera av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1237 — Utvecklad vård och behandling av sköldkörtelsjukdomar av Ingela Nylund Watz (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1262 — Stärkt arbete mot kvinnlig könsstympning av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1515 — Utredning om assisterad dödshjälp av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1547 — Aktiv dödshjälp av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1567 — En nationell samordnare för sällsynta diagnoser av Heléne Björklund (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1574 — Tillgång till rätt behandling för patienter med lipödem av Marianne Fundahn (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1579 — Rättighet att söka genetiska halvsyskon av Lina Nordquist och Jakob Olofsgård (båda L)
- Motion 2025/26:1585 — Förbättrad övergångsvård av Malin Danielsson (L)
- Motion 2025/26:1623 — Minska risken för förlossningsskador av Magnus Manhammar och Heléne Björklund (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1686 — Finansiering av epilepsiregistret av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1819 — Undersökning av bröstcancer av Peter Hultqvist (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1848 — Jämlik transplantationsvård i Sverige av Anna-Belle Strömberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1861 — Jämlik vård vid ätstörningar i hela landet av Anna Wallentheim (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament