2024-02-152023/24:SoU6 · p.24SoUHealth & social services
For-Profit and Non-Profit Actors
Evaluating for-profit and non-profit providers of protective housing
What's at stake: The question concerns whether the new licensing requirement for protective housing risks favouring for-profit providers at the expense of non-profit operations such as women's shelters. The outcome affects whether developments in this area are specifically monitored or left to existing support measures.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should call on the government to evaluate how the new licensing requirement for protective housing affects the balance between for-profit and non-profit providers, or whether no such follow-up is needed beyond the support already directed to non-profit operations.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points out that the government has already decided on a temporary state grant to support the non-profit organisations that run protective housing and need help developing the quality of their operations, and against that background sees no need for a specific call to evaluate developments between for-profit and non-profit providers.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 26 (S, V, MP)
S, V and MP want the government tasked with evaluating how the new legislation on protective housing affects the development of for-profit versus non-profit providers, to ensure the reform does not inadvertently disadvantage non-profit operations such as women's shelters.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 26 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 172–128Ja 158–142
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/13/0/5 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2778 by Maj Karlsson et al. (V) proposal 15 and 2023/24:2783 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) proposal 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2778 av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V) yrkande 15 och 2023/24:2783 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved new regulations to improve protection and support for persons who need protected housing and strengthen the child rights perspective for children who accompany a custodian to protected housing. The legislative changes include, among other things, that protected housing shall be regulated in the Social Services Act. Children who accompany a custodian to protected housing shall be assessed and granted the service individually, and the social committee shall be responsible for meeting the child's need for support and assistance services. The legislative changes come into force on 1 April 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants protected housing to prevent removal decisions. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 26
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to counteract the privatization of women's shelters and stipulates that work against men's violence against women is a societal responsibility and not a profit opportunity for private companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to counteract the privatization of women's shelters and stipulates that work against men's violence against women is a societal responsibility and not a profit opportunity for private companies. That an evaluation be conducted on how the new legislation on protected housing affects the relationship between profit-driven and non-profit actors responds directly to that commitment and to the plan's view of the shelter movement as a unique actor to strengthen. The committee's reference to temporary state subsidies is not addressed by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill motverka den privatisering som sker av kvinnojourernas verksamhet och slår fast att arbetet mot mäns våld mot kvinnor är ett samhällsansvar och inte en vinstmöjlighet för privata bolag. Att utvärdera hur den nya lagstiftningen om skyddat boende påverkar förhållandet mellan vinstdrivande och icke vinstdrivande aktörer svarar direkt mot det åtagandet och mot planens syn på jourrörelsen som en unik aktör att stärka. Utskottets hänvisning till ett tillfälligt statsbidrag berörs inte av planen.
- against privatization of women's sheltersdecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill motverka den privatisering som sker av kvinnojourernas verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to counteract the privatization of women's shelters.”
- societal responsibility, not profit market»Det är ett samhällsansvar att stoppa mäns våld mot kvinnor, inte en möjlighet för privata bolag att göra vinst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a societal responsibility to stop men's violence against women, not an opportunity for private companies to make profit.”
- shelter movement as unique actor»opinionsarbete. Vi ser kvinno- och tjejjourrörelsen som en unik aktör« (party programme ↗)“advocacy work. We see the women's and girls' shelter movement as a unique actor”
- shelters' independence»Vi värnar kvinno- och tjejjourernas självständighet. Den får inte« (party programme ↗)“We protect women's and girls' shelters' independence. It must not”
The plan wants to limit profit interests in tax-funded activities and prevent profit-seeking in welfare care services, while raising resources for women's shelters' work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to limit profit interests in tax-funded activities and prevent profit-seeking in welfare care services, while raising resources for women's shelters' work. Evaluating how the new legislation on protected housing affects the balance between profit-driven and idea-driven actors follows from this commitment. The plan does not specifically mention protected housing, but its principle that profit interests must not guide policy supports the position.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill begränsa vinstintresset i skattefinansierad verksamhet och motverka vinstjakt i välfärdens omsorgsverksamheter, samtidigt som den lyfter resurserna till kvinnojourernas arbete. Att utvärdera hur den nya lagstiftningen om skyddat boende påverkar balansen mellan vinstdrivande och idéburna aktörer följer av detta åtagande. Planen nämner inte skyddade boenden särskilt, men dess princip om att vinstintresset inte får styra bär ställningstagandet.
- limited profit interests in welfaredecisive»vinstintresset begränsas och inte fungerar styrande för verksamheten« (party programme ↗)“profit interests are limited and do not function as guiding for the activity”
- prevent profit-seeking in care»Vinstjakten inom assistansen ska motverkas, liksom att brukare eller personliga assistenter utnyttjas i kriminella syften.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Profit-seeking within care services shall be prevented, as shall the exploitation of service users or personal assistants for criminal purposes.”
- support for women's shelters»och som ökat resurserna till kvinno- och tjejjourernas viktiga arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“and which has increased resources to women's and girls' shelters' important work.”
- social rights outside the market»De sociala rättigheter, som ska komma alla till del« (party programme ↗)“Social rights, which shall benefit everyone”
The party programme wants to remove commercially oriented actors from welfare and instead promote idea-driven activities, and requires more women's shelters with better conditions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to remove commercially oriented actors from welfare and instead promote idea-driven activities, and requires more women's shelters with better conditions. According to the plan, welfare activities should not be treated as any market. A task to evaluate how the new legislation on protected housing affects non-profit versus for-profit actors therefore follows directly from the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill få bort de kommersiellt inriktade aktörerna ur välfärden och i stället främja idéburna verksamheter, och kräver fler kvinnojourer med bättre förutsättningar. Välfärdens verksamheter får enligt planen inte hanteras som vilken marknad som helst. Ett uppdrag att utvärdera hur den nya lagstiftningen om skyddat boende påverkar ideella respektive vinstdrivande aktörer följer därför direkt av planens åtaganden.
- promote idea-driven actorsdecisive»vill därför få bort de kommersiellt inriktade aktörerna och i stället främja idéburna verksamheter« (party programme ↗)“therefore wants to remove commercially oriented actors and instead promote idea-driven activities”
- strengthened women's shelters»mansmottagningar och kvinnojourer och bättre« (party programme ↗)“men's centres and women's shelters and better”
- welfare is not a market»Välfärdens verksamheter får inte hanteras som vilken marknad som helst.« (party programme ↗)“Welfare activities must not be treated as any market.”
- coordinated protection for people exposed to violence»skapa en dörr ut för våldsutsatta i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“create an exit door for people exposed to violence throughout the country”
The election manifesto requires that women's shelters, youth shelters and protected housing receive more and permanent funding and that long-term support to them is secured, as well as to organisations working with vulnerable groups.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that women's shelters, youth shelters and protected housing receive more and permanent funding and that long-term support to them is secured, as well as to organisations working with vulnerable groups. The party programme establishes civil society's independent and fundamental role. Evaluating whether new legislation on protected housing disadvantages volunteer activities therefore follows from the plan. The plan does not address the temporary government grant the committee refers to.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att kvinnojourer, tjejjourer och skyddade boenden får mer och permanent finansiering och att det långsiktiga stödet till dem säkras, liksom till organisationer som arbetar med utsatta. Partiprogrammet slår fast civilsamhällets självständiga och fundamentala roll. Att utvärdera om den nya lagstiftningen om skyddat boende missgynnar ideella verksamheter följer därför av planen. Planen berör inte det tillfälliga statsbidrag utskottet hänvisar till.
- permanent support to sheltersdecisive»Kvinnojourer, tjejjourer och skyddade boenden behöver mer och permanent finansiering för att kunna fortsätta sitt viktiga arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women's shelters, youth shelters and protected housing need more and permanent funding to continue their important work.”
- long-term support to protected housing»säkra det långsiktiga stödet till kvinnojourer, tjejjourer och skyddade boenden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“secure long-term support to women's shelters, youth shelters and protected housing”
- civil society's role»Det civila samhället, människornas frivilliga organisering, är en fundamental del av varje väl fungerande demokrati och välfärdsstat.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society, people's voluntary organising, is a fundamental part of every well-functioning democracy and welfare state.”
- long-term funding of organisations»Organisationer som jobbar med flickor och pojkar, förövare och utsatta, ska ha den långsiktiga finansiering de behöver.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Organisations working with girls and boys, perpetrators and vulnerable people, shall have the long-term funding they need.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that regulations and procurements are designed so that idea-driven actors can more often contribute to welfare and that idea-driven care and welfare activities without profit motive are given good opportunities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that regulations and procurements are designed so that idea-driven actors can more often contribute to welfare and that idea-driven care and welfare activities without profit motive are given good opportunities. The counter-proposal's requirement for an evaluation of how legislation on protected housing affects ideologically driven versus profit-driven actors aims at precisely that. The plan also wants to introduce national support for protected housing and give women's shelters long-term conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att regelverk och upphandlingar utformas så att idéburna aktörer oftare kan bidra i välfärden och att idéburna vård- och omsorgsverksamheter utan vinstsyfte ges goda möjligheter. Motförslagets krav på en utvärdering av hur lagstiftningen om skyddat boende påverkar ideella respektive vinstdrivande aktörer syftar till just detta. Planen vill dessutom införa nationellt stöd för skyddade boenden och ge kvinnojourerna långsiktiga villkor.
- idea-driven actors in welfaredecisive»Regelverk och upphandlingar bör utformas så att det är oftare är möjligt för idéburna aktörer att bidra i välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulations and procurements should be designed so that it is often possible for idea-driven actors to contribute to welfare.”
- idea-driven are important in welfare»Idéburna organisationer och sociala företag som bedriver vård och omsorg utan vinstsyfte är« (party programme ↗)“Ideologically motivated organizations and social enterprises that conduct care and welfare activities without profit are”
- support for protected housing»Ett nationellt stöd för skyddade boenden ska införas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“National support for protected housing shall be introduced.”
- women's shelters indispensable»kvinnojourerna är ett omistligt komplement till det offentligas insatser.« (party programme ↗)“women's shelters are an indispensable complement to the public services.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that non-profit activities be prioritized over commercial interests and that the public realizes that non-profit organizations are independent, and makes evaluation and follow-up an important political task.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that non-profit activities be prioritized over commercial interests and that the public realizes that non-profit organizations are independent, and makes evaluation and follow-up an important political task. The counter-proposal's requirement for a task to evaluate how the reform affects profit and non-profit actors thus follows from the plan's civil society commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att ideell verksamhet prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen och att det offentliga inser att ideella organisationer är fristående, och den gör utvärdering och uppföljning till en viktig politisk uppgift. Motförslagets krav på ett uppdrag att utvärdera hur reformen påverkar vinstdrivande respektive icke vinstdrivande aktörer följer därmed av planens civilsamhällesåtaganden.
- non-profit before commercialdecisive»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen« (party programme ↗)“Non-profit activities shall be prioritized over commercial interests”
- evaluation is political task»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost tracking and quality control are therefore important political”
- independence of non-profits»ideella organisationer är fristående från den offentliga« (party programme ↗)“non-profit organizations are independent from the public”
- strengthened civil society»STÄRKT CIVILSAMHÄLLE« (2022 manifesto ↗)“STRENGTHENED CIVIL SOCIETY”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to continuing to strengthen women's shelters and sees a diversity of actors as a prerequisite for renewal in welfare, which argues for following up whether a reform disadvantages non-profit activities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to continuing to strengthen women's shelters and sees a diversity of actors as a prerequisite for renewal in welfare, which argues for following up whether a reform disadvantages non-profit activities. The plan's reform method moreover includes willingness to evaluate and reconsider what has been implemented. The question is not explicitly addressed, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att fortsätta stärka kvinnojourerna och ser en mångfald av aktörer som en förutsättning för förnyelse i välfärden, vilket talar för att följa upp om en reform missgynnar de ideella verksamheterna. Planens reformmetod innefattar dessutom beredskap att utvärdera och ompröva det som genomförts. Frågan behandlas inte uttryckligen, så stödet är härlett.
- strengthened women's sheltersdecisive»Fortsätta stärka kvinnojourerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Continue to strengthen women's shelters”
- diversity of actors»En mångfald av aktörer är också en förutsättning för förnyelse och innovation.« (party programme ↗)“A diversity of actors is also a prerequisite for renewal and innovation.”
- evaluate reforms»beredskap för att utvärdera, ompröva, förändra och förbättra« (party programme ↗)“willingness to evaluate, reconsider, change and improve”
- stop men's violence»Vi ska stoppa mäns våld mot kvinnor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall stop men's violence against women”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that civil society takes a great responsibility for those who have broken away from honour-based abuse and that women's refuges must be supported and given better conditions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that civil society takes a great responsibility for those who have broken away from honour-based abuse and that women's refuges must be supported and given better conditions. It also requires clear results and follow-up of every public investment. A mandate to evaluate how the new legislation affects non-profit compared to profit-driven providers of protected housing thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att civilsamhället tar ett stort ansvar för dem som brutit sig loss från hedersförtryck och att kvinnojourer måste stödjas och ges bättre förutsättningar. Den kräver också tydliga resultat och uppföljning av varje offentlig satsning. Ett uppdrag att utvärdera hur den nya lagstiftningen påverkar ideella jämfört med vinstdrivande utförare av skyddat boende följer därför av planen.
- support for women's refugesdecisive»Kvinnojourer med inriktning mot hedersproblematik måste stödjas och ges bättre förutsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women's refuges focused on honour-based problems must be supported and given better conditions.”
- civil society's role»Civilsamhället tar ett stort ansvar för att hjälpa dem som har brutit sig loss från hedersförtryck eller försöker göra det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil society takes a great responsibility for helping those who have broken away from honour-based abuse or are trying to do so.”
- support when breaking away from honour-based abuse»Stödja dem som vill bryta sig loss från hedersförtryck« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support those who want to break away from honour-based abuse”
- follow-up of reforms»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SoU6)
- Committee report full text (HB01SoU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2778 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:31 Stärkta rättigheter för barn och vuxna i skyddat boende av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2779 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:31 Stärkta rättigheter för barn och vuxna i skyddat boende av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2780 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:31 Stärkta rättigheter för barn och vuxna i skyddat boende av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2783 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:31 Stärkta rättigheter för barn och vuxna i skyddat boende av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2023/24:31 — Stärkta rättigheter för barn och vuxna i skyddat boende
Source: The Swedish Parliament