2026-03-042025/26:NU13 · p.5NUBusiness & energy
Hydropower
Hydropower's role and conditions in the energy system
What's at stake: Hydropower accounts for a large share of Sweden's electricity production, and its ability to be regulated up and down is central to managing a power system with more weather-dependent wind and solar power. How the environmental conditions and regulatory framework are shaped affects both willingness to invest in hydropower and the environment in the affected waterways.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should issue a directive calling for a national strategy to maximise hydropower capacity and reformed water legislation that eases capacity increases, or whether the ongoing review of hydropower's environmental conditions should be allowed to continue without such a directive.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the process of reviewing hydropower's environmental conditions is already under way in a manner that takes the consequences for the power system into account, including through analyses from the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management and the Swedish Energy Agency, as well as regulatory amendments. The committee therefore sees no reason for the Riksdag to issue further directives on the matter and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 13 (C)
The reservation (C) calls for a national strategy to make full use of hydropower's maximum capacity and to increase power output and storage capacity, along with further proposals in the work to reform water legislation that highlight hydropower's contribution, reduce red tape, respect property rights, and ensure proportionate environmental measures at reasonable cost. The reasoning is that no major investment has been made in hydropower in over 30 years despite substantial potential for capacity increases, while the ongoing review of environmental conditions creates uncertainty that holds back development.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 13 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 156–21Ja 140–37
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 2/0/91/13 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 2/0/13/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SAnnika Strandhäll (S, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SMagdalena Andersson (S, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPJanine Alm Ericson (MP, Västra Götalands läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPRebecka Le Moine (MP, Östergötlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:64 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:2302 by Lars Isacsson (S), 2025/26:2975 by Dan Hovskär (KD), 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) claims 121 and 122 and 2025/26:3594 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) claim 12.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:64 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:2302 av Lars Isacsson (S), 2025/26:2975 av Dan Hovskär (KD), 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 121 och 122 samt 2025/26:3594 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 12.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 197 proposals in motions on energy policy. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2025. Among other things, the proposals concern the direction of energy policy, nuclear power, wind power, biofuels and biofuel, energy efficiency, energy gases, and heat and combined heat and power. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the pursued policy and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to set planning targets for fossil-free electricity production by 2030 and 2035 and strengthen the county administrative boards' instructions to promote fossil-free power production. (C) — Reservation 13
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires ambitious environmental goals with strong legislation and that new energy projects be compared in environmental consequences throughout their entire lifecycle.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires ambitious environmental goals with strong legislation and that new energy projects be compared in environmental consequences throughout their entire lifecycle. The counter-proposal's demands for reduced regulatory burden, respect for property rights and proportionate environmental measures point toward weakened environmental assessment of hydropower, which contradicts that commitment. That power output increases is in itself compatible with the plan, but the decisive part of the requirement is the loosening of water legislation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ambitiösa miljömål med skarp lagstiftning och att nya energiprojekt jämförs i miljökonsekvenser över hela livscykeln. Motförslagets krav på minskat regelkrångel, respekt för äganderätten och proportionerliga miljöåtgärder pekar mot en försvagad miljöprövning av vattenkraften, vilket strider mot det åtagandet. Att effektuttaget ökar är i sig förenligt med planen, men den avgörande delen av kravet är uppluckringen av vattenlagstiftningen.
- strong environmental legislationdecisive»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals pursued through rigorous legislation and practical work.”
- environmental assessment of energy projects»behöver jämföras i miljökonsekvenser och säkerhet över hela sin« (party programme ↗)“need to be compared in environmental consequences and safety over their entire”
- restore ecosystems»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems, among other things by restoring”
- electricity as publicly owned infrastructure»Vi ser el och värme som en del av Sveriges infrastruktur, där« (party programme ↗)“We see electricity and heat as part of Sweden's infrastructure, where”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto commits the party to protecting hydropower and expanding electricity production of all kinds and to speeding up slow permit processes, which supports the counter-proposal's demands for increased output, increased storage capacity and reduced uncertainty in environmental review.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits the party to protecting hydropower and expanding electricity production of all kinds and to speeding up slow permit processes, which supports the counter-proposal's demands for increased output, increased storage capacity and reduced uncertainty in environmental review. The plan's protection of water environments at the same time sets a limit on how far the easements can go.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet binder partiet vid att värna vattenkraften och bygga ut elproduktionen av alla slag samt vid att snabba på långsamma tillståndsprocesser, vilket bär motförslagets krav på effektökning, ökad lagringskapacitet och minskad osäkerhet i miljöprövningen. Planens värn av vattenmiljöerna sätter samtidigt en gräns för hur långt lättnaderna kan gå.
- protect hydropowerdecisive»Vi behöver också värna vattenkraften och se till att solpanelerna blir fler« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We also need to protect hydropower and ensure that solar panels become more”
- expanded electricity production»Bygg ut elproduktionen av alla slag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand electricity production of all kinds.”
- faster permit processes»Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Slow permit processes shall be speeded up.”
- protection of water environments»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable natural and water environments.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that hydropower is fully developed and that the last untouched rivers should be protected, and it rejects using the transition as an excuse to loosen environmental legislation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that hydropower is fully developed and that the last untouched rivers should be protected, and it rejects using the transition as an excuse to loosen environmental legislation. The counter-proposal's demands for reduced regulatory red tape and proportionate environmental measures point toward weakened environmental conditions, which the plan opposes. The plan's desire to promote efficiency in existing facilities is not sufficient to support the counter-proposal as a whole.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att vattenkraften är färdigutbyggd och att de sista orörda älvarna ska skyddas, och den avvisar att omställningen används som ursäkt för att luckra upp miljölagstiftning. Motförslagets krav på minskat regelkrångel och proportionerliga miljöåtgärder pekar mot försvagade miljövillkor, vilket planen motsätter sig. Att planen vill främja effektivisering av befintliga verk räcker inte för att bära motförslaget som helhet.
- hydropower fully developeddecisive»Vi anser att vattenkraften är färdigutbyggd och därför ska de sista orörda älvarna och strömmande vattnen skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“We believe that hydropower is fully developed and therefore the last untouched rivers and flowing waters should be protected.”
- no loosened environmental law»Den gröna omställningen ska inte användas som ursäkt för att luckra upp miljölagstiftning eller urholka minoriteters rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“The green transition should not be used as an excuse to loosen environmental legislation or undermine minorities' rights.”
- environmental adaptation of hydropower»samtidigt som de som tjänat ut sitt syfte eller inte når dagens miljökrav rivs ut eller miljöanpassas för att säkra öppna vandringsvägar för fisk och andra arter.« (party programme ↗)“at the same time as those that have served their purpose or do not meet today's environmental requirements are torn down or environmentally adapted to ensure open migration routes for fish and other species.”
- efficiency improvements of existing facilities»Däremot vill vi främja ombyggnad och effektivisering av befintliga vattenkraftverk« (party programme ↗)“However, we want to promote reconstruction and efficiency improvements of existing hydropower facilities”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to double production of emission-free electricity, significantly shorten approval times and value strong property rights in environmental assessment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to double production of emission-free electricity, significantly shorten approval times and value strong property rights in environmental assessment. The counter-proposal's demand for a strategy to increase hydropower's capacity and storage, reduced regulatory complexity and proportionate environmental measures follow from these commitments. The plan says nothing specifically about hydropower's reconsideration, so the position is derived from the electricity production and approval line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, korta tillståndstiderna kraftigt och värna en stark äganderätt vid miljöprövning. Motförslagets krav på en strategi för att öka vattenkraftens effekt och lagringskapacitet, minskat regelkrångel och proportionerliga miljöåtgärder följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen säger inget om vattenkraftens omprövning specifikt, varför ställningstagandet härleds ur elproduktions- och tillståndslinjen.
- more emission-free electricitydecisive»Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double production of emission-free electricity, and develop and expand the electricity grid.”
- faster permits»Det krävs en kriskommission för att snabbare öka Sveriges utsläppsfria elproduktion och tillstånd för vindkraft ska få ta max två år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A crisis commission is needed to faster increase Sweden's emission-free electricity production and permits for wind power should take a maximum of two years.”
- reduced regulatory complexity»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated regulations.”
- respect for property rights»Äganderätten är central för ett samhälle där människor kan förverkliga sig själva och sina drömmar.« (party programme ↗)“Property rights are central to a society where people can realise themselves and their dreams.”
The plan establishes that hydropower can be developed through efficiency improvements, not through increased exploitation, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's requirement for increased energy output and storage capacity means.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that hydropower can be developed through efficiency improvements, not through increased exploitation, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's requirement for increased energy output and storage capacity means. The election manifesto also promises investments in the power system and efforts in energy storage. The plan simultaneously requires that power plants meet today's environmental regulations and that the national rivers are protected, which sets limits for how far the reform of water legislation can go.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att vattenkraften kan utvecklas genom effektivisering, inte genom ökad exploatering, vilket är precis vad motförslagets krav på ökat effektuttag och lagringskapacitet innebär. Valmanifestet lovar dessutom investeringar i kraftsystemet och satsningar på energilagring. Planen kräver samtidigt att kraftverken lever upp till dagens miljöregler och att nationalälvarna fredas, vilket sätter gränser för hur långt reformen av vattenlagstiftningen kan gå.
- hydropower efficiency improvementsdecisive»Vattenkraften kan utvecklas genom effektivisering, inte genom ökad exploatering.« (party programme ↗)“Hydropower can be developed through efficiency improvements, not through increased exploitation.”
- power system and storage investments»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To lower electricity prices we need to build not only nuclear power but also more solar and wind power across the country, invest in the power system and invest in energy storage.”
- environmental requirements during modernization»Denna modernisering ska också innebära krav på att kraftverken lever upp till dagens miljöregler.« (party programme ↗)“This modernization shall also mean requirements that power plants meet today's environmental regulations.”
- protected national rivers»De fyra nationalälvarna ska fredas från utbyggnad, liksom övriga i lag skyddade vattendrag samt bäckar, åar och andra mindre vattendrag.« (party programme ↗)“The four national rivers shall be protected from development, as shall other water courses protected by law and streams, watercourses and other smaller water courses.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto states that hydropower is to be valued, both large-scale and small-scale, and the party programme counts hydropower among the base load that is to be valued while technology for energy storage is to be encouraged.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that hydropower is to be valued, both large-scale and small-scale, and the party programme counts hydropower among the base load that is to be valued while technology for energy storage is to be encouraged. The plan also requires that property rights be protected against restrictions. The counter-proposal's requirements for power increase, storage, and reform of water legislation with proportionate environmental measures thus follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att vattenkraften ska värnas, både den storskaliga och den småskaliga, och partiprogrammet räknar vattenkraften till den baskraft som ska värnas samtidigt som teknik för energilagring ska uppmuntras. Planen kräver också att äganderätten skyddas mot inskränkningar. Motförslagets krav på effekthöjning, lagring och en reform av vattenlagstiftningen med proportionerliga miljöåtgärder följer därmed av planen.
- value hydropowerdecisive»Värna vattenkraften, både den storskaliga och småskaliga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Value hydropower, both large-scale and small-scale.”
- base load is to be valued»baskraften som framförallt utgörs av kärnkraft, vattenkraft och kraftvärme. Denna baskraft« (party programme ↗)“the base load which is primarily made up of nuclear power, hydropower and combined heat and power. This base load”
- energy storage is encouraged»Teknikutvecklingen för lagring av energi ska uppmuntras för att förnybara« (party programme ↗)“Technology development for energy storage shall be encouraged to enable renewables”
- property rights are protected»Rätten till egendom är en mänsklig rättighet och därför ska en regel finnas i grundlagen som« (party programme ↗)“The right to property is a human right and therefore a rule shall be in the constitution which”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal wants to harness hydropower's capacity potential through a national strategy and continue reforming water legislation with less regulatory burden, respect for ownership rights and proportionate environmental measures.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to harness hydropower's capacity potential through a national strategy and continue reforming water legislation with less regulatory burden, respect for ownership rights and proportionate environmental measures. The plan states that all fossil-free energy sources should be included and contribute, that the goal should be fossil-free rather than renewable and that power production that strengthens stability should be procured. The requirement for consideration of ownership rights aligns with the principle that the owner should also be allowed to use their property.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ta till vara vattenkraftens effektpotential genom en nationell strategi och fortsätta reformera vattenlagstiftningen med mindre regelkrångel, respekt för äganderätten och proportionerliga miljöåtgärder. Planen slår fast att alla fossilfria energikällor ska vara med och bidra, att målet ska vara fossilfritt snarare än förnybart och att kraftproduktion som stärker stabiliteten ska upphandlas. Kravet på äganderättslig hänsyn stämmer med principen att den som äger också ska få bruka.
- all fossil-free energy sourcesdecisive»Ska vi klara det behövs en elproduktion där alla fossilfria energikällor är med och bidrar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To manage that, we need electricity production where all fossil-free energy sources are included and contribute.”
- fossil-free energy goal»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free”
- stable dispatchable power»Upphandla kraftproduktion som stärker stabiliteten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procure power production that strengthens stability”
- ownership rights in environmental review»principen att den som äger också ska ha« (party programme ↗)“the principle that the owner should also”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds electricity supply on predictable and fossil-free power and highlights that large-scale development of nuclear power and hydropower has served Sweden well.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds electricity supply on predictable and fossil-free power and highlights that large-scale development of nuclear power and hydropower has served Sweden well. A national strategy to increase power output and storage capacity in existing hydropower, with reduced red tape and proportionate environmental measures, aligns with both the energy goal and the plan's requirement for simpler rules and strengthened property rights.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger elförsörjningen på planerbar och fossilfri kraft och lyfter fram att den storskaliga utbyggnaden av kärnkraft och vattenkraft har tjänat Sverige väl. En nationell strategi för att öka effektuttag och lagringskapacitet i befintlig vattenkraft, med minskat regelkrångel och proportionerliga miljöåtgärder, ligger i linje med både energimålet och planens krav på enklare regelverk och stärkt äganderätt.
- predictable electricity productiondecisive»Sverige behöver satsa på planerbar och fossilfri elproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to invest in predictable and fossil-free electricity production.”
- hydropower as base»Bakgrunden till detta är att vi tidigt satsade på en storskalig utbyggnad av kärnkraften och vattenkraften, vilket tjänar och har tjänat oss väl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The background to this is that we early invested in large-scale development of nuclear power and hydropower, which serves and has served us well.”
- simplification and legal certainty»Förenkla regelverken och förbättra rättssäkerheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify regulations and improve legal certainty”
- strengthened property rights»Stärka äganderätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen property rights”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU13)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1050 — Ett hållbart och tillgängligt transportsystem för framtiden av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1145 — Förbättrad möjlighet till mer biogasproduktion i Sverige av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1179 — Förnybar energiomställning av Martina Johansson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:1314 — Biogasens potential för cirkulär ekonomi och grön omställning av Per-Arne Håkansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1437 — En robust, kostnadseffektiv och rättvis energiförsörjning av Markus Selin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1442 — För en stark industri och trygg elförsörjning - elektrifiering och fossilfri energi för klimatmålen av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1447 — Bättre förutsättningar för en modern industri av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1481 — Långsiktigt hållbar energiförsörjning i hela landet av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1514 — Byggnation av Barsebäck 3 och 4 av Peter Ollén (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1845 — Ökad användning av elnätsstolpar av trä av Robert Olesen (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1867 — Reformer för rättvisa elpriser och stabil elförsörjning i Skåne av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1875 — Ersättning till fastighetsägare vid vindkraftsetableringar av Tomas Kronståhl (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1878 — Satsningar på svensk fusionskraft av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2093 — En tydligare handlingsplan för vätgas av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2248 — Vedeldning av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2302 — En balanserad och hållbar korttidsreglering av vattenkraft med Dalälven som exempel av Lars Isacsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2368 — Säkerhetspolitik för en fredligare värld av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2669 — Robust elsystem för Sveriges välstånd av Lars Engsund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2681 — Möjlighet till snabbare och effektivare elektrifiering - statlig kontroll, elnätsutbyggnad och vätgasinfrastruktur av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2789 — Klimatet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament