2023-03-152022/23:JuU11 · p.18JuUJustice
Incitement against ethnic groups
Extending incitement against a population group to cover disability
What's at stake: Incitement against a population group currently protects groups on grounds such as race, colour, origin, religion and sexual orientation, but not disability, which according to the motions means threats and hatred against people with disabilities are not captured by statistics or law in the same way as against other groups.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for the incitement against a population group offence to be extended to also cover people with disabilities, while the committee maintained its previous assessment that no such extension is needed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee reaches no different assessment than previously on extending the incitement against a population group offence and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 14 (V)
The reserving party (V) wants disability added as a protected ground in the incitement against a population group offence, pointing out that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has applied in Sweden since 2009 while Swedish law still lacks protection against hate crimes targeting people with disabilities, which also means statistics and research on the issue are lacking.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 14 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 271–20Ja 238–53
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 13/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/11 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:124 by Ola Möller (S) and 2022/23:1232 by Maj Karlsson et al. (V) demand 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:124 av Ola Möller (S) och 2022/23:1232 av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 140 proposals in motions on criminal law issues submitted during the general motion period in 2022. Some of the motions address trespass crimes, controlling behavior or psychological abuse of children. Other motions address, for example, pimping, sexual crimes on the internet, incitement against ethnic groups, child pornography offenses, animal cruelty, harboring of offenders, multiple offenses, aggravating circumstances, recidivism, unauthorized settlement, flag desecration and breach of confidentiality.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants disability to be added to the statutory provision on incitement to hatred against a group. (V) — Reservation 14
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that discrimination on the basis of disability can never be tolerated and that the too weak anti-discrimination legislation shall be strengthened, and that attacks on the right to live as others shall be fought.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that discrimination on the basis of disability can never be tolerated and that the too weak anti-discrimination legislation shall be strengthened, and that attacks on the right to live as others shall be fought. Adding disability as a protected ground for incitement against a group is such a strengthening. The criminal provision is not mentioned in the plan, but the principle addresses the issue.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att diskriminering på grund av funktionsnedsättning aldrig kan tolereras och att den alltför svaga diskrimineringslagstiftningen ska stärkas, och att attackerna mot rätten att leva som andra ska bekämpas. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund vid hets mot folkgrupp är en sådan förstärkning. Straffbestämmelsen nämns inte i planen, men principen träffar frågan.
- strengthened anti-discrimination legislationdecisive»delar av samhället göras tillgängligt och den alltför svaga diskrimineringslagstiftningen stärkas« (party programme ↗)“parts of society are made accessible and the too weak anti-discrimination legislation is strengthened”
- disability as protected ground»kön, funktionsnedsättning, sexuell läggning eller könsidentitet, ålder,« (party programme ↗)“gender, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity, age,”
- fight attacks on disability rights»attackerna mot rätten att leva som andra bekämpas« (party programme ↗)“attacks on the right to live as others are fought”
- exposure to hate and violence»Våld och övergrepp mot kvinnor med normbrytande funktionalitet måste särskilt« (party programme ↗)“Violence and abuse against women with non-normative functionality must specially”
The plan counts ability status as one of the power structures that create systematic subordination and wants a society without hierarchy where people with disabilities can live like others.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan counts ability status as one of the power structures that create systematic subordination and wants a society without hierarchy where people with disabilities can live like others. The party programme makes it society's duty to prevent hate speech against groups and violations of individuals. Adding disability as a protected ground follows from these commitments, even though the plan does not mention the scope of the criminal provision.
Original (Swedish)
Planen räknar funktionsförmåga som en av de maktstrukturer som skapar systematisk underordning och vill ett samhälle utan över- och underordning där personer med funktionsnedsättning kan leva som andra. Partiprogrammet gör det till samhällets skyldighet att förhindra hets mot folkgrupp och kränkningar av enskilda. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund följer av dessa åtaganden, även om planen inte nämner straffbestämmelsens omfattning.
- ability status as a power structuredecisive»bestämd av klass, kön eller etnicitet, av funktionsförmåga eller ålder, av sexuell läggning« (party programme ↗)“determined by class, gender or ethnicity, by ability status or age, by sexual orientation”
- protection against hate speech and violations»att förhindra att nätet används för förtal, hets mot folkgrupp, kränkningar av enskilda« (party programme ↗)“to prevent the network being used for defamation, hate speech against groups, violations of individuals”
- live like others»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“People with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others.”
- society without subordination»Socialdemokratin vill se ett samhälle utan över- och underordning« (party programme ↗)“The Social Democrats want to see a society without hierarchy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that no one should be subjected to hate crimes or hate propaganda and that all forms of discrimination should be countered, explicitly also on the basis of functional impairment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that no one should be subjected to hate crimes or hate propaganda and that all forms of discrimination should be countered, explicitly also on the basis of functional impairment. It goes further and wants to make lack of accessibility a new ground for discrimination and to strengthen anti-discrimination legislation. Adding functional impairment as a protected ground in incitement against a population group follows from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att ingen ska utsättas för hatbrott eller hatpropaganda och att alla former av diskriminering ska motverkas, uttryckligen även på grund av funktionsnedsättning. Den går längre och vill göra bristande tillgänglighet till en ny diskrimineringsgrund samt stärka diskrimineringslagstiftningen. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund i hets mot folkgrupp följer av detta.
- no hate against any groupdecisive»utsättas för hatbrott eller hatpropaganda« (party programme ↗)“be subjected to hate crimes or hate propaganda”
- lack of accessibility as a ground for discrimination»diskriminering och måste därför bli en ny« (party programme ↗)“discrimination and must therefore become a new”
- stronger anti-discrimination legislation»stärka lagstiftningen mot diskriminering och se över rätten till rättshjälp i diskrimineringsfall« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legislation against discrimination and review the right to legal aid in discrimination cases”
- all discrimination countered»Alla former av diskriminering ska motverkas« (party programme ↗)“All forms of discrimination should be countered”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly requires that gender and disability be added as hate crime grounds, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to do in the provisions on incitement against a group of people.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires that gender and disability be added as hate crime grounds, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to do in the provisions on incitement against a group of people. The plan also wants to strengthen the non-discrimination clause and authorities' work against discrimination. That no one should be disadvantaged due to disability is an explicit goal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att kön och funktionsnedsättning läggs till som hatbrottsgrunder, vilket är precis vad motförslaget vill göra i bestämmelsen om hets mot folkgrupp. Planen vill dessutom stärka diskrimineringsförbudet och myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering. Att ingen ska missgynnas på grund av funktionsnedsättning är ett uttalat mål.
- disability as hate crime grounddecisive»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen the authorities' work against discrimination and increase compensation for those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
- no one disadvantaged»Vi måste fortsätta arbetet för ett Sverige där ingen missgynnas på grund av kön, härkomst eller funktionsnedsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must continue the work for a Sweden where no one is disadvantaged because of gender, origin or disability.”
- strengthened non-discrimination clause»Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning, och grundlagsskydda rätten till abort och reproduktiv hälsa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen, among other things, property rights, the non-discrimination clause, minority protection and minority language status, and constitutionally protect the right to abortion and reproductive health.”
- counter discrimination»Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“We fight all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate against people.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to modernize the discrimination law and prioritize police work against hate crimes, and establishes that the state shall vigorously combat all forms of discrimination and intolerance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to modernize the discrimination law and prioritize police work against hate crimes, and establishes that the state shall vigorously combat all forms of discrimination and intolerance. No one should be held back by prejudice, and those affected shall receive redress. Adding disability as a protected ground in the provision on incitement against a population group follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill modernisera diskrimineringslagen och prioritera polisens hatbrottsverksamhet, och slår fast att staten med kraft ska bekämpa all slags diskriminering och intolerans. Ingen ska hållas tillbaka av fördomar, och den som drabbas ska få upprättelse. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund i bestämmelsen om hets mot folkgrupp följer av dessa åtaganden.
- modernize discrimination protectiondecisive»Vi vill modernisera diskrimineringslagen, prioritera polisens hatbrottsverksamhet och säkerställa att alla skolor står upp för alla människors lika värde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernize the discrimination law, prioritize police work against hate crimes, and ensure that all schools stand up for equal worth of all people.”
- combat all discrimination»Därför ska staten med kraft bekämpa all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the state shall vigorously combat all forms of racism, discrimination and intolerance.”
- equal opportunities»Alla ska ha samma möjlighet att nå sin fulla potential utan att hållas tillbaka av fördomar och diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have the same opportunity to reach their full potential without being held back by prejudice and discrimination.”
- redress for discrimination»Den som drabbas av diskriminering ska kunna få hjälp att få upprättelse och det ska kosta att diskriminera.« (party programme ↗)“Those affected by discrimination shall be able to get help obtaining redress and it shall cost to discriminate.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that negative discrimination against people with disabilities is discrimination that can never be tolerated and that there therefore needs to be legislation against discrimination, and that the legislative instrument is justified to improve their situation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that negative discrimination against people with disabilities is discrimination that can never be tolerated and that there therefore needs to be legislation against discrimination, and that the legislative instrument is justified to improve their situation. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is an important guiding star. Adding disability as a protected ground therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att negativ särbehandling av personer med funktionsnedsättning är diskriminering som aldrig kan tolereras och att det därför behöver finnas lagstiftning mot diskriminering, samt att lagstiftningsinstrumentet är befogat för att underlätta deras situation. FN:s funktionsrättskonvention är en viktig ledstjärna. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund följer därför av planen.
- legislation against discriminationdecisive»Därför behöver det finnas en lagstiftning mot diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, there needs to be legislation against discrimination.”
- anti-discrimination clause in the Constitution»Grundlagen ska även säkerställa att ingen diskrimineras på grund av kön, ålder, funktionsvariationer, etniskt ursprung, religion, sexuell identitet,« (party programme ↗)“The Constitution shall also ensure that no one is discriminated against on the grounds of sex, age, functional variations, ethnic origin, religion, sexual identity”
- legislation as a tool»Det är befogat att använda lagstiftningsinstrumentet för att underlätta situationen för personer med funktionsnedsättning.« (party programme ↗)“It is justified to use the legislative instrument to improve the situation of people with disabilities.”
- UN Convention on Disability Rights»En viktig ledstjärna i detta avseende är FN:s konvention om rättigheter för människor med funktionsnedsättning.« (party programme ↗)“An important guiding star in this regard is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that crime targeting vulnerable people is particularly reprehensible and is prepared to introduce new criminal offenses to protect vulnerable groups, such as the crime of assaulting the elderly.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that crime targeting vulnerable people is particularly reprehensible and is prepared to introduce new criminal offenses to protect vulnerable groups, such as the crime of assaulting the elderly. According to the plan, tolerance does not encompass incitement to hate or violence crimes. Adding disability as a protected ground follows from this, even though the plan simultaneously safeguards freedom of expression also for opinions that provoke.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att kriminalitet som riktar sig mot sårbara människor är extra klandervärd och är beredd att införa nya brottsrubriceringar för att skydda utsatta grupper, som äldrefridsbrottet. Toleransen omfattar enligt planen inte uppmaningar till hat- eller våldsbrott. Att lägga till funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund följer av detta, även om planen samtidigt värnar yttrandefriheten också för åsikter som provocerar.
- protection for vulnerabledecisive»Kriminalitet som riktar sig mot sårbara människor är extra klandervärd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crime targeting vulnerable people is particularly reprehensible.”
- new criminal offenses»Införa äldrefridsbrott som en ny brottsrubricering i syfte att skärpa straffen för dessa brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce the crime of assaulting the elderly as a new criminal offense in order to increase penalties for these crimes”
- limits of tolerance»Den tolererar inte uppmaningar till hat- eller våldsbrott.« (party programme ↗)“It does not tolerate incitement to hate or violence crimes.”
- safeguard freedom of expression»Yttrandefriheten gäller även för åsikter som provocerar och« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of expression applies also to opinions that provoke and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wishes to strengthen the Instrument of Government's protection of freedom of expression and value citizens' right to express themselves freely, and contains no commitment to broaden the criminal provision on incitement against a group of people.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to strengthen the Instrument of Government's protection of freedom of expression and value citizens' right to express themselves freely, and contains no commitment to broaden the criminal provision on incitement against a group of people. The plan's way to protect vulnerable groups is instead strengthened efforts by the judicial system against violence and threats and full participation for people with disabilities. The plan says nothing about the committee's reasons, which only uphold an earlier assessment.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förstärka grundlagens skydd för yttrandefriheten och värna medborgarnas rätt att uttrycka sig fritt, och innehåller inget åtagande om att vidga straffbestämmelsen om hets mot folkgrupp. Planens väg att skydda utsatta grupper är i stället stärkta insatser från rättsväsendet mot våld och hot samt full delaktighet för funktionsnedsatta. Planen säger inget om utskottets skäl, som enbart vidhåller en tidigare bedömning.
- strengthened protection of freedom of expressiondecisive»Förstärka grundlagens rättighetsskydd vad gäller yttrandefrihet, äganderätt och frihet från religion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Instrument of Government's rights protection regarding freedom of expression, property rights and freedom from religion”
- free freedom of expression»Varje journalists, konstutövares och medborgares rätt att uttrycka sig fritt utan att utsättas för hot eller repressalier ska värnas och stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every journalist's, artist's and citizen's right to express themselves freely without being subject to threats or reprisals shall be valued and strengthened.”
- protection via the judicial system»Stärka rättsväsendets insatser mot våld, hot och hedersförtryck som begränsar livet för HBT+ -personer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the judicial system's efforts against violence, threats and honour-based oppression that limit life for LGBTQ+ persons”
- participation for people with disabilities»Medborgare som på grund av omständigheter bortom egen kontroll möter andra utmaningar i vardagen ska inte begränsas i sin tillgång till samhälls- eller arbetslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Citizens who due to circumstances beyond their control face other challenges in everyday life shall not be limited in their access to social or working life.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:JuU11)
- Committee report full text (HA01JuU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1001 — Grundlag av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1003 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1004 — Sverigedemokratisk insolvensrätt av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1013 — Post och it i hela landet av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1079 — Om straffrabatt och villkorlig frigivning för de som återgår till brott av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1086 — Översyn av förtalslagstiftningen av Ida Drougge (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1105 — All blåljuspersonal ska ha tjänstemannastatus av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1106 — Skärpt sexualbrottslag av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1111 — Eftersupning av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1117 — Förstärkning av barns rättsskydd mot olika former av sexuellt utnyttjande av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1171 — Progressiva böter vid fortkörning av Monica Haider (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1203 — Mängdrabatt av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1232 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:124 — En översyn av lagen om hets mot folkgrupp av Ola Möller (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1315 — Kriminalisering av kontrollerande beteenden och psykisk misshandel av Aylin Fazelian (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1441 — Fastställande av dagsböter av Serkan Köse m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:149 — Kriminalisering av sexköp utomlands av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1681 — Sexsomni av Helena Vilhelmsson och Anne-Li Sjölund (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1708 — Sexualbrott av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament