2026-03-182025/26:NU16 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
Critical metals and minerals
Supply security for critical metals and minerals
What's at stake: The decision affects how robust the supply becomes of metals and minerals needed for the climate transition and modern environmental technology, at a time when Sweden and the EU are largely dependent on imports from a small number of countries. It also affects opportunities for Swedish extraction, exports and new jobs in the mining industry.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should declare that the government should actively secure the supply of innovation-critical metals and minerals beyond recycling, or whether ongoing mapping, EU cooperation and recycling efforts are already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that several efforts are already under way in Sweden and within the EU to map and make use of critical metals and minerals, including the Geological Survey's mandate to map areas with ore potential, five Swedish projects granted strategic status under the EU regulation on critical raw materials, and the Environmental Protection Agency's work on a national circularity programme. The committee judges that the matter will also be addressed in the government's announced minerals strategy, and therefore sees no reason for parliament to take further action, and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (V, C)
V and C hold that Sweden's and the EU's heavy dependence on imports of innovation-critical metals and minerals from a small number of countries makes supply vulnerable and a security-policy risk, even though Sweden has good conditions for sustainable domestic extraction with significant export potential. The parties argue that large-scale recycling is important but not sufficient to meet future needs, and want parliament to declare that the supply of the innovation-critical metals and minerals needed in modern environmental technology should be secured.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V, C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 243–36Ja 182–97
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/15/0/7 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 10/0/0/6 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:2831 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demand 31, 2025/26:2961 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:2976 by Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3411 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) demand 30, 2025/26:3418 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demands 7 and 8 and 2025/26:3548 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) demand 24.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2831 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 31, 2025/26:2961 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:2976 av Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3411 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 30, 2025/26:3418 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 7 och 8 samt 2025/26:3548 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 24.
Riksdag decision: Parliament voted no on 45 proposals in motions from the regular motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, general questions about mining and minerals, critical metals and minerals, permitting processes and uranium extraction. Parliament refers, among other things, to ongoing and completed initiatives and to the government's work in developing a mineral strategy.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants mining concessions to be granted only when profitability is calculated including full environmental costs. (V, C) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not specifically address innovation-critical metals, but it wants Sweden to secure the technological shifts that industry needs and sees good conditions for domestic production.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not specifically address innovation-critical metals, but it wants Sweden to secure the technological shifts that industry needs and sees good conditions for domestic production. At the same time, the plan conditions mining: it shall happen with greater common ownership and a holistic perspective that factors in local natural values. A guaranteed supply of metals for environmental technology thus aligns with the plan, but only under those conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte innovationskritiska metaller särskilt, men den vill att Sverige tryggar de teknikskiften som industrin behöver och ser goda förutsättningar för inhemsk produktion. Samtidigt villkorar planen gruvbrytningen: den ska ske med ett större gemensamt ägande och ett helhetsperspektiv som väger in lokala naturvärden. En tryggad försörjning av metaller för miljöteknik ligger därmed i linje med planen, men bara på de villkoren.
- strategic technological shifts in industrydecisive»Vi vill att Sverige beslutsamt genomför de strategiska teknikskiften« (party programme ↗)“We want Sweden to decisively implement the strategic technological shifts”
- common ownership of mining»Vi vill gå mot ett större gemensamt ägande av gruvbrytningen i« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater common ownership of mining in”
- holistic view of mining»Den behöver drivas med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som ser till såväl de globala behoven som lokala naturvärden och« (party programme ↗)“It needs to be run with a long-term holistic perspective that considers both global needs and local natural values and”
- increased recycling of material»Återanvändning och återvinning av material behöver öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reuse and recycling of material needs to increase.”
The plan builds the green transition on a strong Swedish industry and innovation capacity, which requires that the supply of innovation-critical metals be actively secured rather than relying on import from a few countries.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds the green transition on a strong Swedish industry and innovation capacity, which requires that the supply of innovation-critical metals be actively secured rather than relying on import from a few countries. The plan also sees preparedness risks in strong dependencies on other countries' supplies and wants to strengthen the domestic supply capacity. Recycling is covered by the commitment to a circular economy but is not pointed out in the plan as sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger den gröna omställningen på en stark svensk industri och innovationskraft, vilket förutsätter att försörjningen av innovationskritiska metaller tryggas aktivt i stället för att vila på import från ett fåtal länder. Planen ser också beredskapsrisker i starka beroenden av andra länders leveranser och vill stärka den inhemska försörjningsförmågan. Återvinning täcks av åtagandet om cirkulär ekonomi men pekas i planen inte ut som tillräcklig.
- industrial climate leadershipdecisive»Svenskt ledarskap i klimatomställningen genom stark industri och innovationskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish leadership in climate transition through strong industry and innovation capacity.”
- circular resource use»Omställning till cirkulär ekonomi, för bättre användning av befintliga resurser.« (party programme ↗)“Transition to circular economy, for better use of existing resources.”
- new green industry in Sweden»Nu tillverkar vi fossilfritt stål i Sverige, vi bygger elbilar och vi ser hur nedlagda industrier blir till batterifabriker.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Now we manufacture fossil-free steel in Sweden, we build electric cars and we see how closed industries become battery factories.”
- strengthened self-sufficiency capacity»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly ranks: resource efficiency first, reuse and recycling second, existing mines third and new mines only after that.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly ranks: resource efficiency first, reuse and recycling second, existing mines third and new mines only after that. The counter-proposal reverses that order by dismissing recycling as insufficient and making actively guaranteed extraction the main track. The plan also states that the transition must not become an excuse to loosen environmental legislation. Therefore the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen rangordnar uttryckligen: resurseffektivitet först, återanvändning och återvinning i andra hand, befintliga gruvor i tredje hand och nya gruvor först därefter. Motförslaget vänder på den ordningen genom att avfärda återvinning som otillräcklig och göra aktivt tryggad utvinning till huvudspår. Planen slår också fast att omställningen inte får bli en ursäkt för att luckra upp miljölagstiftningen. Därför talar planen emot motförslagets krav.
- resource efficiency firstdecisive»Miljöpartiet vill i första hand att mineraler och metaller« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants first and foremost that minerals and metals”
- recycling before extraction»I andra hand ska resurser återanvändas och återvinnas« (party programme ↗)“Secondly, resources should be reused and recycled”
- new mines last»tredje hand ska redan existerande gruvor användas och först därefter bör nya gruvor« (party programme ↗)“third, existing mines should be used and only then should new mines”
- transition does not excuse environmental damage»Den gröna omställningen ska inte användas som ursäkt« (party programme ↗)“The green transition should not be used as an excuse”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly states that Sweden should extract more minerals and metals rather than import them from countries with larger carbon footprints and poorer working conditions, and identifies extraction of the minerals required for the green transition as a source of new jobs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that Sweden should extract more minerals and metals rather than import them from countries with larger carbon footprints and poorer working conditions, and identifies extraction of the minerals required for the green transition as a source of new jobs. It also wants to halve approval times for green investments. The counter-proposal's demand to actively secure supply of innovation-critical metals follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att Sverige bör utvinna mer mineral och metaller i stället för att importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck och sämre arbetsvillkor, och pekar ut utvinningen av de mineral som den gröna omställningen kräver som en källa till nya jobb. Den vill också halvera tillståndstiderna för gröna investeringar. Motförslagets krav på att aktivt trygga försörjningen av innovationskritiska metaller följer direkt av detta.
- own extraction rather than importdecisive»För att klara den gröna omställningen måste vi ta vara på Sveriges naturresurser. Det är bättre att Sverige tar ansvar och utvinner mer mineral och metaller istället för att fortsätta importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck och sämre arbetsvillkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To achieve the green transition, we must use Sweden's natural resources. It is better for Sweden to take responsibility and extract more minerals and metals instead of continuing to import them from countries with larger carbon footprints and poorer working conditions.”
- minerals for green transition»Med rätt reformer kommer nya jobb att skapas på landsbygden inom allt från produktion av biobränslen till utvinning av de mineral och metaller som krävs för den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With the right reforms, new jobs will be created in the countryside ranging from biofuel production to extraction of the minerals and metals required for the green transition.”
- recycling as complement»Sverige ska bli världens mest resurseffektiva land och ekonomin mer cirkulär. Med rätt stöd och regelförenklingar kan vi återvinna och återbruka allt från kläder till mineral och metaller.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should become the world's most resource-efficient country and the economy more circular. With the right support and deregulation, we can recycle and reuse everything from clothes to minerals and metals.”
- faster approval processes»Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och reformera miljöbalken så att ett projekts klimatnytta ges större vikt i miljöprövningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is time to halve the time it takes to get approval for green investments and reform the Environmental Code so that a project's climate benefit is given more weight in environmental assessment.”
The plan requires that trade and promotion policy be conducted without naivety towards Chinese and Russian power politics and sees undemocratic states' control over strategic assets as a security issue.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that trade and promotion policy be conducted without naivety towards Chinese and Russian power politics and sees undemocratic states' control over strategic assets as a security issue. Actively securing the supply of innovation-critical metals reduces precisely such dependence. The plan moreover emphasizes that minerals should circulate in the production system, which the counter-proposal also acknowledges as insufficient in itself.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att handels- och främjandepolitiken bedrivs utan naivitet inför kinesisk och rysk maktpolitik och ser odemokratiska staters kontroll över strategiska tillgångar som en säkerhetsfråga. Att aktivt trygga försörjningen av innovationskritiska metaller minskar just ett sådant beroende. Planen betonar dessutom att mineraler ska cirkulera i produktionssystemet, vilket motförslaget också erkänner som otillräckligt i sig.
- reduced naivety towards dictatorshipsdecisive»Handels- och främjandepolitiken ska stärka Sverige som aktör för en friare värld och dra nytta av frihandelns fördelar utan den naivitet som alltför länge uppvisats för kinesisk och rysk maktpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Trade and promotion policy shall strengthen Sweden as an actor for a freer world and benefit from the advantages of free trade without the naivety that has been shown too long towards Chinese and Russian power politics.”
- strategic dependencies as a security issue»Den utveckling där odemokratiska eller rentav totalitära stater förvärvar strategiska« (party programme ↗)“The development where undemocratic or indeed totalitarian states acquire strategic”
- circular raw material use»grundläggande råvaror, såsom växtnäring och mineraler, ska cirkulera i produktionssystemet« (party programme ↗)“basic raw materials, such as fertilizers and minerals, should circulate in the production system”
- technology for climate transition»Medan andra gröna partier grundades för att stoppa tillväxten vet vi att ny teknik och nya lösningar är en del av lösningen på klimatutmaningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“While other green parties were founded to stop growth, we know that new technology and new solutions are part of the solution to the climate challenge.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes economic defence an important part of total defence and requires that Sweden can in principle provide for its own supply and maintain good preparedness for a blockade of foreign trade.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes economic defence an important part of total defence and requires that Sweden can in principle provide for its own supply and maintain good preparedness for a blockade of foreign trade. A large import dependence on innovation-critical metals from a few countries is exactly such a vulnerability, and the stewardship principle means responsible use of resources, not passive preservation. Actively securing the supply of critical metals and minerals thus lies in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör det ekonomiska försvaret till en viktig del av totalförsvaret och kräver att Sverige i princip kan svara för sin försörjning och hålla god beredskap inför avspärrning av utrikeshandeln. Ett stort importberoende av innovationskritiska metaller från ett fåtal länder är just en sådan sårbarhet, och förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär ett ansvarsfullt brukande av tillgångar, inte passivt bevarande. Att aktivt trygga försörjningen av kritiska metaller och mineral ligger därför i linje med planen.
- economic defencedecisive»Det ekonomiska försvaret är en viktig del av totalförsvaret.« (party programme ↗)“Economic defence is an important part of total defence.”
- national supply capacity»kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedels och energiförsörjning samt hålla en god beredskap« (party programme ↗)“be able to provide for the population's food and energy supply and maintain good preparedness”
- preparedness for blockade»inför avspärrning av utrikeshandeln.« (party programme ↗)“against a blockade of foreign trade.”
- active stewardship of resources»Förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär inget passivt bevarande, utan ett ansvarsfullt brukande och« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle means no passive preservation, but a responsible use and”
Worldstate weighed in: US and Israeli attacks on Iran in February 2026 — increases the risk of disrupted supply chains and makes the plan's demands on supply preparedness more acute; Foreign Ministry's advice against travel to several Gulf states — illustrates how quickly supply chains from a few countries can be broken
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan links the new security situation to the requirement to reduce vulnerability and increase self-sufficiency, and establishes that our rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan links the new security situation to the requirement to reduce vulnerability and increase self-sufficiency, and establishes that our rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly. The counter-proposal's demand to actively secure the supply of innovation-critical metals and minerals is thus in line with the plan. The plan also shortens processing times that would otherwise slow down extraction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kopplar det nya säkerhetsläget till kravet att minska sårbarheten och öka självförsörjningsgraden, och slår fast att våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt. Motförslagets krav på att aktivt trygga försörjningen av innovationskritiska metaller och mineral ligger därmed i linje med planen. Planen kortar också handläggningstider som annars bromsar utvinningen.
- reduced vulnerability and increased self-sufficiencydecisive»Det nya säkerhetsläget i Europa gör att vi som land måste minska vår sårbarhet och öka vår självförsörjningsgrad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The new security situation in Europe means we as a country must reduce our vulnerability and increase our self-sufficiency.”
- domestic mineral extraction»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and sustainably long-term.”
- sustainably extracted long-term»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska även fortsättningsvis kunna utvinnas på ett« (party programme ↗)“Our rich mineral resources should continue to be able to be extracted”
- faster permit processes»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten the processing times of authorities through an outer time limit”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal seeks to secure the supply of innovation-critical metals and minerals and reduce import dependency through own sustainable extraction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal seeks to secure the supply of innovation-critical metals and minerals and reduce import dependency through own sustainable extraction. The election manifesto explicitly states that it shall become easier and faster to open mines for the minerals needed, that licensing processes for mining shall be streamlined and that Sweden's self-sufficiency degree of critical goods shall increase. It bears the requirement directly.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill trygga försörjningen av innovationskritiska metaller och mineral och minska importberoendet genom egen hållbar utvinning. Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att det ska bli enklare och snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs, att tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring ska effektiviseras och att självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska varor ska öka. Det bär kravet direkt.
- facilitate mineral extractiondecisive»Det behöver också bli enklare och gå snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs för exempelvis tillverkning av batterier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It also needs to become easier and go faster to open mines for the minerals needed, for example for the manufacture of batteries.”
- faster licensing processes»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in licensing processes for mining, grid expansion and industry”
- increased self-sufficiency»Öka den svenska självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska produkter och varor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Sweden's self-sufficiency degree of critical products and goods”
- Swedish industry competitiveness»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritise Swedish industry and competitiveness”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU16)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1127 — Ranstad av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1247 — Stopp för brytning i alunskiffer av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Lena Bäckelin (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1669 — Uranbrytning i Sverige av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1882 — Förbud mot brytning av alunskiffer i Sverige av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2047 — Stärkt äganderätt i minerallagen av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2602 — Förenklande för privatpersoner att vaska guld och leta mineral av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2817 — En aktiv industri- och landsbygdspolitik av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2831 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt i hela landet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2961 — Svensk gruvnäring som strategisk del av EU:s råvaruförsörjning av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2963 — Kortare och mer effektiva tillståndsprocesser för gruvnäringen av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2964 — Innovation och hållbar teknik i svensk gruvnäring av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2976 — Klassificering av guld som strategiskt material i Sverige av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3058 — Översyn av möjligheterna att ta vara på Siljansgasen av Malin Höglund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3363 — Förbud mot utvinning ur Närkes alunskiffer av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3411 — Kina - mänskliga rättigheter, miljö och geopolitik av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3418 — En mer hållbar metall- och mineralförsörjning av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3449 — Stärkt kraft till markägare och lokalsamhällen vid mineralutvinning av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3548 — Cirkulär ekonomi av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3582 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3732 — Utgiftsområde 20 Klimat, miljö och natur av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament