2025-04-092024/25:FiU22 · p.8FiUEconomy & finance

SBAB

SBAB's mandate to strengthen competition in the mortgage market

What's at stake: The issue concerns what role a state-owned bank should play in driving down prices and increasing choice in the mortgage and banking market. It affects households' costs for mortgages and other banking services, as well as how actively the state should direct a company it owns.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The motions wanted to give the state-owned mortgage lender SBAB a clearer mandate to push down competition barriers in the mortgage market, including by reviewing the company's return requirements and allowing it to offer salary accounts, while the committee held that current ownership governance is already sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions and holds that SBAB already plays an important role in strengthening competition and contributing to a sound and transparent market, and that it is part of the state's role as an active and professional owner to continually assess the grounds for continued ownership and the company's direction without the parliament needing to micromanage its mandate.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 13 (S, V)

The reserving parties (S, V) want the state to use SBAB more actively to increase competition in the mortgage market, including by changing the company's mandate toward greater diversity and price pressure, reviewing its return requirements, and allowing it to offer salary accounts to strengthen competition in the banking market as well.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 13 by S, V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/14follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CYesYes 19/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDNoYes 62/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:2380 by Jesper Skalberg Karlsson and Louise Meijer (both M) request 3, 2024/25:2645 by Janine Alm Ericson and Katarina Luhr (both MP), 2024/25:2646 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) request 8, and 2024/25:3196 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) request 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:2380 av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson och Louise Meijer (båda M) yrkande 3, 2024/25:2645 av Janine Alm Ericson och Katarina Luhr (båda MP), 2024/25:2646 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 8 och 2024/25:3196 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 3.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has addressed a communication from the government concerning activities in the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank Group, and regional development and investment banks in 2023 and 2024. The communication addresses in particular the institutions' work on matters concerning financial and monetary stability and measures that were of particular importance during 2023 and 2024. The Riksdag shares the government's view on what is prioritized in the institutions' work. It is important that the institutions have adequate resources and good reserves to be able to contribute to financial stability and economic development in member countries even in economically and financially turbulent times. The Riksdag placed the communication with the records, which is to say concluded the matter. The Riksdag also rejected approximately 100 proposals in motions concerning financial market issues from the general motion period 2024. The motions address in particular macroprudential oversight, credit information and debt collection activities, money laundering and banking and payment fraud, and cash handling and payment services.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan states that stronger state ownership in the financial sector shall be used to strengthen competition and keep pricing at a reasonable level, and that commonly owned enterprises can put pressure on markets with excess profits.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that stronger state ownership in the financial sector shall be used to strengthen competition and keep pricing at a reasonable level, and that commonly owned enterprises can put pressure on markets with excess profits. A more active mandate for the state mortgage lender, tested return requirements and wage accounts are precisely that use of state ownership. The plan aims in the long term to democratise the entire banking sector.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger att ett starkare statligt ägande i finanssektorn ska användas för att skärpa konkurrensen och hålla prissättningen på en rimlig nivå, och att gemensamt ägda företag kan sätta tryck på marknader med övervinster. Ett aktivare uppdrag för den statliga bolånegivaren, prövat avkastningskrav och lönekonton är just den användningen av statligt ägande. Planen vill på sikt demokratisera hela bankväsendet.

  • state ownership strengthens competitiondecisive»Med ett starkare ägande i finanssektorn kan staten säkra samhällsviktiga investeringar, skärpa konkurrensen och förbättra villkoren för mindre företag.« (party programme ↗)“With stronger ownership in the financial sector, the state can secure socially important investments, strengthen competition and improve conditions for smaller businesses.”
  • public ownership presses prices»På marknader som präglas av övervinster eller dåliga avtalsvillkor kan gemensamt ägda företag sätta tryck genom att erbjuda bättre villkor.« (party programme ↗)“In markets characterised by excess profits or poor contract terms, commonly owned enterprises can put pressure by offering better terms.”
  • democratised banking sector»På sikt bör bankväsendet i sin helhet demokratiseras.« (party programme ↗)“In the long term, the banking sector in its entirety should be democratised.”
  • reasonable loan terms»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och förhandlingsstyrka.« (party programme ↗)“Debt weakens many people's independence and bargaining power.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The documents say nothing about the state mortgage provider, but the party programme states that regulations and institutions independent of the market are needed to maintain competition and break private monopolies, and that different forms of ownership have a place in the economy.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The documents say nothing about the state mortgage provider, but the party programme states that regulations and institutions independent of the market are needed to maintain competition and break private monopolies, and that different forms of ownership have a place in the economy. The election manifesto's line is that society shall move forward positions and regain control over development. Using state ownership actively for price pressure on the mortgage market thus comes closest to the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten säger inget om den statliga bolånegivaren, men partiprogrammet slår fast att regelverk och institutioner oberoende av marknaden behövs för att upprätthålla konkurrensen och bryta privata monopol, och att olika ägandeformer har en plats i ekonomin. Valmanifestets linje är att samhället ska flytta fram positionerna och ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen. Att använda statligt ägande aktivt för prispress på bolånemarknaden ligger därmed närmast planen.

  • break private monopoliesdecisive»kan upprätthålla konkurrensen och bryta utvecklingen mot privata monopol.« (party programme ↗)“can maintain competition and break the trend towards private monopolies.”
  • society takes control»Samhället ska flytta fram positionerna för att ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall move forward positions to regain control over development.”
  • common ownership presses prices»Starka allmännyttiga och kooperativa företag är nödvändiga för att« (party programme ↗)“Strong public-interest and cooperative enterprises are necessary to”
  • different forms of ownership»innefattar olika former av ägande« (party programme ↗)“includes different forms of ownership”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that the state in certain cases has reason to own and operate business enterprises, that such ownership shall be active and that monopoly and cartel formation shall be prevented to create functioning markets.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the state in certain cases has reason to own and operate business enterprises, that such ownership shall be active and that monopoly and cartel formation shall be prevented to create functioning markets. Using the state mortgage lender more actively to press prices and increase competition is in line with this. The mortgage market is not addressed in the plan, so low certainty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger att staten i vissa fall har skäl att äga och driva affärsverksamhet, att ägandet då ska vara aktivt och att monopol- och kartellbildningar ska motverkas för att skapa fungerande marknader. Att använda den statliga bolånegivaren mer aktivt för att pressa priser och öka konkurrensen ligger i linje med detta. Bolånemarknaden behandlas inte i planen, därför låg säkerhet.

  • prevent monopolydecisive»Monopol- och kartellbildningar ska motverkas för att skapa fungerande« (party programme ↗)“Monopoly and cartel formation shall be prevented to create functioning”
  • active state ownership»delägare ska ägarskapet vara aktivt och inflytandet« (party programme ↗)“part-owner shall ownership be active and influence”
  • state ownership can be justified»I vissa fall kan det dock finnas skäl för staten« (party programme ↗)“In certain cases, however, there may be reasons for the state”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's principle is that public activity must not compete with purely private business and that the market economy must be free from planned economy suggestions.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's principle is that public activity must not compete with purely private business and that the market economy must be free from planned economy suggestions. The counter-proposal wants to use the state mortgage institute more actively as a price pressurer, change its mandate and let it offer salary accounts, which expands the state's commercial role. The plan shares the goal of better competition, but wants to achieve it through freer markets. Therefore it rejects the requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planens princip är att offentlig verksamhet inte ska konkurrera med det rent privata näringslivet och att marknadsekonomin ska vara fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar. Motförslaget vill använda det statliga bolåneinstitutet mer aktivt som prispressare, ändra dess uppdrag och låta det erbjuda lönekonton, vilket vidgar statens kommersiella roll. Målet om bättre konkurrens delar planen, men den vill nå det genom friare marknader. Därför avvisar planen kravet.

  • public must not compete with privatedecisive»Offentlig verksamhet ska inte konkurrera med det rent« (party programme ↗)“Public activity must not compete with purely”
  • freer markets dampen prices»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition, we can dampen prices further.”

flags: citat_blockerat

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The party programme explicitly establishes that the state shall not own banks and that the public should only conduct business activities where there is a strong public interest.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme explicitly establishes that the state shall not own banks and that the public should only conduct business activities where there is a strong public interest. Giving the state-owned mortgage lender a broader and more active mission, including salary accounts, goes directly against that commitment. Competition shall according to the plan be secured through equal conditions, not through expanded state ownership.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att staten inte ska äga banker och att det offentliga endast ska driva affärsverksamhet vid ett starkt samhällsintresse. Att i stället ge den statliga bolånegivaren ett bredare och mer aktivt uppdrag, inklusive lönekonton, går rakt emot det åtagandet. Konkurrensen ska enligt planen säkras genom lika villkor, inte genom utvidgat statligt ägande.

  • the state shall not own banksdecisive»Staten ska inte äga flygbolag, banker och telebolag.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall not own airlines, banks and telecom companies.”
  • restrictive public enterprise»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall only conduct business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
  • competition on equal terms»slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor« (party programme ↗)“guard property rights, competition on equal terms”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan gives the state the role to supervise legislation and good ethics on the market and to conduct business policy with general means, not to use its own company as an active market instrument.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan gives the state the role to supervise legislation and good ethics on the market and to conduct business policy with general means, not to use its own company as an active market instrument. To broaden the state loan-maker's assignment against price pressure and loan accounts is a targeted state intervention that lies outside that role. Competitiveness problems should according to the plan be met with competition policy.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger staten rollen att övervaka lagstiftning och god etik på marknaden och att bedriva näringspolitik med generella medel, inte att använda ett eget bolag som aktivt marknadsinstrument. Att bredda den statliga bolånegivarens uppdrag mot prispress och lönekonton är en riktad statlig insats som ligger utanför den rollen. Konkurrensproblem ska enligt planen mötas med konkurrenspolitik.

  • limited state market roledecisive»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to supervise that”
  • general means»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel,« (party programme ↗)“Business policy should be conducted with general means,”
  • competition policy over state ownership»effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“effective competition policy counteracts oligopolies, monopolies and unfair competition.”
  • personal ownership»bygga på en hög grad av personligt ägande.« (party programme ↗)“be built on a high degree of personal ownership.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan does not take a position on the state mortgage institute.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not take a position on the state mortgage institute. The closest principles speak against an expanded state mandate: the state's role in the economy is to protect institutions and promote competition, a large state gives a weaker society, and the plan wants rather to reduce state ownership, as when parts of Sveaskog are to be sold. Therefore, the plan rejects the demand for a more active state company.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte ställning till det statliga bolåneinstitutet. Närmast liggande principer talar mot ett utvidgat statligt uppdrag: statens roll i ekonomin är att värna institutionerna och främja konkurrens, en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle, och planen vill snarare minska det statliga ägandet, som när delar av Sveaskogs innehav ska säljas. Planen avvisar därför kravet på ett mer aktivt statligt bolag.

  • limited apparatus of statedecisive»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
  • the state promotes competition»skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“protect the value of money, promote competition”
  • reduced state ownership»Sälja av en större andel av statliga Sveaskogs innehav till personer med regional anknytning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sell a larger share of state-owned Sveaskog holdings to people with regional attachment”
  • market economy as foundation»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The basis for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to enable more financing forms for young people and first-time buyers and improve their opportunities to acquire a first home, and to facilitate financing of housing in rural areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to enable more financing forms for young people and first-time buyers and improve their opportunities to acquire a first home, and to facilitate financing of housing in rural areas. Using the state-owned housing lender more actively for price pressure and diversity on the mortgage market serves these goals. The party programme is also pragmatic about ownership and looks to the benefit to citizens rather than to who performs the task.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare och förbättra deras möjligheter att skaffa en första bostad, samt underlätta finansiering av bostäder på landsbygden. Att använda den statligt ägda bostadslångivaren mer aktivt för prispress och mångfald på bolånemarknaden tjänar dessa mål. Partiprogrammet är dessutom pragmatiskt om ägandeform och ser till nyttan för medborgarna snarare än till vem som utför uppgiften.

  • more financing formsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to stop plans for reintroduced property tax, lower electricity prices and enable more financing forms for young people and first-time home buyers.”
  • young people's first home»Förbättra möjligheterna för unga att skaffa sin första bostad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for young people to acquire their first home”
  • pragmatic ownership»Det viktigaste för oss är i de flesta fall inte vem som utför en specifik uppgift utan att« (party programme ↗)“The most important thing for us is in most cases not who performs a specific task but that”
  • financing in rural areas»Finansiering av bostäder på landsbygden bör underlättas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Financing of housing in rural areas should be facilitated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament