2025-10-222025/26:KrU2 · p.6KrUCulture
Broadcasting and provision of the offering
Conditions for public broadcasting output - the number of channels and restraint on external platforms
What's at stake: If the requirement on the number of channels is relaxed, public broadcasters may discontinue channels, which critics say risks reducing the diversity of output - particularly during heightened preparedness. Rules on restraint on external platforms affect how easily the public, not least younger audiences, can be reached with independent news and content where they already are.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the requirement for public broadcasters to run a set number of channels should remain unchanged, and whether the broadcasters should be required to exercise general restraint on external internet platforms other than their own, or whether the government's proposal to ease these conditions should be approved.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for directives on the conditions for public broadcasters' provision of output and the number of channels, in line with the government's proposal to simplify the requirements.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) wants to keep the current requirement on the number of channels, arguing that a reduction risks leading to closures and a less diverse range of output, particularly in a situation of heightened preparedness. The reservation also opposes requiring broadcasters to exercise general restraint on external platforms, since this would reduce their flexibility to reach audiences - not least younger groups - where media consumption is increasingly taking place.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/18/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3435 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki et al. (V) demands 3 and 4, 2024/25:3436 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demands 16 and 17 as well as 2024/25:3439 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) demands 4 and 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3435 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkandena 3 och 4, 2024/25:3436 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkandena 16 och 17 samt 2024/25:3439 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 4 och 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the Government's legislative proposal that rules for the public service assignment and the financing of the assignment shall be collected in a new law on public service. The Riksdag also said yes to the Government's other proposals on among other things the design of the public service assignment and the economic prerequisites for the public service companies during the assignment period 2026–2033. The Public Service Act and the amendments to the Radio and Television Act come into force on 2 December 2025 and other legislative changes on 1 January 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to protect the public service mandate and not regulate in detail the use of text in public service news services. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see a strong, broad and independent public service with comprehensive journalism coverage on national, regional and local level, and emphasises the need for a diversity of channels that are controlled by neither state nor capital.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see a strong, broad and independent public service with comprehensive journalism coverage on national, regional and local level, and emphasises the need for a diversity of channels that are controlled by neither state nor capital. Reducing the number of programme services and imposing general restraint on external platforms pulls in the opposite direction and shrinks both the offering and the ability to reach the public. The counter-proposal's demand to retain today's requirements therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se en stark, bred och självständig public service med heltäckande journalistisk bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå, och betonar behovet av en mångfald av kanaler som inte styrs av vare sig stat eller kapital. Att minska antalet programtjänster och ålägga generell återhållsamhet på externa plattformar drar åt motsatt håll och krymper både utbudet och möjligheten att nå publiken. Motförslagets krav på att behålla dagens krav ligger därför i linje med planen.
- broad and comprehensive mandatedecisive»Vi vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för public service, med ett uppdrag som utgår från grundlagen men står oberoende från den politiska makten, och heltäckande journalistisk bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a strong, broad and independent role for public service, with a mandate that starts from the constitution but stands independent from political power, and comprehensive journalism coverage on national, regional and local level.”
- diversity of media channels»Det behövs en mångfald av kanaler för information, nyheter, åsiktsbrytning och opinionsbildning som inte drivs av vare sig stater eller kapitalintressen.« (party programme ↗)“There must be a diversity of channels for information, news, debate and opinion formation that are not run by either states or capital interests.”
- resistance to control of content»Vi lever i en tid då högerpopulistiska krafter försöker styra information och innehåll allt hårdare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We live in a time when right-wing populist forces are trying to control information and content increasingly hard.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan's commitment is a broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service and media diversity with broader perspectives throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is a broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service and media diversity with broader perspectives throughout the country. Reducing the number of programme services and demanding general restraint on external platforms pulls in the opposite direction and makes it harder to reach the entire audience. The election manifesto also wants to constitutionally protect public service and values a vibrant, free and independent cultural life. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är en bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service samt mediemångfald med bredare perspektiv i hela landet. Att minska antalet programtjänster och kräva generell återhållsamhet på externa plattformar drar åt motsatt håll och försvårar att nå hela publiken. Valmanifestet vill dessutom grundlagsskydda public service och värnar ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv. Motförslagets krav stöds därför.
- broad and independent public servicedecisive»Bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service som är gemensamt finansierad.« (party programme ↗)“Broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed.”
- media diversity throughout the country»Mediemångfald med bredare perspektiv i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Media diversity with broader perspectives throughout the country.”
- constitutionally protected public service»Vi vill grundlagsskydda public service.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to constitutionally protect public service.”
- free and independent cultural life»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a vibrant, free and independent cultural life that both strengthens cohesion and challenges.”
The plan guards a broad and independent public broadcasting and wants to protect it in the constitution, which argues for retaining requirements on the number of program services and against reduced diversity in supply.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan guards a broad and independent public broadcasting and wants to protect it in the constitution, which argues for retaining requirements on the number of program services and against reduced diversity in supply. The counter-proposal's objection to general restraint on external platforms is more weakly anchored, since the plan simultaneously sees tech giants' control over platforms as a democratic problem. On balance, the commitment to broad supply weighs most.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår vakt om ett brett och oberoende public service och vill grundlagsskydda det, vilket talar för att behålla kraven på antalet programtjänster och mot minskad mångfald i utbudet. Motförslagets invändning mot generell återhållsamhet på externa plattformar är svagare förankrad, eftersom planen samtidigt ser techjättarnas kontroll över plattformarna som ett demokratiskt problem. Sammantaget väger åtagandet om ett brett utbud tyngst.
- broad and diverse public servicedecisive»brett och oberoende public service och en mångfald av kommersiella medier« (party programme ↗)“broad and independent public broadcasting and a diversity of commercial media”
- constitutionally protected public service»skydda ett oberoende public service i grundlagen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect an independent public service in the constitution”
- criticism of platform dependence»Det är ett demokratiskt problem att några få globala tech-företag kontrollerar plattformar« (party programme ↗)“It is a democratic problem that a few global tech companies control platforms”
The plan defends an independent public service and comprehensive, vibrant media coverage throughout the country, and requires politics to maintain arm's length distance from the media.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends an independent public service and comprehensive, vibrant media coverage throughout the country, and requires politics to maintain arm's length distance from the media. The counter-proposal protects both breadth of offer and companies' freedom to reach the public where it is, which aligns with that line; the requirement for general restraint on external platforms is precisely the kind of detailed control the plan wants to avoid. That the preparedness perspective is highlighted reinforces the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar ett oberoende public service och en allsidig, livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet, och kräver att politiken håller armlängds avstånd till medierna. Motförslaget värnar både bredden i utbudet och företagens frihet att nå publiken där den finns, vilket ligger i linje med den linjen; kravet på generell återhållsamhet på externa plattformar är just den sortens detaljstyrning planen vill undvika. Att beredskapsperspektivet lyfts förstärker slutsatsen.
- independent public service defendeddecisive»En allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin. Pressfriheten ska skyddas och oberoende public service försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive, independent and vibrant media coverage throughout the country is crucial for democracy. Press freedom must be protected and independent public service defended.”
- arm's length distance from politics»Den akademiska och konstnärliga friheten liksom den fria kulturen är grundbultar i ett vitalt civilsamhälle. Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic and artistic freedom as well as free culture are foundations of a vital civil society. Politics must contribute to good conditions but maintain arm's length distance.”
- broad range throughout the country»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet. Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party. Culture must be free and independent”
- strengthened civil preparedness»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that public service corporations shall continue to have a broad programme offering and a broad mandate, with increased legal protection for independence from political control.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public service corporations shall continue to have a broad programme offering and a broad mandate, with increased legal protection for independence from political control. The counter-proposal's demands for retained number of programme services and flexibility to reach the public follow from this. The plan furthermore wants world coverage to be developed, which argues against any reduction in the offering.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att public service-bolagen ska fortsätta ha ett brett programutbud och ett brett uppdrag, med ökat lagskydd för oberoendet från politisk styrning. Motförslagets krav på bibehållet antal programtjänster och på flexibilitet att nå publiken följer av detta. Planen vill dessutom att omvärldsbevakningen utvecklas, vilket talar mot en minskning av utbudet.
- broad offering and independencedecisive»Därför ska Sveriges Television, Sveriges Radio och Utbildningsradion ha ökat skydd i lagen för sitt oberoende från politisk styrning, och public service-bolagen ska fortsätta ha ett brett programutbud.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, Swedish Television, Swedish Radio and Educational Radio shall have increased legal protection for their independence from political control, and public service corporations shall continue to have a broad programme offering.”
- broad public service mandate»Public service ska fortsatt ha ett brett uppdrag« (party programme ↗)“Public service shall continue to have a broad mandate”
- developed world coverage»Bevakningen av vår omvärld, framför allt Europa, ska utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Coverage of our world, particularly Europe, shall be developed.”
- media independence»Mediernas oberoende måste värnas.« (party programme ↗)“The independence of the media must be protected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme emphasizes the value of independent radio and television channels without profit interests and that the mission should reach persons with disabilities and minorities' needs, which presupposes a broad range of programme services.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme emphasizes the value of independent radio and television channels without profit interests and that the mission should reach persons with disabilities and minorities' needs, which presupposes a broad range of programme services. The counter-proposal's requirement to retain the number of programme services and to be able to reach the audience where it is is in line with this. The plan says nothing about platforms or the number of programme services, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet framhåller värdet av oberoende radio- och tv-kanaler utan vinstintressen och att uppdraget ska nå personer med funktionsnedsättning och minoriteters behov, vilket förutsätter ett brett utbud av programtjänster. Motförslagets krav på att behålla antalet programtjänster och att kunna nå publiken där den finns ligger i linje med detta. Planen säger dock inget om plattformar eller programtjänsternas antal, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- independent public servicedecisive»Betydelsen av oberoende och reklamfria radio- och TV-kanaler utan vinstintressen är stor.« (party programme ↗)“The importance of independent and ad-free radio and television channels without profit interests is great.”
- range for all groups»En viktig del av uppdraget är att göra utbudet tillgängligt för personer med funktionsnedsättning och möta minoriteters behov och önskemål.« (party programme ↗)“An important part of the mission is to make the range accessible to people with disabilities and meet minorities' needs and wishes.”
- support but not control»Den innebär att kulturverksamhet som bedrivs av det civila samhället ska stödjas av det offentliga, men inte styras« (party programme ↗)“It means that cultural activities conducted by civil society shall be supported by the public, but not controlled”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's media policy is to protect and strengthen public broadcasting's core task and to create conditions for a broad range of media operating in competition with each other.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's media policy is to protect and strengthen public broadcasting's core task and to create conditions for a broad range of media operating in competition with each other. Detailed demands on the number of programme services are not something the plan commits to, and a simplification of requirements aligns with the plan's general red-tape-reduction line. Therefore, the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands to keep requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Planens mediepolitik går ut på att värna och stärka public services kärnuppdrag och att skapa förutsättningar för ett brett utbud av medier som verkar i konkurrens med varandra. Detaljerade krav på antalet programtjänster är inte något planen åtar sig, och en förenkling av kraven ligger i linje med planens allmänna regelförenklingslinje. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav på bibehållna krav.
- focus on core taskdecisive»Värna och stärka public services kärnuppdrag och kravet på saklighet och opartiskhet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect and strengthen public broadcasting's core task and the requirement for factuality and impartiality”
- media market in competition»Moderaternas mediepolitik har som mål att skapa förutsättningar för ett brett utbud av medier i olika format som kan verka fritt, självständigt och i konkurrens med varandra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party's media policy aims to create conditions for a broad range of media in various formats that can operate freely, independently and in competition with each other.”
- restrained media policy»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk.« (party programme ↗)“public funding and political ambitions constitute a risk.”
The plan wants to reduce the public sector's economic control over the media sphere and scale back unnecessary public spending.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce the public sector's economic control over the media sphere and scale back unnecessary public spending. The counter-proposal demands that today's requirements for the number of programme services be retained and that public service be given greater freedom on external platforms, which expands rather than restricts the public media remit. The plan's stated public service requirement applies to major sporting events, not output breadth elsewhere.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över mediesfären och skala bort onödiga offentliga utgifter. Motförslaget kräver att dagens krav på antalet programtjänster behålls och att public service ges större frihet på externa plattformar, vilket vidgar snarare än begränsar det offentliga medieuppdraget. Planens uttalade public service-krav gäller stora idrottsevenemang, inte utbudets omfattning i övrigt.
- reduced public media influencedecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the public sector's economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”
- restraint with tax money»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scale back unnecessary spending in the public sector”
- public service's core remit»Att public service ska sända stora idrottsevenemang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That public service shall broadcast major sporting events”
- citizen influence over cultural funds»Fördela offentliga kulturmedel och utforma offentliga miljöer med ett större medborgarinflytande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Distribute public cultural funds and design public environments with greater citizen influence”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KrU2)
- Committee report full text (HD01KrU2)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3435 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3436 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3437 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3439 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:166 — En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033
Source: The Swedish Parliament