2023-04-262022/23:KrU9 · p.7KrUCulture
Digitalization of the film heritage
Digitizing Sweden's film heritage
What's at stake: The Swedish Film Institute's archive holds nearly 9,000 films, and the analog technology and expertise needed to preserve them are disappearing. How quickly digitization proceeds determines whether parts of Sweden's film heritage are lost or made accessible to the public through cinemas, the web and other platforms.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motion called on the government to take action to speed up digitization of Sweden's film heritage, while the committee held that no separate parliamentary declaration was needed beyond its ongoing work on film policy.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion, pointing to the fact that the direction, financing and industry collaboration of film policy are already being reconsidered within the Government Offices; it is not prepared to propose a separate declaration on digitizing the film heritage at this time but intends to keep following the issue.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (V, MP)
V and MP argue that digitizing Sweden's film heritage — nearly 9,000 films in one of the world's oldest film archives — must be sped up before analog film technology and expertise disappear entirely, so the cultural heritage does not decay or become inaccessible to the public.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 91/1/0/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 64/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SMirja Räihä (S, Stockholms kommun) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motion 2022/23:1226 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 11.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2022/23:1226 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 11.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 40 motions on public service and film submitted during the general motion period in 2022. The proposals concern conditions and terms for public service and film policy. Parliament considers that work is already underway in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to increase public service programming in national minority languages. (V, MP) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan counts film among the culture that makes society richer for everyone and establishes that culture is part of welfare with such a fundamental responsibility that it should be enshrined in law.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan counts film among the culture that makes society richer for everyone and establishes that culture is part of welfare with such a fundamental responsibility that it should be enshrined in law. Accelerating the digitalisation of the film heritage before knowledge and technology are lost follows from the demand for equitable access to cultural activities. Film heritage is not mentioned in the plan, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen räknar filmen till den kultur som gör samhället rikare för alla och slår fast att kulturen är en del av välfärden med ett så fundamentalt ansvar att det bör lagfästas. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan kompetens och teknik försvinner följer av kravet på likvärdig tillgång till kulturverksamhet. Filmarvet nämns inte i planen, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- film as part of culturedecisive»Kultur som konst, musik och film bidrar till att skapa ett rikare samhälle att leva i för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture such as art, music and film contribute to creating a richer society to live in for everyone.”
- culture a public responsibility»Kulturens roll i samhället är så fundamental att den bör« (party programme ↗)“Culture's role in society is so fundamental that it should”
- equitable access to culture»En statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera en demokratiskt likvärdig« (party programme ↗)“A public cultural policy should guarantee a democratically equitable”
- culture as part of welfare»Kulturen spelar en viktig roll och är en del av välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture plays an important role and is part of welfare.”
The plan wants to bind together digital technology's distribution with investments in live culture and make the arts accessible to all throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to bind together digital technology's distribution with investments in live culture and make the arts accessible to all throughout the country. Accelerating digitization of the film archive before analogue expertise disappears follows from that commitment. The film archive is not addressed at all in the plan, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill binda samman den digitala teknikens distribution med satsningar på den levande kulturen och göra konstens uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla i hela landet. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan analog kompetens försvinner följer av det åtagandet. Filmarvet behandlas dock inte alls i planen, så stödet är härlett.
- digital distribution of culturedecisive»Vi vill möta utmaningarna genom att binda samman den digitala teknikens gränsöverskridande distribution med kraftfulla satsningar på den levande kulturen.« (party programme ↗)“We want to meet the challenges by binding together the border-crossing distribution of digital technology with powerful investments in live culture.”
- culture accessible to all»Kulturpolitiken går ut på att göra konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy is about making different forms of art accessible to all, children and adults, throughout the country.”
- vibrant cultural life»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a vibrant, free and independent cultural life that both strengthens solidarity and challenges.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that cultural heritage is our shared heritage that shall be preserved and cared for for the future, and that digital technology shall be used in the best way to spread culture throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that cultural heritage is our shared heritage that shall be preserved and cared for for the future, and that digital technology shall be used in the best way to spread culture throughout the country. Accelerating the digitization of film heritage before analog expertise disappears follows directly from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att kulturarvet är vårt gemensamma arv som ska bevaras och vårdas för framtiden, och att digital teknik ska användas på bästa sätt för att sprida kultur i hela landet. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan analog kompetens försvinner följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- cultural heritage shall be preserveddecisive»Kulturarvet är vårt gemensamma arv.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural heritage is our shared heritage.”
- digital technology spreads culture»användas på bästa sätt för att sprida kultur.« (party programme ↗)“be used in the best way to spread culture.”
- accessible culture throughout the country»verksamhet i hela landet. Digital teknik ska« (party programme ↗)“activity throughout the country. Digital technology shall”
The plan does not mention film heritage, but the party programme makes it part of the public mission to preserve and develop a cultural heritage that conveys insights into our history, and sees digitalization as a prerequisite for access regardless of where one lives.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not mention film heritage, but the party programme makes it part of the public mission to preserve and develop a cultural heritage that conveys insights into our history, and sees digitalization as a prerequisite for access regardless of where one lives. A film heritage at risk of decay or becoming inaccessible conflicts with both. The plan's commitment to culture throughout the country speaks for accelerating digitalization.
Original (Swedish)
Planen nämner inte filmarvet, men partiprogrammet gör det till en del av det offentliga uppdraget att vårda och utveckla ett kulturarv som förmedlar insikter om vår historia, och ser digitalisering som en förutsättning för tillgång oavsett var man bor. Ett filmarv som riskerar att förfalla eller bli otillgängligt strider mot båda. Planens åtagande om kultur i hela landet talar för att digitaliseringen påskyndas.
- preserve the cultural heritagedecisive»till att vårda och utveckla ett kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“to preserve and develop a cultural heritage”
- digital access on equal terms»Digitalisering på lika villkor, oavsett var man bor, är en förutsättning för demokrati och möjliggör decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“Digitalization on equal terms, regardless of where one lives, is a prerequisite for democracy and enables decentralization.”
- culture throughout the country»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Center Party.”
- culture's value for the individual»Kulturupplevelser är en grundläggande del av människors självförverkligande och delaktighet i samhället« (party programme ↗)“Cultural experiences are a fundamental part of people's self-realization and participation in society”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that Sweden's cultural heritage shall be kept accessible for coming generations and that new technology increases accessibility to culture, with a general principle that what can reasonably be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that Sweden's cultural heritage shall be kept accessible for coming generations and that new technology increases accessibility to culture, with a general principle that what can reasonably be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible. That accelerating digitalisation of the film heritage before analog technology and expertise disappears follows directly from these commitments. The plan also wants to strengthen the role of educational institutions.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att kulturarvet i Sverige ska hållas tillgängligt för kommande generationer och att ny teknik ökar tillgängligheten till kultur, med en generell princip att det som rimligt kan göras digitalt tillgängligt också ska göras det. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan analog teknik och kompetens försvinner följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Planen vill också stärka bildningsinstitutionernas roll.
- cultural heritage for coming generationsdecisive»är en del av mänsklighetens gemensamma kulturarv och ska hållas tillgängligt för kommande generationer.« (party programme ↗)“is part of humanity's common cultural heritage and shall be kept accessible for coming generations.”
- digital accessibility as principle»kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“can be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible.”
- technology increases access to culture»Den nya tekniken ökar tillgängligheten till kultur.« (party programme ↗)“New technology increases accessibility to culture.”
- strong educational institutions»Museernas roll som bildningsinstitutioner och deras forskningsanknytning ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The role of museums as educational institutions and their research connection shall be strengthened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that cultural policy preserves the cultural heritage left by previous generations and calls that responsibility stewardship, explicitly also for material cultural heritage.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that cultural policy preserves the cultural heritage left by previous generations and calls that responsibility stewardship, explicitly also for material cultural heritage. Accelerating the digitization of film heritage before analogue technology and expertise disappears is exactly such stewardship. The plan also requires that the public actively contributes to making culture available to citizens.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att kulturpolitiken tar tillvara det kulturella arv som tidigare generationer lämnat efter sig och kallar det ansvaret förvaltarskap, uttryckligen även för det materiella kulturarvet. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan analog teknik och kompetens försvinner är just ett sådant förvaltarskap. Planen kräver också att det offentliga aktivt bidrar till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del.
- preserve cultural heritagedecisive»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv som tidigare gene« (party programme ↗)“Good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage that previous generations”
- stewardship of material cultural heritage»förvaltarskap omfattar det materiella kulturarv som« (party programme ↗)“stewardship encompasses material cultural heritage such as”
- responsibility of public institutions»offentliga institutioner som till exempel museer en viktig roll tillsammans med frivilliga organisationer och« (party programme ↗)“public institutions such as museums an important role together with voluntary organisations and”
- culture shall reach citizens»ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till« (party programme ↗)“shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching citizens”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about film heritage or digitisation of cultural heritage.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about film heritage or digitisation of cultural heritage. The closest principle is that the great needs in the justice system, defence and welfare require hard prioritisations and that the plan is clear about what can wait. A demand for accelerated digitisation of film heritage therefore does not follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om filmarvet eller digitalisering av kulturarv. Närmast liggande princip är att de stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden kräver hårda prioriteringar och att planen är tydlig med vad som får vänta. Ett krav på påskyndad digitalisering av filmarvet följer därför inte av planen.
- hard prioritisations neededdecisive»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The great needs in the justice system, defence and welfare make great demands on prioritisations in the years to come.”
- what can wait»Vi vet vad som måste göras – och vad som får vänta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We know what must be done – and what can wait.”
- prioritise and choose not to do»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritise and choose not to do,”
The plan establishes that support for preservation and revival of Swedish cultural heritage shall increase and that cultural heritage has intrinsic value.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that support for preservation and revival of Swedish cultural heritage shall increase and that cultural heritage has intrinsic value. Expediting digitisation of the film heritage before analogue technology and expertise disappear is precisely such preservation that makes the heritage accessible to the public. The committee's reason that film policy is already being reviewed is not affected by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att stödet till bevarandet och levandegörandet av det svenska kulturarvet ska öka och att kulturarvet har ett egenvärde. Att påskynda digitaliseringen av filmarvet innan analog teknik och kompetens försvinner är just ett sådant bevarande som gör arvet tillgängligt för allmänheten. Utskottets skäl att filmpolitiken redan omprövas berörs inte av planen.
- increased support for cultural heritagedecisive»Parallellt med detta skall stödet till bevarandet och levandegörandet av det svenska kulturarvet öka.« (party programme ↗)“Alongside this, support for the preservation and revival of Swedish cultural heritage shall increase.”
- cultural heritage's intrinsic value»Kulturarvet har ett egenvärde genom bland annat de skönhetsvärden och den estetik som det står för.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural heritage has intrinsic value through, among other things, the beauty values and aesthetics that it represents.”
- protect and showcase culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to protect, care for and showcase Swedish culture.”
- shared cultural identity»Skapa sammanhållning kring den svenska kulturen och den nationella identiteten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create cohesion around Swedish culture and national identity”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KrU9)
- Committee report full text (HA01KrU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1226 — Vissa kulturpolitiska frågor av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1474 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2054 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund, fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:538 — Förbättrat arbete med public service av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2022/23:861 — Ett fritt och brett kulturliv i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:862 — Fri journalistik och opinionsbildning som bevakar hela Sverige av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:973 — Filmpolitik av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:988 — Nationella minoriteter i Sverige av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:991 — Public service-frågor av Leonid Yurkovskiy m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament