2024-06-182023/24:TU18 · p.14TUTransport & infrastructure
Cross-border infrastructure
New cross-border link between Sweden and Denmark
What's at stake: The choice of route affects commuting, freight transport and growth in the Öresund region, while the high cost and long lead times make prioritization between infrastructure projects highly consequential for which investments can be carried out.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether a new fixed link between Sweden and Denmark should be studied and decided within the ordinary planning process, or whether a specific route should be singled out and separately investigated before a location is chosen.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions on a new cross-border link. The reason is that the committee welcomes the ongoing Danish-Swedish study and Trafikverket's mandate under the national plan, and holds that any new connection should be handled within this orderly process rather than by singling out a route in advance.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 32 (SD)
The reservation (SD) wants the route for a new Öresund link, the so-called 'Europe track' between Landskrona and Copenhagen, to be studied before a decision is made on where to place the connection. The reasoning is that the Helsingborg-Helsingör alternative, in the reservation's view, is hampered by height differences that impede rail freight, and that Denmark has said it does not want to proceed with that particular route.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 32 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:22 by Jimmy Ståhl et al. (SD), 2023/24:137 by Nima Gholam Ali Pour and Jörgen Grubb (both SD), 2023/24:202 by Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2023/24:319 by Louise Eklund (L), 2023/24:400 by Patrik Jönsson et al. (SD) claims 20, 21, and 23, 2023/24:508 by Katarina Tolgfors (M) claims 2 and 3, 2023/24:688 by Rasmus Ling (MP), 2023/24:722 by Ulrika Heindorff et al. (M) claims 1 and 2, 2023/24:969 by Camilla Brunsberg (M) claim 5, 2023/24:1167 by Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2023/24:1285 by Joakim Sandell and Rose-Marie Carlsson (both S), 2023/24:1350 by Niklas Karlsson (S), 2023/24:1377 by Cecilia Engström (KD), 2023/24:1635 by Jonny Cato et al. (C), 2023/24:1650 by Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) claims 1 and 2, 2023/24:1731 by Elin Nilsson (L), 2023/24:1866 by Isak From et al. (S) claim 1, 2023/24:1878 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) claims 19, 20, 30, 31, 36, and 37, 2023/24:2023 by Isak From et al. (S) claim 3 in this part, 2023/24:2048 by Ida Karkiainen (S), 2023/24:2079 by Johan Hultberg (M) claim 7, 2023/24:2081 by Johan Hultberg (M) claims 1-3 and 5, 2023/24:2277 by Noria Manouchi (M), 2023/24:2279 by Lars Johnsson et al. (M) claims 3 and 9, 2023/24:2553 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) claims 1 and 2, 2023/24:2579 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) claims 1 and 3, 2023/24:2600 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) and 2023/24:2625 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) claim 10 in this part.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:22 av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD), 2023/24:137 av Nima Gholam Ali Pour och Jörgen Grubb (båda SD), 2023/24:202 av Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2023/24:319 av Louise Eklund (L), 2023/24:400 av Patrik Jönsson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 20, 21 och 23, 2023/24:508 av Katarina Tolgfors (M) yrkandena 2 och 3, 2023/24:688 av Rasmus Ling (MP), 2023/24:722 av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:969 av Camilla Brunsberg (M) yrkande 5, 2023/24:1167 av Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2023/24:1285 av Joakim Sandell och Rose-Marie Carlsson (båda S), 2023/24:1350 av Niklas Karlsson (S), 2023/24:1377 av Cecilia Engström (KD), 2023/24:1635 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C), 2023/24:1650 av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:1731 av Elin Nilsson (L), 2023/24:1866 av Isak From m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2023/24:1878 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 19, 20, 30, 31, 36 och 37, 2023/24:2023 av Isak From m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 i denna del, 2023/24:2048 av Ida Karkiainen (S), 2023/24:2079 av Johan Hultberg (M) yrkande 7, 2023/24:2081 av Johan Hultberg (M) yrkandena 1-3 och 5, 2023/24:2277 av Noria Manouchi (M), 2023/24:2279 av Lars Johnsson m.fl. (M) yrkandena 3 och 9, 2023/24:2553 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:2579 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 3, 2023/24:2600 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) och 2023/24:2625 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 10 i denna del.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a letter from the government concerning the Swedish National Audit Office's report on a national plan for transport infrastructure. The Swedish National Audit Office's overall conclusion is that investments in the national plan contribute to achieving transport policy goals but not in an efficient manner. In its letter, the government welcomes the Swedish National Audit Office's review and considers it an important contribution to the work of developing a new national plan. The government is in the process of preparing a new infrastructure bill in order to make a decision on a new national plan in 2026 and views the Swedish National Audit Office's observations and recommendations as supporting material for the continued process. The Riksdag referred the government's letter to the records, that is, closed the matter. At the same time, the Riksdag rejected proposals in motions, of which approximately 380 are from the regular motion period 2023. The proposals concern, for example, infrastructure planning, starting points for planning, measures in infrastructure, and financing and efficiency issues. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the ongoing work to develop a new national plan for transport infrastructure.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants freight traffic to receive higher priority in infrastructure planning. (SD) — Reservation 32
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about the route for a new Öresund connection.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the route for a new Öresund connection. The nearest commitments are that heavy transport should be directed to railways, that the investment plan should contain an expansion of railways and that Nordic cooperation should be close. Since the counter-proposal wants to investigate the alternative that actually enables freight traffic on railway, the plan speaks weakly in favour of the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om sträckningen för en ny Öresundsförbindelse. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att tunga transporter ska styras till järnväg, att investeringsplanen ska innehålla en utbyggnad av järnvägen och att det nordiska samarbetet ska vara tätt. Eftersom motförslaget vill utreda det alternativ som faktiskt möjliggör godstrafik på järnväg talar planen svagt för kravet.
- freight to railwaysdecisive»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be directed to railways and sustainable shipping.”
- expanded railways»som bland annat innehåller en utbyggnad av järnvägen.« (party programme ↗)“which among other things includes an expansion of the railways.”
- long-term investment plan»Det behövs en omfattande och långsiktig investeringsplan för det,« (party programme ↗)“An extensive and long-term investment plan is needed for that,”
- close Nordic cooperation»Vi vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna och ett gott« (party programme ↗)“We want to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and good”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to make massive investments in railways and change transport systems so that road transport is replaced with rail transport, and emphasizes that infrastructure is a national responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make massive investments in railways and change transport systems so that road transport is replaced with rail transport, and emphasizes that infrastructure is a national responsibility. Investigating a route that enables freight traffic on rail before the location for a new Öresund connection is chosen is in line with this. The plan says nothing about individual routes, so the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra massiva investeringar i järnväg och lägga om transportsystemen så att vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter, och betonar att infrastrukturen är ett nationellt ansvar. Att utreda en sträckning som möjliggör godstrafik på järnväg innan läget för en ny Öresundsförbindelse väljs ligger i linje med detta. Planen säger inget om enskilda sträckningar, varför slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.
- railway investmentsdecisive»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing railways, more will be able to travel climate-smart by train.”
- freight to rail»vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter och sjötrafik.« (party programme ↗)“road transport is replaced with rail transport and maritime traffic.”
- functioning infrastructure»Ett framgångsrikt näringsliv kräver en väl fungerande infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“A successful economy requires well-functioning infrastructure.”
- Nordic cooperation»Också det nordiska samarbetet är centralt, liksom samarbetet med de baltiska staterna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nordic cooperation is also central, as is cooperation with the Baltic states.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan prioritizes railways over truck traffic and wants to bring Sweden closer to neighboring countries with more train connections.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritizes railways over truck traffic and wants to bring Sweden closer to neighboring countries with more train connections. The counter-proposal wants to investigate the route that enables goods transport by rail rather than one that hinders it, which follows the plan's transport prioritization. Because the plan does not address Öresund connections or planning order, the support is derived and weakly substantiated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar järnväg framför lastbilstrafik och vill knyta Sverige närmare grannländerna med fler tågförbindelser. Motförslaget vill utreda den sträckning som möjliggör godstrafik på järnväg i stället för en som hindrar den, vilket följer planens transportprioritering. Eftersom planen inte behandlar Öresundsförbindelser eller planeringsordningen är stödet härlett och svagt underbyggt.
- railways before trucksdecisive»Klimatskadliga investeringar som ökar privatbilism och lastbilstrafik ska väljas bort till förmån för ökade järnvägsinvesteringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate-damaging investments that increase private car use and truck traffic shall be rejected in favor of increased railway investments.”
- train connections to neighboring countries»säkra och utveckla nattågstrafiken i hela Sverige och knyt oss närmare våra nordiska grannländer och övriga Europa med fler avgångar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“secure and develop night train traffic throughout Sweden and bring us closer to our Nordic neighboring countries and the rest of Europe with more departures.”
- goods by rail»Vi vill bygga ut och utveckla järnväg, sjöfart och kombiterminaler så att godstransporter på väg kan minska.« (party programme ↗)“We want to expand and develop railways, shipping and combined terminals so that goods transport by road can decrease.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address an Öresund connection and does not take a position on routes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address an Öresund connection and does not take a position on routes. The nearest commitments are to raise the standard on the trunk rail network and greatly invest in tomorrow's rail traffic and that the railway shall be open and accessible, combined with free trade and more open markets for Swedish goods. An investigation requirement aiming at an alternative where goods traffic by rail functions thus aligns more with the plan than refraining from investigation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte någon Öresundsförbindelse och tar inte ställning till sträckningar. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att höja standarden på stambanenätet och storsatsa på morgondagens tågtrafik samt att järnvägen ska vara öppen och tillgänglig, kombinerat med frihandel och öppnare marknader för svenska varor. Ett utredningskrav som syftar till ett alternativ där godstrafik på järnväg fungerar ligger då närmare planen än att avstå från utredning.
- rail investmentsdecisive»Vi vill rusta upp regionala järnvägar, bygga nya stambanor från norr till söder, höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet och storsatsa på morgondagens tågtrafik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to equip regional railways, build new trunk lines from north to south, raise the standard on the national trunk rail network throughout the country and greatly invest in tomorrow's rail traffic”
- accessible infrastructure»Järnvägen till samhället, vägen till huset, bredbandet till skärmen och vägen till världens kunskap« (party programme ↗)“Railway to society, road to house, broadband to screen and access to the world's knowledge”
- free trade and open markets»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel. Öppna upp fler marknader för svenska varor och tjänster.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden does not manage without free trade. Open up more markets for Swedish goods and services.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to see continued major infrastructure investments, especially in railways for goods and persons, and it wants to break down barriers in the Nordic countries and Europe faster than others.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see continued major infrastructure investments, especially in railways for goods and persons, and it wants to break down barriers in the Nordic countries and Europe faster than others. That investigating a route that enables goods traffic on railway before a location is chosen is in line with these commitments. The plan does not, however, take a position on any individual Öresund connection, whereby certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur, särskilt i järnvägen för gods och personer, och den vill riva gränshinder i Norden och Europa snabbare än andra. Att utreda en sträckning som möjliggör godstrafik på järnväg innan ett läge väljs ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen tar dock inte ställning till någon enskild Öresundsförbindelse, varför säkerheten är låg.
- major infrastructure investmentsdecisive»Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs continued major infrastructure investments.”
- upgraded railways»persontransporter är i starkt behov av upprustning och utbyggnad, liksom vissa delar av vägnätet.« (party programme ↗)“person transport is in great need of renovation and expansion, as are certain parts of the road network.”
- fewer border obstacles»Vi vet att friheten växer i takt med att gränshindren för resor, arbete och handel på vår kontinent försvinner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We know that freedom grows as border obstacles for travel, work and trade on our continent disappear.”
- Nordic barrier removal work»fortsätta att gå före och riva gränshinder snabbare än andra« (party programme ↗)“continue to lead and break down border obstacles faster than others”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address any individual connection across the Sound.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address any individual connection across the Sound. The closest principle is that the state is responsible for maintaining a high level of investment in communications infrastructure long-term and that all political decisions should be made according to the stewardship principle, which speaks for alternative routes being investigated before a choice is made. The election manifesto, however, prioritizes roads over expensive rail projects.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte någon enskild förbindelse över Öresund. Närmast liggande princip är att staten ansvarar för att investeringsnivån i kommunikationernas infrastruktur hålls långsiktigt hög och att alla politiska beslut ska fattas enligt förvaltarskapsprincipen, vilket talar för att alternativa sträckningar utreds före ett vägval. Valmanifestet prioriterar dock vägar framför dyra spårprojekt.
- high investment level in infrastructuredecisive»investeringsnivån i kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur« (party programme ↗)“the level of investment in communications systems infrastructure”
- long-term decision-making»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle”
- roads before expensive rail projects»Miljardsatsning för att rusta eftersatta vägar i hela landet - istället för att bygga dyra höghastighetståg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Billion-krona investment to improve neglected roads across the country - instead of building expensive high-speed trains.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's infrastructure line is to upgrade what already exists and refrain from expensive and unprofitable vanity projects, with maintenance of roads and railways as the first priority.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's infrastructure line is to upgrade what already exists and refrain from expensive and unprofitable vanity projects, with maintenance of roads and railways as the first priority. Investigating a new route for yet another fixed Öresund link lies outside that prioritisation. The plan does, however, want to strengthen relations with neighbouring countries, which points in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planens infrastrukturlinje är att rusta upp det som redan finns och avstå från dyra och olönsamma skrytbyggen, med underhåll av vägar och järnväg som första prioritet. Att utreda en ny sträckning för ytterligare en fast Öresundsförbindelse ligger utanför den prioriteringen. Planen vill dock stärka relationerna till grannländerna, vilket pekar i motsatt riktning.
- no to vanity projectsdecisive»I stället för dyra och olönsamma skrytbyggen som höghastighetståg kommer Moderaterna rusta upp den järnväg som redan finns, så att tågen kan gå i tid och du slipper stå och frysa på perrongen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of expensive and unprofitable vanity projects like high-speed trains, the Moderate Party will upgrade the railway that already exists, so that trains can run on time and you will not have to stand and freeze on the platform.”
- upgrade before new construction»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railway instead of betting on high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are finished”
- maintenance first»Laga Sveriges vägar så att du kan komma fram säkert och i tid« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fix Sweden's roads so that you can get there safely and on time”
- stronger relations with neighbouring countries»Sveriges relationer till våra grannländer ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's relations with our neighbouring countries shall be strengthened.”
The plan wants to increase mobility within the Nordic region and smooth out the internal barriers, which according to the plan would greatly increase intra-Nordic trade, and requires that goods can be transported efficiently.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to increase mobility within the Nordic region and smooth out the internal barriers, which according to the plan would greatly increase intra-Nordic trade, and requires that goods can be transported efficiently. To investigate the route Landskrona–Copenhagen before a site is chosen serves that purpose, especially since the alternative complicates rail freight. The plan is simultaneously restrained with expensive new rail projects.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill öka mobiliteten inom Norden och slipa ned de inre gränshindren, som enligt planen skulle öka den inomnordiska handeln kraftigt, och den kräver att gods kan transporteras effektivt. Att utreda sträckningen Landskrona–Köpenhamn innan ett läge väljs tjänar det syftet, särskilt eftersom alternativet försvårar godstrafik på järnväg. Planen är samtidigt återhållsam med dyra nya spårprojekt.
- increased Nordic mobilitydecisive»Ökad mobilitet inom Norden – för människor och myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased mobility within the Nordic region – for people and authorities”
- Nordic trade without barriers»Studier har under de gångna åren visat att om gränserna internt i Norden kunnat slipas ned, så hade värdet av den inomnordiska handeln ökat med hundratals miljarder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Studies over the years have shown that if the barriers internally in the Nordic region could have been smoothed out, the value of intra-Nordic trade would have increased by hundreds of billions.”
- conditions for freight transport»För att näringslivet ska fungera väl krävs också en omläggning av transportinfrastrukturpolitiken vad gäller vägar, järnväg och flyg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For business to work well also requires a shift in transport infrastructure policy regarding roads, rail and aviation.”
- restraint on major projects»Stoppa planerna på dyr höghastighetsjärnväg mellan storstäderna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop plans for expensive high-speed rail between major cities”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:TU18)
- Committee report full text (HB01TU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1000 — Militär mobilitet genom Jämtlands län av Kalle Olsson och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1021 — Inlandsbanan av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Kalle Olsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1022 — Ökad transparens kring fördelningen av länsplanemedel av Kalle Olsson och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1042 — Nya stambanor av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1083 — Infrastruktur av Azra Muranovic m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1099 — Säkerställ Ostlänken av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1102 — Långsiktig finansiering av infrastruktur av Lars Püss (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1115 — Konkurrenskraftiga transporter i Stockholm-Mälardalen av Fredrik Ahlstedt och Anna af Sillén (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1118 — Trafikverkets makt över kommunernas planarbete av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1154 — Färdigställande av riksväg 40 till dubbelfilig väg av Staffan Eklöf och Björn Tidland (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1167 — Stärkt tillväxt i Norden med dubbelspår mellan Oslo och Göteborg av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1169 — Trygga och säkra vägar i Fyrbodal av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1189 — Utredning av statligt ansvar för järnvägen Halmstad-Nässjö av Staffan Eklöf och Eric Westroth (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1194 — Dubbelspår på hela Skånebanan av Per-Arne Håkansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1215 — Framtidssäkring av det svenska vägnätet av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1218 — Trafiksituationen i Ystad av Stina Larsson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1225 — Situationsanpassade regelverk vid infrastrukturplanering av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1249 — Turismöversiktsplan av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1285 — Förverkligande av Öresundsmetron - för jobb och utveckling i södra Sverige av Joakim Sandell och Rose-Marie Carlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1324 — Säkerställa och färdigställa Hjulstabron av Lena Johansson och Fredrik Olovsson (båda S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament