2025-04-092024/25:FiU34 · p.8FiUEconomy & finance

Unscrupulous Actors and Fair Terms

Stricter requirements against rogue operators and fair employment conditions in public procurement

What's at stake: The issue is how to stop rogue and criminal suppliers from winning public contracts, and how employees of subcontractors should be protected from having their pay and conditions undercut when contractors change. It affects both the use of public funds and working conditions for staff in contracted-out services.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The motions called for, among other things, mandatory requirements for bidders to disclose staffing levels and wage levels, consultation with trade unions, and apprenticeship clauses in public procurement, while the committee held that ongoing work on coordinated background checks and existing legislation already provide sufficient tools.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions, pointing out that the government is already actively working on coordinated background checks to exclude rogue operators from procurement, and that legislation on labour-law conditions in procurement already exists, along with the option — though not an obligation — to require employment quotas.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 13 (V)

The reserving party (V) wants a review of procurement legislation so that employees who transfer when a contractor changes are guaranteed unchanged pay and conditions, with a mandatory requirement for bidders to disclose staffing levels and wage levels and greater input from relevant trade unions, in response to cases such as the Hjulstabron bridge where a change of contractor led to a worse collective agreement for the staff.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 13 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoAbstain 0/0/93/13departs from the planconfidence: highderived
MPNoAbstain 0/1/13/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesYes 19/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDYesYes 62/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun)No — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:62 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) requests 25 and 26, 2024/25:2136 by Hanna Westerén and Ida Ekeroth Clausson (both S), 2024/25:2643 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) request 7, 2024/25:2686 by Jessica Rodén and Petter Löberg (both S) requests 1 and 2, and 2024/25:3194 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) request 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:62 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 25 och 26, 2024/25:2136 av Hanna Westerén och Ida Ekeroth Clausson (båda S), 2024/25:2643 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7, 2024/25:2686 av Jessica Rodén och Petter Löberg (båda S) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2024/25:3194 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 50 proposals concerning how both the regulations and procedures for public procurement are designed, regarding for example small businesses, civil society organisations, animal welfare, and environmental requirements. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag points in particular to the fact that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan demands collective agreements in public procurement and makes the power of the employees and the real decision-making authority of trade union organisations a central task.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands collective agreements in public procurement and makes the power of the employees and the real decision-making authority of trade union organisations a central task. Guaranteeing the same wages and conditions during contractor changes, requiring reporting of staff and wage levels and giving unions influence in the procurement is precisely that commitment. The plan also wants to close the space to exploit vulnerable employees.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar och gör de anställdas makt och de fackliga organisationernas reella beslutanderätt till en central uppgift. Att garantera samma löner och villkor vid entreprenörsbyte, kräva redovisning av personal och lönenivåer och ge facken inflytande i upphandlingen är precis det åtagandet. Planen vill också täppa till utrymmet att exploatera utsatta anställda.

  • collective agreements in procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party demands collective agreements in public procurement.”
  • union influence»En central uppgift i valet 2022 är att driva frågan om de anställdas makt över sitt arbete och att stödja fackligt aktivas kamp för avtal som ger reell beslutanderätt till de fackliga organisationerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A central task in the 2022 election is to drive the question of employee power over their work and to support the struggle of union activists for agreements that give real decision-making authority to trade union organisations.”
  • strengthened wage earner positions»Vi vill förändra konflikträtten och annan lagstiftning för att stärka löntagarnas positioner.« (party programme ↗)“We want to change conflict law and other legislation to strengthen wage earners' positions.”
  • stop exploitation»Vi vill täppa till det utrymme som finns idag att exploatera människors utsatta ställning.« (party programme ↗)“We want to close the space that exists today to exploit people in vulnerable positions.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto requires that public employers and purchasers are exemplars of fair competition, that it must never be profitable to compete by neglecting employees, and that conditions must be set so that money goes to welfare workers.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that public employers and purchasers are exemplars of fair competition, that it must never be profitable to compete by neglecting employees, and that conditions must be set so that money goes to welfare workers. Guaranteeing the same wages and conditions in contractor changes, with reporting requirements and union influence, are precisely such conditions. The form is not specified in the documents, but the direction is unambiguous.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare är föredömen för sund konkurrens, att det aldrig ska löna sig att konkurrera genom att försumma de anställda, och att villkor ska ställas så att pengarna går till välfärdens medarbetare. Att garantera samma löner och villkor vid entreprenörsbyte, med redovisningskrav och fackligt inflytande, är precis sådana villkor. Formen anges inte i dokumenten, men riktningen är entydig.

  • requirements in public procurementdecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Employment crime must not exist in the Swedish labour market and public employers and purchasers must set an example in promoting fair competition.”
  • no competition with worse conditions»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must never be profitable to commit crimes or gain competitive advantages by neglecting employees' right to a secure working environment.”
  • collective agreements as norm»Kollektivavtal är en nödvändig« (party programme ↗)“Collective agreements are a necessary”
  • conditions for welfare funding»Villkor ska ställas så att pengarna till välfärden verkligen går till dess medarbetare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions must be set so that money for welfare actually goes to its employees”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that working conditions improve for those with weak positions on the labour market, that the Swedish model with collective agreements is cherished and that procurement sets requirements for social conditions and working environment.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that working conditions improve for those with weak positions on the labour market, that the Swedish model with collective agreements is cherished and that procurement sets requirements for social conditions and working environment. Guaranteeing accompanying personnel the same wages and conditions on contractor change, with reporting requirements and union influence, is an application of this. Contractor changes are not mentioned explicitly, therefore it is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att arbetsvillkoren förbättras för dem som har svag ställning på arbetsmarknaden, att den svenska modellen med kollektivavtal värnas och att upphandlingar ställer krav på sociala villkor och arbetsmiljö. Att garantera medföljande personal samma löner och villkor vid entreprenörsbyte, med redovisningskrav och fackligt inflytande, är en tillämpning av detta. Entreprenörsbyten nämns inte uttryckligen, därför härledning.

  • social conditions in procurementdecisive»krav ställas vad gäller miljö, sociala villkor samt« (party programme ↗)“requirements are set regarding environment, social conditions and”
  • encourage union organising»Modellen bygger på att en hög andel av arbetstagarna är fackföreningsanslutna, och den fackliga« (party programme ↗)“The model is based on a high share of workers being unionised, and the union”
  • better working conditions»Deras arbetsvillkor måste« (party programme ↗)“Their working conditions must”
  • secure employment conditions»finansierad verksamhet ska ha rätt till heltid med« (party programme ↗)“financed activities shall have the right to full-time with”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan advocates that labour market rules be set by the parties rather than through legislation, and that laws and rules shall not override free contractual rights.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan advocates that labour market rules be set by the parties rather than through legislation, and that laws and rules shall not override free contractual rights. The counter-proposal wants to legislate on guaranteed wages and conditions upon supplier change, mandatory disclosure of staff and wage levels and greater union influence in procurement. It also places new administrative requirements on bidders, contrary to the plan's desire to clean up the rules. Therefore the plan rejects the requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen förespråkar att arbetsmarknadens spelregler sätts av parterna snarare än genom lagstiftning, och att lagar och regler inte ska köra över den fria avtalsrätten. Motförslaget vill lagstifta om garanterade löner och villkor vid leverantörsbyte, obligatorisk redovisning av personal och lönenivåer samt större fackligt inflytande i upphandlingen. Det lägger också nya administrativa krav på anbudsgivare, tvärtemot planens vilja att rensa i regelträsket. Därför avvisar planen kravet.

  • the parties, not legislationdecisive»arbetsmarknadens parter i stället för genom lagstiftning« (party programme ↗)“Labour market parties rather than through legislation”
  • free contractual rights»bör lagar och regler inte köra över den fria avtalsrätten« (party programme ↗)“Laws and rules should not override free contractual rights”
  • less regulatory red tape»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory tangle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
  • small businesses in procurement»har svårare att hävda sig i de offentliga beslutsprocesserna« (party programme ↗)“Have difficulty asserting themselves in public decision-making processes”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that conditions on the labour market in the main should be determined through agreement and not in law, and that increased wage dispersion is desirable.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that conditions on the labour market in the main should be determined through agreement and not in law, and that increased wage dispersion is desirable. The counter-proposal's requirements for statutory wage and conditions guarantees in contractor changes and greater union influence in procurement go against that line. The plan's commitment to reduced regulatory burden for small companies points in the same direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att villkoren på arbetsmarknaden i huvudsak ska bestämmas genom avtal och inte i lag, och att ökad lönespridning är önskvärd. Motförslagets krav på lagstadgade löne- och villkorsgarantier vid entreprenörsbyte och ett större fackligt inflytande i upphandlingen går emot den linjen. Planens åtagande om minskad regelbörda för små företag pekar åt samma håll.

  • conditions through agreement, not lawdecisive»avtal och inte i lag, bidrar till ansvarstagande på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“agreement and not in law, contributes to responsibility in the labour market.”
  • increased wage dispersion»Därför är ökad lönespridning önskvärd« (party programme ↗)“Therefore increased wage dispersion is desirable”
  • reduced regulatory burden for small companies»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden for small companies shall decrease”
  • easier and cheaper to employ»Därför vill vi att det ska bli enklare och billigare att anställa genom att arbetsgivaravgifterna sänks för både småföretagare och för dem som vill anställa unga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want it to become easier and cheaper to employ by lowering employer contributions for both small companies and for those who want to employ young people.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan explicitly rejects state control of wage formation and places the design of conditions with the labor market parties.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly rejects state control of wage formation and places the design of conditions with the labor market parties. Statutory requirements that wages and conditions shall follow in contractor change, mandatory disclosure of wage levels and expanded union influence in procurement are precisely such control. The plan further wants small businesses to be able to grow without unjustified thresholds.

Original (Swedish)

Planen avvisar uttryckligen statlig styrning av lönebildningen och lägger utformningen av villkoren hos arbetsmarknadens parter. Lagkrav på att löner och villkor ska följa med vid entreprenörsbyte, obligatorisk redovisning av lönenivåer och utökat fackligt inflytande i upphandlingen är just sådan styrning. Planen vill dessutom att små företag ska kunna växa utan omotiverade trösklar.

  • no state wage policydecisive»Statlig styrning av lönebildningen i form av inkomstpolitik avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“State control of wage formation in the form of incomes policy is rejected.”
  • the parties model»Utformningen ska göras av arbetsmarknadens parter.« (party programme ↗)“The design shall be made by the labor market parties.”
  • balanced employment protection»Den arbetsrättsliga lagstiftningen ska ge ett rimligt« (party programme ↗)“The labor law legislation shall provide reasonable”
  • small business perspective in regulation»regler ska motverkas. Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas. Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“rules shall be countered. Direct company subsidies are rejected. Forthcoming laws should be tested from a small business perspective.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal demands legislated guarantees of equal wages and conditions when contractors change, mandatory disclosure of staff and wage levels and greater union influence in procurement.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal demands legislated guarantees of equal wages and conditions when contractors change, mandatory disclosure of staff and wage levels and greater union influence in procurement. The plan wants to lower the cost of hiring and greatly reduce companies' administration and regulatory red tape, and the state's role in the economy is to value its institutions and promote competition. The plan therefore rejects the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver lagstiftade garantier om samma löner och villkor vid entreprenörsbyte, obligatorisk redovisning av personal och lönenivåer samt större fackligt inflytande i upphandlingen. Planen vill i stället sänka kostnaderna för att anställa och kraftigt minska företagens administration och regelkrångel, och statens roll i ekonomin är att värna dess institutioner och främja konkurrens. Planen avvisar därför kravet.

  • reduced administrative burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
  • lower employment costs»Kraftigt sänka anställningskostnaderna för den som anställer nyanlända och långtidsarbetslösa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly lower employment costs for those who hire newly arrived and long-term unemployed”
  • state's limited role»Statens roll i ekonomin är att värna dess grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in the economy is to value its basic”
  • market economy as foundation»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan defends the Swedish model where labor market parties negotiate wage levels, while the counter-proposal wants to legislate on wages and conditions in contractor changes.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan defends the Swedish model where labor market parties negotiate wage levels, while the counter-proposal wants to legislate on wages and conditions in contractor changes. The plan furthermore wants to depoliticize occupational health work and dismantle politically controlled trade unions' special position, which speaks against greater union influence in the procurement process. Mandatory reporting of staffing levels and wage levels also increases the administrative burden the plan wants to ease.

Original (Swedish)

Planen försvarar den svenska modellen där arbetsmarknadens parter förhandlar om lönenivåer, medan motförslaget vill lagstifta om löner och villkor vid entreprenörsbyte. Planen vill dessutom avpolitisera arbetsmiljöarbetet och avveckla politiskt styrda fackförbunds särställning, vilket talar mot ett större fackligt inflytande i upphandlingsprocessen. Obligatorisk redovisning av personalstyrka och lönenivåer ökar också den administrativa börda planen vill lätta.

  • parties set wagesdecisive»arbetsmarknadens parter genom förhandlingar gör upp om lönenivåer och andra« (party programme ↗)“labor market parties through negotiations agree on wage levels and other”
  • depoliticized union influence»Sverigedemokraterna vill avpolitisera arbetsmiljöarbetet genom att avveckla politiskt styrda fackförbunds företrädesrätt att utse skyddsombud.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Swedish Democrats want to depoliticize occupational health work by dismantling politically controlled trade unions' right of preference to appoint safety representatives.”
  • depoliticized working environment»Avpolitisera arbetsmiljöarbetet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Depoliticize occupational health work”
  • reduced administrative burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament