2025-04-092024/25:FiU34 · p.11FiUEconomy & finance

Direct Procurement and Threshold Value

The threshold for direct procurement

What's at stake: The rules on direct procurement determine how easy it is for smaller companies to compete for public contracts without the advertising and formal requirements that apply to larger procurements, while a lack of transparency in direct procurement can increase the risk of corruption. The decision affects both suppliers' competitive opportunities and the public's ability to see how tax funds are used.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the threshold for direct procurement - procurement without advertising - should be raised and made more transparent to make it easier for smaller companies, or whether the current, simplified framework introduced in 2022 is already sufficiently well balanced.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that since 2022 there has been a simplified procurement framework for procurements not governed by the EU directives, under which, among other things, the threshold for direct procurement of certain social and other special services has already been raised. The committee stresses that a basic framework for these procurements too meets the public's and suppliers' need for transparency and predictability and is an important precondition for the work against corruption, and that it would therefore be problematic to design the legislation solely on the basis of what buyers and suppliers might request. The committee therefore rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 17 (SD)

The reservation wants to counter high thresholds that exclude small businesses from procurement and to make it possible for more companies to participate even without a collective agreement, including by splitting large procurements into smaller parts or letting small companies team up. It wants to raise the limit for how much can be procured directly while increasing transparency in direct procurements - which today do not need to be advertised - for example through changed requirements for information in procurement notices, to counter corruption and give a better picture of competition.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 17 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SYesYes 93/0/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPYesYes 14/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDown reservationNoNo 0/62/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1207 by Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) requests 1 and 2, and 2024/25:1469 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) request 6.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1207 av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2024/25:1469 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 6.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 50 proposals concerning how both the regulations and procedures for public procurement are designed, regarding for example small businesses, civil society organisations, animal welfare, and environmental requirements. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag points in particular to the fact that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan makes explicit demands for collective agreements in public procurement and wants all employees to be protected by strong collective agreements.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes explicit demands for collective agreements in public procurement and wants all employees to be protected by strong collective agreements. The counter-proposal by contrast wants to make it possible for more to participate in procurement without collective agreements and raise the ceiling for direct procurement, which also reduces the transparency the plan wants to increase to counter fraud. That the plan wants good conditions for sound small businesses does not outweigh that.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ställer uttryckliga krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar och vill att alla anställda skyddas av starka kollektivavtal. Motförslaget vill tvärtom göra det möjligt för fler att delta i upphandlingar utan kollektivavtal och höja gränsen för direktupphandling, vilket också minskar insynen som planen vill öka för att stävja fusk. Att planen vill ha goda villkor för sunda småföretag väger inte upp det.

  • collective agreements in procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party demands collective agreements in public procurement.”
  • collective agreements for all»Alla anställda i Sverige ska skyddas av starka kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“All employees in Sweden shall be protected by strong collective agreements.”
  • increased transparency against fraud»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn i företag där det behövs för att stävja fusk med till exempel skatter och anställningar.« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater public transparency in companies where needed to counter fraud with for example taxes and employment.”
  • conditions for sound companies»Vi vill se goda villkor för sunda företag« (party programme ↗)“We want to see good conditions for sound companies”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's decisive commitment is that public procurers shall be examples of fair competition and that it shall never pay to compete through worse conditions for employees, with the collective agreement as a necessary prerequisite in working life.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's decisive commitment is that public procurers shall be examples of fair competition and that it shall never pay to compete through worse conditions for employees, with the collective agreement as a necessary prerequisite in working life. The counter-proposal wants instead to open procurements to more suppliers even without collective agreements and raise the threshold for direct procurement. That the plan wants to stimulate small enterprise weighs partly the other way.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande åtagande är att offentliga upphandlare ska vara föredömen för sund konkurrens och att det aldrig ska löna sig att konkurrera genom sämre villkor för de anställda, med kollektivavtalet som nödvändig förutsättning i arbetslivet. Motförslaget vill tvärtom öppna upphandlingar för fler leverantörer även utan kollektivavtal och höja gränsen för direktupphandling. Att planen vill stimulera småföretagande väger delvis åt andra hållet.

  • requirements in public procurementdecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Workplace crime shall not exist in the Swedish labour market and public employers and procurers shall be examples in working for fair competition.”
  • collective agreements as requirement»Kollektivavtal är en nödvändig« (party programme ↗)“Collective agreements are a necessary”
  • good working conditions for all»goda arbetsvillkor, trygg försörjning och inflytande över det egna arbetet.« (party programme ↗)“good working conditions, secure income and influence over one's own work.”
  • stimulate small enterprise»entreprenörskap och kooperativ och social företagsamhet ska stimuleras.« (party programme ↗)“entrepreneurship and cooperatives and social enterprise shall be stimulated.”

flags: citat_migrerat

MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan cherishes the Swedish model with collective agreements and requires that procurement sets requirements for environment, social conditions and working environment and that environmental and quality aspects are weighted more heavily.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan cherishes the Swedish model with collective agreements and requires that procurement sets requirements for environment, social conditions and working environment and that environmental and quality aspects are weighted more heavily. Opening participation without collective agreements and raising the threshold for direct procurement goes in the opposite direction, even though the plan shares the ambition that small businesses should be able to participate. Therefore the requirement is rejected, but with low certainty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen värnar den svenska modellen med kollektivavtal och kräver att upphandlingar ställer krav på miljö, sociala villkor och arbetsmiljö samt att miljö- och kvalitetsaspekter viktas tyngre. Att öppna för deltagande utan kollektivavtal och höja gränsen för direktupphandling drar i motsatt riktning, även om planen delar ambitionen att små företag ska kunna delta. Därför avvisas kravet, men med låg säkerhet.

  • cherish the collective agreement modeldecisive»Vi värnar den svenska modellen där arbetsmarknadens parter gemensamt förhandlar fram vad som« (party programme ↗)“We cherish the Swedish model where labour market parties jointly negotiate what is”
  • heavier requirements in procurement»miljö- och kvalitetsaspekterna viktas betydligt« (party programme ↗)“environmental and quality aspects are weighted significantly”
  • social conditions in procurement»krav ställas vad gäller miljö, sociala villkor samt« (party programme ↗)“requirements are set regarding environment, social conditions and”
  • small business participation»byggsektorn genom att ge små och medelstora« (party programme ↗)“the construction sector by giving small and medium-sized”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan makes the party to small companies' foremost representative and wants to clear out the rule tangle for entrepreneurs, large as small.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the party to small companies' foremost representative and wants to clear out the rule tangle for entrepreneurs, large as small. The counter-proposal wants to lower the thresholds so that small companies can participate in procurements, divide up large procurements and raise the direct procurement threshold, at the same time as transparency increases. The plan sees that small companies have harder to assert themselves in public decision processes, and wants at the same time sharpen rules against corruption. The plan therefore supports the requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör partiet till småföretagens främsta företrädare och vill rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små. Motförslaget vill sänka trösklarna så att småföretag kan delta i upphandlingar, dela upp stora upphandlingar och höja direktupphandlingsgränsen, samtidigt som transparensen ökar. Planen ser just att små företag har svårare att hävda sig i offentliga beslutsprocesser, och vill samtidigt skärpa reglerna mot korruption. Planen stöder därför kravet.

  • small companies' best frienddecisive»Därför kommer Centerpartiet alltid att vara småföretagens bästa vän i svensk politik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the Center Party will always be small companies' best friend in Swedish politics.”
  • less rule complications»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear out the rule tangle for entrepreneurs, large as small.”
  • small companies in public processes»har svårare att hävda sig i de offentliga beslutsprocesserna« (party programme ↗)“have harder to assert themselves in the public decision processes”
  • transparency against corruption»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, sharpen rules against corruption and introduce a lobby register.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan commits to reducing regulatory burden for small businesses and to analysing public decisions from a small business perspective.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to reducing regulatory burden for small businesses and to analysing public decisions from a small business perspective. That lowering thresholds in procurement, dividing large contracts and raising the direct procurement limit follows directly from that commitment. The requirement for increased transparency lies in line with the plan's view of publicity and oversight of publicly financed activities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen åtar sig att regelbördan för små företag ska minska och att offentliga beslut ska analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv. Att sänka trösklarna i upphandling, dela upp stora kontrakt och höja direktupphandlingsgränsen följer direkt av det åtagandet. Kravet på ökad transparens ligger i linje med planens syn på offentlighet och insyn i offentligt finansierad verksamhet.

  • reduced regulatory burden for small businessesdecisive»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden for small businesses shall decrease”
  • small business perspective in decisions»offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv« (party programme ↗)“public decisions are analysed from a small business perspective”
  • more business owners create jobs»Fler företagare och entreprenörer skapar fler jobb och mer välstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More business owners and entrepreneurs create more jobs and more well-being.”
  • publicity and oversight»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret,« (party programme ↗)“The principle of publicity has fundamental significance for anchoring and deepening popular rule,”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan places small and medium-sized enterprises at the center of business policy and requires that bureaucracy is countered and that forthcoming rules are tested from a small business perspective.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan places small and medium-sized enterprises at the center of business policy and requires that bureaucracy is countered and that forthcoming rules are tested from a small business perspective. Higher direct procurement threshold and divided procurements lower precisely the thresholds that shut out small businesses. The requirement for increased transparency is covered by the plan's emphasis on honesty as the foundation for the market.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter de små och medelstora företagen i centrum för näringspolitiken och kräver att byråkrati motverkas och att tillkommande regler prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv. Högre direktupphandlingsgräns och uppdelade upphandlingar sänker just de trösklar som stänger ute småföretag. Kravet på ökad transparens ryms i planens betoning av hederlighet som fundament för marknaden.

  • small business perspective in regulationdecisive»regler ska motverkas. Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas. Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“rules shall be countered. Direct company subsidies are rejected. Forthcoming laws should be tested from a small business perspective.”
  • reduced bureaucracy»företagande över hela landet. Byråkrati och krångliga« (party programme ↗)“enterprise throughout the country. Bureaucracy and complicated”
  • honesty in business»Hederlighet och personligt ansvarstagande är« (party programme ↗)“Honesty and personal responsibility are”
  • more companies»FLER FöRETAG« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE COMPANIES”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal demands lower thresholds for small businesses in procurement, participation even without collective agreements and a raised direct procurement threshold with increased transparency.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal demands lower thresholds for small businesses in procurement, participation even without collective agreements and a raised direct procurement threshold with increased transparency. The plan establishes that bureaucracy and complicated processes put obstacles in the way of enterprise and that one-third of regulatory red tape shall be removed, while public waste in all forms shall be combated. The demand aligns with this, so the plan supports it.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver lägre trösklar för småföretag i upphandling, deltagande även utan kollektivavtal och en höjd direktupphandlingsgräns med ökad transparens. Planen slår fast att byråkrati och krångliga processer sätter käppar i hjulet för företagande och att en tredjedel av regelkrånglet ska bort, samtidigt som offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas. Kravet ligger i linje med detta, varför planen stöder det.

  • bureaucracy hinders businessdecisive»höga skatter, krångliga tillståndsprocesser och byråkrati sätter käppar i hjulet för innovation och tillväxt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“high taxes, complicated permit processes and bureaucracy put obstacles in the way of innovation and growth”
  • reduced regulatory red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
  • good conditions for small business»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda för att fler ska våga lämna trygga och välbetalda jobb för att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good so more dare to leave secure and well-paid jobs to start a business.”
  • respect for tax money»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly states that unnecessarily strict conditions in public procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market, and wants to work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that unnecessarily strict conditions in public procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market, and wants to work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden. Lowering thresholds, dividing up large procurements and raising the direct procurement threshold respond directly to that. The plan simultaneously requires that fraud and systems that invite corruption be counteracted, which the counter-proposal's transparency requirement meets.

Original (Swedish)

Planen konstaterar uttryckligen att onödigt stränga villkor i upphandlingar gör det svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden, och vill verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda. Att sänka trösklarna, dela upp stora upphandlingar och höja direktupphandlingsgränsen svarar direkt mot det. Planen kräver samtidigt att fusk och system som lockar till korruption motverkas, vilket motförslagets transparenskrav tillgodoser.

  • lower thresholds in procurementdecisive»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and in public procurement often make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market.”
  • regulatory simplification for small businesses»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”
  • counteract corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and such systems that tend to invite fraud and corruption shall be counteracted.”
  • support small business»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new business formation and entrepreneurship”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament