2026-04-222025/26:SfU18 · p.1SfUMigration & social insurance
Social insurance and welfare
Qualification for, and security within, social insurance
What's at stake: The decision affects the financial security of people with severe disabilities who can never work, of those hit by a severe life crisis, and of new arrivals whose social-insurance benefit levels are tied to work.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether qualification for, and levels within, social insurance should change - including through a possible basic income for people who can never work, and a work requirement for new arrivals before reaching higher benefit levels - or whether current rules and the government's ongoing initiatives in this area should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. The question of qualification for social insurance is considered already addressed through a government proposition to the Riksdag, and for the rest the committee refers to earlier positions on related social-insurance issues that the Riksdag has already backed and that the committee sees no reason to change.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation calls for a basic income to be investigated for people who, due to severe physical or psychological disabilities, will never be able to hold paid employment, and for the government to review the possibilities for financial security in severe life crises. It also holds that it is reasonable for new arrivals to have to work to reach higher benefit levels and thereby qualify into the Swedish social-insurance system, arguing that this increases incentives to work, lowers costs, and clarifies that the right to asylum is about protection rather than benefits.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 236–20Nej 121–135
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/16/6 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 90/0/0/16 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 55/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 60/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1954 by Jan Ericson (M), 2025/26:2210 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2779 by Isabell Mixter et al. (V) demands 1, 2 and 32, 2025/26:3187 by Martina Johansson et al. (C) demands 2 and 19, 2025/26:3190 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demand 27, 2025/26:3431 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP), 2025/26:3471 by Dan Hovskär (KD) demand 3 and 2025/26:3502 by Malte Tängmark Roos et al. (MP) demand 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1954 av Jan Ericson (M), 2025/26:2210 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2779 av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1, 2 och 32, 2025/26:3187 av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 2 och 19, 2025/26:3190 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 27, 2025/26:3431 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP), 2025/26:3471 av Dan Hovskär (KD) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3502 av Malte Tängmark Roos m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 162 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, security systems for entrepreneurs and students, sickness insurance and rehabilitation, sickness and activity compensation, and occupational injury insurance. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that investigations and preparations are ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to require work for newly arrived immigrants to reach higher benefit levels in social insurance. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal's central demand is that newly arrived shall qualify into social insurance through employment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's central demand is that newly arrived shall qualify into social insurance through employment. The plan explicitly distances itself from limited welfare for those not born in Sweden and demands that social insurance is universal and comprehensive. That the plan could simultaneously support an inquiry into citizen's income does not outweigh the decisive qualification requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets bärande krav är att nyanlända ska kvalificera sig in i socialförsäkringen genom arbete. Planen tar uttryckligen avstånd från begränsad välfärd för dem som inte är födda i Sverige och kräver att socialförsäkringarna är allmänna och heltäckande. Att planen samtidigt skulle kunna stödja en utredning om samhällslön väger inte upp det avgörande kvalificeringskravet.
- no to conditional welfaredecisive»När högerpartier förespråkar låglönejobb och begränsad välfärd för de av oss som inte är födda i Sverige bygger det på ett cyniskt utnyttjande av människor, ibland förklätt till antirasism.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When right-wing parties advocate low-wage jobs and limited welfare for those of us not born in Sweden it is based on cynical exploitation of people, sometimes disguised as anti-racism.”
- universal social insurance»Att socialförsäkringarna är allmänna och heltäckande gör dem kostnadseffektiva och bygger upp förtroendet för dem.« (party programme ↗)“That social insurance is universal and comprehensive makes it cost-effective and builds trust in it.”
- welfare for all who live here»Att välfärden omfattar alla som bor i vårt land har länge varit en viktig del i det som gjort Sverige till ett tryggt och jämlikt land.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That welfare covers all who live in our country has long been an important part of what has made Sweden a safe and equal country.”
- security without wage work»Samtidigt behöver de vara utformade så att alla människor ska kunna leva tryggt, också den som på grund av funktionshinder på arbetsplatserna inte har kunnat lönearbeta.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time they need to be designed so that all people can live securely, also those who due to disability in the workplace have not been able to earn wages.”
flags: motforslaget_innehaller_delar_planen_stodjer
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan defends a social safety net throughout life and the principle that those too ill to work should be able to rely on insurance, which lies close to the counter-proposal's wish to investigate security for those who can never work and in severe life crises.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends a social safety net throughout life and the principle that those too ill to work should be able to rely on insurance, which lies close to the counter-proposal's wish to investigate security for those who can never work and in severe life crises. The plan builds integration on both duty and right and requires that all who can work should work and contribute, which corresponds to the qualification part. The commitments are however generally held and do not concern precisely these proposals.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår vakt om ett socialt skyddsnät under hela livet och om principen att den som är för sjuk för att arbeta ska kunna lita på försäkringen, vilket ligger nära motförslagets önskan att utreda tryggheten för dem som aldrig kan arbeta och vid svåra livskriser. Planen bygger samtidigt integrationen på både plikt och rätt och kräver att alla som kan jobba ska jobba och bidra, vilket svarar mot kvalificeringsdelen. Åtagandena är dock allmänt hållna och rör inte just dessa förslag.
- robust social insurancedecisive»Socialt skyddsnät under hela livet, med robusta socialförsäkringar och stöd till dem« (party programme ↗)“Social safety net throughout life, with robust social insurance and support for those”
- security in illness»vi slår vakt om principen att den som är för sjuk för att arbeta ska kunna lita på sjukförsäkringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“we defend the principle that those too ill to work should be able to rely on sickness insurance”
- integration on duty and right»Integration byggd på både plikt och rätt, med tydligt ansvar också för individen« (party programme ↗)“Integration built on both duty and right, with clear responsibility also for the individual”
- employment line in integration»Alla som kan jobba ska jobba och bidra för att bli en del av samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All who can work should work and contribute to become part of society.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal's key demand is that newly arrived persons shall work themselves into social insurance, which directly contradicts the plan's commitment that the security system shall cover everyone and that solidarity is not conditional.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's key demand is that newly arrived persons shall work themselves into social insurance, which directly contradicts the plan's commitment that the security system shall cover everyone and that solidarity is not conditional. However, the part about community wages and security in severe life crises lies close to the plan's demand for increased benefits. The qualification requirement carries the most weight and causes the plan to reject the proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets bärande krav är att nyanlända ska arbeta sig in i socialförsäkringen, vilket direkt strider mot planens åtagande att trygghetssystemet ska omfatta alla och att solidariteten inte är villkorad. Delen om samhällslön och trygghet vid svåra livskriser ligger däremot nära planens krav på höjda ersättningar. Kvalificeringskravet väger tyngst och gör att planen avvisar förslaget.
- unconditional social securitydecisive»Vår solidaritet är inte villkorad till att arbeta i sektorer med kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“Our solidarity is not conditional on working in sectors with collective agreements.”
- security system that covers everyone»Målet är att detta trygghetssystem ska omfatta alla« (party programme ↗)“The aim is that this security system shall cover everyone”
- dignified benefit levels»Ersättningarna i trygghetssystemen ska vara tillräckligt höga för att säkerställa en värdig« (party programme ↗)“Benefits in the security systems shall be high enough to ensure a dignified”
- raised minimum levels»höja den lägsta nivån i sjuk- och aktivitetsersättningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the lowest level of sickness and activity benefits.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly states that newcomers should qualify into the security systems, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that newcomers should qualify into the security systems, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires. The plan also promises that those with a disability shall receive the support they need, and the party programme requires social safety nets that provide a good economic basic security, which supports the demand to investigate provision for those who can never work. The plan's emphasis on the work line remains a reservation.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att nyanlända bör kvalificera sig in i trygghetssystemen, vilket är precis vad motförslaget kräver. Planen lovar också att den som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd som behövs, och partiprogrammet kräver sociala skyddsnät som ger en god ekonomisk grundtrygghet, vilket bär kravet på att utreda försörjning för dem som aldrig kan arbeta. Planens betoning på arbetslinjen kvarstår dock som en reservation.
- qualification into security systemsdecisive»Nyanlända bör kvalificera sig in i trygghetssystemen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Newcomers should qualify into the security systems.”
- support for disability»Du som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd du behöver, och staten ska ta ett större ansvar för att LSS fungerar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who have a disability should get the support you need, and the state should take greater responsibility for LSS to work.”
- economic basic security»Välfärden ska innefatta sociala skyddsnät som förmår skapa en god ekonomisk grundtrygghet.« (party programme ↗)“Welfare shall encompass social safety nets that can provide good economic basic security.”
- work line valued»Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More money should be spent on welfare's core, less on benefits.”
The party programme establishes that there shall be a clear link between benefits and paid contributions, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement that newly arrived residents qualify into social insurance through work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that there shall be a clear link between benefits and paid contributions, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement that newly arrived residents qualify into social insurance through work. Simultaneously, the plan guarantees a basic economic standard and support for those whose work capacity is permanently reduced, which speaks for investigating security for those who can never work for wages. The plan does not address community wages, however, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det ska finnas ett tydligt samband mellan förmåner och inbetalade premier, vilket bär motförslagets krav på att nyanlända kvalificerar sig in i socialförsäkringen genom arbete. Samtidigt garanterar planen en grundläggande ekonomisk standard och stöd åt dem vars arbetsförmåga är varaktigt nedsatt, vilket talar för att utreda tryggheten för dem som aldrig kan lönearbeta. Planen behandlar dock inte samhällslön, så stödet är härlett.
- benefits linked to contributionsdecisive»Det ska finnas ett tydligt samband mellan förmåner och inbetalade premier.« (party programme ↗)“There shall be a clear link between benefits and paid contributions.”
- work line»Det ska alltid löna sig att arbeta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall always pay to work.”
- basic economic security»Alla har rätt till en grundläggande ekonomisk standard.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a right to a basic economic standard.”
- support for reduced work capacity»Personer med en funktionsnedsättning som trots hjälpmedel och anpassningsåtgärder begränsar arbetsutbud ska ha möjlighet till lönesubvention.« (party programme ↗)“Persons with a disability that despite aids and accommodations limits work capacity shall have access to wage subsidies.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that tax and benefit systems be designed so that people's own strength is encouraged and benefit dependency is prevented, and the election manifesto a strict migration policy to address exclusion.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that tax and benefit systems be designed so that people's own strength is encouraged and benefit dependency is prevented, and the election manifesto a strict migration policy to address exclusion. The counter-proposal's requirement that newly arrived qualify into social insurance through work follows from this. The plan's rights law on disability and solidarily financed social insurance also supports the requirement to investigate provisions for those who can never work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skatte- och bidragssystemen utformas så att människors egen kraft uppmuntras och bidragsberoende motverkas, och valmanifestet en stram migrationspolitik för att ta itu med utanförskap. Motförslagets krav på att nyanlända kvalificerar sig in i socialförsäkringen genom arbete följer av detta. Planens rättighetslag vid funktionsnedsättning och solidariska socialförsäkring bär också kravet på att utreda försörjning för den som aldrig kan arbeta.
- prevent benefit dependencydecisive»Skatte- och bidragssystemen måste utformas så att människors egen kraft och engagemang« (party programme ↗)“Tax and benefit systems must be designed so that people's own strength and commitment”
- strict migration policy»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
- rights law on disability»Det bör finnas en rättighetslag som skapar förutsättningar för goda« (party programme ↗)“There should be a rights law that creates conditions for good”
- solidarily financed social insurance»Ett solidariskt finansierat socialförsäkringssystem ska finnas för att ge ekonomisk trygghet« (party programme ↗)“A solidarily financed social insurance system shall exist to provide economic security”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires that the person who has immigrated should qualify for welfare benefits through own work, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to see in social insurance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that the person who has immigrated should qualify for welfare benefits through own work, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to see in social insurance. The plan also states that total benefits must never become so high that work doesn't pay. The requirement for an investigation into security for those who can never work falls within the plan's principle that the state has a responsibility for those who cannot work for physical or psychological reasons.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att den som invandrat ska kvalificera sig till välfärdsförmåner genom eget arbete, vilket är precis vad motförslaget vill se i socialförsäkringen. Planen slår också fast att de samlade bidragen aldrig får bli så höga att arbete inte lönar sig. Kravet på en utredning om trygghet för dem som aldrig kan arbeta ryms i planens princip att staten har ett ansvar för den som av fysiska eller psykiska skäl inte kan arbeta.
- qualification for welfaredecisive»Införa kvalificering till välfärden för nyanlända genom eget arbete eller genom permanent och laglig bosättning i landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce qualification for welfare for newly arrived through own work or through permanent and lawful settlement in the country”
- qualification through work»Se till att den som invandrat kvalificerar sig till olika välfärdsförmåner genom arbete och utbildning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that the person who has immigrated qualifies for various welfare benefits through work and education”
- work must always pay»De samlade bidragen ska aldrig bli så höga att det inte lönar sig att jobba.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total benefits must never become so high that work doesn't pay”
- state responsibility for those unable to work»skäl inte kan arbeta har staten ett ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“reasons cannot work, the state has a responsibility”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly requires that access to welfare and social insurance be tied to work, language learning and citizenship, and that the threshold to tax-financed welfare be raised.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that access to welfare and social insurance be tied to work, language learning and citizenship, and that the threshold to tax-financed welfare be raised. The counter-proposal's demand that newly arrived persons work their way into the social insurance system is precisely this commitment. The plan also carries the other part, since it wishes to increase support for those who because of illness or functional limitation cannot work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att tillgången till välfärd och socialförsäkring knyts till arbete, språkinlärning och medborgarskap och att tröskeln till skattefinansierad välfärd höjs. Motförslagets krav på att nyanlända ska arbeta sig in i socialförsäkringssystemet är precis detta åtagande. Planen bär också den andra delen, eftersom den vill öka stödet till dem som på grund av sjukdom eller funktionsnedsättning inte kan arbeta.
- requirement-based qualification for welfaredecisive»Utforma en kravbaserad integrationspolitik som ger rättigheter till välfärden i takt med språkinlärning, arbete och slutligen medborgarskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a requirement-based integration policy that provides rights to welfare in pace with language learning, work and finally citizenship.”
- social insurance tied to work»Tillgång till socialförsäkringssystemet och svensk välfärd ska knytas närmre medborgarskapet och arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to the social insurance system and Swedish welfare shall be tied more closely to citizenship and work.”
- raised threshold to welfare»Skärpa villkoren för medborgarskap och höja tröskeln för att ta del av skattefinansierad välfärd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Toughen conditions for citizenship and raise the threshold to partake in tax-financed welfare.”
- support for those unable to work»Samtidigt behövs ett ökat stöd till de mest utsatta, som på grund av sjukdom eller funktionsnedsättning inte har kunnat arbeta i full utsträckning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, increased support is needed for the most vulnerable, who because of illness or functional limitation have not been able to work to full extent.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SfU18)
- Committee report full text (HD01SfU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1216 — Utveckling av Finsamlagstiftningen av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1359 — Tidsbegränsning för återkrav inom socialförsäkringen av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1360 — Avskaffande av karensavdrag i sjukförsäkringen av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1361 — En reform av sjukförsäkringen som tar hänsyn till vårdköer vid bedömning av arbetsförmåga av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1415 — Säkrad övergång mellan aktivitetsersättning och sjukersättning av Åsa Karlsson och Helén Pettersson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1425 — Musikers och kulturarbetares situation i trygghetssystemet av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1466 — Arbetsförmedlingen, Försäkringskassan och kommunen av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1503 — Brister i arbetsskadeutredningen av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1525 — Förutsättningar för våra elitidrottare av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1537 — En fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela Öresundsområdet av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1584 — Fribelopp för personer med aktivitetsersättning av Malin Danielsson (L)
- Motion 2025/26:171 — Politik för äldres rättigheter och välmående av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1768 — Utökad användning av biometri för att motverka bidragsfusk av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1830 — Avskaffande av karensavdraget av Johanna Haraldsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1832 — Utbildning, omställning och trygghet på arbetsmarknaden av Johanna Haraldsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1954 — Översyn av indexering av bidrag och sociala ersättningar av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2210 — Möjliggörande av vård av förälder av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2221 — Sjukskrivning efter skönhetsoperationer utan medicinska orsaker av Boriana Åberg och Jan Ericson (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2779 — En tryggare sjukförsäkring av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2798 — Svensk flyktingpolitik av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament