2023-11-152023/24:KU3 · p.1KUConstitution
Media Support Act
New law on state media support with a democracy condition
What's at stake: The decision shapes how state support for news media is regulated going forward, what conditions apply for receiving support, and whether resources are directed toward local news coverage at the expense of breadth and diversity in the media landscape.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should adopt the government's proposed new media support law, including a democracy condition and a priority on local news coverage, as drafted, or whether the text should first be amended in several respects.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee supports the government's proposal for a new media support law, including a democracy condition intended to ensure that state funds do not go to activities incompatible with fundamental democratic values, and rejects the motions calling to amend the bill in these respects.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) argues the bill is well-balanced in parts but flawed: the purpose clause prioritizes local news coverage at the expense of breadth and diversity and should be changed, the democracy condition should instead be explicitly grounded in the values of the Instrument of Government to avoid support reaching entities that work against democracy, and the definition of a news medium should not exclude outlets that combine news reporting with opinion journalism; support should be reserved for media that genuinely need it.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 169–94Ja 263–0
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | Yes | No 0/94/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the government's proposal for a Media Support Act with the amendment that the expression "Agency for Press, Radio and Television" in Section 9 shall be replaced with "Media Agency". Thereby, the Riksdag partially approves proposition 2022/23:133 point 1 and rejects the following motions 2023/24:20 by Jessica Wetterling et al. (V) demands 1 and 2, 2023/24:35 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) demands 1-3, 2023/24:37 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) demands 1-4, 2023/24:2490 by Malin Björk et al. (C) demand 22, 2023/24:2685 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) demand 13, and 2023/24:2686 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demand 29.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om mediestöd med den ändringen att uttrycket "Myndigheten för press, radio och tv" i 9 § ska bytas ut mot "Mediemyndigheten". Därmed bifaller riksdagen delvis proposition 2022/23:133 punkt 1 och avslår motionerna 2023/24:20 av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:35 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-3, 2023/24:37 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-4, 2023/24:2490 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) yrkande 22, 2023/24:2685 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkande 13 och 2023/24:2686 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 29.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal for a new Media Support Act. The new law contains provisions on the purpose of media support, on basic conditions for media support, and on the media support board. The law comes into effect on January 1, 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to amend the media support law to ensure that support goes to media in need of economic support. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands diversity of channels for news, opinion exchange and opinion formation and generous state support to press and periodicals, without the state controlling content.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands diversity of channels for news, opinion exchange and opinion formation and generous state support to press and periodicals, without the state controlling content. The counter-proposal's demands that breadth and diversity are not subordinated to local news coverage, that opinion journalism is not excluded and that the democracy condition rests on constitutional values follow from these commitments. The plan also addresses the committee's reasons about a democracy condition through its requirement of arm's length distance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en mångfald av kanaler för nyheter, åsiktsbrytning och opinionsbildning och ett generöst statligt stöd till press och tidskrifter, utan att staten kontrollerar innehållet. Motförslagets krav på att bredd och mångfald inte får underordnas lokal nyhetsbevakning, att opinionsjournalistik inte utesluts och att demokrativillkoret vilar på grundlagens värderingar följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen berör också utskottets skäl om ett demokrativillkor genom sitt krav på armlängds avstånd.
- media diversity for democracydecisive»Samhällets demokratisering kräver en mångfald av kanaler för information, nyheter, åsiktsbrytning och opinionsbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Society's democratization requires diversity of channels for information, news, opinion exchange and opinion formation.”
- no state content control»utan att detta innebär en kontroll av innehållet i fria medier.« (party programme ↗)“without this implying control of the content of free media.”
- arm's length distance»Politiken ska skapa förutsättningar för en bred kultur som kommer alla till del och hålla armlängds avstånd till innehållet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall create conditions for broad culture that reaches everyone and maintain arm's length distance from content.”
- generous media support»det är viktigt med ett generöst stöd till« (party programme ↗)“it is important with generous support to”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly states that media support should provide conditions for independent and locally rooted news distribution throughout the country, precisely the prioritisation of local news coverage that the counter-proposal objects to.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that media support should provide conditions for independent and locally rooted news distribution throughout the country, precisely the prioritisation of local news coverage that the counter-proposal objects to. The plan also stands behind public funds not going to forces that do not stand up for all people's equal value, which supports a democracy condition of the proposed type. The demand for diversity in media policy exists in the party programme but does not break the election manifesto's prioritisation.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att mediestödet ska ge förutsättningar för oberoende och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling i hela landet, precis den prioritering av lokal nyhetsbevakning som motförslaget invänder mot. Planen står också bakom att offentliga medel inte ska gå till krafter som inte står upp för alla människors lika värde, vilket stöder ett demokrativillkor av den föreslagna typen. Kravet på mångfald i mediepolitiken finns i partiprogrammet men bryter inte valmanifestets prioritering.
- locally rooted news distributiondecisive»Mediestödet ska ge förutsättningar för oberoende och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media support should provide conditions for independent and locally rooted news distribution throughout the country.”
- democracy condition for state funding»Socialdemokraterna kommer aldrig att medverka till att ge makt åt Sverigedemokraterna, ett parti som inte står upp för alla människors lika värde och rätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Social democrats will never participate in giving power to the Sweden Democrats, a party that does not stand up for all people's equal value and rights.”
- protection against anti-democratic forces»Demokratin undergrävs när rasistiska och andra ickedemokratiska grupper sprider sitt hat« (party programme ↗)“Democracy is undermined when racist and other non-democratic groups spread their hate”
- media diversity as counterweight»Att motverka maktkoncentration och att upprätthålla mångfald ska vara centrala delar av« (party programme ↗)“Counteracting concentration of power and maintaining diversity should be central parts of”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants media support to be reformed so that it strengthens smaller actors and that a diversity of opinions and freedom of speech are guaranteed, with support for independent media throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants media support to be reformed so that it strengthens smaller actors and that a diversity of opinions and freedom of speech are guaranteed, with support for independent media throughout the country. The counter-proposal's objections about breadth and diversity, that opinion journalism must not exclude a news outlet and that support should go to those who need it are in line with these commitments. The plan is, however, silent on the precise construction of the democracy requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att mediestödet omformas så att det stärker mindre aktörer och att en mångfald av åsikter och yttrandefrihet garanteras, med stöd till oberoende medier i hela landet. Motförslagets invändningar om bredd och mångfald, om att opinionsjournalistik inte får utesluta ett nyhetsmedium och om att stödet ska gå till dem som behöver det ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen är däremot tyst om demokrativillkorets exakta konstruktion.
- support that strengthens smaller actorsdecisive»omformas så att det stärker mindre aktörer« (party programme ↗)“be reformed so that it strengthens smaller actors”
- diversity of opinions»garantera en mångfald av åsikter och yttrandefrihet« (party programme ↗)“guarantee a diversity of opinions and freedom of speech”
- independent media throughout the country»förstärka yttrandefriheten och stödja oberoende medier i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen freedom of speech and support independent media throughout the country.”
- investigative journalism for democracy»Ett demokratiskt samhälle kräver saklig information, aktiv samhällsgranskning och grävande« (party programme ↗)“A democratic society requires factual information, active public scrutiny and investigative”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country and that media stand free from political control, which carries the objection that the aim should give breadth and diversity equal weight and that opinion journalism must not exclude a medium from support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country and that media stand free from political control, which carries the objection that the aim should give breadth and diversity equal weight and that opinion journalism must not exclude a medium from support. The plan's principle that policy should not act as taste-maker supports tying the democracy condition to constitutional values rather than to political judgements. That support should go to those who actually need it follows from the demand to manage taxpayers' money.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet och att medier står fria från politisk kontroll, vilket bär invändningen att syftet bör ge bredd och mångfald samma vikt och att opinionsjournalistik inte får utesluta ett medium från stöd. Planens princip att politiken inte ska agera smakdomare stödjer att demokrativillkoret knyts till grundlagens värderingar snarare än till politiska bedömningar. Att stödet ska gå till dem som faktiskt behöver det följer av kravet att hushålla med skattemedel.
- comprehensive and independent media monitoringdecisive»En allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin. Pressfriheten ska skyddas och oberoende public service försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is crucial for democracy. Press freedom shall be protected and independent public service defended.”
- media free from political control»Tillgången till oberoende medier som står fria från såväl politisk kontroll och censur« (party programme ↗)“Access to independent media that stand free from both political control and censorship”
- policy not taste-maker»Politiken ska akta sig för att agera smakdomare och diktera kulturens innehåll.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should beware of acting as taste-maker and dictating culture's content.”
- support according to actual need»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall manage taxpayers' money.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to reorganize press and media support precisely to promote local quality investigative journalism throughout the country, while the counter-proposal argues that the purpose clause wrongly prioritizes local news coverage over breadth and diversity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to reorganize press and media support precisely to promote local quality investigative journalism throughout the country, while the counter-proposal argues that the purpose clause wrongly prioritizes local news coverage over breadth and diversity. The plan also stands behind a democracy condition through the demand for strengthened monitoring of subsidies and stop for financing that favors extremist forces. The demand for needs testing lies closer to the plan's skepticism about permanent press support, but the decisive commitment speaks against the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill göra om press- och mediestödet just för att främja lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik i hela landet, medan motförslaget menar att syftesparagrafen felaktigt prioriterar lokal nyhetsbevakning framför bredd och mångfald. Planen står också bakom ett demokrativillkor genom kravet på stärkt uppföljning av bidragsgivning och stopp för finansiering som gynnar extremistiska krafter. Kravet på behovsprövning ligger närmare planens skepsis mot varaktigt presstöd, men det avgörande åtagandet talar mot motförslaget.
- media support for local journalismdecisive»Vi vill göra om press- och mediestödet för att främja en lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to reorganize press and media support to promote local quality investigative journalism throughout the country.”
- democracy condition for public grants»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen monitoring of subsidies and stop hidden financing of religious communities so that they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
- media independence»Mediernas oberoende måste värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Media independence must be protected.”
- time-limited press support»Reklamskatten ska avskaffas och en bortre tidsgräns för det nuvarande presstödet slås fast.« (party programme ↗)“Advertising tax shall be abolished and a terminal time limit for current press support shall be fixed.”
The plan requires strong protection for freedom of expression and that public support is conditioned on the activity being in accordance with fundamental values, which lies close to the requirement that the democracy condition shall be based on the constitution's values.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires strong protection for freedom of expression and that public support is conditioned on the activity being in accordance with fundamental values, which lies close to the requirement that the democracy condition shall be based on the constitution's values. The requirement for breadth and diversity and that support be reserved for those who need it is supported by the plan's emphasis on diversity and restraint with public funds. The plan, however, does not take a stance on the exact wording of the purpose paragraph.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett starkt skydd för yttrandefriheten och att offentligt stöd villkoras av att verksamheten står i överensstämmelse med grundläggande värden, vilket ligger nära kravet att demokrativillkoret ska utgå från grundlagens värderingar. Kravet på bredd och mångfald och på att stödet förbehålls dem som behöver det stöds av planens betoning av mångfald och återhållsamhet med offentliga medel. Planen tar däremot inte ställning till syftesparagrafens exakta utformning.
- support conditioned on valuesdecisive»Stöd ska därför utgå till de trossamfund som bedriver« (party programme ↗)“Support shall therefore go to those religious communities that conduct”
- strong freedom of expression»Ett starkt skydd för yttrande- och meddelarfriheten« (party programme ↗)“Strong protection for freedom of expression and the freedom to communicate”
- constitutionally protected freedom of expression»det allmänna inte får ingripa mot yttrandefriheten« (party programme ↗)“the public may not interfere with freedom of expression”
- needs-tested support»återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“restraint in public expenditure.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's media policy goal is a broad range of media in various formats that can operate freely and in competition, and it wants to reform media support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's media policy goal is a broad range of media in various formats that can operate freely and in competition, and it wants to reform media support. That argues for the counter-proposal's requirement that breadth and diversity weigh equally as local news coverage and that media with opinion journalism should not be excluded. The plan also supports that public funds should not go to activities that do not share fundamental democratic values, which is close to the requirement that the democracy condition should be based on the Basic Law's values.
Original (Swedish)
Planens mediepolitiska mål är ett brett utbud av medier i olika format som kan verka fritt och i konkurrens, och den vill reformera mediestödet. Det talar för motförslagets krav att bredd och mångfald ska väga lika tungt som lokal nyhetsbevakning och att medier med opinionsjournalistik inte ska stängas ute. Planen stöder också att skattemedel inte ska gå till verksamheter som inte delar grundläggande demokratiska värderingar, vilket ligger nära kravet att demokrativillkoret ska utgå från grundlagens värderingar.
- broad and diverse media rangedecisive»Moderaternas mediepolitik har som mål att skapa förutsättningar för ett brett utbud av medier i olika format som kan verka fritt, självständigt och i konkurrens med varandra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates' media policy aims to create conditions for a broad range of media in various formats that can operate freely, independently and in competition with each other”
- reformed media support»Reformera mediestödet för att stödja den digitala transformationen och omställningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reform media support to support digital transformation and transition”
- democracy condition for public funds»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of public money to organisations that do not share Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but which threaten people's freedom”
- free media as foundation»Fria medier och ett fritt kulturliv är fundament i ett pluralistiskt« (party programme ↗)“Free media and a free cultural life are foundations in a pluralistic”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that media independence increases through reduced political control and measures for increased plurality, and that public support goes only to activities compatible with democratic values.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that media independence increases through reduced political control and measures for increased plurality, and that public support goes only to activities compatible with democratic values. The counter-proposal's objections — that breadth and plurality must not be subordinated to local news coverage, that the democracy condition should rest on constitutional values and that support should be reserved for those who need it — correspond to these commitments. The plan does not address the details of media support legislation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att mediernas oberoende ökar genom minskad politisk styrning och åtgärder för ökad mångfald, och att offentligt stöd endast går till verksamhet som är förenlig med demokratiska värderingar. Motförslagets invändningar — att bredd och mångfald inte får underordnas lokal nyhetsbevakning, att demokrativillkoret bör vila på grundlagens värderingar och att stödet bör förbehållas dem som behöver det — svarar mot dessa åtaganden. Planen uttalar sig inte om mediestödslagens detaljer.
- media plurality and independencedecisive»Mediernas oberoende ska öka genom minskad politisk styrning från statsmakten och åtgärder för en ökad mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media independence shall increase through reduced political control from the state and measures for increased plurality.”
- democracy condition for public support»förenlig med demokratiska värderingar och en konstruktiv samhällsutveckling.« (party programme ↗)“compatible with democratic values and constructive social development.”
- reduced state media control»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the state's economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere.”
- no subsidies to antidemocrats»Stoppa bidrag till extremistiska idéorganisationer inom civilsamhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop subsidies to extremist ideological organizations within civil society.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KU3)
- Committee report full text (HB01KU3)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:20 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:133 Ett hållbart mediestöd för hela landet av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2483 — Kultur, civilsamhälle, idrott och medier i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2490 — Demokrati och konstitution av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2685 — Utgiftsområde 1 Rikets styrelse av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2686 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund och fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:33 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:133 Ett hållbart mediestöd för hela landet av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:35 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:133 Ett hållbart mediestöd för hela landet av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:37 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:133 Ett hållbart mediestöd för hela landet av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2022/23:133 — Ett hållbart mediestöd för hela landet
Source: The Swedish Parliament