2025-06-042024/25:MJU20 · p.10MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Financing of agriculture
Financing agriculture - credit guarantees and support for farmers
What's at stake: The decision concerns how young farmers can take over family farms when property prices are high, and how animal farmers - who can rarely take time off without paying someone to look after their animals - can get better access to relief workers and holidays. It also affects how competition over milk prices between dairies plays out for Swedish dairy farmers.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should introduce new financing tools for agriculture - such as a state credit guarantee for generational farm succession and support for a relief-worker service for animal farmers - or whether the competitiveness and profitability of agriculture should instead be strengthened through the existing food strategy and regulatory simplification, as favoured by the committee.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the updated food strategy and the ongoing work to strengthen agriculture's competitiveness and profitability through regulatory simplification, better business conditions, and research and innovation, and therefore rejects the motions calling for specific financing support.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 17 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) wants a state credit guarantee investigated to make it easier to buy out siblings during generational transfers of farm properties, including for people with no prior connection to farming. The party also wants a state co-financed support scheme for a relief-worker service for animal farmers to be investigated, with a pilot project in two counties while awaiting the results, and wants competition over milk prices between dairies to be made easier.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 17 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/1/19/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/1/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| VHåkan Svenneling (V, Värmlands län) | No — party line: Abstain |
| MMats Green (M, Jönköpings län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1371 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) point 38, 2024/25:1395 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) points 34, 40 and 41, 2024/25:1927 by Kajsa Fredholm et al. (V) point 8 and 2024/25:3071 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) point 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1371 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkande 38, 2024/25:1395 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 34, 40 och 41, 2024/25:1927 av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V) yrkande 8 och 2024/25:3071 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on expanded collection and provision of animal health data. By animal health data is meant, for example, information from veterinarians on how they use medicines to treat animals. The proposals mean, among other things, that a duty is introduced for veterinarians to hand over animal health data to the Board of Agriculture. It should also become possible for relevant authorities to share animal health data with breeding and animal health organizations. The legal amendments are proposed to come into force on 1 October 2025. The Riksdag also rejected approximately 160 proposals in motions on agricultural policy from the general motion period 2024. The reason for this is primarily that work is already underway in many of the matters the proposals concern. The proposals in the motions concern, among other things, the common agricultural policy, a sustainable and competitive agriculture, organic production and a plant-based agricultural sector, agriculture's climate and environmental impact, and plant breeding and research matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to maintain national decision-making authority over agriculture and to require consequence analyses before EU targets are adopted. (SD) — Reservation 17
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan gives the state a special responsibility for food supply and wants the state to secure socially important investments and improve conditions for smaller companies, and play a role in keeping pricing at a reasonable level.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives the state a special responsibility for food supply and wants the state to secure socially important investments and improve conditions for smaller companies, and play a role in keeping pricing at a reasonable level. A state credit guarantee during generational transitions, state co-financed replacement worker support and better competition over milk prices follow from these commitments, as do the demand that rural areas are not drained.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger staten ett särskilt ansvar för livsmedelsförsörjningen och vill att staten säkrar samhällsviktiga investeringar och förbättrar villkoren för mindre företag, samt spelar en roll för att hålla prissättningen på rimlig nivå. En statlig kreditgaranti vid generationsskiften, ett medfinansierat avbytarstöd och bättre konkurrens om mjölkpriset följer av dessa åtaganden, liksom av kravet att landsbygden inte utarmas.
- self-sufficiency in fooddecisive»se till att landet är tillräckligt självförsörjande med livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“ensure that the country is sufficiently self-sufficient in food.”
- state financing for smaller companies»investeringar, skärpa konkurrensen och förbättra villkoren för mindre« (party programme ↗)“investments, sharpen competition and improve conditions for smaller”
- state keeps prices reasonable»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies'”
- rural areas shall not be drained»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live we have a common interest in that rural areas are not drained.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly uses state credit guarantees as a tool when the market deems investments too risky, which is precisely the mechanism the counter-proposal wants to investigate for generational change in farming.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly uses state credit guarantees as a tool when the market deems investments too risky, which is precisely the mechanism the counter-proposal wants to investigate for generational change in farming. The party programme's goal of viable food production that strengthens self-sufficiency points in the same direction. The demand for increased competition over milk prices is in line with the programme's demand to prevent price cartels and unfair pricing.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet använder uttryckligen statliga kreditgarantier som verktyg när marknaden bedömer investeringar som för riskfyllda, vilket är precis den mekanism motförslaget vill utreda för generationsskiften i lantbruket. Partiprogrammets mål om en livskraftig livsmedelsproduktion som stärker självförsörjningen ger samma riktning. Kravet på ökad konkurrens om mjölkpriset ligger i linje med programmets krav på att förhindra priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.
- expanded state credit guaranteesdecisive»Vi vill utöka de gröna kreditgarantierna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to expand the green credit guarantees.”
- state shares investment risk»Genom att staten tar en del av risken kan de gröna investeringarna öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By having the state take part of the risk, green investments can increase.”
- functioning competition over prices»Förhindrande av priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of price cartels and unfair pricing.”
- strengthened food self-sufficiency»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly states that society shall be able to provide credit guarantees to rural entrepreneurs and that Sweden shall have viable agriculture throughout the country with good competitiveness.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly states that society shall be able to provide credit guarantees to rural entrepreneurs and that Sweden shall have viable agriculture throughout the country with good competitiveness. The counter-proposal's demands for state credit guarantees in generational transitions follow directly from this, as does the replacement service requirement for skilled animal husbandry and functioning competition on the milk market.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att samhället ska kunna bistå med kreditgarantier till landsbygdsföretagare och att Sverige ska ha ett livskraftigt jordbruk i hela landet med god konkurrenskraft. Motförslagets krav på statlig kreditgaranti vid generationsskiften följer direkt av detta, liksom avbytartjänsten av kravet på kunnig djurhållning och en fungerande konkurrens på mjölkmarknaden.
- credit guarantees to rural areasdecisive»Samhället ska kunna bistå med kreditgarantier till landsbygdsföretagare.« (party programme ↗)“Society shall be able to provide credit guarantees to rural entrepreneurs.”
- viable agriculture»Sverige ska ha ett livskraftigt jordbruk i hela landet med god konkurrenskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have viable agriculture throughout the country with good competitiveness.”
- skilled animal husbandry»De som jobbar med djur måste ha god kunskap om djurs beteenden.« (party programme ↗)“Those who work with animals must have good knowledge of animal behaviour.”
- functioning competition»Monopol- och kartellbildningar ska motverkas för att skapa fungerande marknader.« (party programme ↗)“Monopoly and cartel formation shall be prevented to create functioning markets.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto states that good economic conditions are crucial for farming and that a more competitive agriculture is needed for increased food security and food production.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that good economic conditions are crucial for farming and that a more competitive agriculture is needed for increased food security and food production. Capital supply is identified as crucial for small businesses, which is precisely what a credit guarantee during generational handovers should solve. The demand for better competition for milk prices follows from the party programme's view of competition as a driving force.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att goda ekonomiska förutsättningar är avgörande för lantbruket och att ett mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk krävs för ökad försörjningstrygghet och matproduktion. Kapitalförsörjning pekas ut som avgörande för småföretag, vilket är precis vad en kreditgaranti vid generationsskiften ska lösa. Kravet på bättre konkurrens om mjölkpriset följer av partiprogrammets syn på konkurrens som drivkraft.
- profitable and competitive farmingdecisive»Sverige behöver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk. En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar, inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an even more competitive agriculture. A long-term sustainable food supply with increased food security and increased food production requires regulatory simplifications and tax cuts, including a powerful agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that makes sustainable farming more profitable.”
- capital supply for small businesses»Kapitalförsörjning är avgörande för många småföretag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Capital supply is crucial for many small businesses.”
- good conditions for farming»Goda ekonomiska förutsättningar är inte minst avgörande för lantbruket och de gröna näringarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Good economic conditions are not least crucial for farming and green industries.”
- competition as driver»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driver for the development of the market economy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme demands that direct support and market-distorting regulations be phased out and that the public sector does not displace functioning private alternatives.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands that direct support and market-distorting regulations be phased out and that the public sector does not displace functioning private alternatives. State credit guarantees and co-financed substitute labour support are precisely such targeted support. The plan's requirements for competition on equal terms, however, speak for action against lack of competition over milk prices, but it does not support the counter-proposal as a whole.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att direktstöd och marknadsstörande regleringar fasas ut och att det offentliga inte tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ. Statliga kreditgarantier och medfinansierat avbytarstöd är just sådana riktade stöd. Planens krav på konkurrens på lika villkor talar däremot för åtgärder mot bristande konkurrens om mjölkpriset, men det bär inte upp motförslaget som helhet.
- direct support shall be phased outdecisive»EU:s jordbrukspolitik behöver reformeras i grunden. Samtliga direktstöd och marknadsstörande« (party programme ↗)“The EU's agricultural policy needs fundamental reform. All direct support and market-distorting”
- the state shall not displace»offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar« (party programme ↗)“public shall not run activities that displace functioning private alternatives or hinder”
- competition on equal terms»slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“protect property rights, competition on equal terms, legal security”
- lower regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at both municipal, state and”
The election manifesto wants to facilitate generational transfer of businesses so that operations can be continued, and the party programme holds sustainable family farms as the basis for Swedish agriculture.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to facilitate generational transfer of businesses so that operations can be continued, and the party programme holds sustainable family farms as the basis for Swedish agriculture. A state credit guarantee in generational transfers is the same kind of risk mitigation that the plan already places on public bodies. The requirement for better competition on milk prices follows from the plan's requirement for effective competition policy against oligopoly.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill underlätta generationsskifte av företag så att verksamheter kan drivas vidare, och partiprogrammet håller bärkraftiga familjejordbruk som basen i svenskt jordbruk. En statlig kreditgaranti vid generationsskiften är samma slags riskavlastning som planen redan lägger på de offentliga organen. Kravet på bättre konkurrens om mjölkpriset följer av planens krav på en effektiv konkurrenspolitik mot oligopol.
- facilitate generational transferdecisive»Underlätta personalägande och generationsskifte av företag - så att fler företag kan drivas vidare av personalen om ägaren vill sluta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate employee ownership and generational transfer of businesses - so that more businesses can be run on by employees if the owner wants to stop.”
- family farms as basis»Bärkraftiga familjejordbruk bör även i fortsättningen vara basen i svenskt jordbruk.« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable family farms should continue to be the basis for Swedish agriculture.”
- public risk mitigation»De offentliga organen bör medverka till att nödvändigt riskkapital finns tillgängligt, inte minst för mindre företag och i regioner med svag kapitalbildning och sysselsättningsproblem.« (party programme ↗)“The public bodies should help ensure that necessary venture capital is available, particularly for small businesses and in regions with weak capital formation and employment problems.”
- effective competition policy»En effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“An effective competition policy prevents oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to improve conditions for running agriculture through lower taxes and reduced red tape, strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production and strengthen property and use rights for farmers.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to improve conditions for running agriculture through lower taxes and reduced red tape, strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production and strengthen property and use rights for farmers. Measures that facilitate generational change of agricultural properties and lower livestock keepers' costs serve these goals, and increased competition over milk prices responds to the state's duty to promote competition. The plan, however, mentions neither credit guarantees nor relief worker services, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom lägre skatter och minskat regelkrångel, stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska livsmedelsproduktionen och stärka ägande- och brukanderätten för jordbrukare. Åtgärder som underlättar generationsskiften av lantbruksfastigheter och sänker djurhållarnas kostnader tjänar just dessa mål, och ökad konkurrens om mjölkpriset svarar mot statens uppgift att främja konkurrensen. Planen nämner dock varken kreditgarantier eller avbytartjänst, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- better conditions for agriculturedecisive»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna, vilket vi redan börjat göra på drivmedel, och minska regelkrånglet så att kostnaderna för administration går ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to improve conditions for running agriculture by lowering taxes, which we have already started to do on fuel, and reducing red tape so that administration costs go down”
- increased food production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
- strengthened property rights in agriculture»Stärka ägande- och brukanderätten för jordbrukare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen property and use rights for farmers”
- the state shall promote competition»skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“protect the value of money, promote competition”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly states that the party should work for support for relief service for livestock keepers and wants to increase national financing within the support system for agriculture.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that the party should work for support for relief service for livestock keepers and wants to increase national financing within the support system for agriculture. The goal is increased competitiveness and self-sufficiency in food. The counter-proposal's demands for state co-financed relief service and a credit guarantee at generational changes therefore follow the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att partiet ska verka för ett stöd till avbytartjänst för djurhållare och vill höja den nationella finansieringen inom stödsystemet till jordbruket. Målet är ökad konkurrenskraft och självförsörjning av livsmedel. Motförslagets krav på statligt medfinansierad avbytartjänst och en kreditgaranti vid generationsskiften följer därför planen.
- support for relief servicedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna verka för ett stöd till avbytartjänst för att minska minskar sociala risker och öka lantbrukets status och utveckling.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats work for support for relief service to reduce social risks and increase the status and development of farming.”
- increased national financing»Öka den nationella finansieringen i jordbruket, för miljönytta och produktivitetsökning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase national financing in agriculture, for environmental benefit and productivity increases”
- lower taxes and more support»Sverigedemokraterna vill sänka skatter och avgifter samt höja den nationella finansieringen inom stödsystemet till jordbruket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to reduce taxes and fees and increase national financing within the support system for agriculture.”
- increased food supply»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU20)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU20)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1001 — Fritidsodlingens betydelse för livsmedelsförsörjning och livsmedelsberedskap av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1014 — Ansvar för rovdjursförvaltningen av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1022 — Ett levande fäbodbruk av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:13 — Miljöfrämjande grödor för ett hållbart jordbruk av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1371 — Politik för stärkt äganderätt av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1372 — Marina miljöer och vattenvård av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1373 — Livsmedel av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1383 — Planering och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1454 — Regional utveckling - för ett levande Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1570 — Likvärdig stödområdesindelning för det nationella stödet och kompensationsstödet för norra Sverige av Helena Lindahl (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1641 — Förenklade klimatutmaningar i jordbruket av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1814 — Livskraftig skånsk landsbygd av Peter Ollén m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1927 — Ökad nationell självförsörjning med hållbart jordbruk av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2005 — Ett fritt och konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2024/25:201 — Modernisering av odlingsgränsen av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:202 — De gröna näringarna och äganderätten av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2077 — Ekologisk odling - dess påverkan på livsmedelsförsörjningen och Sveriges säkerhet av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2189 — Generationsskifte av lantbruk av Kristoffer Lindberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2240 — Sverige behöver fler unga jordbrukare av Ida Karkiainen (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament