2026-06-162025/26:MJU29 · p.5MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Production-raising measures and environmental considerations
A forest-edge exemption to the reforestation requirement as a production-boosting measure
What's at stake: An exemption would let landowners voluntarily create soft forest edges that benefit wildlife and biodiversity and function as dispersal corridors, but without it the reforestation requirement applies in full even in these transition zones between forest and farmland.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the reforestation requirement after logging should be supplemented with a voluntary exemption for forest edges, to benefit biodiversity with only marginal impact on timber production, or whether the current requirement should remain without exemption.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and aligns with the government's approach of clear and predictable forestry rules that strengthen property rights; instead, the committee emphasizes the importance of increasing incentives for forest owners to keep generating high natural values within the existing regulatory framework, rather than introducing a specific exemption from the reforestation requirement.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (SD)
The reservation (SD) wants landowners to be voluntarily exempted from the reforestation requirement when creating forest edges, i.e. soft transition zones with shrubs and scattered trees between forest and farmland. The reasoning is that such edges benefit biodiversity and wildlife habitat, can reduce the risk of storm and browsing damage, and function as dispersal corridors, while the effect on forest growth is judged to be small and short-lived since only a minority of landowners are expected to use the exemption.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 3/0/18/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 105/0/0/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 3/0/15/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/24/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 18/0/0/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 66/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | No 0/70/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VAndreas Lennkvist Manriquez (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VNooshi Dadgostar (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPAnnika Hirvonen (MP, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPJacob Risberg (MP, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPRebecka Le Moine (MP, Östergötlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:4143 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) and 2025/26:4145 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) request 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:4143 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) och 2025/26:4145 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on several regulatory simplifications in forestry. The legislative amendments include the following: A notification for consultation for forestry measures under the Environmental Code shall be required only if it is specified in regulations that the government determines. The land owner's cost to obtain the knowledge needed before a forestry measure is taken, for example regarding protected species in a forest area, shall be reasonable in relation to the property's value. The confidentiality for the protection of animal and plant species shall be changed so that landowners can access the information needed to determine if consultation is required. The Forest Board's decisions under the Forestry Act shall be appealed to a Land and Environmental Court instead of to an Administrative Court. The deadline for non-profit environmental organizations to appeal decisions about forestry or forestry measures shall be counted from the day the decision was made. Additionally, the Forest Board shall be given standing as a party when environmental organizations appeal the agency's decision. The proposal aims, among other things, to strengthen ownership rights and increase predictability for forest owners. The legislative amendments shall mainly enter into force on 1 January 2027. However, the provision that consultation requirements under the Environmental Code shall apply only if specified in an ordinance shall first enter into force on the day the government determines.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants exceptions from the reforestation requirement for ecologically valuable edge environments and naturally open areas on harvested plots. (SD) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems and regulation of forestry that proceeds from a holistic perspective, and that biological diversity is protected.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems and regulation of forestry that proceeds from a holistic perspective, and that biological diversity is protected. Forest edges as dispersal corridors and habitats are precisely such a nature conservation measure, and the exemption is voluntary with small effect on growth. The counter-proposal's demands therefore align with the plan's environmental commitments, while the committee's focus on property rights is not the plan's starting point.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett starkt skydd av skog med rika ekosystem och en reglering av skogsbruket som utgår från helhetssyn, samt att den biologiska mångfalden skyddas. Skogsbryn som spridningskorridorer och livsmiljöer är precis en sådan naturvårdsåtgärd, och undantaget är frivilligt med liten effekt på tillväxten. Motförslagets krav ligger därför i linje med planens miljöåtaganden, medan utskottets fokus på äganderätten inte är planens utgångspunkt.
- strong forest protectiondecisive»behövs ett starkt skydd av skog med rika ekosystem och en genom« (party programme ↗)“strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems and a through”
- protect biological diversity»Vi måste lösa klimatkrisen och skydda den biologiska mångfalden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must solve the climate crisis and protect biological diversity”
- good conditions for ecosystems»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems, including by restoring”
- protection of forest areas»Skyddet av skogs- och strandområden är en viktig del för att värna den svenska allemansrätten och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The protection of forest and shore areas is an important part of safeguarding Swedish public access rights and biological diversity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan binds the party to protect biological diversity and to forestry that is active but also protects climate and environment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan binds the party to protect biological diversity and to forestry that is active but also protects climate and environment. A voluntary exemption from reforestation requirements for forest edges raises natural values to a small and temporary production loss and is thus in line with this commitment. The plan also states that species death is accelerating, which strengthens the reasons to facilitate measures for diversity.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder partiet vid att värna den biologiska mångfalden och vid ett skogsbruk som är aktivt men samtidigt värnar klimat och miljö. Ett frivilligt undantag från återbeskogningskravet för skogsbryn höjer naturvärdena till en liten och kortvarig produktionsförlust och ligger därmed i linje med detta åtagande. Planen konstaterar dessutom att artdöden accelererar, vilket förstärker skälen att underlätta åtgärder för mångfald.
- protect biological diversitydecisive»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
- active but sustainable forestry»Aktivt och hållbart skogsbruk som bidrar till svensk tillväxt« (party programme ↗)“Active and sustainable forestry that contributes to Swedish growth”
- halt species extinction»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time species death is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wishes landowners to voluntarily be able to be exempted from reforestation requirements when establishing forest edges, which benefit biodiversity and function as dispersal corridors.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wishes landowners to voluntarily be able to be exempted from reforestation requirements when establishing forest edges, which benefit biodiversity and function as dispersal corridors. The plan wishes for considerate and varied forestry, a landscape rich in small biotopes and habitats to be recreated so that species can return. A voluntary exemption of this kind therefore lies in the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill att markägare frivilligt kan undantas från återbeskogningskravet vid anläggning av skogsbryn, som gynnar biologisk mångfald och fungerar som spridningskorridorer. Planen vill ha ett hänsynsfullt och varierat skogsbruk, ett landskap rikt på småbiotoper och att livsmiljöer återskapas så att arter kan komma tillbaka. Ett frivilligt undantag av detta slag ligger därför i planens riktning.
- considerate and varied forestrydecisive»Miljöpartiet vill ha ett hänsynsfullt och varierat skogsbruk, som ger möjlighet att« (party programme ↗)“The Greens wish for considerate and varied forestry, which enables”
- recreated habitats»livsmiljöer återskapas så att arter kan komma tillbaka. De fjällnära naturskogarna är en« (party programme ↗)“habitats are recreated so that species can return. The mountain-near natural forests are a”
- landscape rich in small biotopes»Med ett landskap rikt på småbiotoper och betesdjur som ger gödsel, håller« (party programme ↗)“With a landscape rich in small biotopes and grazing animals providing manure, keep”
- non-clear-felling methods»att mer skogsbruk bedrivs med hyggesfria metoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that more forestry is conducted with non-clear-felling methods.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that voluntary participation and property rights are the foundation for better nature management and that it should become easier for landowners to themselves contribute to biodiversity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that voluntary participation and property rights are the foundation for better nature management and that it should become easier for landowners to themselves contribute to biodiversity. A voluntary exemption from reforestation requirements for forest margins is precisely such an opportunity for the landowner. The plan moreover wants to strengthen green industries' conditions and reduce rule complications. Therefore the counter-proposal's demand is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård och att det ska bli lättare för markägare att själva bidra till biologisk mångfald. Ett frivilligt undantag från återbeskogningskravet för skogsbryn är precis en sådan möjlighet för markägaren. Planen vill dessutom stärka de gröna näringarnas villkor och minska regelkrånglet. Därför stöds motförslagets krav.
- voluntary nature management by landownersdecisive»Sveriges natur ska vårdas och den biologiska mångfalden utvecklas. Mer måste göras för att restaurera våtmarker, bekämpa invasiva arter och underlätta för markägare att bidra, då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's nature shall be managed and biological diversity developed. More must be done to restore wetlands, fight invasive species and facilitate landowners to contribute, as voluntary participation and property rights are the foundation for better nature management.”
- strong property rights in forestry»Skogsbruket behöver goda förutsättningar grundade i en stark äganderätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Forestry needs good conditions based on strong property rights.”
- biodiversity in the cultivation landscape»Vi ska arbeta för mer närodlad och klimatsmart mat och ett levande, hållbart jordbruk som bidrar till den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall work for more locally grown and climate-smart food and a living, sustainable farming that contributes to biological diversity.”
- ownership gives care responsibility»Det man äger har man också ett ansvar för att vårda.« (party programme ↗)“What you own you also have a responsibility to care for.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan stipulates that environmental considerations in forestry must increase and that felling methods must be able to vary according to environmental considerations.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan stipulates that environmental considerations in forestry must increase and that felling methods must be able to vary according to environmental considerations. A voluntary exemption from reforestation requirements for forest margins strengthens biological diversity without coercion against the landowner and with small production effect. It is consistent with the two equal forest policy goals and is therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att miljöhänsynen inom skogsbruket måste öka och att avverkningsmetoder ska kunna variera utifrån miljöhänsyn. Ett frivilligt undantag från återbeskogningskravet för skogsbryn stärker den biologiska mångfalden utan tvång mot markägaren och med liten produktionseffekt. Det är förenligt med de två jämställda skogspolitiska målen och stöds därför.
- increased environmental considerations in forestrydecisive»Miljöhänsynen inom skogsbruket måste öka. Avverkningsmetoder måste kunna variera utifrån miljöhänsyn.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations in forestry must increase. Felling methods must be able to vary according to environmental considerations.”
- equal forest policy goals»Den svenska skogspolitiken ska vila på två jämställda mål, produktionsmålet och miljömålet.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish forest policy shall rest on two equal goals, the production goal and the environmental goal.”
- preserved biological diversity»Både staten och skogsnäringen har ett långtgående ansvar att skydda skogens ekosystemtjänster, bevara den biologiska mångfalden« (party programme ↗)“Both the state and the forest industry have a long-term responsibility to protect forest ecosystem services, preserve biological diversity”
- protection of valuable nature»Då behöver vi fortsätta arbetet med att skydda både värdefull natur och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Then we need to continue the work to protect both valuable nature and biological diversity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires great nature consideration in forest and agricultural landscapes and sees land owners as a main resource in conservation work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires great nature consideration in forest and agricultural landscapes and sees land owners as a main resource in conservation work. A voluntary exemption from reforestation requirements for forest edges increases the land owner's freedom of action and simultaneously benefits biological diversity and wildlife habitat. Since production and environmental goals are to have equal dignity the small growth effect is no obstacle.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver stor naturhänsyn i skogs- och jordbrukslandskapet och ser markägarna som en huvudresurs i bevarandearbetet. Ett frivilligt undantag från återbeskogningskravet för skogsbryn ökar markägarens handlingsfrihet och gynnar samtidigt biologisk mångfald och viltmiljö. Eftersom produktions- och miljömål ska ha samma dignitet är den lilla tillväxteffekten inget hinder.
- nature consideration in forest landscapedecisive»Bevarande av den biologiska mångfalden kräver både reservatsskydd i olika former och stor naturhänsyn i skogs och jordbrukslandskapet.« (party programme ↗)“Conservation of biological diversity requires both nature reserve protection in various forms and great nature consideration in forests and agricultural landscapes.”
- land owner as resource»Markägarna är här en stor resurs, inte minst då det gäller att bevara kulturlandskapet.« (party programme ↗)“Land owners are here a major resource, not least when it comes to preserving the cultural landscape.”
- equal forestry policy goals»Det är angeläget att dessa mål har samma prioritet och dignitet vid utformandet av den övergripande skogspolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that these goals have equal priority and dignity in the formulation of overall forestry policy.”
- protected property rights in forest»äganderätten över skogen hotas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“property rights in the forest are threatened”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's main forest policy commitment is that forest owners' property rights are strengthened and that forest protection shall be done through voluntariness.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's main forest policy commitment is that forest owners' property rights are strengthened and that forest protection shall be done through voluntariness. A voluntary exception from reforestation requirements at forest edges expands precisely the landowner's own choice on their own land and reduces regulatory burden. The plan also wants to strengthen biological diversity within the framework of managed and protected forest, which the counter-proposal's purpose aligns with.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande skogspolitiska åtagande är att skogsägarens äganderätt stärks och att skydd av skog ska ske genom frivillighet. Ett frivilligt undantag från återbeskogningskravet vid skogsbryn utvidgar just markägarens eget val på egen mark och minskar regelbördan. Planen vill dessutom stärka den biologiska mångfalden inom ramen för brukad och skyddad skog, vilket motförslagets syfte ligger i linje med.
- voluntariness in forest protectiondecisive»Stärka skogsägarnas äganderätt genom att formellt skydd av skog ska ske genom frivillighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen forest owners' property rights by allowing formal forest protection through voluntariness”
- owner's right of disposition»rätt att använda sitt ägande efter eget huvud ska vara vägledande.« (party programme ↗)“right to use one's ownership according to one's own judgment shall be guiding”
- biological diversity through stewardship»Vårda redan skyddad skog bättre för att stärka den biologiska mångfalden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Care for already protected forest better to strengthen biological diversity”
- fewer regulations in land-based industries»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of regulations for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's environmental line is that voluntary action with responsibility works best to create environmental values and that adapted forest management should precede the designation of protected areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's environmental line is that voluntary action with responsibility works best to create environmental values and that adapted forest management should precede the designation of protected areas. A voluntary exception that allows the landowner to establish forest edges instead of replanting forests is precisely that model. The plan also sees biological diversity as compatible with active forestry and wants to protect the forest owner's right to manage their land.
Original (Swedish)
Planens miljölinje är att frivillighet under ansvar fungerar bäst för att skapa miljövärden och att anpassad skogsskötsel ska gå före reservatsavsättning. Ett frivilligt undantag som låter markägaren anlägga skogsbryn i stället för att återbeskoga är precis den modellen. Planen ser dessutom biologisk mångfald som förenlig med ett aktivt skogsbruk och vill värna skogsägarens rätt att bruka sin mark.
- voluntary action creates environmental valuesdecisive»Erfarenheten visar att frivillighet under ansvar fungerar bäst för att skapa miljövärden, stöttat med kompetent och hjälpande rådgivning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Experience shows that voluntary action with responsibility works best to create environmental values, supported by competent and helpful advice.”
- adapted management before protected areas»Att anpassad skogsskötsel prioriteras före reservatsavsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That adapted forest management is prioritized before the designation of protected areas”
- diversity with active forestry»Biologisk mångfald går hand i hand med ett aktivt och produktivt skogsbruk« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Biological diversity goes hand in hand with active and productive forestry”
- forest owner's right to manage»Värna skogsägarnas rätt att bruka sina skogar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect the rights of forest owners to manage their forests”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU29)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU29)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4141 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:242 Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4143 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:242 Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:4144 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:242 Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4145 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:242 Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4147 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:242 Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:242 — Ett tydligt regelverk för aktivt skogsbruk
Source: The Swedish Parliament