2026-03-042025/26:SkU14 · p.6SkUTaxation
Tax agreements, tax evasion and tax reporting
International cooperation against tax evasion and reporting requirements for large companies
What's at stake: The decision concerns how hard Sweden and the EU should push against tax evasion and aggressive tax planning by multinational groups and individuals with assets abroad, which affects tax revenue and perceptions of a fair tax system.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should issue directives to further tighten the rules against tax evasion - including criminalising serious tax evasion, broader country-by-country reporting and a disclosure requirement for assets held abroad - or whether the ongoing work under the EU's minimum-tax directive and information exchange should be considered sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the fact that it has already backed the government's proposal on top-up tax to ensure an effective minimum tax rate of 15 percent for large groups, as well as a recently submitted bill on exchanging information in top-up tax reports implementing the EU's DAC 9 directive. Against this background, the committee considers that the Riksdag does not need to issue further directives on tax evasion and country-by-country reporting, and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (V)
The reservation (V) calls, among other things, for serious tax evasion to be criminalised and further investigated, for Sweden to push within the EU for country-by-country reporting to cover all countries where companies operate and all multinational companies with turnover above EUR 40 million, for the criteria for the EU's blacklist of tax jurisdictions to include zero taxation and very low corporate tax rates, for the information duty on cross-border arrangements to be extended to domestic arrangements, and for Sweden to introduce a disclosure requirement for wealth held abroad. The reasoning is that the current regulatory framework and EU directive have shortcomings that make it difficult to effectively combat tax evasion and avoidance.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:177 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) demands 1-6, 11 and 12, 2025/26:740 by Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:1088 by Anna Wallentheim (S) demands 2 and 3, 2025/26:1537 by Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) demands 4 and 8, 2025/26:2817 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) demand 14, 2025/26:3192 by Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:3402 by Lars Püss (M), 2025/26:3509 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) demands 33 and 34, 2025/26:3553 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) demand 22 and 2025/26:3554 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) demand 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:177 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-6, 11 och 12, 2025/26:740 av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:1088 av Anna Wallentheim (S) yrkandena 2 och 3, 2025/26:1537 av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) yrkandena 4 och 8, 2025/26:2817 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) yrkande 14, 2025/26:3192 av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:3402 av Lars Püss (M), 2025/26:3509 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 33 och 34, 2025/26:3553 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 22 och 2025/26:3554 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 120 proposals in motions from the general motion period in 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, making taxes and fees visible, F-tax, tax evasion, population registration, protected personal data, and the Customs Agency's powers and activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to initiatives already taken and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to tighten F-skatt approval requirements by demanding multiple clients, time-limiting the approval, and requiring F-skatt for subcontractors and self-employed platform workers. (V) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants greater societal oversight of businesses to combat tax fraud and effective monitoring of organized economic crime.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants greater societal oversight of businesses to combat tax fraud and effective monitoring of organized economic crime. Criminalization of gross tax evasion, expanded country-by-country reporting, and declaration requirements for assets abroad are concrete expressions of the same commitment. The election manifesto furthermore points out that tax money ends up in tax havens as a core problem and demands that the richest pay their share.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ha en större samhällelig insyn i företag för att stävja fusk med skatter och en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade ekonomiska brottsligheten. Kriminalisering av grov skatteflykt, utvidgad land-för-land-rapportering och deklarationsplikt för förmögenheter utomlands är konkreta uttryck för samma åtagande. Valplattformen pekar dessutom ut att skattemedel hamnar i skatteparadis som ett kärnproblem och kräver att de rikaste betalar sin del.
- oversight of businesses against tax frauddecisive»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move toward greater societal oversight”
- combat economic crime»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade« (party programme ↗)“There needs to be effective monitoring of organized”
- stop tax havens»Pengarna du och jag betalar för våra barns skolgång och framgång går till vinster i skolkoncerner och hamnar i skatteparadis.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Money you and I pay for our children's education and success goes to profits in school companies and ends up in tax havens.”
- solidaristic tax system»Vi vill se ett enkelt, stabilt och solidariskt« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a simple, stable and solidaristic”
The plan's decisive commitment is that tax fraud and money laundering must be stopped and that fraud and all other economic crime must be combated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that tax fraud and money laundering must be stopped and that fraud and all other economic crime must be combated. The programme also wants a global agreement on increased taxation of enterprises and a tax system with broad tax bases that secure welfare financing. Criminalisation of serious tax evasion, broader country-by-country reporting and tightened EU criteria are in line with this.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att skattefusk och penningtvätt ska stoppas och att bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet ska bekämpas. Programmet vill dessutom ha en global överenskommelse om ökad beskattning av företag och ett skattesystem med breda skattebaser som säkrar välfärdens finansiering. Kriminalisering av grov skatteflykt, bredare land-för-land-rapportering och skärpta EU-kriterier ligger i linje med detta.
- stop tax frauddecisive»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering must be stopped.”
- global corporate taxation»Global överenskommelse om ökad beskattning av företag.« (party programme ↗)“Global agreement on increased taxation of enterprises.”
- combat economic crime»Bekämpande av bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Combating fraud and all other economic crime.”
- robust and fair tax system»Robust, hållbart och rättvist skattesystem med breda skattebaser som ger ökat utrymme« (party programme ↗)“Robust, sustainable and fair tax system with broad tax bases that provide increased room”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands strong action against large enterprises and wealthy persons who use tax planning to often avoid paying taxes and requires joint commitments and strengthened global cooperation to address this challenge.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands strong action against large enterprises and wealthy persons who use tax planning to often avoid paying taxes and requires joint commitments and strengthened global cooperation to address this challenge. The plan demands that the principle of everyone contributing according to their capacity shall apply to capital both in Sweden and globally, and wishes to strengthen work against criminal economy. Stricter country-by-country reporting, stricter listing criteria and criminalization of serious tax evasion are measures in precisely this direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att storföretag och förmögna personer med skatteplanering ofta undviker att betala skatt och att detta kräver gemensamma åtaganden och stärkt globalt samarbete. Den kräver också att principen om att bidra efter förmåga ska gälla kapital både i Sverige och globalt, och vill stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin. Skärpt land-för-land-rapportering, hårdare listkriterier och kriminalisering av grov skatteflykt är åtgärder i just den riktningen.
- stop tax planningdecisive»Storföretag och förmögna personer kan med hjälp av skatteplanering ofta undvika att betala skatt.« (party programme ↗)“Large enterprises and wealthy persons can with the help of tax planning often avoid paying taxes.”
- strengthened global tax cooperation»För att hantera denna utmaning krävs gemensamma åtaganden och att det globala samarbetet stärks, i Sverige, EU och i resten av världen.« (party programme ↗)“To address this challenge, joint commitments are required and global cooperation must be strengthened, in Sweden, the EU and in the rest of the world.”
- capital shall be taxed according to capacity»Principen att alla ska bidra efter förmåga är grundläggande och måste gälla kapital – både i Sverige och globalt.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that everyone shall contribute according to their capacity is fundamental and must apply to capital – both in Sweden and globally.”
- against criminal economy»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“We also wish to strengthen work against criminal economy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the EU should refrain from intervening in countries' taxes and that Swedish taxes should be globally competitive.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the EU should refrain from intervening in countries' taxes and that Swedish taxes should be globally competitive. Making zero taxes and low corporate tax rates into blacklist criteria, expanding country-by-country reporting and introducing reporting requirements for foreign assets means both tax harmonization and greatly increased administration, contrary to the plan's rule-simplification line. The plan's demands for transparency and stricter rules against corruption point partly the other way.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att EU ska avhålla sig från att gripa in i ländernas skatter och att svenska skatter ska vara globalt konkurrenskraftiga. Att göra nollskatter och låga bolagsskatter till svartlistningskriterium, utvidga land-för-land-rapporteringen och införa deklarationsplikt för utländska förmögenheter innebär både skatteharmonisering och kraftigt ökad administration, tvärtemot planens regelförenklingslinje. Planens krav på transparens och skärpta regler mot korruption talar delvis åt andra hållet.
- taxes are national competencedecisive»Däremot måste unionen avhålla sig från att gripa in i t.ex. ländernas skatter,« (party programme ↗)“However, the union must refrain from intervening in e.g. countries' taxes,”
- competitive taxes»Våra skatter behöver vara globalt konkurrenskraftiga, stimulera till innovationer och entreprenörskap« (party programme ↗)“Our taxes need to be globally competitive, stimulate innovation and entrepreneurship.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear up the rule jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- transparency against corruption»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants corporate tax to continue to be reduced and taxes to be internationally competitive, which is difficult to reconcile with low corporate taxes in themselves becoming a criterion for the EU's blacklist.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants corporate tax to continue to be reduced and taxes to be internationally competitive, which is difficult to reconcile with low corporate taxes in themselves becoming a criterion for the EU's blacklist. The plan also requires as simple and transparent a tax system as possible and reduced regulatory burden, while the counter-proposal adds several new reporting and declaration requirements. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att bolagsskatten fortsätter sänkas och att skatterna är internationellt konkurrenskraftiga, vilket är svårt att förena med att låga bolagsskatter i sig blir kriterium för EU:s svarta lista. Planen kräver också ett så enkelt och transparent skattesystem som möjligt och minskad regelbörda, medan motförslaget lägger till flera nya rapporterings- och deklarationsplikter. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför.
- reduced corporate taxdecisive»För att säkra den svenska konkurrenskraften ska bolagsskatten fortsätta sänkas och enhetligheten i kapitalinkomstbeskattningen öka.« (party programme ↗)“To secure Swedish competitiveness, corporate tax shall continue to be reduced and uniformity in capital income taxation shall increase.”
- competitive taxes»För att vårt land ska vara attraktivt för kapital, företag och högutbildad arbetskraft behöver skatterna vara internationellt konkurrenskraftiga.« (party programme ↗)“For our country to be attractive for capital, businesses and highly educated labour, taxes must be internationally competitive.”
- simple tax system»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna, vara så enkel och transparent som möjligt och främja ett hållbart klimat och en god miljö.« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall favour wealth-creating forces, be as simple and transparent as possible and promote sustainable climate and good environment.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at municipal, state and European level, and public decisions shall be analysed from a small business perspective.”
The plan requires competitive capital taxes, tax regulations as simple as possible, and that tax policy does not drive companies out of the country, and states that each country itself gets to choose the design of its economic policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires competitive capital taxes, tax regulations as simple as possible, and that tax policy does not drive companies out of the country, and states that each country itself gets to choose the design of its economic policy. The counter-proposal's package with expanded reporting, blacklisting of low-tax countries and declaration requirements for foreign assets goes in the opposite direction. The plan certainly values honesty in the tax system, but the basis is principled and the support weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver konkurrenskraftiga kapitalskatter, så enkla skatteregler som möjligt och att skattepolitiken inte driver företag ur landet, samt slår fast att varje land självt får välja utformningen av sin ekonomiska politik. Motförslagets paket med utvidgad rapportering, svartlistning av lågskatteländer och deklarationsplikt för utländska förmögenheter går i motsatt riktning. Planen värnar visserligen hederlighet i skattesystemet, men underlaget är principiellt och stödet svagt.
- competitive capital taxesdecisive»Kapitalskatterna måste därför vara konkurrenskraftiga. Beskattning av inkomster, varor,« (party programme ↗)“Capital taxes must therefore be competitive. Taxation of income, goods,”
- simple tax rules»utformas så enkelt som möjligt för att därigenom underlätta för bland annat« (party programme ↗)“be designed as simply as possible in order to thereby facilitate, among other things”
- national right over economic policy»EU:s inre marknad komma till sin fulla rätt. Varje land har dock rätt att själv välja« (party programme ↗)“the EU's internal market come into its full right. However, each country has the right to choose itself”
- tax must not drive out companies»på ett sådant sätt att den inte driver människor och företag ut ur landet.« (party programme ↗)“in such a way that it does not drive people and companies out of the country.”
The counter-proposal wants to sharply widen reporting requirements on businesses, expand the information obligation to domestic arrangements and introduce declaration duty for assets abroad.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to sharply widen reporting requirements on businesses, expand the information obligation to domestic arrangements and introduce declaration duty for assets abroad. The plan's commitment goes in the opposite direction: a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape should go, and taxes should be low because more tax is not a solution. The driving forces for investments and entrepreneurship should be strengthened, not burdened by new reporting obligations.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill kraftigt vidga rapporteringskraven på företag, utvidga informationsplikten till inhemska arrangemang och införa deklarationsplikt för förmögenheter utomlands. Planens åtagande går i motsatt riktning: en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och av regelkrånglet ska bort, och skatterna ska vara låga eftersom mer skatt inte är någon lösning. Drivkrafterna för investeringar och entreprenörskap ska stärkas, inte tyngas av nya rapporteringsbördor.
- reduced administrative burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
- no increased tax burden(2022 manifesto)
- competitive business taxes»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the driving forces for investments, research and entrepreneurship, through lower taxes on business”
- low and effective taxes»Skatterna ska vara låga« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be low”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan wants to stop transfers of power and EU taxes and requires taxes on companies that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world, while the regulatory burden on companies should be reduced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to stop transfers of power and EU taxes and requires taxes on companies that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world, while the regulatory burden on companies should be reduced. The counter-proposal's expanded country-by-country reporting, broadened disclosure requirements and filing requirements for foreign assets entails both more EU-controlled tax regulation and more administration. The plan's opposition to fraud and corruption pulls in the other direction, but does not fully support the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter och kräver skatter på företag som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, samtidigt som regelbördan för företagen ska minska. Motförslagets utvidgade land-för-land-rapportering, breddad informationsplikt och deklarationsplikt för utländska förmögenheter innebär både mer EU-styrd skattereglering och mer administration. Planens motstånd mot fusk och korruption drar åt andra hållet, men bär inte hela kravet.
- no to EU tax powerdecisive»Stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop transfers of power and EU taxes”
- reduced regulatory burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and reduce the administrative burden on small businesses”
- competitive corporate taxes»Skattepolitiken måste därför syfta till konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, framförallt de skatter som läggs på företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax policy must therefore aim for competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world, especially those taxes imposed on companies.”
- prevent fraud and corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be prevented.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU14)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1088 — Stärkt arbete mot skattefusk och skatteflykt av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1281 — Redovisning av vad skattepengarna går till av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1537 — En fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela Öresundsområdet av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1657 — Stopp för svartjobb av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1677 — Översyn av kravet på personalliggare av Charlotte Nordström (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1753 — Verka för att fler arbetsgivare redovisar arbetsgivaravgifterna på lönebeskedet av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1755 — Redovisa arbetsgivaravgifterna på slutskattsedeln av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1756 — Samarbete och en samlad strategi mot identitetsfusk av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:177 — Skatteflykt av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1835 — Reformerad F-skatt för en sjyst arbetsmarknad av Johanna Haraldsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1879 — Inkludera ansökan om bostadstillägg för pensionärer i deklarationen av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1972 — Samling av trängselavgifter av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1973 — Möjlighet för extra frivillig skatteinbetalning av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1975 — Sekretess av folkbokföring för poliser av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1976 — Synliggörande av skatter, moms och avgifter av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1994 — Trängselavgiften måste upp i minst 100 kronor innan räkning av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1995 — Frivilliga skatteinbetalningar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1998 — Separering av avgifter till socialförsäkringar från skatter av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2126 — Likabehandling för belopp under 100 kronor på skattekontot av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2141 — Översyn av kravet på personalliggare i mindre företag av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament