2024-04-242023/24:KrU10 · p.3KrUCulture
Access to culture and cultural activities
Access to culture across the whole country
What's at stake: Where in the country someone lives, their finances, and any disability currently affect their ability both to experience and to practise culture themselves, and high inflation risks widening those gaps further.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the model for regional cultural cooperation and other state grants are enough to secure equal access to culture nationwide, or whether targeted measures are needed for groups such as children, older people, people with disabilities, and civil society.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the view that access to culture nationwide is important and points out that the model for regional cultural cooperation, together with other state grants, already increases the ability to reach citizens across the country; the committee does not want to pre-empt the ongoing review of the model.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (C)
Culture needs to be free and accessible to everyone regardless of where they live, disability, or background, with a special responsibility for children and young people; the government should closely monitor how high inflation affects the ability to create and take part in culture, including from an equality perspective.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 175–22Ja 123–74
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/92/14 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/22/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:271 by Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2023/24:1622 by Anders Ådahl (C) demands 1 and 2, 2023/24:1885 by Amanda Lind and Jacob Risberg (both MP) demands 7 and 9, 2023/24:2483 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) demand 1, 2023/24:2686 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demand 5 and 2023/24:2705 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) demands 32 and 34.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:271 av Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2023/24:1622 av Anders Ådahl (C) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2023/24:1885 av Amanda Lind och Jacob Risberg (båda MP) yrkandena 7 och 9, 2023/24:2483 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2686 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 5 och 2023/24:2705 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 32 och 34.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions from the regular motion period 2023 about everyone's access to culture. The reason is, among other things, that work is ongoing or that measures have already been taken on the issues that the proposals address. The proposals deal, among other things, with the conditions for performing arts, access to culture and cultural activities, and literature and library matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to carefully monitor how access to culture develops for all, especially children and youth. (C) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that everyone shall have the same right and opportunity to practice culture and participate in cultural life, and that state cultural policy shall guarantee equivalent distribution across the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone shall have the same right and opportunity to practice culture and participate in cultural life, and that state cultural policy shall guarantee equivalent distribution across the country. The counter-proposal's demand for free and accessible culture regardless of place of residence, disability or background is the same commitment. The plan also sees culture as a tool against segregation and class differences. The plan supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla ska ha samma rätt och möjlighet att utöva kultur och ta del av kulturlivet, och att statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera likvärdig fördelning över landet. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, funktionsnedsättning eller bakgrund är samma åtagande. Planen ser dessutom kulturen som ett verktyg mot segregation och klasskillnader. Planen stöder kravet.
- equal right to culturedecisive»Alla ska ha samma rätt och möjlighet att utöva kultur och att ta del av kulturlivet.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have the same right and opportunity to practice culture and participate in cultural life.”
- equivalent culture across the country»En statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera en demokratiskt likvärdig fördelning av resurser över landet och alla invånares tillgång till kulturverksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“A state cultural policy shall guarantee a democratically equivalent distribution of resources across the country and all residents' access to cultural activities.”
- free culture across the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture stands free from both commercial and political control and exists across the country.”
- culture against class differences»Kulturen kan spegla samhället, motverka segregation och klasskillnader.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture can reflect society, counter segregation and class differences.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme explicitly states that cultural policy is about making the different forms of artistic expression accessible to everyone, children and adults, throughout the country, and that institutions should exist everywhere.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly states that cultural policy is about making the different forms of artistic expression accessible to everyone, children and adults, throughout the country, and that institutions should exist everywhere. The election manifesto promises a strengthened cultural school and special initiatives in resource-poor areas as well as cheaper leisure and cultural activities. The counter-proposal's demand for free and accessible culture regardless of place of residence, background or disability is thus in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet säger uttryckligen att kulturpolitiken går ut på att göra konstens uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet, och att institutionerna ska finnas överallt. Valmanifestet lovar en stärkt kulturskola och särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden samt billigare fritids- och kulturaktiviteter. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, bakgrund eller funktionsnedsättning är därmed planens linje.
- culture accessible to alldecisive»konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“the different forms of artistic expression accessible to everyone, children and adults, throughout the country.”
- cultural school and disadvantaged areas»Vi vill stärka kulturskolan för att säkra alla barns möjligheter till kulturella aktiviteter, och genomföra särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen the cultural school to secure all children's opportunities for cultural activities, and implement special initiatives in resource-poor areas.”
- culture independent of means»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka. Föräldrarnas plånbok ska inte avgöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable costs, both for sport and culture, needs to increase. Parents' wallets should not decide.”
- cultural institutions throughout the country»Institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet ska därför finnas över hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Institutions for professional cultural life should therefore exist throughout the country.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme's cultural policy is based on everyone being able to practice and participate in culture on equal terms and all children being able to go to cultural school regardless of family finances.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme's cultural policy is based on everyone being able to practice and participate in culture on equal terms and all children being able to go to cultural school regardless of family finances. The election manifesto wishes to build a stronger cultural life that more have access to throughout the country and particularly cherish children's culture. The counter-proposal's demands for free and accessible culture regardless of place of residence, disability or background are therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammets kulturpolitik bygger på att alla ska kunna utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor och att alla barn ska kunna gå i kulturskola oavsett familjens ekonomi. Valmanifestet vill bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till i hela landet och värna barns kultur särskilt. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, funktionsnedsättning eller bakgrund stöds därmed.
- culture on equal termsdecisive»utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor.« (party programme ↗)“practice and participate in culture on equal terms.”
- culture throughout the country, children first»Vi vill bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till — i hela landet. Barns kultur ska särskilt värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to build a stronger cultural life that more have access to — throughout the country. Children's culture shall be particularly cherished.”
- culture regardless of family finances»kultur inom någon form av kulturskola oavsett« (party programme ↗)“culture in some form of cultural school regardless”
- recovery plan for cultural life»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a broad recovery plan for the cultural life throughout the country, which includes both public, free, professional and non-profit actors.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and demands that state cultural institutions spread their activities across the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and demands that state cultural institutions spread their activities across the country. The counter-proposal's demand for free and accessible culture regardless of residence, disability or background is thus the plan's own direction. The plan also states that culture shall be free and that everyone should have access to cultural values.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kultur i hela landet till en uttalad utgångspunkt och kräver att statliga kulturinstitutioner sprider sin verksamhet över landet. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, funktionsnedsättning eller bakgrund är därmed planens egen linje. Planen slår också fast att kulturen ska vara fri och att alla ska ha tillgång till kulturvärden.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party.”
- dispersed cultural activities»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities throughout the country.”
- free and inclusive culture»Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture shall be free and independent, sport fair and inclusive.”
The party programme requires the public sector to increase at all levels the accessibility of culture to the entire population and to create economic conditions also for culture that is not commercially profitable.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires the public sector to increase at all levels the accessibility of culture to the entire population and to create economic conditions also for culture that is not commercially profitable. Sweden shall be a model when it comes to culture by and for children and young people, and gender equality within culture shall increase. The counter-proposal's demand for free and accessible culture regardless of place of residence, disability or background follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ålägger det offentliga att på alla nivåer öka kulturens tillgänglighet för hela befolkningen och att skapa ekonomiska förutsättningar även för kultur som inte är kommersiellt lönsam. Sverige ska vara ett föredöme när det gäller kultur av och för barn och unga, och jämställdheten inom kulturen ska öka. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, funktionsnedsättning eller bakgrund följer direkt av detta.
- increased accessibility to culturedecisive»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck, öka kulturens tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall at all levels promote diversity of cultural expression, increase the accessibility of culture”
- culture for children and youth»Sverige ska vara ett föredöme på området kultur av och för barn och ungdomar.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a model in the field of culture by and for children and youth.”
- gender equality in culture»Insatser måste göras för att öka jämställdheten inom kulturen.« (party programme ↗)“Measures must be taken to increase gender equality within culture.”
- free access via libraries»Biblioteken har en central roll för att alla ska ha kostnadsfri tillgång till litteratur och annan kultur« (party programme ↗)“Libraries have a central role so that everyone has free access to literature and other culture”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan places on the state the responsibility for cultural infrastructure throughout the country and requires that cultural and leisure activities are accessible to persons with disabilities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places on the state the responsibility for cultural infrastructure throughout the country and requires that cultural and leisure activities are accessible to persons with disabilities. Culture is assigned an intrinsic value that shall be available to all citizens. The counter-proposal's requirement for free and accessible culture regardless of place of residence, disability or background responds to these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lägger på staten ansvaret för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet och kräver att kultur- och fritidsaktiviteter är tillgängliga för personer med funktionsnedsättning. Kulturen tillmäts ett eget värde som ska komma alla medborgare till del. Motförslagets krav på fri och tillgänglig kultur oavsett bostadsort, funktionsnedsättning eller bakgrund svarar mot dessa åtaganden.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“cultural infrastructure, throughout the country”
- accessible culture and leisure»att offentliga inrättningar, anläggningar och informationssystem utformas med höga krav på tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“that public institutions, facilities and information systems are designed with high accessibility requirements”
- culture's intrinsic value»Genom kulturen får vi rötter till vår historia, mening i nuet, visioner för framtiden« (party programme ↗)“Through culture we get roots to our history, meaning in the present, visions for the future”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan lacks commitments about culture's accessibility throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan lacks commitments about culture's accessibility throughout the country. The nearest-lying principles are the goal of a broad and free supply, that nature and outdoor life shall be accessible to everyone and the stated concern for households pressured by price increases. Based on these, the plan gives weak support for culture to be accessible regardless of residence and for inflation's effects to be monitored, while at the same time protecting cultural institutions' freedom from political control.
Original (Swedish)
Planen saknar åtaganden om kulturens tillgänglighet i hela landet. Närmast liggande principer är målet om ett brett och fritt utbud, att natur och friluftsliv ska vara tillgängliga för alla och den uttalade oron för hushåll som pressas av prisökningar. Utifrån dessa ger planen ett svagt stöd för att kultur ska vara tillgänglig oavsett bostadsort och att inflationens effekter följs, medan den samtidigt värnar kulturinstitutionernas frihet från politisk styrning.
- broad and free supplydecisive»Vi ska ha en mediepolitik för mångfald« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall have a media policy for diversity”
- accessibility for everyone»Friluftslivet och naturen ska vara tillgänglig för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Outdoor life and nature shall be accessible to everyone.”
- pressured household economy»Det har blivit orimligt dyrt att vara svensk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It has become unreasonably expensive to be Swedish.”
- culture's freedom from politics»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.« (party programme ↗)“The goal shall be independent institutions that in their activities stand free from state and politics.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that cultural policy should be designed so that culture reaches all of Sweden and that citizen participation in the distribution of cultural funds should increase.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that cultural policy should be designed so that culture reaches all of Sweden and that citizen participation in the distribution of cultural funds should increase. The counter-proposal's demand that culture should be accessible regardless of place of residence and disability, with particular responsibility for children and young people, aligns with that commitment and with the plan's principle of equal access regardless of background. The plan, however, speaks of Swedish culture rather than equal access as a goal in itself.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att kulturpolitiken ska utformas så att kulturen når hela Sverige och att medborgarinflytandet över fördelningen av kulturmedel ska öka. Motförslagets krav på att kultur ska vara tillgänglig oavsett bostadsort och funktionsnedsättning, med särskilt ansvar för barn och unga, ligger i linje med det åtagandet och med planens princip om lika tillgång oavsett bakgrund. Planen talar dock om svensk kultur snarare än om jämlik tillgång som mål i sig.
- culture shall reach the whole countrydecisive»Politiken bör utformas för att den svenska kulturen ska nå hela Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should be designed so that Swedish culture reaches all of Sweden.”
- the whole country shall live»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for all of Sweden”
- equal access regardless of background»Ge alla tillgång till idrott oavsett kön, ålder eller kulturell bakgrund« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give everyone access to sports regardless of gender, age or cultural background”
- citizen participation in cultural funding»Fördela offentliga kulturmedel och utforma offentliga miljöer med ett större medborgarinflytande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Distribute public cultural funds and design public environments with greater citizen participation”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KrU10)
- Committee report full text (HB01KrU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1031 — Fullföljning av satsningen på blåsmusiken av Tomas Eneroth (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1431 — Indelning av länder och språk på bibliotek av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson och Ulrika Heindorff (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1488 — Offentliga satsningar på musik av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1524 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1622 — Utveckling av kultursamverkansmodellen för ökat kulturellt genomslag i hela landet av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1798 — Finansiering av Stockholms konserthus av Leonid Yurkovskiy och Fredrik Lindahl (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1839 — Teckenspråk av Carita Boulwén (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1884 — Levla upp spelpolitiken av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1885 — Kulturpolitiska frågor av Amanda Lind och Jacob Risberg (båda MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2446 — Politik för det samiska folket av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2483 — Kultur, civilsamhälle, idrott och medier i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2548 — Ökad finansiering av biblioteken av Jamal El-Haj m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2606 — Dalhalla - en nationell sommarscen för Kungliga Operan av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2679 — Stärka teckenspråkets ställning i Sverige av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2685 — Utgiftsområde 1 Rikets styrelse av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2686 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund och fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2705 — Ett rikare liv för äldre av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:271 — Tillgänglighet till scenkonst av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2736 — E-sport och spelande i Sverige av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:344 — Bibliotek i tradition och förnyelse av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament