2023-12-202023/24:NU1 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
Objectives for Foreign Trade, Export and Investment Promotion
The goal for Sweden's foreign trade, export and investment promotion policy
What's at stake: The wording of the goal steers the direction of Sweden's trade policy and its new foreign trade strategy, and therefore which considerations - such as fair terms for poorer countries or social and environmental requirements - should carry the most weight in trade negotiations and export-promotion efforts.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the parliament-set goal for foreign trade, export and investment promotion should be changed from free, sustainable and rule-based trade to explicitly include fair trade, or whether the current goal should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion to change the goal to include fair trade. The committee holds that Sweden should be a clear voice for free and rule-based trade in which the World Trade Organization (WTO) plays a fundamental role, and that the current goal - which the new foreign trade strategy builds on - provides good conditions for a strong economy, increased welfare and strengthened competitiveness, so the committee sees no reason to change the goal.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (S)
The reservation (S) wants fair trade to be included in the goal for trade policy. The reasoning is that fair trade strengthens the legitimacy of global trade, is a precondition for sustainable and socially sustainable trade, and means a responsible globalisation that takes account of the environment, climate, social security, decent working conditions, health and animal welfare - especially since the benefits of globalisation are currently unfairly distributed.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 193–92Ja 158–127
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 9/1/11/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/16 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/11 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VAli Esbati (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VAndrea Andersson Tay (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VBirger Lahti (V, Norrbottens län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VDaniel Riazat (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIsabell Mixter (V, Västernorrlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VLorena Delgado Varas (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VMalcolm Momodou Jallow (V, Malmö kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VNooshi Dadgostar (V, Stockholms län) | No — party line: Abstain |
| VSamuel Gonzalez Westling (V, Gävleborgs län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2023/24:2632 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) amendment 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2632 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on how the appropriations in the state budget for 2024 within the Expenditure Area Business shall be distributed. In total, this is approximately 9.5 billion kronor from the state budget. Most of the money, approximately 3.5 billion kronor, goes to the Agency for Innovation Systems: research and development. Approximately 834 million kronor goes to institutions' strategic competence funds and approximately 680 million goes to grants for business development and innovation. Thus the Riksdag rejected alternative budget proposals in motions. The Riksdag also approved the government's proposal on certain mandates concerning SAS AB and Almi AB, and approved other proposals for mandates regarding financial commitments. Furthermore, the Riksdag approves the government's proposal that the objective for tourism policy shall cease to apply. The Riksdag decides on the state budget in two steps. First, the frameworks for the 27 expenditure areas in the budget are decided. The Riksdag decided this on 29 November 2023. Then the Riksdag determines in a second step how the money shall be distributed within each expenditure area. This decision concerns step two in the decision process.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants fair trade policy that prioritises environment, climate, human rights and social responsibility, and ensures EU trade policy becomes a tool for poverty reduction and climate action. (S) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that free trade presupposes equal conditions and that a fair trade policy counteracting today's unequal world market must be developed, and that international cooperation shall be based on human rights and not capital's interests.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that free trade presupposes equal conditions and that a fair trade policy counteracting today's unequal world market must be developed, and that international cooperation shall be based on human rights and not capital's interests. Writing fair trade into the goals of trade policy is precisely this commitment. The plan also speaks directly against the committee's grounds about free and rule-based trade with the WTO as foundation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att frihandel förutsätter likvärdiga förutsättningar och att en rättvis handelspolitik som motverkar dagens ojämlika världsmarknad måste utvecklas, samt att internationell samverkan ska grundas på mänskliga rättigheter och inte kapitalets intressen. Att skriva in rättvis handel i handelspolitikens mål är precis detta åtagande. Planen talar också direkt mot utskottets skäl om fri och regelbaserad handel med WTO som grund.
- fair trade policydecisive»Frihandel förutsätter likvärdiga förutsättningar. En rättvis handelspolitik,« (party programme ↗)“Free trade presupposes equal conditions. A fair trade policy,”
- human rights before capital interests»Internationell samverkan ska grundas på respekt för mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“International cooperation shall be based on respect for human”
- reduce global inequality»I en rättvis värld måste den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt minskas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a fair world, global inequality must be significantly reduced.”
- criticism of the WTO's role»Internationella organ som Världshandelsorganisationen (WTO), Internationella valutafonden (IMF) och« (party programme ↗)“International bodies such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly states that the party stands up for open, free and fair trade and that trade agreements shall be guided by values on social dialogue, human rights and environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that the party stands up for open, free and fair trade and that trade agreements shall be guided by values on social dialogue, human rights and environment. Writing fair trade into the goal for trade policy is thus the plan's own formulation. The party programme additionally requires fair rules in the trade system and coordination with environmental and labour rights agreements, while the plan protects the WTO.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att partiet står upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel och att handelsavtal ska vägledas av värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö. Att skriva in rättvis handel i målet för handelspolitiken är därmed planens egen formulering. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom rättvisa spelregler i handelssystemet och samordning med miljö- och arbetsrättsavtal, samtidigt som planen värnar WTO.
- free and fair tradedecisive»Vi står upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We stand up for open, free and fair trade.”
- values in trade agreements»EU behöver sluta fler handelsavtal där också våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU needs to conclude more trade agreements where our values on social dialogue, human rights and environment are also guiding.”
- fair rules in trade»utveckling, men den förutsätter rättvisa spelregler i det internationella handelssystemet.« (party programme ↗)“development, but it requires fair rules in the international trade system.”
- rules-based trade via WTO»Det globala samarbetet inom WTO ska stärkas, liksom samarbetet med likasinnade länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Global cooperation within the WTO shall be strengthened, as shall cooperation with like-minded countries.”
The plan establishes that Sweden shall have an open economy and work for fair trade, with strict environmental and social requirements in trade policy and requirements that imported goods are manufactured with consideration to environment, human rights and working conditions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden shall have an open economy and work for fair trade, with strict environmental and social requirements in trade policy and requirements that imported goods are manufactured with consideration to environment, human rights and working conditions. Letting fair trade be part of the goal for trade policy is precisely this commitment translated into goal formulation. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige ska ha en öppen ekonomi och verka för frihandel på rättvisa villkor, med hårda miljökrav och sociala krav i handelspolitiken och krav på att importerade varor tillverkats med hänsyn till miljö, mänskliga rättigheter och arbetsförhållanden. Att låta rättvis handel ingå i målet för handelspolitiken är just detta åtagande omsatt i målformuleringen. Motförslagets krav stöds därför.
- fair tradedecisive»omvärlden och verka för frihandel på rättvisa« (party programme ↗)“the world and work for fair trade”
- environmental and social requirements in trade»införa hårda miljökrav och sociala krav i handelspolitiken« (party programme ↗)“introduce strict environmental and social requirements in trade policy”
- requirements for imported goods»tillverkade med hänsyn till miljö, mänskliga rättigheter och arbetsförhållanden för anställda i tillverkningsländerna« (party programme ↗)“manufactured with consideration to environment, human rights and working conditions for employees in manufacturing countries”
- equalization as guiding star in trade»Förutsättningar för handel ska utformas med utjämning av« (party programme ↗)“Conditions for trade shall be designed with equalization of”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly demands stricter requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements while expanding free trade, and the party programme states that attention must be paid to ethical and environmental perspectives in trade.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands stricter requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements while expanding free trade, and the party programme states that attention must be paid to ethical and environmental perspectives in trade. This is in substance what the counter-proposal asks for when fair trade is to be included in trade policy goals. The plan moreover wants to use trade policy as a climate tool, but rejects protectionism, which sets a limit on how the demands may be formulated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal samtidigt som frihandeln utvidgas, och partiprogrammet slår fast att hänsyn måste tas till etiska och miljömässiga perspektiv i handeln. Det är i sak det motförslaget begär när rättvis handel ska ingå i handelspolitikens mål. Planen vill dessutom använda handelspolitiken som klimatverktyg, men avvisar protektionism, vilket sätter en gräns för hur kraven får utformas.
- requirements on working conditions in trade agreementsdecisive»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel. Öppna upp fler marknader för svenska varor och tjänster. Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot get by without free trade. Open up more markets for Swedish goods and services. Set stricter requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- ethical and environmental consideration»Hänsyn måste tas till etiska och miljömässiga perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Attention must be paid to ethical and environmental perspectives.”
- trade policy for climate»Vi ska använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner runtom i världen och pressa stora utsläppare som Kina att stänga ner sina kolkraftverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies around the world and pressure major polluters like China to shut down their coal-fired power plants.”
- free trade without protectionism»Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's defining commitment is that Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade and that the EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers against the outside world.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's defining commitment is that Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade and that the EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers against the outside world. Writing in fair trade as a conditioning goal for trade policy pulls in the opposite direction from that free trade mandate. The plan instead wants to integrate climate aspects into the EU's trade policy, thus through climate policy instruments and not through a rewritten goal formulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel och att EU helt ska avskaffa tullar och andra handelshinder mot omvärlden. Att skriva in rättvis handel som villkorande mål för handelspolitiken drar i motsatt riktning mot det frihandelsuppdraget. Planen vill i stället integrera klimataspekterna i EU:s handelspolitik, alltså genom klimatstyrmedel och inte genom en omskriven målformulering.
- strong voice for free tradedecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade”
- abolished trade barriers»EU ska helt avskaffa tullar och andra handelshinder mot omvärlden.« (party programme ↗)“The EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers against the outside world.”
- more free trade agreements»Vi ska stärka EU som frihandelsunion med en fördjupad inre marknad, värna den fria rörligheten i Europa och verka för fler frihandelsavtal med omvärlden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen the EU as a free trade union with a deepened internal market, protect free movement in Europe and work for more free trade agreements with the outside world.”
- climate via trade policy»Klimataspekterna ska integreras i EU:s handelspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Climate aspects shall be integrated into the EU's trade policy.”
The plan requires freer world trade with fairer rules of the game and that trade policy is made compatible with international solidarity, which in substance is what the counter-proposal wants to write into the goal.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires freer world trade with fairer rules of the game and that trade policy is made compatible with international solidarity, which in substance is what the counter-proposal wants to write into the goal. The plan also wants to strengthen global ethical codes for business and places requirements on the treatment of animals. Free trade and fair rules of the game are in the plan two sides of the same commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler och att handelspolitiken görs förenlig med internationell solidaritet, vilket i sak är det motförslaget vill skriva in i målet. Planen vill också förstärka de globala etiska koderna för näringslivet och ställer krav på djurens behandling. Fri handel och rättvisa spelregler är i planen två sidor av samma åtagande.
- fairer rules of the game in tradedecisive»En friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler är en förutsättning för att klyftorna ska kunna minska.« (party programme ↗)“Freer world trade with fairer rules of the game is a prerequisite for narrowing the gaps.”
- trade and international solidarity»förenliga med internationell solidaritet« (party programme ↗)“compatible with international solidarity”
- human rights in trade»Förhållandet mellan näringslivet och mänskliga rättigheter kommer i fokus genom globaliseringen.« (party programme ↗)“The relationship between business and human rights comes into focus through globalization.”
- animal welfare»undvika stress, smärta och skador för djuren« (party programme ↗)“avoid stress, pain and injury to animals”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is built on free trade and a deepened internal market, and sees the state's role as facilitating trade and internationalisation rather than conditioning it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on free trade and a deepened internal market, and sees the state's role as facilitating trade and internationalisation rather than conditioning it. Writing in fair trade with requirements for environment, social protection and working conditions in the goals of trade policy risks making the goal an instrument for trade barriers. The plan therefore gives no support for the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på fri handel och en fördjupad inre marknad, och ser statens roll som att underlätta för handel och internationalisering snarare än att villkora den. Att skriva in rättvis handel med krav på miljö, social trygghet och arbetsvillkor i handelspolitikens mål riskerar att göra målet till ett instrument för handelshinder. Planen ger därför inget stöd för motförslagets krav.
- free and deepened tradedecisive»Fördjupa den inre marknaden, inte minst för tjänster och digitala produkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen the internal market, not least for services and digital products”
- the state shall facilitate trade»och underlätta för handel och internationalisering.« (party programme ↗)“and facilitate trade and internationalisation.”
- market economics as foundation»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- growth as overarching goal»Arrangera ett EU-toppmöte om tillväxt under det svenska EU-ordförandeskapet i syfte att sätta i gång ett arbete med att få på plats en ny tillväxtstrategi för EU« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Arrange an EU summit on growth during the Swedish EU presidency in order to start work on putting in place a new growth strategy for the EU”
The counter-proposal wants fair trade, taking into account among other things environment, working conditions and animal welfare, to be part of trade policy's goals.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants fair trade, taking into account among other things environment, working conditions and animal welfare, to be part of trade policy's goals. The plan is fundamentally pro-free trade but states that exceptions must be possible, explicitly to be able to stop imports of goods from animals that have been subjected to suffering, and criticizes that Swedish special requirements for environment and animal welfare make domestic production more expensive without compensation. From this it follows that the plan supports writing such considerations into the goal, but with Swedish interests as the ultimate benchmark.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill att rättvis handel, med hänsyn till bland annat miljö, arbetsvillkor och djurvälfärd, ska ingå i handelspolitikens mål. Planen är i grunden frihandelsvänlig men slår fast att avsteg måste vara möjliga, uttryckligen för att kunna stoppa import av varor från djur som utsatts för lidande, och kritiserar att svenska särkrav för miljö och djurvälfärd gör inhemsk produktion dyrare utan kompensation. Härlett stöder planen att sådana hänsyn skrivs in i målet, dock med svenska intressen som yttersta rättesnöre.
- exceptions to free trade for animal welfaredecisive»import av varor som framställts genom att utsätta djur för stort och onödigt lidande.« (party programme ↗)“import of goods produced by subjecting animals to great and unnecessary suffering.”
- import ban on animal cruelty products»Arbeta för ett förbud mot import av produkter från djur som har tvångsmatats eller slaktats utan bedövning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a ban on imports of products from animals that have been force-fed or slaughtered without stunning”
- equal conditions in trade»Svenska särkrav för miljöskydd och djurvälfärd gör dessutom ofta inhemsk produktion dyrare än konkurrenternas utan att svenska lantbrukare kompenseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish special requirements for environmental protection and animal welfare also often make domestic production more expensive than competitors' without Swedish farmers being compensated.”
- Swedish interests in trade agreements»Värna svenska intressen i frihandelsavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in free trade agreements”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU1)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU1)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2325 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2632 — Handel och exportfrämjande av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2634 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2703 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2728 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2023/24:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2024
Source: The Swedish Parliament