2026-06-032025/26:MJU27 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Penalties and Sanction Fees
Penalties and sanction fees against fraud in the food chain
What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly and forcefully the state can act against fraud in the food chain, which matters for consumer protection, public and animal health, the environment, and competition between compliant and non-compliant food businesses. Food-chain fraud is in some cases linked to organised crime.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should now call for tougher and more effective sanctions against fraud in the food chain, or whether this should wait for ongoing inquiries into the control authorities' effectiveness and a possible sanction fee.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee backs the government's bill for stricter controls and better cooperation between authorities against fraud in the food chain and rejects motion 2025/26:4020 (S) calling for further measures; the committee does not want to preempt the outcome of ongoing inquiries into the control authorities' effectiveness and a possible sanction fee for food fraud.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) considers today's sanctions system inadequate because few violations lead to penalties, undermining trust in the food chain and distorting competition to the disadvantage of law-abiding businesses; they want the government to promptly bring forward proposals for tougher and more effective sanctions.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 198–149Nej 128–219
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/106/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/18/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 23/0/0/1 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 18/0/0/1 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 66/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 70/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:4020 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) demands 1 and 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4020 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on measures to prevent fraud in the food chain. The measures shall strengthen control and include the following: Two designated control authorities, the Food Agency and the Board of Agriculture, shall in certain cases be able to assume control responsibility from other bodies, such as county administrative boards and municipalities. New provisions are introduced on information obligations between control authorities connected to the food sector. The legislative changes regarding a central authority being able to assume control responsibility take effect on 1 January 2028. The legislative changes regarding information obligations take effect on 1 January 2027.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to return with proposals for stricter and effective sanctions for violations of rules in the food chain. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan sees economic crime in enterprises as a serious problem that drives out legitimate businesses and undermines tax revenue, and wants effective monitoring and greater public transparency.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees economic crime in enterprises as a serious problem that drives out legitimate businesses and undermines tax revenue, and wants effective monitoring and greater public transparency. A toughened sanctions system with sanction fees for food fraud is a direct application of that line. The committee's grounds are that ongoing investigations should not be prejudged, which is a procedural question the plan does not take a position on.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser ekonomisk brottslighet i företag som ett allvarligt problem som slår ut seriösa företag och urholkar skatteintäkter, och vill ha effektiv uppföljning och större samhällelig insyn. Ett skärpt sanktionssystem med sanktionsavgift för livsmedelsbedrägerier är en direkt tillämpning av den linjen. Utskottets skäl är att pågående utredningar inte bör föregripas, vilket är en beredningsfråga som planen inte uttalar sig om.
- combat economic crimedecisive»Ekonomisk brottslighet i företag leder till allvarliga konsekvenser,« (party programme ↗)“Economic crime in enterprises leads to serious consequences,”
- effective monitoring of crime»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for effective monitoring of the organised”
- transparency in enterprises against fraud»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater public transparency”
- economic crime distorts competition»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
The plan requires that fraud and all other economic crime be combated and that penalties be commensurate with the seriousness of crimes.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that fraud and all other economic crime be combated and that penalties be commensurate with the seriousness of crimes. It also wants to protect viable Swedish food production, which presupposes that cheating does not distort competition. Rapid proposals for sharpened sanctions, including a sanction fee for food fraud, therefore follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet bekämpas och att straffen står i paritet med brottens allvar. Den vill också värna en livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion, vilket förutsätter att fusk inte snedvrider konkurrensen. Skyndsamma förslag om skärpta sanktioner, inklusive en sanktionsavgift för livsmedelsbedrägerier, följer därför av planen.
- combated economic crimedecisive»Bekämpande av bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Combating fraud and all other economic crime.”
- effective sanctions»Straff i paritet med brottens allvar.« (party programme ↗)“Penalties commensurate with the seriousness of crimes.”
- confidence in the food chain»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency.”
- stop for misuse of tax funds»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
The plan establishes that everyone shall be able to feel secure about the food we eat and that oversight is needed so that no one gains competitive advantages by breaking the rules.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone shall be able to feel secure about the food we eat and that oversight is needed so that no one gains competitive advantages by breaking the rules. A sanctions system where few violations lead to consequences conflicts with this, and the counter-proposal's demands for tighter sanctions including sanction fees follow from the plan's line that criminal profits shall be taken from those who break the rules.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla ska kunna känna trygghet med maten vi äter och att tillsyn behövs för att ingen ska få konkurrensfördelar genom att bryta mot reglerna. Ett sanktionssystem där få överträdelser leder till påföljd står i strid med det, och motförslagets krav på skärpta sanktioner inklusive sanktionsavgift följer av planens linje om att brottsvinster ska tas ifrån den som bryter mot reglerna.
- safe food and poison-free everyday lifedecisive»Alla ska kunna känna en trygghet med maten vi äter, vattnet vi dricker och alla produkter vi omger oss med.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall be able to feel secure about the food we eat, the water we drink and all products we surround ourselves with.”
- oversight provides fair competition»Tillsynen är också viktig för att skapa rättvisa mellan olika företag – ingen ska få ett övertag i konkurrensen genom att bryta mot miljöregler.« (party programme ↗)“Oversight is also important to create fairness between different enterprises – no one shall gain an advantage in competition by breaking environmental rules.”
- criminal profits shall be seized»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin. Brottsvinster ska beslagtas och återföras till samhället.« (party programme ↗)“We also wish to strengthen the work against criminal economy. Criminal profits shall be seized and returned to society.”
- resources for prosecution»Domstolar och rättsvårdande myndigheter ska ha nog med resurser för att kunna hantera och lagföra miljöbrott.« (party programme ↗)“Courts and law-enforcement authorities shall have sufficient resources to handle and prosecute environmental crimes.”
The election manifesto demands action against crimes that harm businesses and wants to strengthen the competitiveness of green industries.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands action against crimes that harm businesses and wants to strengthen the competitiveness of green industries. Food fraud that rarely results in penalties distorts this competition and undermines confidence in Swedish food production. The party programme also states that criminal policy should both prevent and deter, which supports effective sanctions now.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver krafttag mot brott som drabbar företag och vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft. Livsmedelsfusk som sällan leder till påföljd snedvrider just den konkurrensen och undergräver förtroendet för svensk livsmedelsproduktion. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att kriminalpolitiken ska både förebygga och avskräcka, vilket talar för effektiva sanktioner nu.
- action against crimes against businessesdecisive»krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“action against crimes against businesses”
- green industries' competitiveness»Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen green industries' competitiveness.”
- deterrent sanctions»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy should therefore both prevent and deter crime, support victims of crime and encourage those who have committed illegal acts into a new life situation without crime.”
- healthy competition»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driver for the development of the market economy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that oversight of compliance with national laws and EU rules is strengthened and that clear sanctions exist for violations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that oversight of compliance with national laws and EU rules is strengthened and that clear sanctions exist for violations. A sanctions system where few violations result in consequences also distorts the fair competition the plan protects. The counter-proposal's requirement for swift and effective sanctions, including a sanction fee, therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att kontrollen av att nationella lagar och EU-regler efterlevs skärps och att tydliga sanktioner finns vid överträdelser. Ett sanktionssystem där få överträdelser leder till påföljd snedvrider dessutom den konkurrens på lika villkor som planen slår vakt om. Motförslagets krav på skyndsamma och effektiva sanktioner, inklusive en sanktionsavgift, följer därför av planen.
- strengthened compliance oversightdecisive»Kontrollen av att nationella lagar och EU-regler efterlevs måste skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“Oversight that national laws and EU rules are complied with must be strengthened.”
- clear sanctions for violations»Det behövs tydliga sanktioner vid överträdelser av bestämmelser gällande utsläpp, vattenrening, transportsäkerhet och fiske.« (party programme ↗)“There must be clear sanctions for violations of provisions regarding emissions, water purification, transport safety and fishing.”
- consumer perspective in food policy»Jordbruks- och livsmedelspolitiken ska ha ett tydligt konsument- och hållbarhetsperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Agricultural and food policy shall have a clear consumer and sustainability perspective.”
- competition on equal terms»Lagar och regler ska slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet och att enskilda människor har likvärdiga och goda möjligheter att nå sina livsmål.« (party programme ↗)“Laws and rules shall protect property rights, competition on equal terms, legal certainty and that individuals have equivalent and good opportunities to reach their life goals.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that all crimes be effectively prosecuted without exception, including those that might be dismissed as minor, and wants to counteract unfair competition.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all crimes be effectively prosecuted without exception, including those that might be dismissed as minor, and wants to counteract unfair competition. Food fraud, which rarely leads to prosecution, distorts competition for Swedish agriculture, whose competitiveness the plan wants to strengthen. This supports the counter-proposal's demand for stricter and more effective sanctions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla brott effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som mindre, och vill motverka illojal konkurrens. Livsmedelsfusk som sällan leder till påföljd snedvrider konkurrensen för svenskt lantbruk, vars konkurrenskraft planen vill stärka. Det bär motförslagets krav på skärpta och effektiva sanktioner.
- alla brott ska beivrasdecisive»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
- mot illojal konkurrens»En effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Effective competition policy counteracts oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition.”
- lantbrukets konkurrenskraft»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
- säkra livsmedel»Sverige bör ta till vara sina mycket goda förutsättningar för miljövänlig och säker produktion av högkvalitativa livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should make use of its very good conditions for environmentally friendly and safe production of high-quality food.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that hard work and honesty shall always trump cheating and that sanctions for rule breaches shall be tightened, and it gives the state the task to promote competition.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that hard work and honesty shall always trump cheating and that sanctions for rule breaches shall be tightened, and it gives the state the task to promote competition. Food fraud that rarely receives penalties distorts competition and undermines the food strategy the plan wants to strengthen. Prompt and effective sanctions therefore follow from the plan's principles, even though the factual question is not addressed explicitly.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att slit och flit alltid ska trumfa fusk och att sanktionerna mot regelbrott ska skärpas, och den ger staten uppgiften att främja konkurrensen. Livsmedelsbedrägerier som sällan får påföljd snedvrider konkurrensen och undergräver den livsmedelsstrategi planen vill förstärka. Skyndsamma och effektiva sanktioner följer därmed av planens principer, även om sakfrågan inte behandlas uttryckligen.
- cheating shall never pay offdecisive»Där slit och flit alltid trumfar fusk och dåliga ursäkter, och där välfärdens skyddsnät finns till för den som behöver det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where hard work and honesty always trump cheating and bad excuses, and where welfare's safety net exists for those who need it.”
- tightened sanctions for rule breaches»Skärpa straffen för miljöbrott och nedskräpning och ge ordningsvakter befogenhet att dela ut böter för småskräp« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten penalties for environmental crimes and littering and give law enforcement the authority to issue fines for minor litter”
- the state shall promote competition»institutioner, skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“institutions, protect the value of money, promote competition”
- strengthened food chain»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly identifies food fraud as a problem that farmers face and requires increased measures against it, while crime affecting business owners should be combated and fraud prevented.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly identifies food fraud as a problem that farmers face and requires increased measures against it, while crime affecting business owners should be combated and fraud prevented. The counter-proposal's demands for swiftly sharpened and effective sanctions, including a sanctions fee, directly respond to this commitment. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's cause.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar uttryckligen ut livsmedelsbedrägerier som ett problem som lantbrukare drabbas av och kräver ökade åtgärder mot det, samtidigt som brottslighet som drabbar företagare ska bekämpas och fusk motverkas. Motförslagets krav på skyndsamt skärpta och effektiva sanktioner, inklusive en sanktionsavgift, svarar direkt mot detta åtagande. Planen stöder därför motförslagets sak.
- measures against food frauddecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill därtill skapa förutsättningar för innovation och teknikutveckling och öka åtgärderna mot de problem som lantbrukare drabbas av, som t.ex. stora vildsvinsstammar och livsmedelsbedrägerier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats further want to create conditions for innovation and technology development and increase measures against the problems farmers face, such as large wild boar populations and food fraud.”
- crime against business owners»Bekämpa brottslighet som drabbar företagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat crime affecting business owners”
- agricultural competitiveness»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
- prevent fraud»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be prevented.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU27)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU27)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4020 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:206 Stärkt kontroll av fusk i livsmedelskedjan av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)
- Proposition 2025/26:206 — Stärkt kontroll av fusk i livsmedelskedjan
Source: The Swedish Parliament