2026-02-252025/26:MJU17 · p.9MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Competition and trading practices in the agricultural and food chain
Competition and trading practices in the food chain: wait for the coming bill or act now
What's at stake: The decision affects food prices, the ability of small and medium-sized food producers to reach the market, and how the concentrated market power of a handful of wholesalers and retail chains is addressed.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should wait for the government's announced bill on stronger implementation of the EU directive against unfair trading practices (UTP), or take action now against the market power of wholesalers and large groups in the food chain.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee gives very high priority to good business conditions and well-functioning trading practices in the food chain and is closely engaged with the issue, but chooses to await the government's announced bill on stronger implementation of the UTP directive in spring 2026, and therefore opposes the motions pending that work.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (S)
The S party points out that a handful of wholesalers and large groups hold excessive market power, which pushes up prices and shuts out new wholesalers and smaller producers; it wants to increase competition among wholesalers now, curb large groups' market power, clarify the ban on its unfair use, review implementation of the UTP directive, and make it easier for small and medium-sized producers to gain market access.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:2833 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) motion 21, 2025/26:3593 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) motion 19 and 2025/26:3733 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) motions 18 and 21.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2833 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 21, 2025/26:3593 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 19 och 2025/26:3733 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkandena 18 och 21.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to adapt two laws to EU law. These are the law on the protection of designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs and the law on sanctions for infringement of certain protected designations. The legislative changes mean, among other things, that the government, or a designated authority, will be able to decide on the procedure for objections to an application for a protected designation in Sweden. Regulations may also be issued on how producer groups should be composed. Producer groups may be local food producers who apply for a product to receive a protected designation. The legislative changes are to come into force on 1 April 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to require written and visible information about meat origin in restaurants without consumers having to ask. (S) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants the state to act strategically so that capital does not sit in unreasonable positions of power, sharpen competition and improve conditions for smaller businesses.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the state to act strategically so that capital does not sit in unreasonable positions of power, sharpen competition and improve conditions for smaller businesses. The counter-proposal's demand for reduced market power for the large groups in the food chain and easier entry for small and medium producers directly responds to it. The plan also highlights the small business person competing with large corporations and wants to focus on sustainable food production.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att staten agerar strategiskt så att kapitalet inte sitter på orimliga maktpositioner, skärper konkurrensen och förbättrar villkoren för mindre företag. Motförslagets krav på minskad marknadsmakt för de stora koncernerna i livsmedelskedjan och lättare inträde för små och medelstora producenter svarar direkt mot det. Planen lyfter också småföretagaren som konkurrerar med storbolag och vill satsa på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.
- better conditions for smaller businessesdecisive»investeringar, skärpa konkurrensen och förbättra villkoren för mindre« (party programme ↗)“investments, sharpen competition and improve conditions for smaller”
- small businesses against large corporations»Du som arbetar hårt inom ditt eget småföretag, i konkurrens med storbolag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who work hard in your own small business, in competition with large corporations.”
- state role against high prices»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies'”
- sustainable food production»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that harmful oligopolies have emerged in certain markets and demands that price cartels and unfair pricing be prevented.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that harmful oligopolies have emerged in certain markets and demands that price cartels and unfair pricing be prevented. The counter-proposal's demand for increased competition at the wholesale level, limited market power for large corporations and easier market entry for smaller producers is precisely the democratic counterweight the plan seeks. The commitment to viable Swedish food production points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet konstaterar att skadliga oligopol vuxit fram på vissa marknader och kräver att priskarteller och oskälig prissättning förhindras. Motförslagets krav på ökad konkurrens i grossistledet, begränsad marknadsmakt för de stora koncernerna och lättare inträde för mindre producenter är just den demokratiska motvikt planen efterfrågar. Åtagandet om en livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion pekar åt samma håll.
- counter unfair pricingdecisive»Förhindrande av priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of price cartels and unfair pricing.”
- harmful oligopolies in markets»och skadliga oligopol har även vuxit fram.« (party programme ↗)“and harmful oligopolies have also emerged.”
- viable food production»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency.”
- security for smaller producers»Trygghet för småföretagare.« (party programme ↗)“Security for small businesses.”
The plan wishes to strengthen Swedish agriculture and create better conditions for more farmers, and particularly promote small and medium-sized farms ahead of continued large-scale operations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to strengthen Swedish agriculture and create better conditions for more farmers, and particularly promote small and medium-sized farms ahead of continued large-scale operations. It also establishes that unregulated markets tend to create private monopolies and insufficient competition that harm households, and that the state has a responsibility to counter this. The counter-proposal's demands for increased competition in the wholesale sector and limited market power follow from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka det svenska jordbruket och skapa bättre villkor för fler bönder, och särskilt främja små och medelstora lantbruk framför fortsatt storskalighet. Den slår också fast att oreglerade marknader tenderar att ge privata monopol och bristande konkurrens som drabbar hushållen, och att staten har ett ansvar att motverka detta. Motförslagets krav på ökad konkurrens i grossistledet och begränsad marknadsmakt följer av dessa åtaganden.
- better conditions for farmersdecisive»Miljöpartiet vill stärka det svenska jordbruket och skapa bättre villkor för fler bönder.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens wish to strengthen Swedish agriculture and create better conditions for more farmers.”
- promote smaller farms»Små och medelstora lantbruk som bygger på lokala kretslopp,« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized farms that are based on local cycles,”
- counter private monopolies»I en oreglerad marknadsekonomi tenderar det att uppstå situationer som« (party programme ↗)“In an unregulated market economy, situations tend to arise where”
- state responsibility for competition»Staten har ett ansvar att motverka en sådan utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility to counter such development.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that freer markets and improved competition shall dampen prices, and the party programme wants to prevent an economic centralization that puts market mechanisms out of play.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that freer markets and improved competition shall dampen prices, and the party programme wants to prevent an economic centralization that puts market mechanisms out of play. The counter-proposal's requirement for increased competition in the wholesale level and limited market power for large corporations is precisely this. The plan also wants to strengthen the green industries' competitiveness and give small businesses better preconditions, which bears the requirement to make it easier for smaller producers.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att friare marknader och förbättrad konkurrens ska dämpa priserna, och partiprogrammet vill förhindra en ekonomisk centralisering som sätter marknadsmekanismerna ur spel. Motförslagets krav på ökad konkurrens i grossistledet och begränsad marknadsmakt för de stora koncernerna är just detta. Planen vill dessutom stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft och ge småföretagen bättre förutsättningar, vilket bär kravet att underlätta för mindre producenter.
- better competition dampens pricesdecisive»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition we can dampen prices further.”
- counteract economic centralization»förhindrar en ekonomisk centralisering som sätter marknadsmekanismerna ur spel.« (party programme ↗)“prevents an economic centralization that puts market mechanisms out of play.”
- strengthened competitiveness for green industries»Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen the green industries' competitiveness.”
- better conditions for small businesses»Småföretagen är motorer för jobb, integration och möjligheter. Vi ska skapa bättre förutsättningar för dem att lyckas, med lägre skatt, mindre regelkrångel och en starkare arbetslinje.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Small businesses are motors for jobs, integration and opportunities. We shall create better preconditions for them to succeed, with lower taxes, less regulatory red tape and a stronger work line.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that private power can also be abused and that market economy requires rules for fair competition, and that strong competition law is needed.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that private power can also be abused and that market economy requires rules for fair competition, and that strong competition law is needed. To increase competition at the wholesale level, limit corporations' market power and clarify the prohibition against improper use of that power is an application of this. The requirement to facilitate small and medium-sized producers meets the plan's commitment to reduced regulatory burden.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att även den privata makten kan missbrukas och att marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för sund konkurrens, samt att det behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning. Att öka konkurrensen i grossistledet, begränsa koncernernas marknadsmakt och tydliggöra förbudet mot otillbörlig användning av den är en tillämpning av detta. Kravet på att underlätta för små och medelstora producenter svarar mot planens åtagande om minskad regelbörda.
- counteract abuse of market powerdecisive»Även den privata makten kan missbrukas. Marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att upprätthålla en sund konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Private power can also be abused. Market economy requires rules to maintain fair competition.”
- strong competition law»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt produktinformation.« (party programme ↗)“Strong competition law and consumer laws that give right to correct product information are therefore needed.”
- competition on equal terms»Lagar och regler ska slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet och att enskilda människor har likvärdiga och goda möjligheter att nå sina livsmål.« (party programme ↗)“Laws and rules shall protect property rights, competition on equal terms, legal certainty and that individuals have equivalent and good opportunities to reach their life goals.”
- facilitate smaller producers»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at municipal, state and European level, and public decisions analyzed from a small business perspective.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires effective competition policy that counters oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition, and places small and medium-sized enterprises at the centre of business policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires effective competition policy that counters oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition, and places small and medium-sized enterprises at the centre of business policy. The counter-proposal's requirements for increased competition at the wholesale level, limited market power for the conglomerates and easier entry for smaller producers is precisely that policy applied to the food chain. The plan moreover wants agricultural policy to create proximity between producer and consumer. The requirement is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver en effektiv konkurrenspolitik som motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens, och sätter de små och medelstora företagen i centrum för näringslivspolitiken. Motförslagets krav på ökad konkurrens i grossistledet, begränsad marknadsmakt hos koncernerna och lättare inträde för mindre producenter är just den politiken tillämpad på livsmedelskedjan. Planen vill dessutom att jordbrukspolitiken skapar närhet mellan producent och konsument. Kravet stöds.
- competition policy against oligopolydecisive»En effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Effective competition policy counters oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition.”
- small and medium-sized enterprises at the centre»De små och medelstora företagen, som ofta är familjeföretag, ska stå i centrum för utformningen av näringslivspolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized enterprises, which are often family businesses, shall be at the centre of the design of business policy.”
- break up closed markets»Det måste ske genom att förenkla regler och förbättra konkurrensen, genom att bryta upp slutna marknader och monopol, och att förhindra otillbörligt statligt stöd.« (party programme ↗)“This must happen by simplifying rules and improving competition, by breaking up closed markets and monopolies, and by preventing improper state aid.”
- proximity between producer and consumer»Jordbrukspolitiken bör utformas så att den skapar förutsättningar för närhet mellan producent och konsument.« (party programme ↗)“Agricultural policy should be designed so that it creates conditions for proximity between producer and consumer.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the state's role in the economy includes promoting competition, and that prosperity is built on a dynamic and vigorous business life.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the state's role in the economy includes promoting competition, and that prosperity is built on a dynamic and vigorous business life. To increase competition in the wholesaling level and make it easier for small and medium-sized food producers to gain market share responds to that principle, as does the plan's view that profitability in agriculture is unsustainably low. However, the plan does not take a position on rules on unfair trading practices.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att statens roll i ekonomin bland annat är att främja konkurrensen, och att välståndet bygger på ett dynamiskt och livskraftigt näringsliv. Att öka konkurrensen i grossistledet och göra det lättare för små och medelstora livsmedelsproducenter att ta plats svarar mot den principen, liksom mot planens bild av att lönsamheten i jordbruket är ohållbart låg. Planen tar dock inte ställning till reglerna om otillbörliga handelsmetoder.
- the state shall promote competitiondecisive»institutioner, skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“institutions, protect the value of money, promote competition”
- profitability in agriculture»Samtidigt vittnar bönder om att det inte lönar sig att så inför sommarsäsongen. Det är ohållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile, farmers testify that it does not pay to plant before summer season. That is unsustainable.”
- vigorous business life»Sveriges välstånd bygger på ett dynamiskt och livskraftigt näringsliv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's prosperity is built on a dynamic and vigorous business life.”
- good conditions for smaller businesses»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market, and wants to increase agricultural competitiveness and conditions for new ventures.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market, and wants to increase agricultural competitiveness and conditions for new ventures. It also wants to increase measures against the problems farmers face, including food fraud. The counter-proposal's demands for increased competition at the wholesale level and clearer prohibitions on improper market power respond to these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och upphandlingar gör det svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden, och vill öka jordbrukets konkurrenskraft samt förutsättningarna för nyföretagande. Den vill också öka åtgärderna mot de problem lantbrukare drabbas av, däribland livsmedelsbedrägerier. Motförslagets krav på ökad konkurrens i grossistledet och tydligare förbud mot otillbörlig marknadsmakt svarar mot dessa åtaganden.
- smaller actors entering the marketdecisive»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and in procurement often make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market.”
- strengthened agricultural competitiveness»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
- measures against farming problems»Sverigedemokraterna vill därtill skapa förutsättningar för innovation och teknikutveckling och öka åtgärderna mot de problem som lantbrukare drabbas av, som t.ex. stora vildsvinsstammar och livsmedelsbedrägerier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats further want to create conditions for innovation and technology development and increase measures against the problems farmers face, such as large wild boar populations and food fraud.”
- new ventures and competition»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new ventures and entrepreneurship”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1394 — Säkrade beredskapslager för livsmedel av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1527 — Stärkt säkerhet för Sveriges dricksvattenförsörjning av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1601 — Införande av gränsvärden för PFAS i livsmedel av Magnus Manhammar och Gustaf Lantz (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1662 — En självständig och säker livsmedelsförsörjning för Sverige och Norden av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1721 — Enhetligare tillämpning av livsmedelslagstiftningen av Marie Nicholson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:192 — Stärkt svensk livsmedelsberedskap och ökad självförsörjning av Serkan Köse (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1985 — Beredskapslager för säkrad livsmedelstillgång av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2251 — Ökad självförsörjning på livsmedel av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2359 — Ökad självförsörjning på livsmedel av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2401 — Säljakt av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2404 — Tydligare ursprungsmärkning av animaliska produkter av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2438 — Åtgärder mot hälsofarliga kosttillskott av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2574 — Stöd för svenskt mathantverk av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2619 — Fridtidsodlingens betydelse för livsmedelsförsörjning och livsmedelsberedskap av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2789 — Klimatet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2817 — En aktiv industri- och landsbygdspolitik av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2822 — Militärt och civilt försvar samt samhällets krisberedskap av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2825 — Vatten, hav och fiske av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2833 — Jord, skog, jakt av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2849 — Satsning på Stockholms skärgård av Markus Wiechel (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament