2023-04-192022/23:AU7 · p.1AULabour market

Gender equality policy objectives and related matters

The goals of gender equality policy - new inquiries and gender mainstreaming

What's at stake: The decision affects whether shortcomings in gender equality - such as structural pay differences and an uneven distribution of power between women and men - should be newly mapped through a major government inquiry, or whether the work should continue within existing structures without such a new initiative.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should set up new, broadly scoped inquiries into the state of gender equality and give authorities specific gender-equality directives, or whether ongoing work on gender mainstreaming and recently completed inquiries are sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. On the calls for new, wide-ranging inquiries into gender equality policy, the committee points out that the Commission for Equal Lifetime Income recently submitted its final report, in February 2022, and therefore sees no need for further such inquiries at this time. The call for gender-equality directives to authorities is rejected on the grounds that gender mainstreaming is already the government's main strategy and already covers, among other things, the steering of government agencies. A proposal for an inquiry to align legislation with the UN Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women is also rejected, since the legislative process is already part of the gender-mainstreaming work and Sweden reports regularly on compliance with the convention. The committee shares the view that an intersectional perspective and work against destructive masculine norms are important, but sees no reason for a formal statement to the government since this is already part of the broad ongoing work on gender equality.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

The reservation (V) calls for the government to set up a new inquiry into women's economic power as soon as possible in order to address shortcomings in gender equality. The reasoning is that many of the problems identified by the previous such inquiry in the late 1990s persist and have in some cases worsened - for example that education pays off less for women than for men, and that part-time and temporary jobs in the public sector leave women with worse pay, development opportunities and pensions. According to the reservation, a thorough review of the situation in society is needed to bring about change.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
SNoYes 93/0/0/14departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/16/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 63/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:181 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) item 21, 2022/23:1120 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) item 14, 2022/23:1217 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) item 1, 2022/23:1673 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) items 1-3, and 2022/23:2277 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) items 1, 6, 7 and 28.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:181 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 21, 2022/23:1120 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 14, 2022/23:1217 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 1, 2022/23:1673 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1-3 och 2022/23:2277 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1, 6, 7 och 28.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag directed a formal request (tillkännagivande) to the government to implement a zero-tolerance vision for intimate partner violence. This directive was issued as the Riksdag addressed approximately 80 proposals in motions from the general 2022 motion period on gender equality and measures against discrimination. The Riksdag rejected proposals in other motions, citing inter alia ongoing work. The motions concerned, for example, the establishment of investigations in the gender equality policy area, work against men's violence against women and honour-related violence and oppression, measures for workplace equality, and various initiatives to counter discrimination in society.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that the labour market is gender-segregated with worse pay and conditions in female-dominated professions, that more women work part-time and that Sweden has the Nordic region's highest share of poor pensioners, mostly women.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the labour market is gender-segregated with worse pay and conditions in female-dominated professions, that more women work part-time and that Sweden has the Nordic region's highest share of poor pensioners, mostly women. It demands a strategy to close the income gap between women and men. A broad examination of women's economic position is therefore in line with the plan's problem description and demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att arbetsmarknaden är könssegregerad med sämre löner och villkor i kvinnodominerade yrken, att fler kvinnor arbetar deltid och att Sverige har Nordens högsta andel fattigpensionärer, oftast kvinnor. Den kräver en strategi för att sluta inkomstklyftan mellan kvinnor och män. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning ligger därmed i linje med planens problembeskrivning och krav.

  • gender-segregated labour marketdecisive»Den svenska arbetsmarknaden är könssegregerad. Löner och arbetsvillkor i kvinnodominerade yrken är sämre än i mansdominerade.« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish labour market is gender-segregated. Wages and working conditions in female-dominated professions are worse than in male-dominated ones.”
  • strategy against income gap»Att sluta inkomstklyftan mellan kvinnor och män kräver såväl en strategi för att sluta löneklyftan och en förstärkning av arbetslöshets« (party programme ↗)“Closing the income gap between women and men requires both a strategy to close the pay gap and a strengthening of unemployment”
  • part-time gives lower income»Inkomstskillnaden beror även på att fler kvinnor än män arbetar deltid« (party programme ↗)“The income difference is also because more women than men work part-time”
  • women's low pensions»Sverige har högst andel fattigpensionärer av de nordiska länderna, oftast är det kvinnor som drabbas av orättvisan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden has the highest share of poor pensioners of the Nordic countries; it is mostly women who suffer from this injustice.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme states that the gender power order gives women lower incomes and that women and men must have equal rights to their own provision; the election manifesto notes that especially women have too low pensions after a full working life.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that the gender power order gives women lower incomes and that women and men must have equal rights to their own provision; the election manifesto notes that especially women have too low pensions after a full working life. A broad review of women's economic position is a means for those commitments. The plan, however, does not request a new investigation in itself.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att könsmaktsordningen ger kvinnor lägre inkomster och att kvinnor och män måste få lika rätt till egen försörjning; valmanifestet konstaterar att särskilt kvinnor har för låga pensioner efter ett helt yrkesliv. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning är ett medel för de åtagandena. Planen begär däremot ingen ny utredning i sig.

  • unequal living conditions between gendersdecisive»underordning mellan könen som skapar ojämlika livsvillkor för kvinnor och män.« (party programme ↗)“subordination between genders that creates unequal living conditions for women and men.”
  • women's low pensions»Alltför många pensionärer som har arbetat ett helt yrkesliv, särskilt kvinnor, har för låga pensioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too many pensioners who have worked a full working life, especially women, have too low pensions.”
  • equal right to own provision»Män och kvinnor måste få lika rätt till egen försörjning och ett utvecklande yrkesliv.« (party programme ↗)“Men and women must have equal rights to their own provision and a developing working life.”
  • feminist party»Med denna grundsyn är socialdemokratin ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“With this fundamental view, Social Democracy is a feminist party.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that wages in female-dominated professions are raised to male-dominated professions' level, that unjustifiable wage differences cease and that women's lifetime incomes match men's.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that wages in female-dominated professions are raised to male-dominated professions' level, that unjustifiable wage differences cease and that women's lifetime incomes match men's. A broad analysis of women's economic position is a basis for precisely these commitments. That a review is needed is not said explicitly, hence derivation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att lönerna i kvinnodominerade yrken höjs till mansdominerade yrkens nivå, att osakliga löneskillnader upphör och att kvinnors livsinkomster ska matcha männens. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning är ett underlag för just dessa åtaganden. Att en utredning behövs sägs inte uttryckligen, därav härledning.

  • equal paydecisive»höja lönerna i kvinnodominerade yrken till samma nivåer som i mansdominerade yrken med motsvarande ansvar och utbildningskrav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise wages in female-dominated professions to the same levels as in male-dominated professions with corresponding responsibility and educational requirements.”
  • no unjustifiable wage differences»Osakliga löneskillnader ska inte förekomma och yrkens status och lönebild ska inte vara beroende av könsmönster.« (party programme ↗)“Unjustifiable wage differences should not occur and professions' status and wage picture should not depend on gender patterns.”
  • equal lifetime incomes»I vårt nya gröna folkhem kan kvinnor leva gott på ålderns höst när livsinkomsterna matchar männens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our new green commonweal can women live well in old age when lifetime incomes match men's.”
  • secure conditions in female professions»Det är också viktigt att åstadkomma rimliga arbetsvillkor och trygga anställningsformer i det som i dag är kvinnodominerade branscher.« (party programme ↗)“It is also important to achieve reasonable working conditions and secure employment forms in what today is female-dominated sectors.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes greater economic equality a stated goal and describes the problems in precisely the terms the counter-proposal uses: women own half as much as men, the wage gap will close only in 2041 and female-dominated occupations are undervalued.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes greater economic equality a stated goal and describes the problems in precisely the terms the counter-proposal uses: women own half as much as men, the wage gap will close only in 2041 and female-dominated occupations are undervalued. A broad review of women's economic status serves that goal. The plan, however, requires measures rather than a new inquiry, so the support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör större ekonomisk jämställdhet till ett uttalat mål och beskriver problemen i just de termer motförslaget använder: kvinnor äger hälften så mycket som män, lönegapet sluts först 2041 och kvinnodominerade yrken undervärderas. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning tjänar det målet. Planen kräver dock åtgärder snarare än en ny utredning, varför stödet är härlett.

  • economic equality as goaldecisive»Vi ska dessutom leda Sverige till större ekonomisk jämställdhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall also lead Sweden to greater economic equality.”
  • remaining economic gaps»Kvinnor äger hälften så mycket som män, och i dagens takt kommer lönegapet att slutas först 2041. Kvinnodominerade yrken undervärderas och kvinnor tar större ansvar för familj och hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women own half as much as men, and at today's rate the wage gap will close only in 2041. Female-dominated occupations are undervalued and women take greater responsibility for family and home.”
  • elevate female-dominated occupations»Vi vill uppvärdera statusen för kvinnodominerande yrken och förbättra arbetsvillkoren inom offentlig sektor, bland annat genom karriärtjänster och rätt till kompetensutveckling.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to elevate the status of female-dominated occupations and improve working conditions in the public sector, including through career tracks and the right to skills development.”
  • feminist basic stance»Centerpartiet är ett feministiskt parti, som utmanar och bryter rådande maktförhållanden och kollektiva orättvisor.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party is a feminist party, which challenges and breaks prevailing power relations and collective injustices.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes the difference in economic power between women and men a central equality issue and states that Sweden is not an equal country.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the difference in economic power between women and men a central equality issue and states that Sweden is not an equal country. A broad review of women's economic position is a knowledge base for precisely that commitment. The plan also points out itself wage differences and women's lower occupational pensions as problems that shall be addressed.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör skillnaden i ekonomisk makt mellan kvinnor och män till en central jämställdhetsfråga och konstaterar att Sverige inte är ett jämställt land. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning är ett kunskapsunderlag för just det åtagandet. Planen pekar dessutom själv ut löneskillnader och kvinnors lägre tjänstepension som problem som ska åtgärdas.

  • economic equalitydecisive»Skillnaden i ekonomisk makt mellan kvinnor och män är en central jämställdhetsfråga.« (party programme ↗)“The difference in economic power between women and men is a central equality issue.”
  • equal wages»Vi vill öka trycket på arbetsgivare att erbjuda jämställda löner och villkor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase pressure on employers to offer equal wages and conditions”
  • pension gap»En ojämställd arbetsmarknad gör att kvinnor oftast har mycket lägre tjänstepension än män« (2022 manifesto ↗)“An unequal labor market means women usually have much lower occupational pensions than men”
  • remaining inequality»Sverige är inte ett jämställt land.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden is not an equal country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan points to unjustified wage differences between women and men as a sign of insufficient equality and requires that traditionally female occupations be valued as highly as male ones.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan points to unjustified wage differences between women and men as a sign of insufficient equality and requires that traditionally female occupations be valued as highly as male ones. The equality perspective should permeate all policy areas, and the pension system must not disadvantage those who have reduced their work. A broad review of women's economic position serves these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar ut osakligt motiverade löneskillnader mellan kvinnor och män som ett tecken på bristande jämställdhet och kräver att traditionellt kvinnliga yrkesområden värderas lika högt som manliga. Jämställdhetsperspektivet ska genomsyra alla politikområden, och pensionssystemet får inte missgynna den som minskat sitt förvärvsarbete. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning tjänar dessa åtaganden.

  • osakliga löneskillnaderdecisive»Ett tecken på bristande jämställdhet är osakligt motiverade löneskillnader mellan kvinnor och män.« (party programme ↗)“A sign of insufficient equality is unjustified wage differences between women and men.”
  • likvärdig värdering av kvinnoyrken»Traditionellt kvinnliga yrkesområden som vård, omsorg och undervisning« (party programme ↗)“Traditionally female occupations such as care, social services and education”
  • jämställdhet i all politik»Jämställdhetsperspektivet ska genomsyra alla politikområden.« (party programme ↗)“The equality perspective should permeate all policy areas.”
  • rättvisa pensionsvillkor»minskat förvärvsarbetande under småbarnsåren inte missgynnar den ena föräldern.« (party programme ↗)“reduced work participation during early childhood years should not disadvantage one parent.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's path to economic equality is concrete measures now — increased self-sufficiency and self-determination, removed child supplement from the fourth child onwards, and reduced involuntary part-time work — not a new broad state-wide examination.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's path to economic equality is concrete measures now — increased self-sufficiency and self-determination, removed child supplement from the fourth child onwards, and reduced involuntary part-time work — not a new broad state-wide examination. The programme also establishes that the goal is greater life chances and not requirements for exact or static outcomes, which is the investigation's starting point.

Original (Swedish)

Planens väg till ekonomisk jämställdhet är konkreta åtgärder nu — ökad självförsörjning och egenmakt, borttaget flerbarnstillägg från fjärde barnet och mindre ofrivilligt deltidsarbete — inte en ny bred statlig genomlysning. Programmet slår dessutom fast att målet är större livschanser och inte krav på exakta eller statiska utfall, vilket är den utredningens utgångspunkt.

  • self-sufficiency gives equalitydecisive»Ökad självförsörjning ger ökad egenmakt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased self-sufficiency gives increased self-determination.”
  • life chances before outcome targets»och medlet är större livschanser, inte krav på exakta eller« (party programme ↗)“and the means is greater life chances, not requirements for exact or”
  • concrete reforms for self-determination»Avskaffa flerbarnstillägget från och med barn fyra så att inte kvinnor i stora familjer fastnar i hemmet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the child supplement from and including the fourth child so that women in large families do not get stuck at home”
  • measures before investigation»Minska det ofrivilliga deltidsarbetet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce involuntary part-time work”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan itself makes the counter-proposal's diagnosis: wage formation in female-dominated professions is low, working conditions are poor and the income gap between women and men becomes largest in retirement, which is why the pension system needs more equal conditions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan itself makes the counter-proposal's diagnosis: wage formation in female-dominated professions is low, working conditions are poor and the income gap between women and men becomes largest in retirement, which is why the pension system needs more equal conditions. A comprehensive review of women's economic situation therefore aligns with the plan's direction. At the same time, the plan is skeptical of outcome-focused gender equality policy and new investigation costs, which is why certainty is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör själv motförslagets diagnos: lönebilden i kvinnodominerade yrken är låg, arbetsvillkoren dåliga och inkomstgapet mellan kvinnor och män blir störst som pensionär, varför pensionssystemet behöver mer jämställda förutsättningar. En bred genomlysning av kvinnors ekonomiska ställning ligger därför i planens riktning. Samtidigt är planen skeptisk till utfallsinriktad jämställdhetspolitik och till nya utredningskostnader, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • low wages in female-dominated professionsdecisive»I kvinnodominerade yrken är lönebilden generellt och i synnerhet i de offentligt anställda tämligen låg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In female-dominated professions, wage formation is generally and especially among public employees quite low.”
  • income gap at retirement»Det kan även konstateras att inkomstgapet mellan män och kvinnor blir som allra störst när de blir pensionärer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It can also be noted that the income gap between men and women becomes largest when they become pensioners.”
  • equal pensions»Verka för mer jämställda förutsättningar till bra pension« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for more equal conditions for good pensions”
  • individual perspective»Riktig jämställdhet nås inte genom att vidta politiska åtgärder för att på gruppnivå skapa samma utfall mellan män och kvinnor, utan genom att ta krafttag mot samhällsfenomen som begränsar den enskilde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“True equality is not achieved by taking political measures to create the same outcome between men and women at the group level, but by taking action against social phenomena that limit individuals.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament