2026-05-272025/26:UbU21 · p.2UbUEducation
Handover of information, teachers' workload and child rights perspective
Sharing information between schools: workload and children's rights
What's at stake: The decision affects how schools handle sensitive information about pupils for crime-prevention purposes, and how much extra workload and ethical weighing this places on teachers and head teachers, with consequences for both school safety and pupils' rights.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's proposal for a duty to share information between schools when a pupil changes school is sufficiently balanced, or whether a clearer analysis of teachers' workload and a deeper child-impact assessment are needed before it takes effect.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee finds the government's proposals well balanced: the government assesses that they will not create unnecessary administrative burden but will instead support effective safeguarding work, points to the importance of professional and ethical conduct when sharing information, announces support material from the National Agency for Education, and endorses the government's impact assessment regarding the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The committee therefore rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (MP)
MP welcomes the aim but argues the law should give schools a possibility rather than a duty to share pupil information, points to teachers' and head teachers' already high workload and the risk of ethical conflicts, and calls for clearer guidance and a deeper child-impact assessment before implementation.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 327–20Ja 345–2
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 106/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | Yes | No 0/18/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 24/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 70/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:4056 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) claims 1-3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4056 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal that information about a student shall be handed over for crime prevention purposes between schools if a student changes school. This shall occur if there is a concrete risk that the student will commit or be subjected to a crime, and the information is needed in the receiving school to prevent or hinder this. The purpose of the proposal is for students, teachers, principals and other school staff to have a safe and secure educational and working environment and for students at risk to receive well-founded and correct support measures. The proposal also means that more schools are obligated to inform that they have received a student at risk, since the proposal applies both between different external schools, as well as within the school between, for example, primary school, intermediate school and secondary school. The legislative amendments enter into force on 30 June 2026, and shall be used within education and other activities after 31 December 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to allow schools to transfer student information between schools to prevent crime, with clear guidance and a child rights perspective. (MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that children's rights shall be strengthened, and it opposes welfare professionals being transformed into administrators in models that would not have been needed.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that children's rights shall be strengthened, and it opposes welfare professionals being transformed into administrators in models that would not have been needed. A duty to share student data places precisely such a burden on teachers and heads and requires deepened child impact analysis. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand for possibility rather than duty.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att barns rättigheter ska stärkas, och den vänder sig mot att välfärdens yrkesgrupper förvandlas till administratörer i modeller som inte hade behövts. En skyldighet att dela elevuppgifter lägger just en sådan börda på lärare och rektorer och kräver en fördjupad barnkonsekvensanalys. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på möjlighet i stället för skyldighet.
- protection of personal integritydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
- children's rights»Utvecklingen mot starkare rättigheter för barn är en av de progressiva« (party programme ↗)“The development towards stronger rights for children is one of the progressive”
- against unnecessary administration»Läkare och sjuksköterskor, undersköterskor, lärare och socialsekreterare, alla som behövs i välfärden, förvandlas till administratörer i ett system där politiker kräver att allt dokumenteras i modeller som inte hade behövts.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Doctors and nurses, healthcare workers, teachers and social workers, all those needed in welfare, are transformed into administrators in a system where politicians demand that everything be documented in models that would not have been needed.”
- trust in the profession»Tillit till kunskapen och engagemanget hos dem som gör« (party programme ↗)“Trust in the knowledge and commitment of those doing”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly requires that secrecy barriers between authorities be removed so that the police and other professional groups can do their job, and wants more cooperation between police, student health, social services and school.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires that secrecy barriers between authorities be removed so that the police and other professional groups can do their job, and wants more cooperation between police, student health, social services and school. This speaks against making schools' reporting voluntary. The plan's objection to increased bureaucracy in welfare weighs less than the commitment to catch young people early.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter rivs så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb, och vill ha mer samarbete mellan polis, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och skola. Det talar mot att göra skolans uppgiftslämnande frivilligt. Planens invändning mot ökad byråkrati i välfärden väger lättare än åtagandet att fånga upp unga i tid.
- removed secrecy barriersdecisive»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that the police and other professional groups can do their job.”
- cooperation around young people»Det behövs mer samarbete mellan polis, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och skola.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More cooperation is needed between police, student health, social services and school.”
- early interventions for young people»Att socialtjänsten stärks är centralt för att fånga upp unga i tid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthening social services is central to catching young people early.”
- less bureaucracy in welfare»Villkor ska ställas så att pengarna till välfärden verkligen går till dess medarbetare – inte mer byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions shall be set so that money to welfare truly goes to its staff – not more bureaucracy.”
The plan explicitly wishes to ease secrecy between area police, schools and social services so no children fall through the cracks, and that schools, social services and police shall cooperate closely to early catch young people at risk.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly wishes to ease secrecy between area police, schools and social services so no children fall through the cracks, and that schools, social services and police shall cooperate closely to early catch young people at risk. Making information sharing into an option rather than an obligation weakens precisely that cooperation. The counter-proposal's demands therefore go against the plan, even though the plan also values teachers' workload.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen lätta på sekretessen mellan områdespoliser, skola och socialtjänst så att inga barn faller mellan stolarna, och att skola, socialtjänst och polis ska samarbeta nära för att tidigt fånga upp unga i riskzonen. Att göra informationsdelningen till en möjlighet i stället för en skyldighet försvagar just den samverkan. Motförslagets krav går därmed emot planen, även om planen också värnar lärares arbetsbelastning.
- eased secrecy for cooperationdecisive»lätta på sekretessen mellan områdespoliser, skola, socialtjänst och stärka samarbetet med civilsamhälle så att inga barn faller mellan stolarna i det förebyggande arbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ease secrecy between area police, schools, social services and strengthen cooperation with civil society so no children fall through the cracks in prevention work.”
- close cooperation around young people»Skola, socialtjänst och polis ska samarbeta nära« (party programme ↗)“School, social services and police shall cooperate closely”
- trust in school's professionals»Vi vill se en tillitsstyrd skola där lärare, rektorer och elevhälsa ges förtroende« (party programme ↗)“We wish to see a school based on trust where teachers, principals and student health professionals are given confidence”
- the child's best interests decisive»Barnkonventionen är svensk lag och barnets bästa« (party programme ↗)“The Convention on the Rights of the Child is Swedish law and the child's best interests”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that legislation and regulations offer great freedom to locally solve the school's task and that all legislation be tested against its impact on personal privacy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that legislation and regulations offer great freedom to locally solve the school's task and that all legislation be tested against its impact on personal privacy. An obligation to disclose student data is a more far-reaching intervention than a possibility. Children's rights and perspective should moreover be of great importance, which supports a more thorough child impact assessment.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att lagstiftning och regelverk erbjuder stor frihet att lokalt lösa skolans uppgift och att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten. En skyldighet att lämna ut elevuppgifter är ett mer långtgående ingrepp än en möjlighet. Barnens rättigheter och perspektiv ska dessutom vara av största betydelse, vilket talar för en fördjupad barnkonsekvensanalys.
- local freedom in schooldecisive»Lagstiftning och regelverk måste erbjuda stor frihet« (party programme ↗)“Legislation and regulations must offer great freedom”
- privacy review of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy.”
- children's rights first»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of greatest importance are children's rights and perspective.”
- trust in the teaching profession»Professionella lärares kompetens och pedagogik är avgörande.« (party programme ↗)“Professional teachers' competence and pedagogy are crucial.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires that the main rule shall be that schools always report to police and file notifications of concern when there is suspected crime, that is, an obligation and not merely an option.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that the main rule shall be that schools always report to police and file notifications of concern when there is suspected crime, that is, an obligation and not merely an option. It also wants legal secrecy obstacles to be removed so that information can be shared more smoothly between schools, police and social services. The counter-proposal's demand for voluntariness thereby conflicts with the plan, although the plan shares the ambition to relieve teachers administratively.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att huvudregeln ska vara att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet, alltså en skyldighet och inte enbart en möjlighet. Den vill också att sekretesshinder undanröjs så att information delas smidigare mellan skola, polis och socialtjänst. Motförslagets krav på frivillighet strider därmed mot planen, även om planen delar ambitionen att avlasta lärare administrativt.
- mandatory reporting from schoolsdecisive»För att polis och socialtjänst alltid ska få kännedom om barn som är på fel väg i livet ska huvudregeln bli att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“So that police and social services always learn of children who are going off track in life, the main rule shall be that schools always report to police and file notifications of concern when there is suspected crime.”
- information sharing between authorities»Polis och socialtjänst ska som huvudregel alltid kunna utbyta information sinsemellan och ska oftare dela lokaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Police and social services shall as a main rule always be able to exchange information with each other and shall more often share premises.”
- removed legal secrecy obstacles»Samarbetet mellan polis och socialtjänst behöver utvecklas, sekretesshinder undanröjas så att information smidigare kan delas mellan myndigheter« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation between police and social services needs to be developed, legal secrecy obstacles removed so that information can be shared more smoothly between authorities”
- relieved teachers»Lärare ska avlastas för att kunna vara just lärare, kunna göra karriär, få betald fortbildning och få ordentligt bra betalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Teachers shall be relieved so that they can be teachers, make careers, get paid professional development and get decent good pay.”
The plan's clearest commitment on the matter is a comprehensive review of secrecy rules so that authorities can actually share information to prevent crime, and that schools, social services and police must work closely together early on.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's clearest commitment on the matter is a comprehensive review of secrecy rules so that authorities can actually share information to prevent crime, and that schools, social services and police must work closely together early on. A counter-proposal that would make sharing voluntary instead of mandatory goes against this. The requirement for careful handling of personal data qualifies but does not override the commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Planens tydligaste åtagande på området är en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter faktiskt kan dela uppgifter för att förebygga brott, och att skola, socialtjänst och polis ska ha nära samverkan tidigt. Ett motförslag som vill göra delningen frivillig i stället för obligatorisk går emot detta. Kravet på varsam hantering av personuppgifter kvalificerar men upphäver inte åtagandet.
- authorities must share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and clear up crime.”
- cooperation school-police-social services»Socialtjänsten, polisen och skolan har en stor uppgift i detta avseende och ska ha en nära samverkan med varandra för att på ett tidigt stadium förhindra kriminalitet hos barn och ungdomar.« (party programme ↗)“Social services, police and schools have an important task in this respect and must work closely together with each other to prevent crime among children and young people at an early stage.”
- early interventions against youth crime»Stärk sociala insatser och socialtjänstens möjligheter till tvingande åtgärder gentemot barn och unga som begår brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen social interventions and social services' opportunities for compulsory measures against children and young people who commit crimes.”
- careful handling of personal data»det offentliga måste tillämpa stor försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten vid hantering av personuppgifter« (party programme ↗)“the public sector must exercise great care and respect for personal integrity when handling personal data”
The plan's core commitment is to remove confidentiality barriers so that information is actually shared between school, social services, and police when children are at risk.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core commitment is to remove confidentiality barriers so that information is actually shared between school, social services, and police when children are at risk. The counter-proposal wants to make the sharing voluntary instead of mandatory, which directly undermines that commitment. The plan's promise of reduced documentation burden for teachers weighs less than the obligation to identify inappropriate conditions early.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att undanröja sekretesshinder så att uppgifter faktiskt delas mellan skola, socialtjänst och polis när barn är i riskzonen. Motförslaget vill göra delningen frivillig i stället för obligatorisk, vilket direkt motverkar det åtagandet. Planens löfte om minskad dokumentationsbörda för lärare väger lättare än skyldigheten att fånga upp olämpliga förhållanden tidigt.
- no confidentiality barriers against crime preventiondecisive»Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all confidentiality barriers between social services and police”
- early intervention for young people»Se till att fler unga lagöverträdare omhändertas enligt lagen om vård av unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that more young offenders are taken into care under the Youth Care Act”
- schools' responsibility against youth crime»skolan och socialtjänsten ska inskärpa den enskildes ansvar« (party programme ↗)“schools and social services shall impress upon individuals their responsibility”
- lower administrative burden»Minska lärarnas dokumentationskrav« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce documentation requirements for teachers”
The plan requires that schools, social services and the justice system be given the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage and that authorities' cooperation to detect criminals is improved.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that schools, social services and the justice system be given the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage and that authorities' cooperation to detect criminals is improved. The counter-proposal wants to make information-sharing voluntary instead of mandatory, which weakens precisely that cooperation the plan requires. The plan's requirement for relief for teachers moderates but does not change the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skola, socialtjänst och rättsväsende ges möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede och att myndigheternas samverkan för att upptäcka kriminella förbättras. Motförslaget vill göra informationsdelningen frivillig i stället för obligatorisk, vilket försvagar just den samverkan planen kräver. Planens krav på avlastning för lärare mildrar men ändrar inte slutsatsen.
- early interventions at schooldecisive»Ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give social services, schools and the justice system the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage”
- improved authority cooperation»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The justice system's cooperation between authorities and tools to detect and prosecute criminals shall be improved.”
- school as sanctuary»Skolan ska göras till en fristad genom särskild placering av kriminella elever och nolltolerans mot attribut med gängassociationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The school shall be made a sanctuary through special placement of criminal students and zero tolerance against attributes with gang associations.”
- relief for teachers»Läraryrket ska stärkas med ändamålsenliga pedagogiska verktyg, avlastning och bättre villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The teaching profession shall be strengthened with appropriate pedagogical tools, relief and better conditions.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU21)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU21)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4056 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:192 Överlämnande av uppgifter mellan skolor i brottsförebyggande syfte av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:192 — Överlämnande av uppgifter mellan skolor i brottsförebyggande syfte
Source: The Swedish Parliament