2026-03-192025/26:MJU15 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Financing
Funding for county administrative boards' work under the new dog legislation
What's at stake: If the county administrative boards do not receive sufficient resources for their new tasks around dog bans and supervision, other animal welfare oversight risks being deprioritised, which affects both the agencies' workload and animal welfare more broadly.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether to accept the government's assessment that county administrative boards' increased costs from the new dog legislation fit within existing budget frameworks, or whether the Riksdag should require the government to guarantee additional resources for the boards.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has assessed that the proposals do not entail cost increases for the county administrative boards beyond what fits within existing budget frameworks, and that it is the government's responsibility to ensure the agencies can implement the legislation. The committee shares the government's assessment of the funding need and proposes that the motions be rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) considers the bill a step in the right direction but believes more needs to be done, and agrees with the criticism from several referral bodies that the county administrative boards' cost increases do not fit within existing budget frameworks. The reservation demands that the government ensure sufficient resources for the boards to implement the new legislation.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/17/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/13/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:3858 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP) amendment 1 and 2025/26:3859 by Stina Larsson et al. (C).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3858 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:3859 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C).
Riksdag decision: The county councils shall receive more tools to exercise supervision over dogs to prevent and stop dogs from causing harm. For example, it may be mentioned that the county councils gain access to homes and other spaces for supervision and that they to a greater extent are able to decide on immediate seizures. The Riksdag approved the government's proposal which also means that the Police Authority, in certain cases, may decide on euthanisation of animals that have been seized under the Animal Welfare Act. The new rules enter into force on 1 May 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure adequate resources to the regional administrations for implementation of proposed measures. (V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see ambitious environmental targets followed up with sharp legislation and practical work, which presupposes that the authorities that are to implement the legislation have resources.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see ambitious environmental targets followed up with sharp legislation and practical work, which presupposes that the authorities that are to implement the legislation have resources. It more generally establishes that it is resources that are primarily needed in public activity, not more governance models. The requirement to ensure sufficient funds to the regional county administrative boards thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete, vilket förutsätter att de myndigheter som ska genomföra lagstiftningen har resurser. Den slår mer allmänt fast att det främst är resurser som behövs i offentlig verksamhet, inte fler styrmodeller. Kravet på att säkerställa tillräckliga medel till länsstyrelserna ligger därför i linje med planen.
- environmental targets with practical implementationdecisive»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental targets followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
- resources before administration»Det är resurser som främst behövs, inte formulär för kvalitetssäkring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is resources that are primarily needed, not forms for quality assurance”
- comprehensive environmental work»Sverige behöver också ett medvetet och heltäckande arbete med att« (party programme ↗)“Sweden also needs conscious and comprehensive work with”
The plan requires that the state is present throughout the country and takes greater responsibility for equal conditions, which speaks in favour of the county administrative boards receiving the resources new legislation requires instead of placing the tasks within unchanged budgets.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the state is present throughout the country and takes greater responsibility for equal conditions, which speaks in favour of the county administrative boards receiving the resources new legislation requires instead of placing the tasks within unchanged budgets. The plan also prioritizes increased resources for public services before savings. The financing of the county administrative boards is not addressed in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att staten finns närvarande i hela landet och tar ett större ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar, vilket talar för att länsstyrelserna får de resurser ny lagstiftning kräver i stället för att uppgifterna läggs på oförändrade ramar. Planen prioriterar också ökade resurser till offentlig verksamhet framför besparingar. Just länsstyrelsernas finansiering behandlas inte i dokumenten.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- state responsibility for equality»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equal conditions throughout Sweden.”
- resources before tax cuts»En avgörande fråga i höstens val är om vi ska fortsätta öka resurserna till välfärden, eller om stora skattesänkningar ska gå före.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A decisive question in the autumn election is whether we should continue increasing welfare resources, or whether large tax cuts should take precedence.”
- society's services throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to society's services throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that stronger environmental protection requires effective oversight of law compliance and that authorities must have sufficient resources to handle environmental matters.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that stronger environmental protection requires effective oversight of law compliance and that authorities must have sufficient resources to handle environmental matters. Ensuring adequate funding for the county administrative boards when new legislation increases their costs is a direct application of that. The plan also notes that oversight is needed to create fairness between companies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att ett starkare miljöskydd kräver en effektiv tillsyn av att lagarna följs och att myndigheterna ska ha nog med resurser för att kunna hantera miljöärenden. Att säkerställa tillräckliga medel till länsstyrelserna när ny lagstiftning ökar deras kostnader är en direkt tillämpning av det. Planen påpekar också att tillsynen behövs för att skapa rättvisa mellan företag.
- resources for environmental authoritiesdecisive»myndigheter ska ha nog med resurser för att kunna hantera och lagföra miljöbrott.« (party programme ↗)“authorities must have sufficient resources to handle and prosecute environmental crimes.”
- effective environmental oversight»behövs en tydlig lagstiftning mot miljöförstöring och en effektiv tillsyn av att lagarna« (party programme ↗)“effective legislation against environmental damage and effective oversight of law compliance”
- fair oversight between companies»Tillsynen är också viktig för att skapa rättvisa mellan olika företag – ingen ska få ett« (party programme ↗)“Oversight is also important for creating fairness between different companies – no one should be given a”
The plan requires that processing times for handling and administration be shortened and that permit procedures for green investments move faster, which assumes that regional authorities can actually perform their task.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that processing times for handling and administration be shortened and that permit procedures for green investments move faster, which assumes that regional authorities can actually perform their task. Ensuring sufficient resources for new legislation thus aligns with the plan, even though the plan simultaneously requires that the state economizes with taxpayers' money.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning kortas och att tillståndsprövningen för gröna investeringar går snabbare, vilket förutsätter att länsstyrelserna faktiskt kan utföra sitt uppdrag. Att säkerställa tillräckliga resurser för ny lagstiftning ligger därför i linje med planen, även om planen samtidigt kräver att staten hushållar med skattebetalarnas pengar.
- shorter processing timesdecisive»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad. Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone living in Sweden shall be able to get their case examined. Processing times for handling and administration in courts and agencies must be shortened and access to counsel improved.”
- faster permitting»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk. Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated regulations. It is time to halve the time it takes to get permission for green investments”
- state shall function efficiently»Centerpartiets uppgift är att se till att staten gör det den är till för, så effektivt och rättssäkert som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party's task is to ensure that the state does what it is meant to do, as efficiently and fairly as possible”
- economize with tax funds»Det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och förstärkas, och Sveriges långsiktiga ekonomiska stabilitet ska försvaras. Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fiscal policy framework shall be valued and strengthened, and Sweden's long-term economic stability shall be defended. Politics shall economize with taxpayers' money.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that oversight be improved and that regulatory authorities be strong, and that access to public service be secured throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that oversight be improved and that regulatory authorities be strong, and that access to public service be secured throughout the country. An oversight that is not funded does not fulfill that function. However, the plan says nothing specifically about county administrative boards' allocations, which is why the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att tillsynen förbättras och att tillsynsmyndigheterna är starka, och att tillgången till statlig service säkras i hela landet. En tillsyn som inte är finansierad fyller inte den funktionen. Planen säger dock inget om just länsstyrelsernas anslag, varför slutsatsen är härledd.
- improved oversightdecisive»Tillsynen behöver förbättras och sanktionerna skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“Oversight needs to be improved and sanctions strengthened.”
- strong regulatory authorities»Tillsynen över myndigheternas maktutövning mot enskilda behöver utvecklas genom starka« (party programme ↗)“Oversight of public authorities' exercise of power over individuals needs to be developed through strong”
- state presence throughout the country»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to public service shall be secured throughout the country.”
- responsibility for government finances»Stabila offentliga finanser och låg statsskuld skapar utrymme för Sverige att möta kriser utan« (party programme ↗)“Stable public finances and low government debt create space for Sweden to meet crises without”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the financing principle is respected when the state assigns new tasks to lower levels, which is the same principle that the counter-proposal invokes for the county administrative boards' cost increases.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the financing principle is respected when the state assigns new tasks to lower levels, which is the same principle that the counter-proposal invokes for the county administrative boards' cost increases. It also establishes that the state is responsible for ensuring that public service is available throughout Sweden and that decided legal rules shall be consistently upheld, which presupposes that the authorities receive resources to implement the legislation. The conclusion is derived because the plan speaks of municipalities, not county administrative boards.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att finansieringsprincipen respekteras när staten lägger nya uppgifter på lägre nivåer, vilket är samma princip som motförslaget åberopar för länsstyrelsernas kostnadsökningar. Den slår också fast att staten ansvarar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige och att beslutade rättsregler konsekvent ska upprätthållas, vilket förutsätter att myndigheterna får resurser att genomföra lagstiftningen. Slutsatsen är härledd eftersom planen talar om kommuner, inte om länsstyrelser.
- the financing principledecisive»Finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“The financing principle must be respected when the state assigns new tasks to municipalities.”
- public service throughout the country»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time the state is responsible for ensuring that public service is available throughout Sweden.”
- decided rules shall be upheld»upprätthålla de rättsregler som beslutats.« (party programme ↗)“uphold the legal rules that have been decided.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not take a position on county administrative boards' budgets for the current legislation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position on county administrative boards' budgets for the current legislation. The closest principle is that the finances of government agencies shall be scrutinised and made efficient to free up resources, and that new commitments shall fit within given frameworks. On the basis of that principle, the demand for additional funds is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till länsstyrelsernas anslag för den aktuella lagstiftningen. Närmast liggande princip är att myndigheternas ekonomi ska genomlysas och effektiviseras för att frigöra resurser, och att nya åtaganden ska rymmas inom givna ramar. Utifrån den principen avvisas kravet på att ytterligare medel tillförs.
- effektivisera myndigheternas ekonomidecisive»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall go through all government agencies' finances to free up resources for defence”
- reformer inom givna ramar»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- bekämpa offentligt slöseri»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
The counter-proposal requires that the county administrative boards receive sufficient resources to implement the new legislation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires that the county administrative boards receive sufficient resources to implement the new legislation. The plan establishes that municipalities must be given increased support and assistance in environmental work and that more must be done against the problems the legislation targets, and the party programme holds fast to the funding principle when new commitments are placed on the administration. The conclusion is derived because the plan does not address the county administrative boards' budget frames at all.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att länsstyrelserna får tillräckliga resurser för att kunna genomföra den nya lagstiftningen. Planen slår fast att kommunerna måste ges ökat stöd och hjälp i miljöarbetet och att mer måste göras mot de problem lagstiftningen tar sikte på, och principprogrammet håller fast vid finansieringsprincipen när nya åtaganden läggs på förvaltningen. Slutsatsen är härledd eftersom planen inte alls behandlar länsstyrelsernas budgetramar.
- support to those implementing environmental workdecisive»Kommunerna måste ges ökat stöd och hjälp i miljöarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipalities must be given increased support and assistance in environmental work.”
- funding shall follow the commitment»Den kommunala finansieringsprincipen är grundläggande för de ekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The municipal funding principle is fundamental for the economic”
- raised ambition in environmental work»Mer måste göras för att förebygga och lösa problemen med invasiva växt- och djurarter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done to prevent and solve the problems with invasive plant and animal species.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU15)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:2706 — Skärpta regler för kamphundsraser av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3733 — Utgiftsområde 23 Areella näringar, landsbygd och livsmedel av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3858 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:57 Hund under kontroll av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3859 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:57 Hund under kontroll av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2025/26:57 — Hund under kontroll
Source: The Swedish Parliament