Charitable Giving Deduction

The plan wants to see a simple, stable and solidaristic tax system where the richest pay more, and points to decades of tax cuts as the reason welfare has been hollowed out. The counter-proposal demands the opposite in substance: a raised ceiling and broadened purposes for a tax reduction that gives individual donors a deduction. The plan wants instead to finance civic and cultural life with shared resources, not through expanded tax deductions.

• simple and solidaristic tax systemdecisive»Vi vill se ett enkelt, stabilt och solidariskt« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a simple, stable and solidaristic”
• tax cuts hollow out welfare»De massiva skattesänkningar som genomförts av högerpartier och socialdemokrater under många år har resulterat i att det nu finns 350 miljarder mindre per år till välfärden än 1990.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The massive tax cuts implemented by right-wing and social democratic parties over many years have resulted in there now being 350 billion less per year for welfare than in 1990.”
• reforms for all, not deductions»Vänsterpartiet tycker att det är viktigare med en arbetstidsförkortning som kommer alla till del än sänkta skatter för ett fåtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party thinks it is more important to have a shorter working week that benefits everyone than tax cuts for a few.”
• shared resources for civic life»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that secure a strong”

The plan puts welfare financing before tax cuts and establishes that large tax cuts make increased welfare resources impossible. A raised cap and broadened purposes for the gift tax deduction are precisely an expanded tax subsidy that erodes the tax base. The party programme holds that the tax system's most important task is to finance welfare and that the rules should be simple with broad tax bases. Civil society should according to the plan be supported with common funds, not through deductions, which is why the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

• welfare before tax cutsdecisive»En avgörande fråga i höstens val är om vi ska fortsätta öka resurserna till välfärden, eller om stora skattesänkningar ska gå före.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A decisive question in the autumn election is whether we should continue increasing welfare resources, or whether large tax cuts should take precedence.”
• tax finances welfare»Skattesystemets viktigaste uppgift är att finansiera vår välfärd och nödvändiga« (party programme ↗)“The tax system's most important task is to finance our welfare and necessary”
• broad tax bases, simple rules»tydlighet i regelverket, breda skattebaser« (party programme ↗)“clarity in the rules, broad tax bases”
• stop tax fraud»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering must be stopped.”

The plan does not treat gift tax deduction. Nearest commitments are that welfare shall be secured through tax rather than private consumption and that those with most money shall contribute more, which speaks against an expanded tax deduction whose value follows the individual's gift capacity. Civil society shall according to the plan be supported, but through direct support. The basis is weak.

• tax-financed welfaredecisive»Vi kommer sannolikt också behöva nya skattebaser och är beredda att genom skatt öka den offentliga konsumtionen på bekostnad av den privata när det är nödvändigt för att trygga välfärden och samhällstryggheten.« (party programme ↗)“We will probably also need new tax bases and are prepared to through tax increase public consumption at the expense of private when it is necessary to secure welfare and social security.”
• progressive taxation»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with most money, who also cause larger emissions, shall contribute more to the transition and welfare through progressive taxation of capital”
• support for civil society»Politiken bör på olika vis synliggöra, stödja och uppmuntra sådana insatser.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should in various ways make visible, support and encourage such efforts.”

The party programme makes civil society a fundamental part of democracy and wants politics to remove obstacles to its development, while the manifesto highlights the invaluable role of social movements and civil society. A raised ceiling and more approved charitable purposes in the donation tax deduction strengthens exactly this independent financing. The plan's general line on lower overall tax burden points in the same direction.

• civil society bears democracydecisive»Det civila samhället, människornas frivilliga organisering, är en fundamental del av varje väl fungerande demokrati och välfärdsstat.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society, people's voluntary organizing, is a fundamental part of every well-functioning democracy and welfare state.”
• remove obstacles for civil society»Politikens uppgift är att riva hinder och röja väg för denna utvecklingskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Politics' task is to remove obstacles and clear the path for this creative force.”
• civil society's integration role»Civilsamhällets roll för att binda samman människor och förbättra integrationen är ovärderlig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil society's role in binding people together and improving integration is invaluable.”
• reduced overall tax burden»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must be reduced in the next term.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan explicitly promises to improve civil society's financing through broader tax deductions for donations, and the party programme stipulates that there shall be a right of deduction for donations from both individuals and legal entities. The counter-proposal's requirement for a raised ceiling and broadened general purposes is exactly the expansion the plan promises. The commitment is explicit and the position therefore certain.

• broader donation tax deductionsdecisive»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue improving civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
• right of deduction for donations»För att stärka civilsamhällets finansiering ska det finnas en avdragsrätt för gåvor från såväl enskilda« (party programme ↗)“To strengthen civil society's financing there shall be a right of deduction for donations from both individuals”
• donation deductions also for research»Avdragsrätt ska finnas för privatpersoners gåvor till forskning.« (party programme ↗)“Right of deduction shall exist for private individuals' donations to research.”
• good conditions for civil society»Politiken ska bidra till att det civila samhället ges goda förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall contribute to civil society being given good conditions.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The party programme explicitly states that gifts to non-profit organisations should be tax-exempt, and the election manifesto goes to the polls on a strengthened civil society. A raised ceiling and a broadening of which public-benefit purposes are covered moves in that direction, and the plan's requirement for rules as simple as possible speaks against the administratively burdensome model. Therefore the demand is supported.

• tax exemption for giftsdecisive»Gåvor till ideella organisationer bör vara skattebefriade.« (party programme ↗)“Gifts to non-profit organisations should be tax-exempt.”
• strengthened civil society»STÄRKT CIVILSAMHÄLLE« (2022 manifesto ↗)“STRENGTHENED CIVIL SOCIETY”
• promote voluntary giving»främja människors frivilliga engagemang« (party programme ↗)“promote people's voluntary engagement”
• simple tax rules»viktigt att skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“important that tax rules are drafted as simply as possible”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The plan does not address the gift tax deduction, but it states that the tax burden is too high, that the tax system needs to become simpler, and that strong independent social institutions outside the state shall be protected. The counter-proposal demands a higher ceiling and broader purposes for the deduction, which both means lower tax and strengthens civil society's own financing. Based on these principles, the plan supports the demand.

• reduced tax burdendecisive(2022 manifesto)
• strong civil society»Starka självständiga samhällsinstitutioner bidrar till att balansera makten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Strong independent social institutions help balance power in society.”
• simpler tax rules»Ska det ske måste skattesystemet bli enklare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For that to happen, the tax system must become simpler”

flags: citat_ej_verifierat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan wants to reduce the public sector's economic control over the culture and civil society sphere and highlight the voluntary sector without restricting its freedom of action. A raised ceiling and broader purposes in the charitable gift tax deduction shift financing from public grants to private donors and reduce administration, which follows the plan's line. The condition that extremist organizations should not be supported remains.

• reduced public controldecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the public sector's economic control over contemporary culture and media sphere”
• support for civil society»att lyfta fram och stödja den ideella sektorn utan att i alltför hög grad begränsa dess« (party programme ↗)“to highlight and support the voluntary sector without to an excessive degree restricting its”
• regulatory simplification»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”
• no funds to extremists»Stoppa bidrag till extremistiska idéorganisationer inom civilsamhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop funding for extremist idea organizations within civil society”