2022-11-172022/23:JuU2 · p.2JuUJustice

New penalty determination following previous judgment

New sentencing determination after a prior judgment – should previously imposed fines be included?

What's at stake: The issue affects people convicted of multiple offences handled in separate stages of the same case: if earlier fines are not combined with a later sentence, the total punishment can end up harsher than if the offences had been tried together, raising questions about equal treatment under the law.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

In faster criminal proceedings using split handling or partial judgments, the choice stands between keeping the current rules — where previously imposed fines are not factored into the final sentence — or extending chapter 34 of the Criminal Code's rules on new sentencing determinations to also cover fines.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motion and does not want to extend the rules on new sentencing determinations to cover fines at this time, pointing out that a special investigator has already been tasked with reviewing criminal sentencing law for multiple offences.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, C, MP)

V, C and MP want chapter 34 of the Criminal Code's rules on new sentencing determinations to also cover previously imposed fines, since otherwise unjustified differences in punishment can arise depending on whether the case is split into separate proceedings or handled together.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SYesYes 93/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 1/20/0/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 64/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

CAnne-Li Sjölund (C, Västernorrlands län)Yes — party line: No

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects motion 2022/23:18 by Malin Björk et al. (C).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2022/23:18 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C).

Riksdag decision: Parliament approved a proposal from the government on law changes intended to make the criminal prosecution process faster and more efficient. The law changes concern, among other things, that a requirement is introduced for district courts to decide criminal cases faster if the crime has been included in a special expedited procedure during investigation accessibility service is introduced as a permanent service method and is developed to include documents that are immediately accessible simplified service can be used in more cases divided handling of prosecution can be used to a greater extent service shall be faster for suspected persons under 18 years handling of penalty orders shall be made more efficient. The law changes come into effect on 1 January 2023.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The programme establishes that everyone's equality before the law shall be guaranteed and that democracy is undermined without a functioning justice system.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The programme establishes that everyone's equality before the law shall be guaranteed and that democracy is undermined without a functioning justice system. The same crime resulting in different total fines depending on whether the proceedings are divided contradicts that principle, which speaks for the counter-proposal's requirement that previously imposed fines also be counted. The plan also emphasises prevention work over raised penalty levels. The plan says nothing about the processing order or the ongoing investigation.

Original (Swedish)

Programmet slår fast att allas likhet inför lagen ska garanteras och att demokratin undergrävs utan ett väl fungerande rättsväsende. Att samma brottslighet ger olika sammanlagt bötesstraff beroende på om handläggningen delats upp strider mot den principen, vilket talar för motförslagets krav att även tidigare utdömda böter räknas in. Planen betonar dessutom förebyggande arbete framför höjda straffnivåer. Planen säger inget om beredningsordningen eller den pågående utredningen.

  • everyone's equality before the lawdecisive»granskning av rättstillämpningen garanteras allas likhet« (party programme ↗)“scrutiny of the administration of justice ensures everyone's equality”
  • functioning justice system»Utan ett väl fungerande rättsväsende undergrävs demokratin« (party programme ↗)“Without a functioning justice system democracy is undermined”
  • the justice system should function»Det är viktigt att rättssystemet fungerar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the justice system functions”
  • prevention before penalty increases»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Some penalties may need to be raised but much more focus must be directed at preventing the recruitment of new children into gang crime.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants to tighten penalties for those who commit repeated and serious crime, while the counter-proposal means that already imposed fines are counted down so that the total sanction in multiple crime becomes lighter.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to tighten penalties for those who commit repeated and serious crime, while the counter-proposal means that already imposed fines are counted down so that the total sanction in multiple crime becomes lighter. The party programme requires that society reacts clearly to crime and rule violations. The plan's requirement for equality before the law pulls in the opposite direction, but the issue is a technical sentencing rule that the plan does not treat, why the position is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill skärpa straffen för den som begår upprepade och allvarliga brott, medan motförslaget innebär att redan utdömda böter räknas av så att den sammanlagda påföljden vid flerfaldig brottslighet blir lindrigare. Partiprogrammet kräver att samhället reagerar tydligt mot brott och regelöverträdelser. Planens krav på likhet inför lagen drar i motsatt riktning, men frågan är en teknisk påföljdsregel som planen inte behandlar, varför ställningstagandet är osäkert.

  • tightened sentences for repeated crimedecisive»Vi vill skärpa straffen bland annat för gängrelaterad brottslighet, för den som begår upprepade och allvarliga brott och för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to tighten penalties among others for gang-related crime, for those who commit repeated and serious crimes and for those who support organised crime.”
  • clear reaction to crime»Samhället måste reagera tydligt mot brott och regelöverträdelser.« (party programme ↗)“Society must react clearly to crime and rule violations.”
  • equality before the law»Vi är lika inför lagbokens paragrafer och i våra myndigheter arbetar plikttrogna tjänstemän med hög integritet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are equal before the law's paragraphs and in our authorities work duty-conscious officials with high integrity.”
  • uncompromising crime fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The struggle against crime shall be uncompromising.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about new sentencing or how previously imposed fines shall be counted in.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about new sentencing or how previously imposed fines shall be counted in. Nearest principle is that the justice system shall be effective and have public confidence and that legal certainty shall be secured. That the same criminal act produces different total sentences depending on whether processing is divided up sits ill with that principle, and the plan views sanctions as preventive and rehabilitative rather than as summed fine amounts. Derivatively supporting the counter-proposal, but the basis is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om ny påföljdsbestämning eller om hur tidigare utdömda böter ska räknas in. Närmast liggande princip är att rättsväsendet ska vara effektivt och ha allmänhetens förtroende och att rättssäkerheten ska tryggas. Att samma brottslighet ger olika sammanlagt straff beroende på om handläggningen delas upp rimmar illa med den principen, och planen ser påföljder som förebyggande och rehabiliterande snarare än som summerade bötesbelopp. Härlett stöder planen motförslaget, men underlaget är svagt.

  • confidence in the justice systemdecisive»ett effektivt och välfungerande rättsväsen som har allmänhetens förtroende« (party programme ↗)“an effective and well-functioning justice system that has public confidence”
  • legal certainty»Rättssäkerheten ska tryggas« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty shall be secured”
  • the sanction's preventive purpose»Brottspåföljder har både ett brottsförebyggande« (party programme ↗)“Criminal sanctions have both a crime-preventive”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto includes equality before the law among the principles that must remain strong regardless of political rule, and the party programme establishes the same rights and obligations for all.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto includes equality before the law among the principles that must remain strong regardless of political rule, and the party programme establishes the same rights and obligations for all. That the same crime results in different total fine amounts depending on whether the handling is divided is difficult to reconcile with this. The plan also wants to shorten processing times in courts, but the counter-proposal does not prevent faster prosecution, only the uneven punishment.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet räknar likheten inför lagen till de principer som ska stå starka oavsett politiskt styre, och partiprogrammet slår fast samma rättigheter och skyldigheter för alla. Att samma brottslighet ger olika sammanlagt bötesbelopp beroende på om handläggningen delas upp är svårt att förena med detta. Planen vill också korta ledtiderna i domstolarna, men motförslaget hindrar inte snabbare lagföring, bara den olikformiga påföljden.

  • equality before the lawdecisive»Våra demokratiska institutioner och principer — oberoende domstolar, äganderätten, den fria pressen, likheten inför lagen och många fler — ska stå starka oavsett politiskt styre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our democratic institutions and principles — independent courts, property rights, free press, equality before the law and many others — must remain strong regardless of political rule.”
  • equal rights and obligations»Alla människor har lika rätt och värde, alla har samma grundläggande rättigheter och skyldigheter.« (party programme ↗)“All people have equal worth and rights, all have the same fundamental rights and obligations.”
  • predictable criminal policy»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy should therefore both prevent and deter crime, support those affected by crime and encourage those who have committed illegal acts to a new life situation without crime.”
  • shorter processing times»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Processing times for handling and public administration in courts and agencies must be shortened and access to counsel improved.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto's overarching commitment in this area is that the sentence discount for multiple crimes shall be abolished, and the party programme wants repeated criminal activity to result in stricter sentences.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto's overarching commitment in this area is that the sentence discount for multiple crimes shall be abolished, and the party programme wants repeated criminal activity to result in stricter sentences. The counter-proposal conversely wants previously imposed fines to be counted off in the new sentence determination, which lowers the total penalty for multiple criminal offenses. The plan's requirement for shorter processing times furthermore argues for the order that provides faster criminal proceedings.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestets bärande åtagande på området är att mängdrabatten på brott ska avskaffas, och partiprogrammet vill att upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff. Motförslaget vill tvärtom att tidigare utdömda böter räknas av vid den nya påföljdsbestämningen, vilket sänker det sammanlagda straffet vid flerfaldig brottslighet. Planens krav på kortare handläggningstider talar dessutom för den ordning som ger snabbare lagföring.

  • abolished sentence discountdecisive»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to abolish today's sentence discount for multiple crimes, eliminate the nearly automatic release from imprisonment, and increase penalties for among other things weapons crimes, rape, and extortion.”
  • stricter sentences for repeated criminal activity»Påföljdssystemet ska förändras så att återfall och upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff« (party programme ↗)“The penalty system shall be changed so that reoffending and repeated criminal activity result in stricter sentences”
  • faster criminal proceedings»effektivitet behöver förbättras så att handläggningstiderna kortas« (party programme ↗)“efficiency needs to be improved so that processing times are shortened”
  • equal treatment in court»Domstolarna ska vara oberoende och opartiska.« (party programme ↗)“The courts shall be independent and impartial.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The counter-proposal wants previous fines to count towards new sentencing as well, so that the same criminal conduct is not punished differently depending on whether handling is split.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants previous fines to count towards new sentencing as well, so that the same criminal conduct is not punished differently depending on whether handling is split. The party programme requires swift and predictable reactions in clear legislation and grounds crime policy on justice as a balance between all people's rights and duties. The requirement for equal treatment in sentencing follows from this, even though the plan does not address split judgments directly.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att även tidigare utdömda böter räknas in vid ny påföljdsbestämning, så att samma brottslighet inte straffas olika beroende på om handläggningen delats upp. Principprogrammet kräver snabba och förutsägbara reaktioner i en tydlig lagstiftning och bygger rättspolitiken på rättvisa som en balans mellan alla människors rättigheter och skyldigheter. Kravet på likabehandling vid straffmätning följer av detta, även om planen inte behandlar deldomar direkt.

  • predictable and clear criminal lawdecisive»förutsägbara reaktioner som är förankrade i en human och tydlig lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“predictable reactions that are anchored in a humane and clear legislation.”
  • justice balance as fundamental value»alla människors intressen, rättigheter och skyldigheter.« (party programme ↗)“all people's interests, rights and duties.”
  • expedited prosecution»med fasthet och förövare av brott ska skyndsamt lagföras.« (party programme ↗)“with firmness and offenders of crime shall be promptly prosecuted.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants previous fines to be counted when a new sentence is determined, which in practice gives a quantity discount for multiple offences.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants previous fines to be counted when a new sentence is determined, which in practice gives a quantity discount for multiple offences. The election manifesto, on the other hand, promises to abolish today's quantity discounts and shift focus from the perpetrator to the victim, and the party wants more crimes to result in conviction through faster prosecution. The plan therefore points away from the counter-proposal's demand.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att tidigare utdömda böter räknas in när ny påföljd bestäms, vilket i praktiken ger en mängdrabatt vid flerfaldig brottslighet. Valmanifestet lovar tvärtom att slopa dagens mängdrabatter och att skifta fokus från gärningsmannen till brottsoffret, och partiet vill att fler brott leder till fällande dom genom snabbare lagföring. Planen pekar därför bort från motförslagets krav.

  • abolished quantity discountsdecisive»Ta bort alla straffrabatter för den som fyllt 18 år och slopa dagens mängdrabatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all sentence discounts for those who have reached 18 and abolish today's quantity discounts”
  • victim perspective»Införa en ny brottsbalk för att skifta fokus från gärningsmannen till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a new Criminal Code to shift focus from the perpetrator to the victim”
  • the victim at the centre»Brottsoffrens perspektiv är viktigt i kriminalpolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“The victim perspective is important in criminal policy.”
  • effective prosecution»Satsa på fler åklagare så att fler brott kan leda till fällande dom« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in more prosecutors so that more crimes can lead to conviction”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants already imposed fines to be counted in new penalty determination, which in practice lowers the total penalty for one who has committed multiple crimes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants already imposed fines to be counted in new penalty determination, which in practice lowers the total penalty for one who has committed multiple crimes. The plan requires the opposite: the quantity discount should be abolished and punishment discounts for multiple crimes removed, because otherwise crime victims are left without redress. At the same time, the plan supports the faster prosecution that the bill aims for.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att redan utdömda böter räknas in vid ny påföljdsbestämning, vilket i praktiken sänker den sammanlagda påföljden för den som begått flera brott. Planen kräver motsatsen: mängdrabatten ska avskaffas och straffrabatter för flerfaldig brottslighet tas bort, eftersom brottsoffer annars blir utan upprättelse. Samtidigt stöder planen den snabbare lagföring som lagförslaget syftar till.

  • abolished quantity discountdecisive»Kraftigt höja straffen samt avskaffa mängdrabatten vid allvarliga brott mot person« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly raise sentences and abolish the quantity discount for serious crimes against persons”
  • no punishment discounts for multiple crimes»Straffrabatter för den som begått flerfaldig brottslighet eller begått en rå gärning som ung ska tas bort och hela strafftiden ska tjänas av innan villkor kan ställas för frigivning för den som döms till fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Punishment discounts for one who has committed multiple crimes or committed a crude act as young should be removed and the full sentence should be served before conditions can be set for release for one sentenced to imprisonment.”
  • redress for crime victims»Som en konsekvens av dagens rättssystem kan brottsoffer också stå nästan helt utan upprättelse när seriekriminella begått brott mot många, detta på grund av den så kallade mängdrabatten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“As a consequence of today's justice system, crime victims can also be left almost completely without redress when serial criminals have committed crimes against many, this because of the so-called quantity discount”
  • more efficient prosecution»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enabling increased prosecution must also be removed.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament