2025-05-212024/25:TU13 · p.2TUTransport & infrastructure

Scope and possibility to reduce penalty fees

Scope and possibility of reducing sanction fees under ReFuelEU Aviation

What's at stake: A stricter framework would pressure more airports and fuel suppliers to convert faster, while broader grounds for reducing the fee give operators more flexibility while the supply of sustainable aviation fuel remains limited.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the new sanction system for shortfalls in the transition to sustainable aviation fuel should cover more airports and have narrower grounds for reducing the fee than the EU regulation requires, or whether the government's proposal, with broader exemption grounds and its current scope, should apply.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's assessment that the sanction fee should be reducible or waivable under certain circumstances, given that the supply of sustainable aviation fuels is currently limited, and sees no reason for the government to return with an amended legislative proposal on this point.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (MP)

The reservation holds that the government's proposal allows greater scope for reducing or waiving the sanction fee than the EU regulation permits, and that the rules should also cover all airports in the national core network rather than just a handful; the reservation therefore wants the government to come back with a revised proposal that limits the reduction and exemption grounds to what the EU regulation requires.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motions 2024/25:3356 by Malin Östh et al. (V) claims 1 and 2 as well as 2024/25:3359 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) claims 1 and 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3356 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2024/25:3359 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 2.

Riksdag decision: The use of and access to sustainable fuels shall increase within aviation. The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal which is based on the EU regulation on ensuring equal conditions for sustainable air transport. The proposal means that Sweden introduces the rules required to comply with the EU regulation and meet its goal of reducing emissions from aviation. The proposed law contains, among other things, provisions on penalty fees for violations of the EU regulation as well as various regulations on supervision and appeal. The law enters into force on 1 July 2025. The Riksdag also said no to approximately 80 proposals in motions from the ordinary motion session in 2024, partly with reference to measures taken and ongoing investigation and preparation work. The proposals concern, among other things, state and regional airports, standby airports, security-related issues in aviation, aviation's climate impact and electric aviation.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan sees air traffic as one of the major challenges in the transition and wants aviation to start bearing its socioeconomic costs.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees air traffic as one of the major challenges in the transition and wants aviation to start bearing its socioeconomic costs. A requirement that reduction and exemption from sanction fees be limited to the EU regulation level and that the regulations encompass all base provision of airports sharpens that. The committee's reference to limited availability of sustainable fuels is met by the plan's view that biomass is a limited resource.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser flygtrafiken som en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen och vill att flyget börjar stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader. Ett krav på att nedsättning och befrielse från sanktionsavgiften begränsas till EU-förordningens nivå och att regelverket omfattar hela basutbudet av flygplatser skärper just det. Utskottets hänvisning till begränsad tillgång på hållbara bränslen möts av planens syn att biomassan är en begränsad resurs.

  • aviation should bear its costsdecisive»stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader. Det skulle sänka utsläppen« (party programme ↗)“bear its socioeconomic costs. That would reduce emissions”
  • aviation is a major transition issue»Flygtrafiken är en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen.« (party programme ↗)“Air traffic is one of the major challenges in the transition.”
  • limited biomass»Biomassan är en begränsad resurs, särskilt i« (party programme ↗)“Biomass is a limited resource, particularly in”
  • residual products for biofuel»Den skog som avverkas måste användas klokt där endast restprodukter ska användas till biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The forest that is harvested must be used wisely where only residual products shall be used for biofuel.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto states that the climate policy framework is fixed and that Sweden shall reach net zero emissions in 2045.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that the climate policy framework is fixed and that Sweden shall reach net zero emissions in 2045. Generous opportunities to reduce the sanction fee undermines the requirement for sustainable aviation fuel and thus the steering towards that goal. The party wants instead to increase the production of renewable fuels so that availability improves. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand for a stricter framework.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att det klimatpolitiska ramverket ligger fast och att Sverige ska nå nettonollutsläpp 2045. Generösa möjligheter att sätta ned sanktionsavgiften urholkar kravet på hållbara flygbränslen och därmed styrningen mot det målet. Partiet vill i stället öka produktionen av förnybara drivmedel så att tillgången förbättras. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på ett stramare regelverk.

  • climate framework fixeddecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall remain fixed.”
  • net zero target 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären, för att därefter uppnå negativa utsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In 2045, Sweden shall have no net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, and thereafter achieve negative emissions.”
  • more renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to refuel fossil-free in Sweden.”
  • leader in climate policy»vara en föregångare i den egna, nationella klimatpolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“be a leader in its own, national climate policy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto wants to reduce aviation emissions and accelerate the transition to renewable aviation fuels, and the party programme that aviation shall bear its environmental costs fully.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to reduce aviation emissions and accelerate the transition to renewable aviation fuels, and the party programme that aviation shall bear its environmental costs fully. Generous opportunities to lower the sanction fee erodes precisely this policy instrument. The counter-proposal's demand for narrower reduction grounds and broader application thus aligns with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill minska flygets utsläpp och skynda på omställningen till förnybara flygbränslen, och partiprogrammet att flyget ska bära sina miljökostnader fullt ut. Generösa möjligheter att sätta ned sanktionsavgiften urholkar just det styrmedlet. Motförslagets krav på snävare nedsättningsgrunder och bredare tillämpning ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • aviation bears its environmental costsdecisive»Det är för oss självklart att flyget ska bära sina miljökostnader fullt ut.« (party programme ↗)“It is self-evident to us that aviation shall bear its environmental costs fully.”
  • reduce aviation emissions»minska flygets utsläpp — höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet och skynda på omställningen till förnybara bränslen, elektrobränslen och elflyg för de flygresor som inte kan ersättas på annat sätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce aviation emissions - raise the aviation tax, reduce air travel and accelerate the transition to renewable fuels, electric fuels and electric aviation for those flights that cannot be replaced in another way.”
  • the polluter pays»Det som är bra för människor och miljö ska vara billigt, det som är dåligt ska vara dyrt och det som är alltför skadligt ska förbjudas.« (party programme ↗)“That which is good for people and the environment shall be cheap, that which is bad shall be expensive and that which is far too damaging shall be banned.”
  • aviation in the emissions trading system»höja priset på utsläppsrätter i EU, inkludera utsläpp från flyg och sjöfart i systemet och införa klimattullar på varor från länder utanför EU.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the price of emission allowances in the EU, include emissions from aviation and shipping in the system and introduce climate tariffs on goods from countries outside the EU.”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto requires that more is done for aviation to switch to renewable fuels and that it should cost more to pollute.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that more is done for aviation to switch to renewable fuels and that it should cost more to pollute. The party programme states that low set requirements must not prevent tightened requirements from being applied and that climate policy should be based on science. A revised proposal that limits reduction and exemption to the level of the EU regulation and covers the entire base offering of airports follows that line, even though the plan at the same time protects regional aviation.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att mer görs för att flyget ska ställa om till förnybara drivmedel och att det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner. Partiprogrammet slår fast att lågt satta krav inte får hindra att skärpta krav tillämpas och att klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vetenskapen. Ett omarbetat förslag som begränsar nedsättning och befrielse till EU-förordningens nivå och omfattar hela basutbudet av flygplatser följer den linjen, även om planen samtidigt värnar det regionala flyget.

  • aviation's shift to renewabledecisive»Mer behöver göras för att flyget, sjöfarten och jordbruket ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More needs to be done for aviation, shipping and agriculture to switch to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness.”
  • polluter pays»Det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should cost more to pollute.”
  • science-based climate policy»Klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt för att undvika farliga förändringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy should be based on what science shows is necessary to avoid dangerous changes.”
  • protect regional aviation»Det regionala flyget håller ihop Sverige. Flyginfrastrukturen ska fungera i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regional aviation holds Sweden together. Aviation infrastructure should function throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that the polluter pays and that more flights should be made fossil-free.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the polluter pays and that more flights should be made fossil-free. It sees EU cooperation as the most important instrument for environmental work and wants regulations to be tightened. To limit exemption and relief from sanction fees to EU regulation level, and have the rules cover the entire base supply of airports, thus follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det är den som förorenar som ska betala och att fler flygresor ska göras fossilfria. Den ser EU-samarbetet som det viktigaste instrumentet för miljöarbetet och vill att regelverken skärps. Att begränsa nedsättning och befrielse från sanktionsavgiften till EU-förordningens nivå, och låta reglerna omfatta hela basutbudet av flygplatser, följer därför av planen.

  • the polluter paysdecisive»Det är den som förorenar – ingen annan – som ska betala.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the one who pollutes – no one else – who shall pay.”
  • fossil-free aviation»Fler flygresor ska göras fossilfria och all kollektivtrafik på väg och spår ska vara fossilfri senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More flights should be made fossil-free and all public transport on road and rail shall be fossil-free by 2030.”
  • EU drives environmental work»EU-samarbetet är vårt viktigaste instrument för att driva på miljöarbetet.« (party programme ↗)“EU cooperation is our most important instrument for driving environmental work.”
  • tightened EU regulations»miljö- och klimatområdet måste höjas och regelverken skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“environment and climate area must be raised and regulations tightened.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to tighten opportunities for reduction and exemption from the penalty fee and extend the rules to more airports.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to tighten opportunities for reduction and exemption from the penalty fee and extend the rules to more airports. The plan goes the opposite direction: the election manifesto wants to reduce the use of expensive biofuel, and the party programme establishes that well-functioning domestic air service is necessary in a country with long distances. Stricter sanctions with limited fuel availability therefore lies outside the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill strama åt möjligheterna till nedsättning och befrielse från sanktionsavgiften och utvidga regelverket till fler flygplatser. Planen går åt motsatt håll: valmanifestet vill minska inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle, och partiprogrammet slår fast att ett välfungerande inrikesflyg är nödvändigt i ett land med långa avstånd. Hårdare sanktioner vid begränsad bränsletillgång ligger därför utanför planens linje.

  • reduced biofuel blendingdecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices significantly for all, primarily by reducing the use of expensive biofuel.”
  • necessary domestic air service»Ett välfungerande inrikesflyg är nödvändigt i Sverige med dess långa avstånd.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning domestic air service is necessary in Sweden with its long distances.”
  • counter regulatory red tape»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules should be countered.”
  • predictable rules»Långsiktiga förutsägbara spelregler och villkor måste gälla« (party programme ↗)“Long-term predictable rules and conditions must apply”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to welcome aviation's transition and invest in fossil-free jet fuel, not punish the industry when the fuel is not yet available.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to welcome aviation's transition and invest in fossil-free jet fuel, not punish the industry when the fuel is not yet available. It also states that climate policy must never become expensive symbolic politics and that regulatory red tape should decrease. The counter-proposal's demands for narrower possibilities for reduction and more covered airports increase the sanction burden and thus go against the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bejaka flygets omställning och satsa på fossilfria flygbränslen, inte straffa branschen när bränslet ännu inte finns att få tag på. Den slår också fast att klimatpolitiken aldrig får bli dyrbar symbolpolitik och att regelkrånglet ska minska. Motförslagets krav på snävare möjligheter till nedsättning och fler omfattade flygplatser ökar sanktionsbördan och går därför emot planen.

  • welcome aviation's transitiondecisive»Flyget är mitt uppe i en snabb omställning med ökad användning av biobränslen, vätgas och utveckling av elflyg. Det är en utveckling som Moderaterna vill bejaka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Aviation is in the midst of a rapid transition with increased use of biofuels, hydrogen and development of electric aviation. This is a development that the Moderates want to welcome.”
  • no expensive symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy can never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administration costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
  • no Swedish exceptions»motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut« (2022 manifesto ↗)“counteract overimplementation in Sweden of EU decisions”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto wants to preserve domestic flights and regional airports and reduce the use of expensive and ineffective biofuels, and stop symbolic politics that harms industry and business.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to preserve domestic flights and regional airports and reduce the use of expensive and ineffective biofuels, and stop symbolic politics that harms industry and business. The counter-proposal requires stricter penalty fees and significantly limited possibilities for reductions for airlines. This goes against the plan's line of not adding additional costs to aviation.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill bevara inrikesflyget och de regionala flygplatserna och minska användningen av dyra och ineffektiva biodrivmedel, samt stoppa symbolpolitik som slår mot näring och industri. Motförslaget kräver hårdare sanktionsavgifter och kraftigt begränsade möjligheter till nedsättning för flygbolagen. Det går emot planens linje att inte lägga ytterligare kostnader på flyget.

  • protected domestic flightsdecisive»Bevara inrikesflyget och Bromma flygplats« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve domestic flights and Bromma Airport”
  • reduced blending requirements»Minska användningen av miljöskadliga och dyra biodrivmedel från utlandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the use of environmentally harmful and expensive biofuels from abroad”
  • stop to symbolic politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that harms the ability to operate industry and business”
  • against aviation-hostile policy»Regeringens flygfientliga politik hotar landets sammanhållning och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The government's aviation-hostile policy threatens the country's cohesion and competitiveness.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament