2023-04-262022/23:KrU9 · p.5KrUCulture
Cinemas in smaller towns
The role of cinemas in the cultural life of smaller towns
What's at stake: The outcome affects whether residents of smaller towns can count on their local cinema being safeguarded as part of access to a broad cultural life, or whether the issue must wait for a broader review of film policy.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should already declare that cinemas in smaller towns are an important part of the cultural infrastructure and deserve special support, or whether the role of cinemas should instead be addressed within the broader review of film policy the government is already conducting.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses the importance of good conditions for Swedish film and a well-anchored film policy, and notes that the government is already processing questions about the future of film policy, its financing, and cooperation with industry stakeholders, following earlier pronouncements from parliament. Against that background, it is not prepared to propose new pronouncements at this time, but intends to follow the issue closely. The committee therefore rejects the motions on cinemas in smaller towns and related film issues.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (C)
The reservation (C) considers that cinemas in smaller towns mean more to the cultural life there than just being a place to watch films, since they are an important part of a cultural infrastructure that provides access to a broad cultural life across the country, and wants parliament to instruct the government that this should be safeguarded.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 214–21Ja 193–42
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/64/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:861 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) demand 18 in this part and 2022/23:973 by Jonas Andersson et al. (SD) demands 6 and 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:861 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 18 i denna del och 2022/23:973 av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 6 och 7.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 40 motions on public service and film submitted during the general motion period in 2022. The proposals concern conditions and terms for public service and film policy. Parliament considers that work is already underway in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to be excluded from decision-making regarding pre-review of public service. (C) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly points out that culture has been impoverished when cinemas exist in fewer places and demands that culture exists throughout the country and is counted as part of welfare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly points out that culture has been impoverished when cinemas exist in fewer places and demands that culture exists throughout the country and is counted as part of welfare. To especially protect cinemas in smaller places as cultural infrastructure is therefore exactly what the plan advocates. The party programme moreover demands an equivalent distribution of cultural resources across the country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar uttryckligen ut att kulturen utarmats när biografer finns på färre orter och kräver att kulturen finns i hela landet och räknas som en del av välfärden. Att särskilt värna biografer på mindre orter som kulturell infrastruktur är därför precis vad planen förespråkar. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom en likvärdig fördelning av kulturresurser över landet.
- cinemas disappearing from townsdecisive»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sport have also been impoverished when school libraries are closed, swimming schools have become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
- culture throughout the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture stands free from both commercial and political steering and exists throughout the country.”
- equivalent cultural policy across the country»En statlig kulturpolitik ska garantera en demokratiskt likvärdig« (party programme ↗)“A state cultural policy shall guarantee democratically equivalent”
- culture as part of welfare»Kulturen spelar en viktig roll och är en del av välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture plays an important role and is part of welfare.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that institutions for professional cultural life exist throughout the country and that forms of artistic expression are made accessible to all throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that institutions for professional cultural life exist throughout the country and that forms of artistic expression are made accessible to all throughout the country. Cinemas in smaller towns are precisely such cultural infrastructure, and the plan wants to see a vibrant cultural life and a state that is present throughout the country. Cinemas are however not explicitly mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet finns över hela landet och att konstens uttrycksformer görs tillgängliga för alla i hela landet. Biografer på mindre orter är just en sådan kulturell infrastruktur, och planen vill se ett levande kulturliv och en stat som är närvarande i hela landet. Biografer nämns dock inte uttryckligen.
- kulturinstitutioner i hela landetdecisive»Institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet ska därför finnas över hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Institutions for professional cultural life shall therefore exist throughout the country.”
- kultur tillgänglig i hela landet»Kulturpolitiken går ut på att göra konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy is about making the various forms of artistic expression accessible to all, children and adults, throughout the country.”
- levande kulturliv»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a vibrant, free and unbound cultural life that both strengthens social cohesion and challenges.”
- samhällsservice i hela landet»För att säkra välfärden i hela landet behöver vi se över skatteutjämningssystemet, så att det garanterar offentlig service av hög kvalitet i hela landet, även i små kommuner som kämpar med sitt befolkningsunderlag. Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To ensure welfare throughout the country, we need to review the tax equalisation system, so that it guarantees public services of high quality throughout the country, even in small municipalities struggling with their population base. The state shall be present throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to build stronger cultural life that more people have access to across the country and invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to build stronger cultural life that more people have access to across the country and invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life. The party programme requires that culture be made accessible across the country and invests in regional cultural activities. To particularly protect cinemas in smaller communities as part of cultural infrastructure is thus in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till i hela landet och satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet. Partiprogrammet kräver att kulturen tillgängliggörs i hela landet och satsar på regional kulturverksamhet. Att särskilt värna biografer på mindre orter som del av den kulturella infrastrukturen ligger därför i linje med planen.
- cultural life across the countrydecisive»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life across the country, which includes public, independent, professional and non-profit actors.”
- culture accessible across the country»verksamhet i hela landet. Digital teknik ska« (party programme ↗)“activities across the country. Digital technology shall”
- culture as rural infrastructure»Kultur bidrar till landsbygdens attraktionskraft och främjar inflyttning och besöksnäring.« (party programme ↗)“Culture contributes to rural areas' attractiveness and promotes in-migration and tourism.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto makes access to culture throughout the country an explicit starting point, and the party programme requires that cultural institutions spread their activities throughout the country and that everyone is given the opportunity to participate in cultural life.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes access to culture throughout the country an explicit starting point, and the party programme requires that cultural institutions spread their activities throughout the country and that everyone is given the opportunity to participate in cultural life. A cinema in a smaller town is precisely such a part of the cultural infrastructure. The plan therefore speaks in favour of it being specially protected.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör tillgången till kultur i hela landet till en uttalad utgångspunkt, och partiprogrammet kräver att kulturinstitutioner sprider sin verksamhet i hela landet och att alla ges förutsättningar att delta i kulturlivet. Biografen på den mindre orten är just en sådan del av den kulturella infrastrukturen. Planen talar därför för att den värnas särskilt.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Center Party.”
- cultural activities throughout the country»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions should spread their activities throughout the country.”
- everyone's participation in cultural life»Politiken ska fokusera på att skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should focus on creating conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life.”
- culture's value for the individual»Kulturupplevelser är en grundläggande del av människors självförverkligande och delaktighet i samhället« (party programme ↗)“Cultural experiences are a fundamental part of people's self-fulfilment and participation in society”
The party programme requires that cultural accessibility increases for the entire population and that accessibility to high-quality culture increases in the long term throughout the country, even for culture that is not commercially profitable.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that cultural accessibility increases for the entire population and that accessibility to high-quality culture increases in the long term throughout the country, even for culture that is not commercially profitable. Specially protecting cinemas in smaller towns as part of a cultural infrastructure follows from these commitments. However, the plan wants to change state film policy to a broad stakeholder agreement rather than new targeted political commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att kulturens tillgänglighet ökar för hela befolkningen och att tillgängligheten till kultur av hög kvalitet långsiktigt ökar i hela landet, även för kultur som inte är kommersiellt lönsam. Att särskilt värna biografer på mindre orter som del av en kulturell infrastruktur följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen vill däremot lägga om den statliga filmpolitiken till en bred partsöverenskommelse snarare än nya riktade politiska utfästelser.
- cultural accessibilitydecisive»öka kulturens tillgänglighet för hela« (party programme ↗)“increase cultural accessibility for the entire”
- culture throughout the country»Syftet bör vara att långsiktigt öka tillgängligheten till kultur av hög kvalitet i hela« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be to increase accessibility to high-quality culture in the long term throughout”
- support for non-commercial culture»skapa ekonomiska förutsättningar även för sådan kultur som är av hög kvalitet utan att vara« (party programme ↗)“create economic conditions even for culture that is of high quality without being”
- reformed film policy»Det statliga filmpolitiken bör ersättas av en bred partsöverenskommelse« (party programme ↗)“State film policy should be replaced by a broad stakeholder agreement”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan places on the state the responsibility for cultural infrastructure throughout the country and requires that the public actively contributes to culture reaching citizens.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places on the state the responsibility for cultural infrastructure throughout the country and requires that the public actively contributes to culture reaching citizens. Cinemas in smaller towns are precisely such a part of the infrastructure, and the election manifesto wants all of Sweden to function also outside the major cities. The plan's subsidiarity view speaks for support without control of the activity.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lägger på staten ansvaret för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet och kräver att det offentliga aktivt bidrar till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del. Biografer på mindre orter är just en sådan del av infrastrukturen, och valmanifestet vill att hela Sverige ska fungera även utanför storstäderna. Planens subsidiaritetssyn talar för stöd utan styrning av verksamheten.
- cultural infrastructure throughout the countrydecisive»svara för det som brukar benämnas en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“provide what is usually called cultural infrastructure, throughout the country.”
- culture shall reach citizens»ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till« (party programme ↗)“shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching citizens”
- all of Sweden shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work also outside the major cities.”
- support but not control»Den innebär att kulturverksamhet som bedrivs av det« (party programme ↗)“This means that cultural activity conducted by”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan has no commitments about cinemas or film infrastructure.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan has no commitments about cinemas or film infrastructure. The programme establishes that culture and media policy must always be conducted with insight that public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk, and that the goal is institutions that stand free from state and politics. A special political protection of cinemas in smaller places therefore does not follow from the plan, even though it wants to make use of all of Sweden's possibilities.
Original (Swedish)
Planen har inga åtaganden om biografer eller filmens infrastruktur. Programmet slår fast att kultur- och mediepolitik alltid måste bedrivas med insikt om att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk, och att målet är institutioner som står fria från stat och politik. Ett särskilt politiskt värnande av biografer på mindre orter följer därför inte av planen, även om den vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.
- risk with public cultural financingdecisive»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk.« (party programme ↗)“public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk.”
- culture free from politics»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.« (party programme ↗)“The goal shall be independent institutions that in their activities stand free from state and politics.”
- all of Sweden shall function»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to make use of all of Sweden's possibilities.”
The plan states that cultural policy shall be shaped so that Swedish culture reaches all of Sweden and that culture shall be protected, cared for and shown.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that cultural policy shall be shaped so that Swedish culture reaches all of Sweden and that culture shall be protected, cared for and shown. Particularly protecting cinemas in smaller towns as part of a cultural infrastructure throughout the country follows from that, together with the principle that the whole country shall thrive. The committee's reasoning that film policy is already being handled is not affected by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att kulturpolitiken ska utformas så att den svenska kulturen når hela Sverige och att kulturen ska värnas, vårdas och visas. Att särskilt värna biografer på mindre orter som del av en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet följer av det, tillsammans med principen att hela Sverige ska leva. Utskottets skäl att filmpolitiken redan bereds berörs inte av planen.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Politiken bör utformas för att den svenska kulturen ska nå hela Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should be shaped for Swedish culture to reach all of Sweden.”
- protected Swedish culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to protect, care for and show Swedish culture.”
- the whole country shall thrive»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that the whole country shall thrive is very important to Sweden Democrats.”
- policy for the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct policy for all of Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KrU9)
- Committee report full text (HA01KrU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1226 — Vissa kulturpolitiska frågor av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1474 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2054 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund, fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:538 — Förbättrat arbete med public service av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2022/23:861 — Ett fritt och brett kulturliv i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:862 — Fri journalistik och opinionsbildning som bevakar hela Sverige av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:973 — Filmpolitik av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:988 — Nationella minoriteter i Sverige av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:991 — Public service-frågor av Leonid Yurkovskiy m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament