2024-05-152023/24:FöU8 · p.2FöUDefence

Support for voluntary organizations

Funding support for civil-society environmental groups in the nuclear-waste repository process

What's at stake: The decision determines whether independent environmental groups get long-term funding to scrutinise the repository process and support public transparency, or must continue seeking funds elsewhere without guaranteed support.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the nuclear-waste fee should also fund civil-society environmental groups that scrutinise the repository process, or whether oversight through the affected municipalities and existing budget appropriations is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions calling for the nuclear-waste fee to fund civil-society organisations. The reason is that public transparency in the continued process can largely be ensured through the affected municipalities, and that the organisations can instead apply for funds from a designated budget appropriation.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

The reservation (V) calls for the nuclear-waste fee to again fund civil-society environmental organisations. The reasoning is that such support, which existed before but was withdrawn, enabled independent scrutiny and a balanced view of the repository issue and strengthened public transparency in a process that runs for a very long time.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/16/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 61/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2785 by Hanna Gunnarsson et al. (V) and 2023/24:2789 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2785 av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V) och 2023/24:2789 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP).

Riksdag decision: Municipalities shall to a greater extent be compensated for their costs in connection with the handling and final storage of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. The Riksdag approved the government's proposal which means that more of the municipalities' costs shall be covered by the nuclear waste fund. The decision means that municipalities shall be able to receive compensation from the nuclear waste fund, for example for efforts in connection with stepwise review of the expansion of the repository for radioactive operational waste and spent nuclear fuel. The new regulations come into effect on July 1, 2024.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan makes support for independent and democratic popular movements a cornerstone of the party's strategy and pushes for conditions that secure the independence of associational life.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes support for independent and democratic popular movements a cornerstone of the party's strategy and pushes for conditions that secure the independence of associational life. Independent environmental organizations' review of the nuclear waste process is precisely the kind of democratic infrastructure the plan wants to finance. The counter-proposal's demand that the fee again finance support for independent environmental organizations therefore follows the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör stödet till självständiga och demokratiska folkrörelser till en grundpelare i partiets strategi och driver på för villkor som säkrar föreningslivets oberoende. Oberoende miljöorganisationers granskning av kärnavfallsprocessen är just den sortens demokratiska infrastruktur planen vill finansiera. Motförslagets krav på att avgiften åter ska finansiera stöd till ideella miljöorganisationer följer därmed planen.

  • support independent popular movementsdecisive»självständiga och demokratiska folkrörelser är därför en grundpelare i« (party programme ↗)“independent and democratic popular movements are therefore a cornerstone in”
  • independent associational life»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that secure a strong”
  • popular movements drive change»Det är tillsammans med folkrörelser som Vänsterpartiet driver fram förändringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is together with popular movements that the Left Party drives forward change.”
  • defence of natural resources»folkligt förankrade värden som mänskliga rättigheter och naturresurser.« (party programme ↗)“popularly rooted values such as human rights and natural resources.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme attributes environmental movements and other popular movements a central role in broadening democracy and allowing civil society to scrutinize and make demands of power, and requires that the administration be built on openness and transparency.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme attributes environmental movements and other popular movements a central role in broadening democracy and allowing civil society to scrutinize and make demands of power, and requires that the administration be built on openness and transparency. Support enabling independent scrutiny of the nuclear waste process is an application of this. However, the plan does not mention the use of the fee.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet tillmäter miljörörelser och andra folkrörelser en central roll för att bredda demokratin och låta civilsamhället granska och ställa krav på makten, och kräver att förvaltningen bygger på offentlighet och insyn. Stöd som möjliggör oberoende granskning av kärnavfallsprocessen är en tillämpning av detta. Planen nämner dock inte avgiftens användning.

  • civil society as counterweightdecisive»Genom sina verksamheter har civilsamhället en viktig uppgift att balansera« (party programme ↗)“Through its activities, civil society has an important task to balance”
  • environmental movement deepens democracy»miljörörelser, konsumentorganisationer och kooperativa« (party programme ↗)“environmental movements, consumer organizations and cooperative”
  • openness and transparency»Den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen måste bygga på offentlighet och« (party programme ↗)“The democratic process and public administration must be built on openness and”
  • strong civil society»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power and that public bodies shall provide organizational support to the voluntary sector.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power and that public bodies shall provide organizational support to the voluntary sector. According to the plan, the nuclear waste issue is a long-term problem that is passed on to future generations, which makes independent scrutiny of the process particularly urgent. That the fee again finances support for non-profit environmental organizations thus follows from the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att medborgarna alltid ska kunna granska makten och att offentliga organ ska ge organisatoriskt stöd till frivilligsektorn. Kärnavfallsfrågan är enligt planen ett långsiktigt problem som överlämnas till kommande generationer, vilket gör oberoende granskning av processen särskilt angelägen. Att avgiften åter finansierar stöd till ideella miljöorganisationer följer därför av planens linje.

  • public scrutinydecisive»Medborgarna ska alltid kunna granska makten.« (party programme ↗)“Citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power.”
  • public support for civil society»Offentliga organ ska aktivt ta del av frivilligsektorns förslag och erbjuda organisatoriskt stöd till frivilligcentraler.« (party programme ↗)“Public bodies shall actively take part in the voluntary sector's proposals and offer organizational support to voluntary centres.”
  • nuclear waste's long time horizon»leder till att radioaktivt avfall överlämnas till kommande generationer att hantera« (party programme ↗)“leads to radioactive waste being passed on to future generations to manage”
  • transparency and openness»Offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste värnas och stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The principle of transparency and freedom of expression must be protected and strengthened.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says that policy can support civil society among other things by involving it in more processes, and that openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for democracy.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says that policy can support civil society among other things by involving it in more processes, and that openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for democracy. Support that makes it possible for voluntary environmental organizations to scrutinize a long-drawn nuclear waste process aligns with both these commitments. The plan says nothing about the funding source as such, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger att politiken ska stödja civilsamhället bland annat genom att involvera det i fler processer, och att öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för demokrati. Ett stöd som gör det möjligt för ideella miljöorganisationer att granska en långdragen kärnavfallsprocess ligger i linje med båda dessa åtaganden. Planen säger inget om finansieringskällan som sådan, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • involve civil societydecisive»Politiken kan stödja civilsamhället genom att involvera det i fler processer« (party programme ↗)“Policy can support civil society by involving it in more processes”
  • openness and scrutiny»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for freedom, democracy and to prevent corruption and abuse.”
  • increased transparency»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent.”
  • independent scrutinizing civil society»En fristående folkbildning har mycket stor betydelse i tider då demokratiska värden ifrågasätts.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Independent public education is very significant in times when democratic values are questioned.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan makes independent scrutiny the lifeblood of democracy and wants to strengthen civil society's independence and long-term financing, which speaks for the fee again financing support for civil society organizations that scrutinize the nuclear waste process.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes independent scrutiny the lifeblood of democracy and wants to strengthen civil society's independence and long-term financing, which speaks for the fee again financing support for civil society organizations that scrutinize the nuclear waste process. Civil society is described as a prerequisite for democratic participation and influence in societal processes. The plan says nothing about the nuclear waste fee as such, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör oberoende granskning till demokratins livsluft och vill stärka civilsamhällets oberoende och långsiktiga finansiering, vilket talar för att avgiften åter finansierar stöd till ideella organisationer som granskar kärnavfallsprocessen. Civilsamhället beskrivs som en förutsättning för demokratiskt deltagande och inflytande i samhälleliga processer. Planen säger dock inget om just kärnavfallsavgiften, så slutsatsen är härledd.

  • scrutiny as democracy's lifeblooddecisive»Demokratins livsluft är att fler granskar, diskuterar och pekar ut samhällets brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Democracy's lifeblood is that more scrutinize, discuss and point out society's shortcomings.”
  • long-term financing of civil society»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue improving civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
  • civil society's democratic role»Det civila samhället ökar det demokratiska deltagandet och människors inflytande i samhälleliga processer.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society increases democratic participation and people's influence in societal processes.”
  • independent civil society»Det fria samtalet ska värnas genom att stärka oberoendet hos journalistiken, kulturen och civilsamhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The free conversation shall be cherished by strengthening the independence of journalism, culture and civil society.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan attributes vital importance to a vital civil society for democracy and highlights the role of idea-based organizations as a voice in important matters.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan attributes vital importance to a vital civil society for democracy and highlights the role of idea-based organizations as a voice in important matters. Insight into public processes is according to the programme central to an open democracy. Support that enables independent scrutiny of the spent fuel process responds to both these commitments, and pluralism requires that different groups are given the opportunity to take responsibility for such activities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tillmäter ett vitalt civilsamhälle avgörande betydelse för demokratin och framhåller idéburna organisationers roll som röst i viktiga frågor. Insyn i offentliga processer är enligt programmet centralt för en öppen demokrati. Ett stöd som möjliggör oberoende granskning av kärnavfallsprocessen svarar mot båda dessa åtaganden, och pluralismen kräver att olika grupper ges möjlighet att ta ansvar för sådana verksamheter.

  • vital civil societydecisive»Ett vitalt civilt samhälle är av största vikt för en levande demokrati och ett mänskligt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A vital civil society is of greatest importance for a living democracy and a humane society.”
  • insight into public processes»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till allmänna handlingar, är central för en öppen och vital demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“The public principle, that is access to public documents, is central to an open and vital democracy.”
  • idea-based organizations' voice»Idéburna eller intressebaserade organisationer som vill ge röst åt särskilda grupper i viktiga frågor har starkt bidragit till det välfärdssamhälle vi har idag.« (party programme ↗)“Idea-based or interest-based organizations that want to give voice to particular groups in important matters have strongly contributed to the welfare society we have today.”
  • pluralism and group rights»Ett pluralistiskt samhälle förutsätter att stat och kommun ger olika grupper möjlighet och frihet att ansvara för verksamheter« (party programme ↗)“A pluralistic society presupposes that state and municipality give different groups the opportunity and freedom to take responsibility for activities”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about association support from the nuclear waste levy.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about association support from the nuclear waste levy. Its energy policy commitment is instead to facilitate and speed up new nuclear power: regulations, financing and shorter processing times. Letting the charge again finance support for non-profit organisations lies outside the plan and increases costs in the process, so the demand receives no support.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om föreningsstöd ur kärnavfallsavgiften. Dess energipolitiska åtagande är i stället att underlätta och snabba på ny kärnkraft: regelverk, finansiering och kortare handläggning. Att åter låta avgiften finansiera stöd till ideella organisationer ligger utanför planen och ökar kostnaderna i processen, varför kravet inte får stöd.

  • expanded nuclear powerdecisive»Ny kärnkraft är lösningen för att reparera Sveriges energisystem på lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New nuclear power is the solution to repair Sweden's energy system in the long term.”
  • regulations for nuclear power»Ge resurser till Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten för att ta fram ett regelverk för ny kärnkraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Provide resources to the Radiation Safety Authority to develop regulations for new nuclear power”
  • faster processes»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten government processing times through a deadline”
  • fiscal restraint»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“All forms of public waste shall be combated.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan demands clear results for every public investment and wants to eliminate unnecessary expenses in the public sector; allowing a fee linked to nuclear waste management to again finance civil society organizations' oversight does not fit within that.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands clear results for every public investment and wants to eliminate unnecessary expenses in the public sector; allowing a fee linked to nuclear waste management to again finance civil society organizations' oversight does not fit within that. The plan also wants to streamline and make licensing processes more predictable and invest in new nuclear power, which argues against building in more external actors in the process.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning och vill skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga; att låta en avgift kopplad till kärnavfallshanteringen åter finansiera ideella organisationers granskning ryms inte i det. Planen vill dessutom effektivisera och göra tillståndsprocesser mer förutsägbara och satsa på ny kärnkraft, vilket talar mot att bygga in fler externa aktörer i processen.

  • results requirement for public fundsdecisive»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
  • away with unnecessary expenses»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Eliminate unnecessary expenses in the public sector”
  • efficient licensing processes»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in licensing processes for mining, grid expansion and industry”
  • expanded nuclear power»Skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft i Sverige och en färdplan för byggandet av SMR-reaktorer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new nuclear power in Sweden and a roadmap for building SMR reactors”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament