2023-03-302022/23:NU13 · p.9NUBusiness & energy

Mineral compensation

A higher mineral fee

What's at stake: At stake is how much mining companies should pay for the minerals they extract. A higher fee would give more money to landowners and the state and could fund compensation for damage to infrastructure and the local environment, but it also affects the mining industry's profitability.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the fee mining companies pay on extracted minerals — the mineral compensation — should be sharply raised, or whether the current level should stand.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions and does not consider that the mineral compensation should be raised beyond today's level.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 11 (V, MP)

The reservation (V, MP) wants to sharply raise the mineral fee, partly to secure funds for compensating infrastructure damage and to build sustainable communities, since the fee is very low by international comparison.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoYes 92/0/0/15departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesAbstain 0/0/64/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:936 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) item 11, 2022/23:1123 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) item 18, 2022/23:1672 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) item 20 and 2022/23:2263 by Marielle Lahti et al. (MP) item 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:936 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 11, 2022/23:1123 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 18, 2022/23:1672 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 20 och 2022/23:2263 av Marielle Lahti m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag issued a directive, a formal request (tillkännagivande), to the government concerning the role of authorities in permit processes. The Committee considers that authorities in connection with permit processes should work in a more advisory and solution-oriented manner than previously. The directive is based on a proposal in a motion from the general motion period 2022 on mineral policy matters. The Riksdag rejected approximately 40 proposals in other motions. These dealt with, among other things, permits and permit processes, bans on mining, ownership rights and compensation, as well as so-called innovation-critical metals and minerals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires that more of the value of natural resources stays where they are extracted and produced, and that extraction shall benefit the municipality and residents in the surrounding area.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires that more of the value of natural resources stays where they are extracted and produced, and that extraction shall benefit the municipality and residents in the surrounding area. A significantly raised mineral tax that finances compensation for damage and sustainable communities is precisely that redistribution. The plan also wants those with large capital holdings to contribute more.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att mer av naturresursernas värden stannar kvar där de utvinns och produceras, och att utvinning ska gynna kommunen och de boende i närområdet. En kraftigt höjd mineralavgift som finansierar kompensation för skador och hållbara samhällen är just den omfördelningen. Planen vill dessutom att de med stora kapitaltillgångar bidrar mer.

  • value stays where extracteddecisive»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must stay where they are extracted and produced.”
  • local benefit from natural resources»Vindkraften ska gynna både kommun och boende i närområdet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wind power shall benefit both the municipality and residents in the surrounding area.”
  • capital must contribute more»Det är hög tid att de få som har stora kapitaltillgångar bidrar mer till omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time that the few who have large capital holdings contribute more to the transition.”
  • public interest in natural resources»strategiska naturtillgångar« (party programme ↗)“strategic natural resources”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The level of mineral royalties is not addressed in the documents.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The level of mineral royalties is not addressed in the documents. The closest principles are that the whole country shall be able to live and develop and that all regions shall offer good living conditions, which speaks to mining leaving funds for infrastructure damage and local community development. That taxes and fees shall be levied according to ability to pay points in the same direction. The confidence is low because the support is only derived.

Original (Swedish)

Mineralersättningens nivå behandlas inte i dokumenten. Närmast liggande principer är att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas och att alla regioner ska erbjuda goda levnadsvillkor, vilket talar för att gruvbrytning ska lämna medel kvar för skador på infrastruktur och för lokal samhällsutveckling. Att skatter och avgifter ska tas ut efter bärkraft pekar i samma riktning. Säkerheten är låg eftersom stödet enbart är härlett.

  • the whole country shall livedecisive»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
  • good living conditions in the regions»förutsättningar för arbete, företagande och studier samt erbjuda goda levnadsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“opportunities for work, enterprise and studies and offer good living conditions.”
  • levied according to ability to pay»Skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft och« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay and”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme establishes that the mining industry shall be built on long-term stewardship of mineral resources and that environmental considerations shall weigh more heavily than short-term extraction interests, and that the true costs of extracting raw materials shall be reflected in the price through taxes and fees.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that the mining industry shall be built on long-term stewardship of mineral resources and that environmental considerations shall weigh more heavily than short-term extraction interests, and that the true costs of extracting raw materials shall be reflected in the price through taxes and fees. A substantially raised mineral fee that covers damage and builds sustainable societies is precisely such an internalization, in line with the election manifesto's demand for fair returns to affected municipalities.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att gruvnäringen ska bygga på långsiktig hushållning med mineraltillgångar och att miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än kortsiktiga exploateringsintressen, samt att de verkliga kostnaderna för att utvinna råvaror ska återspeglas i priset genom skatter och avgifter. En kraftigt höjd mineralavgift som täcker skador och bygger hållbara samhällen är just en sådan internalisering, i linje med valmanifestets krav på rejäl återbäring till berörda kommuner.

  • raw materials' true costdecisive»De verkliga kostnaderna för att utvinna råvaror« (party programme ↗)“The true costs of extracting raw materials”
  • costs internalized through fees»annan part ska inkluderas i priset genom skatter,« (party programme ↗)“another party shall be included in the price through taxes,”
  • environmental considerations before extraction»mineraltillgångar. Miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än« (party programme ↗)“mineral resources. Environmental considerations shall weigh more heavily than”
  • returns to affected municipalities»bygga ut vindkraften till havs snabbt i hela landet, med hänsyn till livet i havet. Ge rejäl ekonomisk återbäring till de kommuner där det byggs och finns vindkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand offshore wind power quickly across the country, with consideration for marine life. Provide fair economic returns to the municipalities where it is built and where wind power exists.”
CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires that more of the value created from natural resources — for example mines — remain locally, and that compensation for land taken shall be given to significantly larger amounts than today.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires that more of the value created from natural resources — for example mines — remain locally, and that compensation for land taken shall be given to significantly larger amounts than today. A significantly raised mineral fee that finances compensation for damage and sustainable communities is precisely what the plan demands. The plan also establishes that local anchoring and fair compensation are keys to succeeding with the transition.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser - exempelvis gruvor - ska stanna kvar lokalt, och att ersättning för ianspråktagen mark ska ges till avsevärt större belopp än i dag. En kraftigt höjd mineralavgift som finansierar kompensation för skador och hållbara samhällen är just det planen efterfrågar. Planen slår också fast att lokal förankring och rättvis ersättning är nycklar för att lyckas med omställningen.

  • natural resource values remain locallydecisive»Mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser — exempelvis vindkraft, vattenkraft och gruvor — ska stanna kvar lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value created from natural resources — for example wind power, hydropower and mines — shall remain locally.”
  • higher land compensation»Likaså ska ersättning för ianspråktagen mark ersättas till avsevärt större belopp än idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Likewise, compensation for land taken shall be compensated at significantly larger amounts than today.”
  • fair compensation locally»Att bygga lokalt stöd och ge rättvis ersättning till markägare och närboende är viktiga nycklar för att lyckas med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Building local support and giving fair compensation to landowners and neighbours are important keys to succeeding with the green transition.”
  • local anchoring»Den gröna omställningen kräver lokal förankring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The green transition requires local anchoring.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's overarching commitment on tax and fee matters is competitive levels that favour wealth-creating forces, not sharp increases in industry's burdens.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's overarching commitment on tax and fee matters is competitive levels that favour wealth-creating forces, not sharp increases in industry's burdens. A sharply raised mineral fee goes in the opposite direction and risks investments in the mining and minerals industry. That activities should bear their own environmental costs qualifies the picture but does not justify a general increase in compensation levels.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande på skatte- och avgiftsområdet är konkurrenskraftiga nivåer som gynnar de välståndsbildande krafterna, inte kraftiga höjningar av näringens pålagor. En kraftigt höjd mineralavgift går i motsatt riktning och riskerar investeringar i gruv- och mineralnäringen. Att verksamheter ska bära sina egna miljökostnader kvalificerar bilden men motiverar inte en generell höjning av ersättningsnivån.

  • competitive taxesdecisive»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage business, education and investments.”
  • taxes for wealth creation»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall favour the wealth-creating forces”
  • the polluter pays»Det är den som förorenar – ingen annan – som ska betala.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the one who pollutes – no one else – who shall pay.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's main tax policy rule is that taxation shall weigh more heavily on consumption of finite natural resources than on labour, and that the polluter shall pay the costs the activity causes.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's main tax policy rule is that taxation shall weigh more heavily on consumption of finite natural resources than on labour, and that the polluter shall pay the costs the activity causes. A raised mineral fee that finances compensation for damage and sustainable communities follows that line. At the same time, the plan requires competitive conditions, which sets a limit to how strong the increase can be.

Original (Swedish)

Planens skattepolitiska huvudregel är att beskattningen ska ligga tyngre på förbrukning av ändliga naturresurser än på arbete, och att förorenaren ska betala de kostnader verksamheten orsakar. En höjd mineralavgift som finansierar kompensation för skador och uthålliga samhällen följer den linjen. Samtidigt kräver planen konkurrenskraftiga villkor, vilket sätter en gräns för hur kraftig höjningen kan vara.

  • tax on resource consumptiondecisive»Beskattningen ska utformas så att arbete gynnas« (party programme ↗)“Taxation shall be designed so that labour is favoured”
  • the polluter pays»upprätthålla principen att förorenaren ska betala« (party programme ↗)“maintain the principle that the polluter shall pay”
  • green tax shift»beskattningen i högre grad ligger på natur- och miljö« (party programme ↗)“taxation to a greater degree lies on nature and environment”
  • competitive taxation»Kapitalskatterna måste därför vara konkurrenskraftiga.« (party programme ↗)“Capital taxes must therefore be competitive.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan commits to a tax increase freeze where total taxes and charges are not raised during the parliamentary term, and wants mineral resources to be extracted responsibly rather than subjected to higher burdens.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to a tax increase freeze where total taxes and charges are not raised during the parliamentary term, and wants mineral resources to be extracted responsibly rather than subjected to higher burdens. A significantly increased mineral royalty is exactly such a raised charge on the mining industry. The plan's tax principle of low and efficient taxes points the same way.

Original (Swedish)

Planen utfäster ett skattehöjarstopp där de samlade skatterna och pålagorna inte höjs under mandatperioden, och vill att mineraltillgångarna ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt snarare än belastas hårdare. En kraftigt höjd mineralavgift är just en sådan höjd pålaga på gruvnäringen. Planens skatteprincip om låga och effektiva skatter pekar samma väg.

  • tax increase freezedecisive»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax increase freeze during the coming parliamentary term that means total taxes are not raised”
  • responsible mineral extraction»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our rich mineral resources shall be able to be extracted responsibly and with long-term sustainability.”
  • low and efficient taxes»Statens finanser ska vara starka. Skatterna ska vara låga,« (party programme ↗)“The state's finances shall be strong. Taxes shall be low,”
  • high charges hamper business»Men höga skatter, krångliga tillståndsprocesser och byråkrati sätter käppar i hjulet för innovation och tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But high taxes, complicated permit processes and bureaucracy stand in the way of innovation and growth.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan's decisive commitment is that taxes and charges on companies shall not hamper Swedish competitiveness and that Swedish industry shall be prioritized.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's decisive commitment is that taxes and charges on companies shall not hamper Swedish competitiveness and that Swedish industry shall be prioritized. A significant increase in the mineral tax instead places new costs on precisely the mining industry the plan wants to facilitate for. The plan shares the counter-proposal's picture that raw material revenues rarely benefit the local community, but solves this through regionalized property tax rather than increased charges.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande åtagande är att skatter och avgifter på företag inte ska hämma svensk konkurrenskraft och att svensk industri ska prioriteras. En kraftig höjning av mineralavgiften lägger tvärtom nya kostnader på just den gruvnäring planen vill underlätta för. Planen delar däremot motförslagets bild av att råvaruintäkter sällan kommer lokalbygden till del, men löser det genom regionaliserad fastighetsskatt snarare än höjd avgift.

  • competitive taxesdecisive»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish companies in international competition”
  • low company taxes»Skattepolitiken måste därför syfta till konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, framförallt de skatter som läggs på företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax policy must therefore aim for competitive taxes that do not diverge too much from the surroundings, especially the taxes placed on companies.”
  • industry first»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
  • local share of raw material value»om hur intäkter från råvaruutvinning och industri sällan kommer lokalbygden till del« (2022 manifesto ↗)“about how revenues from raw material extraction and industry rarely benefit the local community”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament