2025-04-102024/25:CU13 · p.1CUCivil law & housing
Measures on the housing market
State measures to tackle the housing crisis and weak construction activity
What's at stake: The decision affects people looking for housing, particularly in rural areas and regions with weak housing markets, as well as a construction sector grappling with a sharp drop in new building. If the motions are rejected, the issue continues to be handled through existing support schemes and ongoing inquiries rather than new, more far-reaching state initiatives.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should call for further targeted state measures — such as a state-owned property company, a housing commission and new financing tools for housing construction — to address the housing crisis, or whether this should be left to already ongoing preparatory work and announced measures.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the 2020 credit-guarantee regulation, which already contains rules for calculating the guarantee to ease financing of new construction and renovation in weak markets, as well as to ongoing preparatory work within the Government Offices on proposals for subsidised credit-guarantee fees in transition and establishment municipalities, budget funds for housing-policy development in northern Sweden, state market-complementing top-up loans via Almi, and state top-up loans with partial municipal loss liability. The committee considers that this ongoing work should not be pre-empted, and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) calls for a state-owned property company that can build and acquire properties nationwide and act as a buffer during downturns, a joint housing commission bringing together the construction industry, labour-market parties and politicians, and forceful state measures against the housing crisis, since a decent home should be a social right for everyone.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/17 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/12 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:45 by Martina Johansson (C), 2024/25:475 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2024/25:537 by Yasmine Bladelius (S), 2024/25:620 by Rasmus Ling (MP) item 6, 2024/25:792 by Jamal El-Haj (-) item 1, 2024/25:882 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2024/25:947 by Amalia Rud Stenlöf and Johan Büser (both S) item 1, 2024/25:1386 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) items 5, 6, 9 and 10, 2024/25:1485 by Amalia Rud Stenlöf and Adrian Magnusson (both S) item 3, 2024/25:1587 by Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1700 by Niklas Sigvardsson et al. (S) item 1, 2024/25:1992 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) items 2 and 7, 2024/25:2015 by Adrian Magnusson et al. (S) item 1, 2024/25:2190 by Kristoffer Lindberg et al. (S), 2024/25:2514 by Mathias Tegnér et al. (S) item 5, 2024/25:2643 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) item 29, 2024/25:2950 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) items 1 and 30, 2024/25:3055 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) item 30, 2024/25:3057 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) item 3, 2024/25:3075 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) items 1, 2, 16 and 36, 2024/25:3087 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) item 1 and 2024/25:3090 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) items 1-3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:45 av Martina Johansson (C), 2024/25:475 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2024/25:537 av Yasmine Bladelius (S), 2024/25:620 av Rasmus Ling (MP) yrkande 6, 2024/25:792 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 1, 2024/25:882 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2024/25:947 av Amalia Rud Stenlöf och Johan Büser (båda S) yrkande 1, 2024/25:1386 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 5, 6, 9 och 10, 2024/25:1485 av Amalia Rud Stenlöf och Adrian Magnusson (båda S) yrkande 3, 2024/25:1587 av Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1700 av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2024/25:1992 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 2 och 7, 2024/25:2015 av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2024/25:2190 av Kristoffer Lindberg m.fl. (S), 2024/25:2514 av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S) yrkande 5, 2024/25:2643 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 29, 2024/25:2950 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 30, 2024/25:3055 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 30, 2024/25:3057 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3, 2024/25:3075 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1, 2, 16 och 36, 2024/25:3087 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkande 1 och 2024/25:3090 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkandena 1-3.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 160 proposals concerning housing policy in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals concern, among other things, measures on the housing market, financing of housing construction, housing construction associated with green industrial establishment, and circular economy in the construction and real estate sector. Parliament refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway on many of the issues that the proposals concern.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants a state-owned property company to acquire and build properties throughout the country and a housing commission to address the housing crisis. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto explicitly requires a state-owned building company, investment support for increased housing construction and active land policy – exactly the kind of shared responsibility-taking the counter-proposal demands with a state-owned property company and a housing commission.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires a state-owned building company, investment support for increased housing construction and active land policy – exactly the kind of shared responsibility-taking the counter-proposal demands with a state-owned property company and a housing commission. The party programme places primary responsibility for investments in building and renovation with the state and sees housing as a right. The requirement to build away the housing shortage and reduce overcrowding is the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik – exakt det slags gemensamma ansvarstagande motförslaget efterfrågar med ett statligt ägt fastighetsbolag och en bostadskommission. Partiprogrammet lägger huvudansvaret för investeringar i byggande och upprustning på staten och ser bostaden som en rättighet. Kravet på att bygga bort bostadsbristen och minska trångboddheten är planens egen linje.
- state-owned building companydecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state-owned building company, investment support for increased housing construction and an active land policy.”
- state primary responsibility for construction»Staten behöver ta huvudansvaret för att stärka« (party programme ↗)“The state needs to take primary responsibility for strengthening”
- massive housing construction»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is about a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and reduced rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”
- housing as a social right»Vi vill bygga ett samhälle där varje människas rätt att ha någonstans att bo« (party programme ↗)“We want to build a society where every person's right to have somewhere to live”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's guiding housing commitment is to fight overcrowding and continue building rental apartments ordinary people can afford, and the party programme makes housing a social right and housing supply a social responsibility.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's guiding housing commitment is to fight overcrowding and continue building rental apartments ordinary people can afford, and the party programme makes housing a social right and housing supply a social responsibility. A state property company as a shock absorber in economic downturns is an application of the line that society shall push forward positions. The specific company and housing commission are not mentioned in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande bostadsåtagande är att bekämpa trångboddheten och fortsätta bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med, och partiprogrammet gör bostaden till en social rättighet och bostadsförsörjningen till ett samhälleligt ansvar. Ett statligt fastighetsbolag som stötdämpare i konjunkturnedgången är en tillämpning av linjen att samhället ska flytta fram positionerna. Det specifika bolaget och bostadskommissionen nämns inte i dokumenten.
- build away housing shortagedecisive»Trångboddheten ska bekämpas. Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Overcrowding shall be fought. We shall continue to build rental apartments that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
- housing a social right»ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“sees housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- social responsibility for housing»Därför anser vi att det är ett samhälleligt ansvar att trygga« (party programme ↗)“We therefore believe it is a social responsibility to secure”
- society takes control»Samhället ska flytta fram positionerna för att ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall push forward positions to take back control of development.”
The plan sees housing as a right and wants to build more climate-smart rental apartments with a developed and expanded state investment support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees housing as a right and wants to build more climate-smart rental apartments with a developed and expanded state investment support. The party programme explicitly opens for the state or a municipality to own and operate business operations and wants to see extensive investments in energy-efficient buildings. A state property company and a housing commission to eliminate the housing shortage thereby aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser bostaden som en rättighet och vill bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med ett utvecklat och utökat statligt investeringsstöd. Partiprogrammet öppnar uttryckligen för att staten eller en kommun äger och driver affärsverksamhet och vill se omfattande investeringar i energieffektiv bebyggelse. Ett statligt fastighetsbolag och en bostadskommission för att bygga bort bostadsbristen ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- state investment support for rental apartmentsdecisive»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand the investment support that made it cheaper to build”
- housing as social right»Alla har rätt till en bostad.« (party programme ↗)“All have the right to housing.”
- state ownership can be justified»I vissa fall kan det dock finnas skäl för staten« (party programme ↗)“In some cases, however, there may be reasons for the state”
- investments in sustainable building»behövs omfattande investeringar i energieffektivisering av befintlig bebyggelse, i kollektivtrafik,« (party programme ↗)“extensive investments are needed in energy efficiency of existing buildings, in public transport,”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is built on a market economy free from centrally planned guidance and that public activity shall not compete with private business.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on a market economy free from centrally planned guidance and that public activity shall not compete with private business. A state real estate company that shall acquire and build housing throughout the country is precisely such a public competitor, and also binds tax money that the plan wants to manage wisely. The plan shares the goal of more housing but argues against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och att offentlig verksamhet inte ska konkurrera med det privata näringslivet. Ett statligt fastighetsbolag som ska förvärva och bygga bostäder i hela landet är just en sådan offentlig konkurrent, och binder dessutom skattemedel som planen vill hushålla med. Planen delar målet om fler bostäder men talar emot motförslagets krav.
- no public competitiondecisive»Offentlig verksamhet ska inte konkurrera med det rent« (party programme ↗)“Public activity shall not compete with purely”
- manage tax money wisely»Det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och förstärkas, och Sveriges långsiktiga ekonomiska stabilitet ska försvaras. Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fiscal framework shall be protected and strengthened, and Sweden's long-term economic stability shall be defended. Policy shall manage taxpayers' money wisely.”
- incentives rather than state ownership»starka drivkrafter att investera i bostäder, kan byggandet öka i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“strong incentives to invest in housing, can building increase throughout the country”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to abolish expensive building subsidies and holds firm on the view that the public should only operate business activities with a strong public interest.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to abolish expensive building subsidies and holds firm on the view that the public should only operate business activities with a strong public interest. A state property company that shall acquire and build throughout the country goes against both these commitments. The housing shortage should according to the plan be met with simplified rules, shorter processes and free rent-setting in new construction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill avskaffa dyra byggsubventioner och håller fast vid att det offentliga bara ska driva affärsverksamhet vid ett starkt samhällsintresse. Ett statligt fastighetsbolag som ska förvärva och bygga i hela landet går emot båda dessa åtaganden. Bostadsbristen ska enligt planen mötas med förenklade regler, kortare processer och fri hyressättning i nyproduktion.
- no building subsidiesdecisive»Dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished”
- restrictive public enterprise»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public should only operate business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
- simplified rules for more housing»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save towards the first down payment, abolish the heightened amortization requirement, shorten appeal processes and continue simplifying building rules.”
- free rent-setting in new construction»Fri hyressättning ska tillåtas i nybyggnation.« (party programme ↗)“Free rent-setting shall be allowed in new construction.”
The plan gives the state the role of overseeing legislation and ethics in the market, not of running its own property company acquiring and building throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives the state the role of overseeing legislation and ethics in the market, not of running its own property company acquiring and building throughout the country. Housing provision's social responsibility lies according to the plan with the municipalities, and the economy shall be built on a high degree of personal ownership. A state property company and direct subsidies are therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger staten rollen att övervaka lagstiftning och etik på marknaden, inte att driva ett eget fastighetsbolag som förvärvar och bygger i hela landet. Bostadsförsörjningens sociala ansvar ligger enligt planen på kommunerna, och ekonomin ska bygga på en hög grad av personligt ägande. Ett statligt fastighetsbolag och direkta subventioner avvisas därför.
- limited state market roledecisive»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to oversee that”
- municipal housing responsibility»Kommunerna ska ha det sociala ansvaret för att« (party programme ↗)“The municipalities shall have the social responsibility for”
- personal ownership»bygga på en hög grad av personligt ägande.« (party programme ↗)“be built on a high degree of personal ownership.”
- no direct company subsidies»regler ska motverkas. Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas. Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“rules shall be countered. Direct company subsidies are rejected. Forthcoming laws should be tested from a small business perspective.”
The counter-proposal requires a state-owned property company that acquires and builds housing throughout the country, as well as a housing commission and housing as a social right.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires a state-owned property company that acquires and builds housing throughout the country, as well as a housing commission and housing as a social right. The plan addresses the housing shortage with reforms that increase construction and simpler building regulations, not with state ownership: prosperity rests on a market economy and private ownership, and a large state leads to a weaker society. The plan therefore rejects the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver ett statligt ägt fastighetsbolag som förvärvar och bygger bostäder i hela landet, samt en bostadskommission och bostaden som social rättighet. Planen möter bostadsbristen med reformer som ökar byggandet och enklare byggregler, inte med statligt ägande: välståndet vilar på marknadsekonomi och enskilt ägande, och en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- construction through reformsdecisive»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase the construction of both rental and owner-occupied housing.”
- market economy and private ownership»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- limited state apparatus»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- simpler building regulations»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace complicated detailed development plans with simpler building plans”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan's remedy for the housing shortage is simplified regulations, faster decision processes, increased competition on the construction market and reduced migration pressure through return migration, not new state-owned companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's remedy for the housing shortage is simplified regulations, faster decision processes, increased competition on the construction market and reduced migration pressure through return migration, not new state-owned companies. It furthermore wants to invest in welfare instead of political prestige projects. A state-owned property company and a housing commission is therefore outside the plan's line, although the goal of increasing building is shared.
Original (Swedish)
Planens recept mot bostadsbristen är förenklade regelverk, snabbare beslutsprocesser, ökad konkurrens på byggmarknaden och minskad migrationspåfrestning genom återvandring, inte nya statliga bolag. Den vill dessutom satsa på välfärden i stället för politiska prestigeprojekt. Ett statligt ägt fastighetsbolag och en bostadskommission ligger därför vid sidan av planens linje, även om målet att öka byggandet delas.
- build through regulatory simplificationdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to facilitate house building by simplifying and speeding up decision processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern house building.”
- increased competition in building»Nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New construction can be facilitated by reviewing building norms and increasing competition on the construction market.”
- reduced migration pressure on housing»Minska migrationens påfrestning på bostadsmarknaden genom återvandring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce migration's pressure on the housing market through return migration”
- against political prestige projects»Satsa på välfärden istället för politiska prestigeprojekt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in welfare instead of political prestige projects”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU13)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1228 — Återbruk i byggsektorn av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1311 — Äldres bostadsbehov av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1315 — Stärkande av naturen i våra stadsmiljöer av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1370 — Skog, skogsbruk och ekonomi av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1383 — Planering och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1386 — Inriktning för bostadspolitiken av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1485 — Fler och billigare studentbostäder av Amalia Rud Stenlöf och Adrian Magnusson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1487 — En bättre bostadspolitik för våldsutsatta kvinnor och barn av Aida Birinxhiku (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1513 — Investeringsstöd för bostadsbyggande av Malin Larsson och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1562 — En reformerad Allbolag av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1575 — Säkra bostadsbyggandet av Åsa Karlsson och Björn Wiechel (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1586 — Ett Sverige utan utsatta områden av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1587 — Ökning av allmännyttans andel av det totala bostadsbeståndet av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1651 — Upprustning av miljonprogrammet av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1700 — En politik för fler bostäder av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1753 — Rivning och återbruk inom byggsektorn av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1807 — En modern bostadspolitik av Annika Strandhäll (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1989 — Hyresrätt och allmännytta av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1992 — Bostadspolitik, planering och byggande av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2015 — Ungas ställning på bostadsmarknaden av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament