2026-06-172025/26:JuU45 · p.1JuUJustice
Government's Bill
Lower burden of proof and removal of the time limit on detention under the Act on Special Controls
What's at stake: The decision affects people assessed as posing qualified security threats to Sweden who may be held in detention pending enforcement of a deportation order, without having been convicted of any crime. It settles the balance between protecting national security and the individual's legal certainty, including how long someone may be held in detention.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
Parliament decides on the government's proposal to lower the burden of proof for detaining adults under the Act on Special Control of Certain Foreigners and to remove the fixed time limit on such detention, against a motion not to make any changes to the law.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the government's assessment that the serious security situation warrants measures against the foreign nationals who pose the most qualified security threats. The committee considers the lowered burden of proof for detaining adults - from it being likely that a deportation decision will be issued to it being conceivable that one will be issued - to be well balanced, since objective grounds are still required and the standard is well established in aliens law. The committee also shares the assessment that the fixed time limit on detaining adults should be removed, since protecting Sweden's security warrants longer detention periods and there is no obstacle to a framework without fixed time limits.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V)
The reservation (V) moves to reject the bill, arguing that the law is already highly repressive and far-reaching, and that widening its scope by invoking the security situation is too vague and risks legally uncertain deportations on arbitrary grounds, in line with criticism from several consultation bodies about a lack of precision and predictability. It also opposes the lowered burden of proof for detention and considers it unreasonable to remove the time limit on detaining adults, since a case-by-case proportionality assessment is not enough protection when the people concerned have not been convicted of any crime; clear time limits are needed for when detention must end.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 105/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/18/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 24/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 70/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for an amendment to the Act (2022:700) on Special Control of Certain Foreigners. Thereby the Riksdag approves Government Bill 2025/26:267 and rejects the motions 2025/26:4188 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) and 2025/26:4192 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) request 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i lagen (2022:700) om särskild kontroll av vissa utlänningar. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:267 och avslår motionerna 2025/26:4188 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) och 2025/26:4192 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Protection against foreigners constituting qualified security threats is to be strengthened. The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal. The proposal means, among other things, that possibilities for detention are expanded, including longer detention periods and a lower burden of proof for detention of adults the conditions for deciding on deportation are clarified penalties for certain offenses under the law are tightened. The legislative changes enter into force on March 1, 2027.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Parliament to reject the government's proposals to expand the LSU scope and tighten detention provisions. (V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that legal security shall be maintained through legal aid, public insight and independent review and that the presumption of innocence is fundamental.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that legal security shall be maintained through legal aid, public insight and independent review and that the presumption of innocence is fundamental. Lowering the standard of proof and removing the fixed time limit for detention of persons not convicted of a crime goes against this. The counter-proposal's demands for clear time limits and resistance to a vague expanded scope of application are therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att rättssäkerheten ska upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig insyn och oberoende granskning och att oskuldspresumtionen är grundläggande. Att sänka beviskravet och ta bort den fasta tidsgränsen för förvar av personer som inte är dömda för brott går emot detta. Motförslagets krav på tydliga tidsgränser och motstånd mot ett vagt utvidgat tillämpningsområde stöds därför av planen.
- legal security and insightdecisive»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal security needs to be maintained through legal aid, public”
- presumption of innocence»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad är grundläggande i det.« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until proved otherwise is fundamental in the”
- legally secure justice system»Utvecklingen av ett rättsväsende byggt på rättssäkerhet är viktig« (party programme ↗)“The development of a justice system based on legal security is important”
- the right to asylum is inviolable»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we require that only permanent residence permits are issued when asylum is granted.”
The plan demands that violence-promoting extremism is combated and terrorist acts are prevented and wants to give the crime-fighting authorities more and sharper tools against the most serious threats.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that violence-promoting extremism is combated and terrorist acts are prevented and wants to give the crime-fighting authorities more and sharper tools against the most serious threats. The counter-proposal's demand to keep the higher standard of proof and a fixed time limit for detention goes against that line. The plan's protection of civil liberties and rights is a counterweight, but the plan gives the greatest weight to security against the most serious threats.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att våldsbejakande extremism bekämpas och terrordåd förhindras och vill ge de brottsbekämpande myndigheterna fler och skarpare verktyg mot de allvarligaste hoten. Motförslagets krav på att behålla det högre beviskravet och en fast tidsgräns för förvar går emot den linjen. Planens skydd för medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter väger emot, men planen låter säkerheten mot de mest kvalificerade hoten väga tyngst.
- prevent terrorist actsdecisive»Bekämpande av våldsbejakande extremism och förhindrande av terrordåd.« (party programme ↗)“Fighting violence-promoting extremism and prevention of terrorist acts.”
- more tools for authorities»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and search warrants.”
- strict immigration policy»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened immigration policy, and that line remains firm.”
- civil liberties and rights»Skydd för medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of civil liberties and rights.”
The plan requires that all new legislation be carefully examined on the basis of legal rights and fundamental freedoms and rights and that crime-fighting not occur at the expense of rule-of-law principles.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all new legislation be carefully examined on the basis of legal rights and fundamental freedoms and rights and that crime-fighting not occur at the expense of rule-of-law principles. Coercive measures are needed but shall be weighed against personal integrity and surrounded by strong oversight. A lowered standard of proof and removed time limits for detention of persons not convicted of crime are difficult to reconcile with this. The counter-proposal's objections are therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att all ny lagstiftning prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter och att brottsbekämpning inte sker på bekostnad av rättsstatens principer. Tvångsmedel behövs men ska vägas mot den personliga integriteten och omgärdas av stark tillsyn. Ett sänkt beviskrav och borttagna tidsgränser för förvar av personer som inte är dömda för brott är svårt att förena med detta. Motförslagets invändningar stöds därför.
- legal rights examination of new legislationdecisive»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“be carefully examined on the basis of legal rights and fundamental freedoms and rights.”
- rule of law sets limits»Brottsbekämpning ska inte ske på bekostnad av« (party programme ↗)“Crime-fighting shall not occur at the expense of”
- integrity protection with coercive measures»Ett sätt att värna integriteten är en stark, oberoende tillsyn över« (party programme ↗)“A way to protect integrity is strong, independent oversight over”
- humane and legally secure migration»Vi gröna står för en human och rättssäker migrationspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“We Greens stand for a humane and legally secure migration policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and says no to methods like reversed burden of proof and preventive wiretapping.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and says no to methods like reversed burden of proof and preventive wiretapping. A lowered standard of proof and detention without a time limit for persons not convicted of crimes is precisely such an intervention that according to the plan must be in proportion to its purpose and be controllable. Therefore, the counter-proposal's demand is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar uttryckligen rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten och säger nej till metoder som omvänd bevisbörda och preventiv avlyssning. Ett sänkt beviskrav och ett förvar utan bortre tidsgräns för personer som inte är dömda för brott är just ett sådant ingrepp som enligt planen måste stå i proportion till sitt syfte och vara kontrollerbart. Därför stöds motförslagets krav.
- no to legally unsafe methodsdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions on religious freedom.”
- proportionality in coercive measures»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between the legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
- control of the state's coercive power»Staten är den enda enheten i samhället som får utöva tvång och våld.« (party programme ↗)“The state is the only entity in society permitted to exercise coercion and violence.”
- right to a hearing»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All who live in Sweden shall be able to get their case heard.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants more of those awaiting deportation and rejection to be held in custody and explicitly accepts coercive measures against qualified threats even without concrete criminal suspicion.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants more of those awaiting deportation and rejection to be held in custody and explicitly accepts coercive measures against qualified threats even without concrete criminal suspicion. The counter-proposal's demands for retained time limits and higher evidentiary standards thus go against the plan's line against the most serious security threats. The plan's legal certainty requirements ease but do not bear the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill att fler som väntar på utvisning och avvisning hålls i förvar och accepterar uttryckligen tvångsmedel mot kvalificerade hot även utan konkret brottsmisstanke. Motförslagets krav på bibehållna tidsgränser och högre beviskrav går därmed emot planens linje mot de allvarligaste säkerhetshoten. Planens rättssäkerhetskrav mildrar men bär inte kravet.
- more in custodydecisive»Fler som väntar på både utvisning och avvisning ska hållas i förvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More awaiting both deportation and rejection shall be held in custody.”
- coercive measures without criminal suspicion»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Interception and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both upon suspicion of more crimes than today and after court decision against organized gang members even without concrete criminal suspicion.”
- enforced departure without grounds»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right of asylum shall be cherished where the person with asylum grounds stays and the one without grounds leaves the country.”
- strengthened legal certainty»Rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna behöver förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty and protection of civil liberties and rights need to be strengthened.”
The party programme requires that Sweden be able to meet attacks from international crime and terrorism, and the election manifesto points out the grip of extremist environments on public life as an acute problem.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that Sweden be able to meet attacks from international crime and terrorism, and the election manifesto points out the grip of extremist environments on public life as an acute problem. The counter-proposal wants to maintain the higher evidentiary standard and fixed time limits for detention of the most qualified security threats, which weakens protection. The plan's rights protection for personal freedom remains as a limit but does not carry the requirement in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver att Sverige ska kunna möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism, och valmanifestet pekar ut extremistiska miljöers grepp om samhällslivet som ett akut problem. Motförslaget vill behålla det högre beviskravet och fasta tidsgränser för förvar av de mest kvalificerade säkerhetshoten, vilket försvagar skyddet. Planens rättighetsskydd för personlig frihet finns kvar som en gräns men bär inte kravet i sak.
- protection against terrorismdecisive»Sverige måste kunna möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism, cyberkrigföring, biologiska vapen, kemiska vapen och kärnvapen.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must be able to meet attacks from international crime, terrorism, cyber warfare, biological weapons, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons.”
- countered violent extremism»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on public life.”
- strict migration policy»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
- protection for personal freedom»Sådana rättigheter är framför allt rätten till liv, personlig frihet och integritet« (party programme ↗)“Such rights are above all the right to life, personal freedom and integrity”
The plan wants to strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect the country and consistently pursues a harder line against persons who pose a threat, including expulsion of gang members regardless of conviction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect the country and consistently pursues a harder line against persons who pose a threat, including expulsion of gang members regardless of conviction. The counter-proposal wants to maintain evidentiary requirements and fixed time limits for detention and limit the scope of application. The plan provides no support for such restrictions; its principle is that the state's core security function is non-negotiable.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka Säkerhetspolisens förmåga att skydda landet och driver genomgående en hårdare linje mot personer som utgör hot, inklusive utvisning av gängmedlemmar oavsett dom. Motförslaget vill behålla beviskrav och fasta tidsgränser för förvar och begränsa tillämpningsområdet. Planen ger inget stöd för sådana begränsningar; dess princip är att statens hårda kärna inte är förhandlingsbar.
- strengthened security protectiondecisive»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and all citizens of the country”
- expulsion without requirement of conviction»Utvisa gängmedlemmar, som inte är svenska medborgare, oavsett om de dömts för brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expel gang members who are not Swedish citizens regardless of whether they have been convicted of crime”
- the state's security function»Statens hårda kärna får aldrig vara förhandlingsbar.« (party programme ↗)“The state's core security function must never be negotiable.”
- effective enforcement»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is of paramount importance that the person who has received a refusal for asylum leaves the country as quickly as possible.”
The election manifesto explicitly demands harsh restrictions and detention for security threats that are present in Sweden, and that such persons be monitored and deported.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly demands harsh restrictions and detention for security threats that are present in Sweden, and that such persons be monitored and deported. The counter-proposal instead wants to maintain time limits and the higher standard of proof for detention. This goes directly against the plan's commitment to lower thresholds for detention and deportation of security threats.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen hårda restriktioner och förvar för de säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige, och att sådana personer kontrolleras och utvisas. Motförslaget vill i stället behålla tidsgränser och det högre beviskravet för förvar. Det går rakt emot planens åtagande om sänkta trösklar för förvar och utvisning av säkerhetshot.
- detention for security threatsdecisive»Införa hårda restriktioner och förvar för säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Implement harsh restrictions and detention for security threats that are present in Sweden.”
- monitor and deport security threats»De säkerhetshot som verkar inom dessa miljöer ska kontrolleras, och utvisas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security threats operating in these environments shall be monitored and deported.”
- lowered thresholds for detention»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for taking into detention and deporting persons and carrying out deportations also need to be lowered.”
- security threats shall leave the country»Genom att använda neddraget bistånd, sanktioner eller andra påtryckningar så ska säkerhetshot lämna landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By using cut aid, sanctions or other pressure, security threats shall leave the country.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:JuU45)
- Committee report full text (HD01JuU45)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4188 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:267 Stärkt skydd mot utlänningar som utgör kvalificerade säkerhetshot av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4192 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:267 Stärkt skydd mot utlänningar som utgör kvalificerade säkerhetshot av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:267 — Stärkt skydd mot utlänningar som utgör kvalificerade säkerhetshot
Source: The Swedish Parliament