2025-02-132024/25:SoU13 · p.14SoUHealth & social services
Tobacco and Tobacco-Free Nicotine Products, etc.
Tobacco-free nicotine products: implementing the inquiry's proposals
What's at stake: Faster implementation could reduce access to and use of tobacco-free nicotine products, whereas waiting means the regulation is coordinated with the broader processing of the inquiry's proposals before it takes effect.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the inquiry's proposals on tobacco-free nicotine products - including a minimum package size, an upper limit on nicotine content and a ban on illegal reselling - should be implemented without delay, or whether the Riksdag should wait for the proposals to be fully processed within the Government Offices.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee opposes the motions and considers that the Riksdag should not take any initiative, since the inquiry's proposals on tobacco-free nicotine products are already being processed within the Government Offices.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 17 (S)
The reservation calls for the government to act now to implement the inquiry's proposals on tobacco-free nicotine products, including that packages of portion-packed snus should contain at least 20 portions, that nicotine content be capped at 12 milligrams per gram, and that illegal reselling of tobacco and nicotine products be banned.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 17 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/87/0/19 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 54/0/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:2325 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S) demand 3 and 2024/25:3022 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) demands 133-135.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:2325 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2024/25:3022 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkandena 133-135.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 150 proposals in motions on, among other things, alcohol, narcotics and tobacco from the general motion period 2024. Primarily with reference to ongoing work. The motions dealt with, among other things, alcohol legislation, narcotics policy and tobacco and tobacco-free nicotine products.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants gambling to be included in the ANDTS health strategy. (S) — Reservation 17
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme's commitment to restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco supports the implementation of stricter rules for tobacco-free nicotine products.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme's commitment to restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco supports the implementation of stricter rules for tobacco-free nicotine products. The programme also identifies tobacco companies as a destructive actor to isolate and views healthcare as part of broader public health work. The counter-proposal's requirements for minimum pack size, nicotine cap and sales ban are therefore supported by the plan, even though the exact threshold values are not addressed there.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammets åtagande om en restriktiv reglering av alkohol och tobak talar för att skärpta regler för tobaksfria nikotinprodukter genomförs. Programmet pekar också ut tobaksbolagen som en destruktiv aktör att isolera och ser vården som en del av ett bredare folkhälsoarbete. Motförslagets krav på minsta förpackningsstorlek, nikotintak och langningsförbud stöds därför av planen, även om de exakta gränsvärdena inte behandlas där.
- restrictive nicotine regulationdecisive»Vi vill se en restriktiv reglering av alkohol och tobak.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco.”
- isolate tobacco companies politically»spelar en destruktiv roll, som fossilkapitalet eller tobaksbolagen.« (party programme ↗)“play a destructive role, like fossil capital or tobacco companies.”
- public health before industry interest»Vården behöver ses som en del i det bredare arbetet med folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Healthcare needs to be seen as part of the broader work of public health.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme gives all children the right to a safe upbringing in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child and explicitly free from drugs, and holds democratic decisions above market interests.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme gives all children the right to a safe upbringing in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child and explicitly free from drugs, and holds democratic decisions above market interests. Requirements for minimum package size, caps on nicotine content, and prohibitions on sales are measures that protect young people from nicotine products. The plan does not mention nicotine products, so the assessment is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ger alla barn rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med barnkonventionen och uttryckligen fri från droger, och håller demokratins beslut över marknadens intressen. Krav på minsta förpackningsstorlek, tak för nikotinhalt och förbud mot langning är åtgärder som skyddar just unga från nikotinprodukter. Planen nämner inte nikotinprodukter, varför bedömningen är härledd och osäker.
- upbringing free from drugsdecisive»och till en trygg uppväxt fri från droger och våld.« (party programme ↗)“and to a safe upbringing free from drugs and violence.”
- the Convention on the Rights of the Child as foundation»Alla barn ska ha rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med FN:s barnkonvention.« (party programme ↗)“All children shall have the right to a safe upbringing in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”
- democracy before the market»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore takes precedence over the market.”
The counter-proposal wants to implement restrictions on nicotine content and package size and prohibit dealing in it now.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to implement restrictions on nicotine content and package size and prohibit dealing in it now. The plan explicitly wants to counteract dealing in addictive substances and apply the precautionary principle to harmful substances, with special regard to products children use. Tightening the regulations thus follows from the plan's health and children's perspective, even though these specific limit values are not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill genomföra begränsningar av nikotinhalt och förpackningsstorlek och förbjuda langning redan nu. Planen vill uttryckligen motverka langning av beroendemedel och tillämpa försiktighetsprincipen på ämnen som skadar, med särskild hänsyn till produkter barn använder. Att skärpa reglerna följer därmed av planens hälso- och barnperspektiv, även om just dessa gränsvärden inte nämns.
- counteract dealingdecisive»Polisens arbete ska därför fokusera på att motverka försäljning och langning av narkotika.« (party programme ↗)“Police work shall therefore focus on counteracting sales and dealing in drugs.”
- away with harmful substances»fasa ut giftiga ämnen omgående, speciellt från produkter för barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out toxic substances immediately, especially from products for children.”
- special protection for children»Barn är särskilt känsliga för många miljögifter, och de produkter och miljöer som barn använder och vistas i måste värnas särskilt.« (party programme ↗)“Children are particularly sensitive to many environmental toxins, and the products and environments that children use and spend time in must be specially protected.”
- precautionary principle»Försiktighetsprincipen måste gälla vid bedömning av kemikalier, eftersom det kan ta tid innan negativa effekter blir tydliga.« (party programme ↗)“The precautionary principle must apply to the assessment of chemicals, since it can take time before negative effects become clear.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address nicotine products, but its core principle is freedom from paternalism and that the individual himself shall be able to take responsibility for his health and lifestyle.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address nicotine products, but its core principle is freedom from paternalism and that the individual himself shall be able to take responsibility for his health and lifestyle. The counter-proposal's demands for minimum package size and ceiling for nicotine content are detailed regulation of adults' choices, which the plan argues against. The children's perspective, which the sales prohibition protects, pulls in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte nikotinprodukter, men dess bärande princip är frihet från förmynderi och att individen själv ska kunna ta ansvar för sin hälsa och livsstil. Motförslagets krav på minsta förpackningsstorlek och tak för nikotinhalt är detaljreglering av vuxnas val, vilket planen talar emot. Barnens perspektiv, som langningsförbudet värnar, drar i motsatt riktning.
- freedom from paternalismdecisive»vi försvarar alla människors frihet från förmynderi« (party programme ↗)“we defend all people's freedom from paternalism”
- personal responsibility for health»förutsättningar för att individer ska kunna ta ansvar för sitt välbefinnande, sin hälsa och livsstil.« (party programme ↗)“conditions for individuals to be able to take responsibility for their wellbeing, their health and lifestyle.”
- individual self-determination»Centerpartiet kommer alltid att kämpa för ett friare Sverige där människor kan bestämma mer över sina egna liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Centerpartiet will always fight for a freer Sweden where people can determine more of their own lives.”
- children's perspective carries weight»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of paramount importance is then the rights and perspective of children.”
The party programme establishes that tobacco-prevention work shall be conducted purposefully and that new recruitment shall be kept back, and that special consideration shall be given to children and young people's sensitivity.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that tobacco-prevention work shall be conducted purposefully and that new recruitment shall be kept back, and that special consideration shall be given to children and young people's sensitivity. A distribution ban, a minimum package size, and an upper nicotine limit are measures that precisely keep back new recruitment among young people, in line with the plan's position that debut should be postponed. The plan does not, however, take a stand on the specific threshold values.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det tobakspreventiva arbetet ska bedrivas målmedvetet och att nyrekryteringen ska hållas tillbaka, och att särskild hänsyn ska tas till barn och ungas känslighet. Ett langningsförbud, en minsta förpackningsstorlek och en övre nikotingräns är åtgärder som just håller tillbaka nyrekryteringen bland unga, i linje med planens hållning att debuten bör skjutas upp. Planen tar dock inte ställning till de specifika gränsvärdena.
- keep back new recruitmentdecisive»Det tobakspreventiva arbetet ska bedrivas målmedvetet och nyrekryteringen hållas tillbaka« (party programme ↗)“Tobacco-prevention work shall be conducted purposefully and new recruitment kept back”
- consideration for children and young people»särskild hänsyn tas till barn och ungas känslighet« (party programme ↗)“special consideration is given to children and young people's sensitivity”
- later debut among young people»ungdomar skjuter upp sin alkoholdebut« (party programme ↗)“young people postpone their alcohol debut”
- knowledge-based public health policy»Folkhälsoarbetet och de förebyggande hälsoinsatserna ska vila på kunskap« (party programme ↗)“Public health work and preventive health measures shall rest on knowledge”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires age limits for tobacco purchases and restrictive legislation that reduces harms, with preventive measures for children and young people as priority.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires age limits for tobacco purchases and restrictive legislation that reduces harms, with preventive measures for children and young people as priority. A ban on sale to minors and limited nicotine content and package size are precisely such measures, and they serve the plan's goal of low total consumption. The plan therefore argues for implementing the proposals now.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver åldersgränser för inköp av tobak och en restriktiv lagstiftning som minskar skadeverkningarna, med förebyggande insatser för barn och unga som prioritet. Ett förbud mot langning och begränsad nikotinhalt och förpackningsstorlek är just sådana åtgärder, och de tjänar planens mål om låg totalkonsumtion. Planen talar därför för att genomföra förslagen nu.
- age limits for tobaccodecisive»ungdomar prioriteras. Det ska finnas åldersgränser för« (party programme ↗)“[children and] young people are prioritized. There should be age limits for [tobacco purchases]”
- restrictive legislation»aktiv prispolitik, försäljningsmonopol och en restriktiv lagstiftning, skapas förutsättningar för att minska« (party programme ↗)“active pricing policy, sales monopoly and restrictive legislation, conditions are created to reduce [harms]”
- low total consumption»alkoholskador genom en låg totalkonsumtion.« (party programme ↗)“[alcohol harms through] low total consumption.”
- prevention for children and young people»I det förebyggande arbetet ska insatser för barn och« (party programme ↗)“In the preventive work, measures for children and [young people shall be implemented]”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to implement detailed regulation of products—minimum package size and nicotine content cap—which is wrong in relation to the plan's line of great personal freedom and against nudging in everyday choices, and contrary to the party programme's view that politics lacks the ability to micromanage.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to implement detailed regulation of products—minimum package size and nicotine content cap—which is wrong in relation to the plan's line of great personal freedom and against nudging in everyday choices, and contrary to the party programme's view that politics lacks the ability to micromanage. The part about banning dealing is closer to the plan, but the plan's answer to youth use is primarily strengthened parental responsibility. Overall, the documents speak against the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill genomföra detaljreglering av produkter – minsta förpackningsstorlek och tak för nikotinhalt – vilket ligger fel i förhållande till planens linje om stor personlig frihet och mot pekpinnar i vardagens val, och till partiprogrammets syn att politiken saknar förmåga att detaljstyra. Delen om förbud mot langning ligger närmare planen, men planens svar på ungas bruk är i första hand förstärkt föräldraansvar. Sammantaget talar dokumenten mot kravet.
- great personal freedomdecisive»I Sverige är friheten stor och ska så förbli.« (party programme ↗)“In Sweden freedom is great and should remain so.”
- no to detailed regulation of everyday choices»Där miljöbovar betalar för sig, men du kan unna dig en plastpåse när du veckohandlar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where environmental villains pay, but you can treat yourself to a plastic bag when you do your weekly shopping.”
- politics cannot micromanage»att detaljstyra och överpröva en så komplicerad process.« (party programme ↗)“to micromanage and review such a complicated process.”
- parental responsibility first»Betona och förstärka föräldraansvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Emphasize and strengthen parental responsibility”
The election manifesto assumes that the individual themselves should shape their life without public control, and the plan wants rules to be cost-effective and existing rules to be reviewed rather than expanded.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto assumes that the individual themselves should shape their life without public control, and the plan wants rules to be cost-effective and existing rules to be reviewed rather than expanded. Requirements for minimum package size and maximum nicotine content are such detailed control of legal products that the plan does not support. A dealing prohibition is instead close to the plan's action against crime that affects young people, but the counter-proposal as a whole does not carry this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet utgår från att individen själv ska forma sitt liv utan offentlig styrning, och planen vill att regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler ses över snarare än utökas. Krav på minsta förpackningsstorlek och högsta nikotinhalt är sådan detaljstyrning av lagliga produkter som planen inte ställer sig bakom. Ett langningsförbud ligger däremot nära planens krafttag mot brottslighet som drabbar unga, men det bär inte motförslaget som helhet.
- individual's free choicedecisive»Varje individ ska stå fri att göra sina egna val och forma sina egna liv, utan att det offentliga ska styra dessa val.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every individual shall be free to make their own choices and shape their own lives, without the public controlling these choices.”
- cost-effective rules»Nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler behöver ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New rules shall be cost-effective and existing rules need to be reviewed.”
- do not punish lifestyles»inte genom ett ensidigt fokus på bestraffningar av oönskade levnadssätt hos enskilda« (party programme ↗)“not through a one-sided focus on punishment of undesired lifestyles in individuals”
- protect youth against crime»Krafttag mot den brottslighet som drabbar unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Action against the crime that affects young people”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SoU13)
- Committee report full text (HC01SoU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1084 — Försäljning av lågalkoholhaltiga drycker i livsmedelsbutiker av Joanna Lewerentz och Carl Nordblom (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1195 — Sänkt ålder för inköp på Systembolaget av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1197 — Ett systembolag för vuxna av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1203 — Bevakning av grannländers narkotikapolitik av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1205 — Utvärdering av den svenska missbrukspolitiken av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1290 — Flexiblare pausservering av Camilla Rinaldo Miller och Larry Söder (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1356 — ANDTS och missbruks- och beroendevård av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1364 — Folkhälsan i fokus av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1450 — Turism och besöksnäring av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1463 — Export av snus av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1477 — En modern evidensbaserad beroendevård för skademinimering av Anna Starbrink (L)
- Motion 2024/25:1616 — Gränsöverskridande alkoholtillstånd av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1759 — Skärpta regler för försäljning av lustgas av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1780 — Slopat matkrav för alkoholservering av Carl Nordblom och Kristina Axén Olin (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1837 — Möjliggör champagnefrukost genom ändring i alkohollagen av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1838 — Stockholm som testkommun för mer tillgängliga systembolag av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1839 — Avskaffat förbud mot att servera förblandade drinkar av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:185 — En tobaksfri uppväxt av Catarina Deremar (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1855 — Geografiska alkoholtillstånd av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament