2025-04-022024/25:TU9 · p.3TUTransport & infrastructure
Procurement responsibility
Client responsibility in procuring freight transport services
What's at stake: The decision affects how well rule violations such as illegal cabotage transport are detected and countered when state-owned companies purchase transport services, which matters for fair conditions in the haulage industry.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether state-owned companies should be subject to stricter requirements to check suppliers when procuring transport services, or whether existing rules and industry initiatives are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to existing rules on client responsibility and stricter penalties for transport buyers who fail to follow them, as well as existing tools such as the web service for authorization checks, the industry's sustainability certification, and state-owned companies' codes of conduct, and therefore sees no reason to take a new initiative.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (SD)
The dissenters want state-owned companies to unconditionally have better checks of suppliers when procuring transport services, pointing out that traffic police have repeatedly stopped foreign tractor units hauling goods for such companies and reported them for illegal cabotage transport.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 240–62Nej 147–155
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/62/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:1393 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) claim 10.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:1393 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 30 proposals concerning professional transport and taxi in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal, for example, with oversight and control as well as implementation of reviews within various parts of the area. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to planned and taken measures as well as ongoing investigation and preparatory work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants police to develop road controls to stop illegal traffic and verify legal cabotage transport. (SD) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan makes explicit demands on public procurement and sees publicly owned operations' purchasing as a tool to drive change also in private companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes explicit demands on public procurement and sees publicly owned operations' purchasing as a tool to drive change also in private companies. Tightened supplier controls at state companies are precisely that tool used against wage dumping and exploitation in the transport sector. The plan also wants to close the space that exists to exploit people's vulnerable position.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ställer uttryckliga krav vid offentlig upphandling och ser gemensamt ägda verksamheters inköp som ett verktyg för att driva förändring även i privata företag. Skärpta leverantörskontroller hos statliga bolag är just det verktyget använt mot lönedumpning och utnyttjande i transportsektorn. Planen vill dessutom täppa till det utrymme som finns att exploatera människors utsatta ställning.
- requirements in public procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party requires collective agreements in public procurement.”
- state companies as example»Gemensamt ägda verksamheter kan användas för att driva förändring också i privata företag.« (party programme ↗)“Publicly owned operations can be used to drive change also in private companies.”
- stop wage dumping»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime, and exploitation are central threats today.”
- stop exploitation of vulnerable people»Vi vill täppa till det utrymme som finns idag att exploatera människors utsatta ställning.« (party programme ↗)“We want to close the space that exists today to exploit people's vulnerable position.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly states that public employers and procurement bodies shall be models for promoting healthy competition and that labor crime should not exist on the Swedish labor market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that public employers and procurement bodies shall be models for promoting healthy competition and that labor crime should not exist on the Swedish labor market. State-owned companies controlling their transport suppliers is precisely such exemplary procurement. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demands in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för sund konkurrens och att arbetslivskriminalitet inte ska finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad. Att statligt ägda bolag kontrollerar sina transportleverantörer är precis en sådan föredömlig upphandling. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav i sak.
- public procurement bodies as modelsdecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Labor crime should not exist on the Swedish labor market and public employers and procurement bodies should be models for promoting healthy competition.”
- no competition through rule-breaking»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should never pay to commit crime or gain competitive advantage by neglecting employees' right to a safe working environment.”
- prevent social dumping»förhindrar social dumping« (party programme ↗)“prevents social dumping”
- strong labor law»arbetsrättslig lagstiftning behövs som skydd för de anställda.« (party programme ↗)“labor law legislation is needed as protection for employees.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that state ownership be used actively and that procurements set requirements for social conditions and working environment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that state ownership be used actively and that procurements set requirements for social conditions and working environment. Controls of suppliers in state-owned companies' transport procurements are a direct application of this, and the party also wants to make it difficult and costly to conduct operations with broken rules. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att statens ägande används aktivt och att upphandlingar ställer krav på sociala villkor och arbetsmiljö. Kontroller av leverantörer i statliga bolags transportupphandlingar är en direkt tillämpning av det, och partiet vill dessutom göra det svårt och dyrt att bedriva verksamhet med brutna regler. Därför stöder planen motförslagets krav.
- active state ownershipdecisive»delägare ska ägarskapet vara aktivt och inflytandet« (party programme ↗)“part-owner the ownership shall be active and the influence”
- social requirements in procurement»krav ställas vad gäller miljö, sociala villkor samt« (party programme ↗)“requirements be set regarding environment, social conditions and”
- make unlawful operations more difficult»Det ska vara dyrt, jobbigt och svårt att vara kriminell.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be costly, troublesome and difficult to be criminal.”
- protect the Swedish model»Vi värnar den svenska modellen där arbetsmarknadens parter gemensamt förhandlar fram vad som« (party programme ↗)“We protect the Swedish model where labour market parties jointly negotiate what”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires action against crime directed at businesses and that the business sector gets competition-neutral regulations with predictable rules of the game.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires action against crime directed at businesses and that the business sector gets competition-neutral regulations with predictable rules of the game. The counter-proposal wants state companies to better control their transport suppliers, because unauthorized cabotage traffic distorts competition against legitimate hauliers. The requirement thus lies close to the plan's commitment to equal conditions, even though plan documents do not treat procurement of transport services directly.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver krafttag mot brott som riktas mot företag och att näringslivet får konkurrensneutrala regelverk med förutsägbara spelregler. Motförslaget vill att statliga bolag kontrollerar sina transportleverantörer bättre, eftersom otillåten cabotagetrafik snedvrider konkurrensen mot seriösa åkerier. Kravet ligger därmed nära planens åtagande om lika villkor, även om plandokumenten inte behandlar upphandling av transporttjänster direkt.
- action against crime against businessesdecisive»krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“action against crime against businesses”
- competition-neutral regulations»Viktigt är också att näringslivet får konkurrensneutrala regelverk« (party programme ↗)“It is also important that the business sector gets competition-neutral regulations”
- predictable rules of the game»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have given and predictable rules of the game”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that public procurement ensures equal treatment and stimulates competition and that laws and regulations safeguard competition on equal terms; unauthorized cabotage traffic distorts both.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public procurement ensures equal treatment and stimulates competition and that laws and regulations safeguard competition on equal terms; unauthorized cabotage traffic distorts both. The party programme furthermore sets special requirements on state-owned companies' business relations and wants to prevent undeclared work. Better supplier controls in state-owned companies' transport procurement thus follows the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att offentlig upphandling säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens och att lagar och regler slår vakt om konkurrens på lika villkor; otillåten cabotagetrafik snedvrider båda. Partiprogrammet ställer dessutom särskilda krav på statligt ägda bolags affärsrelationer och vill motverka svartjobb. Bättre leverantörskontroller vid statliga bolags transportupphandlingar följer därmed planens linje.
- equal treatment in procurementdecisive»som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar« (party programme ↗)“that gives taxpayers low costs, high quality, ensures equal treatment and stimulates”
- competition on equal terms»slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet och att enskilda människor har« (party programme ↗)“safeguard ownership, competition on equal terms, legal certainty and that individual people have”
- requirements on state companies»staten ska det finnas kriterier gällande affärsrelationer med odemokratiska regimer.« (party programme ↗)“the state there should be criteria regarding business relations with undemocratic regimes.”
- prevent undeclared work»systemet för arbetskraftsinvandring inte ska missbrukas för till exempel svartjobb.« (party programme ↗)“the system for labour migration should not be abused for, for example, undeclared work.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that all crimes shall be prosecuted without exception and that the state shall monitor that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that all crimes shall be prosecuted without exception and that the state shall monitor that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market. That state-owned companies better control their transport providers follows directly from this and from opposition to unfair competition. The plan does not mention cabotage, therefore the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla brott ska beivras utan undantag och att staten ska övervaka att lagstiftning och god etik upprätthålls på marknaden. Att statligt ägda bolag kontrollerar sina transportleverantörer bättre följer direkt av detta och av motståndet mot illojal konkurrens. Planen nämner inte cabotage, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- all crimes shall be prosecuteddecisive»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively prosecuted without exception”
- against unfair competition»effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens« (party programme ↗)“effective competition policy counters oligopolies, monopolies and unfair competition”
- the state monitors good ethics»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in economic policy is to monitor that [legislation and good ethics are upheld]”
- integrity as a social value»främja goda värden som medmänsklighet ansvarstagande, förvaltarskap, hederlighet, måttfullhet och jämställdhet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“promote good values such as compassion, responsibility, stewardship, integrity, moderation and equality”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address buyer responsibility or procurement controls in state-owned companies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address buyer responsibility or procurement controls in state-owned companies. The closest commitments point away from new unconditional control requirements: red tape and company administration should be significantly reduced, and illicit trafficking and smuggling should be met with stronger customs and control authorities rather than new demands in the procurement process. The plan therefore rejects the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte beställaransvar eller upphandlingskontroller i statligt ägda bolag. Närmast liggande åtaganden pekar bort från nya ovillkorliga kontrollkrav: regelkrånglet och företagens administration ska minska kraftigt, och otillåten trafik och smuggling ska mötas med starkare tull och kontrollmyndigheter snarare än med nya krav i upphandlingsledet. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- reduced red tapedecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
- control through customs»Stärka tullen med mer resurser och kraftfulla befogenheter för att stoppa stöldligor och vapensmugglare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen customs with more resources and powerful authority to stop theft rings and weapons smugglers”
- the state's role in the economy»skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“protect the value of money, promote competition”
The plan demands zero tolerance for crime so that even minor violations are investigated and prosecuted, and that Swedish industry's competitiveness is prioritized.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands zero tolerance for crime so that even minor violations are investigated and prosecuted, and that Swedish industry's competitiveness is prioritized. Repeated unauthorized cabotage transport in state-owned companies' transport chains is both a crime and unfair competition against Swedish transport companies, and the plan furthermore wants to stop cheap foreign labour being used in occupations that can be handled domestically. Tightened supplier controls in state-owned companies' transport procurement is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga överträdelser utreds och lagförs, och att svensk industris konkurrenskraft prioriteras. Upprepad otillåten cabotagetransport i statliga bolags transportkedjor är både lagbrott och osund konkurrens mot svenska åkerier, och planen vill dessutom stoppa att billig utländsk arbetskraft används i yrken som kan skötas inhemskt. Skärpta leverantörskontroller vid statliga bolags transportupphandlingar ligger därför i linje med planen.
- zero tolerance for crimedecisive»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Implement zero tolerance for crime so that even minor serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted”
- fair competition for Swedish companies»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
- domestic labour first»Stoppa arbetskraftsinvandring till yrken som kan tillgodoses av inhemsk arbetskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop labour immigration to occupations that can be met with domestic labour”
- protect serious entrepreneurs»Bekämpa brottslighet som drabbar företagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat crime that affects entrepreneurs”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:TU9)
- Committee report full text (HC01TU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1045 — Vägavgifter av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1393 — Post och it i hela landet av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1464 — En tillväxtorienterad politik för industrilandet Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1673 — Bättre kontroll av yrkestrafiken av Johanna Haraldsson (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1690 — Fler kontrollplatser för tunga fordon behövs i Södermanland av Caroline Helmersson Olsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1836 — Översyn av regler för busskort på fordonslinjen av Jennie Wernäng (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1882 — Bättre villkor för gränsöverskridande lastbilstransporter i Norden av Johan Hultberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2001 — Omkörningsförbud för tung trafik av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2947 — En infrastruktur som fungerar i hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3126 — Transportpolitik som bygger ett starkt och rättvist samhälle av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3236 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:28 Vägen till en pålitlig transportinfrastruktur - för att hela Sverige ska fungera av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:430 — Ordning och reda i taxibranschen av Serkan Köse (S)
- Motion 2024/25:431 — Förstärkt skydd mot oskäliga taxipriser av Serkan Köse (S)
- Motion 2024/25:432 — Kriminalitet inom taxibranschen av Serkan Köse (S)
- Motion 2024/25:480 — Trafikpoliser av Martina Johansson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:6 — Skärpta kontroller för taxiförare av Robert Stenkvist (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:636 — Legitimation för persontransporter med buss av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:925 — Inrättande av en yrkestrafikinspektion av Tomas Eneroth (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament