2023-03-292022/23:FiU34 · p.3FiUEconomy & finance

Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Conditions for small and medium-sized enterprises' participation in public procurement

What's at stake: How procurement rules are designed affects how easily smaller companies can compete for public contracts, while raising the threshold for unadvertised direct procurement could affect transparency and corruption risk.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether procurement rules, including the direct-procurement threshold, should be changed to lower the barriers facing smaller companies, or whether existing support and requirements to split up contracts are already sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee rejects the motions, pointing out that procurement support is already directed at easing participation for small and medium-sized enterprises, and that authorities must justify not splitting a contract into smaller parts.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (SD)

The reserving member (SD) wants to raise the threshold for direct procurement and increase transparency in such procurement, to lower the barriers excluding small companies and counter corruption risk, and to stop procurement being used for outdated labour-market policy such as collective-agreement requirements.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SYesYes 93/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPYesYes 15/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDown reservationNoNo 0/64/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:965 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) proposal 9 and 2022/23:1121 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) proposals 13 and 14.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:965 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9 och 2022/23:1121 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkandena 13 och 14.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 30 proposals concerning public procurement. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period in 2022. The motions address, among other things, how the regulatory framework is designed, social criteria in public procurement, and environmental requirements in procurement. The Riksdag rejected the motions by referring to existing legislation and ongoing investigation work in the area.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto's binding commitment is to require collective agreements in public procurement, and the programme wants procurement to be used strategically to guarantee and strengthen labour rights and working conditions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto's binding commitment is to require collective agreements in public procurement, and the programme wants procurement to be used strategically to guarantee and strengthen labour rights and working conditions. The counter-proposal instead wants to avoid requirements that bind procurement to labour market policy models and raise the threshold for direct procurement, which reduces precisely the governance the plan requires. The demand for increased openness is insufficient for the plan to support the proposal substantively.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestets bindande åtagande är att ställa krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar, och programmet vill att upphandlingen används strategiskt för att garantera och stärka arbetsrätt och arbetsvillkor. Motförslaget vill tvärtom undvika krav som binder upphandlingen till arbetsmarknadspolitiska modeller och höja gränsen för direktupphandling, vilket minskar just den styrning planen kräver. Kravet på ökad öppenhet räcker inte för att planen ska stödja förslaget i sak.

  • collective agreements in procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party requires collective agreements in public procurement.”
  • strategic procurement for labour rights»måste användas strategiskt av upphandlare på olika nivåer« (party programme ↗)“must be used strategically by procurers at various levels”
  • no tax money without collective agreements»till arbetsgivare som saknar kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“to employers without collective agreements.”
  • procurement as a political tool»Offentlig upphandling är ett viktigt verktyg för omställningen.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement is an important tool for the transition.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's line is that public employers and procurement bodies shall be models for promoting healthy competition and that labor crime should be removed from the labor market.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's line is that public employers and procurement bodies shall be models for promoting healthy competition and that labor crime should be removed from the labor market. An increased direct procurement threshold and fewer requirements in procurement remove precisely this tool, and the programme wants instead to expand the possibility of directing procurement, including to non-profit actors. The demand for increased transparency regarding direct purchases, however, is in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje är att offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens och att arbetslivskriminalitet ska bort från arbetsmarknaden. En höjd direktupphandlingsgräns och färre krav i upphandlingen drar bort just det instrumentet, och programmet vill tvärtom vidga möjligheten att styra upphandlingar, bland annat till non profit-aktörer. Kravet på ökad öppenhet kring direktköp ligger däremot i linje med planen.

  • procurement as modeldecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Labor crime should not exist on the Swedish labor market and public employers and procurement bodies should be models for promoting healthy competition.”
  • politically directed procurement»möjligt att rikta upphandlingar enbart till non profit-aktörer.« (party programme ↗)“possible to direct procurement only to non-profit actors.”
  • strong action against labor crime»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strong action against labor crime.”
  • effective competition»konkurrenslagstiftning ska motverka monopol och koncentration.« (party programme ↗)“competition legislation shall counteract monopoly and concentration.”

flags: citat_migrerat

MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's key commitment on procurement is that requirements shall be set for environment, social conditions and working environment and that environmental and quality aspects shall weigh significantly more than today.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's key commitment on procurement is that requirements shall be set for environment, social conditions and working environment and that environmental and quality aspects shall weigh significantly more than today. Raising the threshold for direct procurement while simultaneously avoiding requirements linked to labour market policy models removes exactly that requirement-setting. The plan's wish that small enterprises can participate and that corruption be counteracted pulls partly in the opposite direction, which is why the certainty is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande om upphandling är att krav ska ställas på miljö, sociala villkor och arbetsmiljö och att miljö- och kvalitetsaspekter ska väga betydligt tyngre än i dag. Att höja gränsen för direktupphandling och samtidigt undvika krav kopplade till arbetsmarknadspolitiska modeller drar bort just den kravställningen. Planens önskan att småföretag kan delta och att korruption motverkas drar delvis i motsatt riktning, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • social requirements in procurementdecisive»krav ställas vad gäller miljö, sociala villkor samt« (party programme ↗)“requirements be set regarding environment, social conditions and”
  • environmental and quality requirements heavier»redovisas öppet. Vid offentliga upphandlingar ska« (party programme ↗)“are disclosed openly. In public procurement,”
  • small enterprises should be able to participate»byggföretag goda förutsättningar att delta. Marknadens spelregler måste dessutom vara tydliga och« (party programme ↗)“construction companies good opportunities to participate. Market rules must also be clear and”
  • counteract corruption»kunna granska makten. Alla former av korruption« (party programme ↗)“be able to scrutinise power. All forms of corruption”
CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to clear up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs and notes that small and newly started businesses have the hardest time bearing extensive bureaucracy, which is precisely the threshold a higher direct procurement limit removes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to clear up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs and notes that small and newly started businesses have the hardest time bearing extensive bureaucracy, which is precisely the threshold a higher direct procurement limit removes. The plan requires increased transparency and tightened rules against corruption, which corresponds to the counter-proposal's demands for openness around direct purchases. Procurement rules are not treated explicitly in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer och konstaterar att små och nystartade företag har svårast att bära omfattande byråkrati, vilket är precis den tröskel en högre direktupphandlingsgräns tar bort. Planen kräver samtidigt ökad transparens och skärpta regler mot korruption, vilket motförslagets krav på öppenhet kring direktköp svarar mot. Upphandlingsreglerna behandlas inte uttryckligen i planen.

  • less regulatory burdendecisive»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
  • small businesses' thresholds»Små och nystartade företag har svårare att få tillgång till kapital och att bära omfattande byråkrati« (party programme ↗)“Small and newly started businesses find it harder to get access to capital and to bear extensive bureaucracy”
  • openness against corruption»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
  • easy to run a business»Det ska vara lätt att starta och driva företag; det ska löna sig att ta klivet och satsa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should be easy to start and run a business; it should pay to take the step and invest.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme requires that regulatory burden for small businesses be reduced, that government decisions be analysed from a small business perspective and that public procurement provide low costs, equal treatment and stimulated competition.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that regulatory burden for small businesses be reduced, that government decisions be analysed from a small business perspective and that public procurement provide low costs, equal treatment and stimulated competition. A raised direct procurement threshold with increased transparency lowers precisely the barriers that exclude smaller businesses, and transparency is the plan's answer to corruption risks. The plan mentions no specific amount, so the support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att regelbördan för små företag minskar, att offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv och att offentlig upphandling ger låga kostnader, likabehandling och stimulerad konkurrens. En höjd direktupphandlingsgräns med ökad öppenhet sänker just de trösklar som stänger ut mindre företag, och offentlighet är planens svar på korruptionsrisker. Planen nämner ingen beloppsgräns, varför stödet är härlett.

  • reduced regulatory burdendecisive»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small businesses shall be reduced”
  • small business perspective in decisions»offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“government decisions are analysed from a small business perspective.”
  • efficient procurement with competition»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader,« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall be conducted in ways that give taxpayers low costs,”
  • transparency against corruption»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access has fundamental importance for anchoring and deepening democratic governance”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan puts small and medium-sized businesses at the center of business policy and requires that new regulations be examined from an SME perspective and that bureaucracy be counteracted.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan puts small and medium-sized businesses at the center of business policy and requires that new regulations be examined from an SME perspective and that bureaucracy be counteracted. Transparency and access to information are meanwhile central values. A raised threshold for direct procurement with increased openness lowers barriers for smaller businesses and thus follows the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter de små och medelstora företagen i centrum för näringspolitiken och kräver att tillkommande regler prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv och att byråkrati motverkas. Offentlighet och insyn är samtidigt centrala värden. En höjd gräns för direktupphandling med ökad öppenhet sänker trösklarna för mindre företag och följer därmed planen.

  • SMEs at the centerdecisive»De små och medelstora företagen, som ofta är familjeföretag« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized businesses, which are often family businesses”
  • SME perspective on rules»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“New laws should be examined from an SME perspective.”
  • procurement in competition»Övrig offentlig verksamhet, som inte är myndighetsutövning, bör« (party programme ↗)“Other public activity, which is not authority exercise, should”
  • openness and transparency»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access, i.e., access to”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that cumbersome bureaucracy holds back businesses and promises to remove a third of red tape and administrative costs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that cumbersome bureaucracy holds back businesses and promises to remove a third of red tape and administrative costs. A higher threshold for direct procurement with strengthened transparency lowers precisely the threshold that excludes small businesses, and the state should, according to the plan, promote competition. The plan therefore supports the demand, even though procurement rules are not particularly mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att krånglig byråkrati sätter käppar i hjulet för företagen och lovar att ta bort en tredjedel av regelkrånglet och administrationskostnaderna. En högre gräns för direktupphandling med stärkt öppenhet sänker just den tröskel som stänger ute mindre företag, och staten ska enligt planen främja konkurrensen. Planen stöder därför kravet, även om upphandlingsregler inte nämns särskilt.

  • reduced red tapedecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
  • bureaucracy hinders growth»Men höga skatter, krångliga tillståndsprocesser och byråkrati sätter käppar i hjulet för innovation och tillväxt. Det kan vi aldrig acceptera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But high taxes, cumbersome permit processes and bureaucracy hold back innovation and growth. We can never accept that.”
  • good conditions for business»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda för att fler ska våga lämna trygga och välbetalda jobb för att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding must be good so that more people dare to leave secure and well-paid jobs to start businesses.”
  • the state should promote competition»skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“protect the value of money, promote competition”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan explicitly points out that unnecessarily strict conditions in procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market and demands regulatory simplification that relieves small businesses' administrative burden.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly points out that unnecessarily strict conditions in procurement make it difficult for smaller actors to enter the market and demands regulatory simplification that relieves small businesses' administrative burden. A raised direct procurement threshold with increased openness lowers precisely such barriers, and the plan's requirement to prevent fraud and corruption supports the transparency requirement. The plan furthermore wants to abolish ineffective labour market programs.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar uttryckligen ut att onödigt stränga villkor i upphandlingar gör det svårt för mindre aktörer att komma in på marknaden och kräver regelförenkling som avlastar småföretagens administrativa börda. En höjd direktupphandlingsgräns med ökad öppenhet sänker just sådana trösklar, och planens krav på att motverka fusk och korruption stöder transparenskravet. Planen vill dessutom avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknadsprogram.

  • lower thresholds in procurementdecisive»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and in procurement often make it difficult for smaller actors to break into the market.”
  • regulatory simplification for small businesses»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”
  • counter corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and such systems that tend to invite fraud and corruption shall be countered.”
  • no to old labour market models»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish ineffective labour market and integration programs that are created to hide unemployment”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament