2023-04-192022/23:AU7 · p.9AULabour market
Review of the Discrimination Act
Review of the Discrimination Act - new grounds for discrimination, etc.
What's at stake: Which grounds count as discrimination determines what legal protection people have against being treated worse because of, for example, skin colour, language, religion or political opinion, and whether people affected by discrimination on several grounds at once have that vulnerability recognised.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Discrimination Act should be reviewed and expanded with additional grounds for discrimination and a clearer intersectional perspective, or whether the current seven grounds and regulatory framework are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for language and political opinion to be added as new grounds for discrimination. The reason is that the European Convention on Human Rights, which applies as Swedish law, already contains a ban on discrimination covering both language and political opinion, so the committee is not currently prepared to propose that the government be asked to look into the issue. The committee does share the concern that people discriminated against on several grounds at once are particularly vulnerable, but notes that this has already been addressed, including through an assignment the Equality Ombudsman recently completed and reported to the government. The proposal to differentiate the requirements for active measures based on company size is also rejected, since the committee considers the current rules to be well balanced.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 18 (MP)
The reservation (MP) calls for the government to set up an inquiry into how the Discrimination Act can be adapted to apply more fully to discrimination based on skin colour, language or religion, and that takes into account how grounds for discrimination can intersect. Part of the inquiry should also be to consider adding language as its own, explicit ground for discrimination. The reasoning is that discrimination is still part of many people's everyday lives and that the legislation needs to be developed where it falls short.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 18 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 247–16Ja 233–30
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 64/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motions 2022/23:181 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) claim 15, 2022/23:1122 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) claim 12, 2022/23:1214 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) claim 2, 2022/23:1474 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) claim 10, 2022/23:1635 by Martina Johansson (C) claim 4, 2022/23:1688 by Eric Westroth (SD), 2022/23:2098 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) claim 9 and 2022/23:2223 by Eric Palmqvist (SD) claims 1 and 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:181 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 15, 2022/23:1122 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 12, 2022/23:1214 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 2, 2022/23:1474 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkande 10, 2022/23:1635 av Martina Johansson (C) yrkande 4, 2022/23:1688 av Eric Westroth (SD), 2022/23:2098 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkande 9 och 2022/23:2223 av Eric Palmqvist (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2.
Riksdag decision: Parliament directed a formal request (tillkännagivande) to the government to introduce a zero vision for intimate partner violence. The request came in connection with Parliament's consideration of approximately 80 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022 on gender equality and anti-discrimination measures. Parliament rejected proposals in other motions, citing among other things ongoing work. The motions concern for example the appointment of inquiries in the field of gender equality policy, work against men's violence against women and against honor-based violence and oppression, measures for gender equality in working life and various initiatives to counteract discrimination in society.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to ensure that an intersectional perspective and gender equality perspective permeate legislation. (MP) — Reservation 18
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The programme establishes that discrimination legislation is far too weak and needs to be strengthened, and that discrimination based on appearance or origin remains part of everyday life despite the prohibition.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The programme establishes that discrimination legislation is far too weak and needs to be strengthened, and that discrimination based on appearance or origin remains part of everyday life despite the prohibition. The plan also analyzes how racism and patriarchy interact, which is precisely the intersectional perspective the counter-proposal seeks. The demand for expanded possibility to use one's own language supports testing language as grounds for discrimination.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet slår fast att diskrimineringslagstiftningen är alltför svag och behöver stärkas, och att diskriminering på grund av utseende eller ursprung förblir en del av vardagslivet trots förbudet. Planen analyserar också hur rasism och patriarkat samverkar, vilket är just det intersektionella perspektiv motförslaget efterfrågar. Kravet på utvidgad möjlighet att använda det egna språket stöder att språk prövas som diskrimineringsgrund.
- strengthened discrimination legislationdecisive»Därför måste alla delar av samhället göras tillgängligt och den alltför svaga diskrimineringslagstiftningen stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore all parts of society must be made accessible and the far too weak discrimination legislation strengthened.”
- the prohibition is insufficient in practice»Diskriminering av människor på grund av utseende eller ursprung är förbjuden antingen den är medveten eller inte, men utgör trots det en del av det vardagliga samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination of people based on appearance or origin is prohibited whether it is conscious or not, but nevertheless constitutes part of everyday social life.”
- interconnected power structures»Rasifierade kvinnor möts av rasistiska och patriarkala föreställningar från majoritetssamhället och skiktas längst ned i den ekonomisk-sociala hierarkin.« (party programme ↗)“Racialized women are met by racist and patriarchal views from the majority society and are placed at the bottom of the socio-economic hierarchy.”
- linguistic rights»Möjligheten att använda det egna språket i kontakt med myndigheter bör utökas och gälla alla talare av ett nationellt minoritetsspråk oavsett var i landet de bor.« (party programme ↗)“The opportunity to use one's own language in contact with authorities should be expanded and apply to all speakers of a national minority language regardless of where in the country they live.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that equality policy be directed at all forms of superordination and subordination seen in a holistic perspective where oppressive structures reinforce each other - that is precisely the intersectional perspective the counter-proposal wants to investigate.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that equality policy be directed at all forms of superordination and subordination seen in a holistic perspective where oppressive structures reinforce each other - that is precisely the intersectional perspective the counter-proposal wants to investigate. The party defines itself as anti-racist and strives for equality regardless of skin color, ethnicity, or religion, and the election manifesto promises to counteract discrimination in the labor market. Language as its own ground for discrimination is not addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att jämlikhetspolitiken riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning sedda i ett helhetsperspektiv där förtryckande strukturer förstärker varandra - det är just det intersektionella perspektiv motförslaget vill utreda. Partiet definierar sig som antirasistiskt och strävar efter jämlikhet oavsett hudfärg, etnisk tillhörighet eller religion, och valmanifestet lovar att motarbeta diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden. Språk som egen diskrimineringsgrund behandlas inte.
- intersectional equality policydecisive»Jämlikhetspolitik måste riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning, och dessa måste« (party programme ↗)“Equality policy must be directed at all forms of superordination and subordination, and these must”
- equality regardless of skin color and religion»efter jämlikhet oavsett hudfärg, etnisk och kulturell tillhörighet eller religion.« (party programme ↗)“for equality regardless of skin color, ethnic and cultural belonging, or religion.”
- anti-racist party»Socialdemokraterna är ett antirasistiskt parti, som strävar« (party programme ↗)“The Social Democrats are an anti-racist party that strives”
- counteracted discrimination»Diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden ska motarbetas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination in the labor market shall be counteracted.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires that legislation against discrimination be strengthened, and the party programme points particularly to discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, name or accent and that power structures interact.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that legislation against discrimination be strengthened, and the party programme points particularly to discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, name or accent and that power structures interact. It bears both the investigation into skin colour, language and religion and the intersectional perspective. The plan also responds to the committee's reasoning by requiring strong legislation, that is, that existing protection is not deemed sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att lagstiftningen mot diskriminering stärks, och partiprogrammet pekar särskilt ut diskriminering på grund av etnicitet, namn eller brytning och att maktordningar samverkar. Det bär både utredningen om hudfärg, språk och religion och det intersektionella perspektivet. Planen svarar också på utskottets skäl genom att kräva en stark lagstiftning, det vill säga att befintligt skydd inte anses tillräckligt.
- stronger discrimination lawdecisive»stärka lagstiftningen mot diskriminering och se över rätten till rättshjälp i diskrimineringsfall.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legislation against discrimination and review the right to legal aid in discrimination cases.”
- discrimination on the basis of language»Människor diskrimineras på grund av sin etnicitet, sitt namn eller sin brytning. Det vill vi motverka. Strukturell diskriminering och rasism ska upphöra.« (party programme ↗)“People are discriminated against on the basis of their ethnicity, their name or their accent. We want to counteract this. Structural discrimination and racism shall cease.”
- intersectional perspective»Vi ser att maktordningar som etnicitet, sexuell läggning, klass, och ålder samverkar med den samhällsgenomgående könsmaktsordningen.« (party programme ↗)“We see that power structures such as ethnicity, sexual orientation, class and age interact with the society-wide gender power structure.”
- strong legislation is needed»Det krävs också en stark lagstiftning och en stark diskrimineringsombudsman.« (party programme ↗)“Strong legislation and a strong discrimination ombudsman are also required.”
The election manifesto establishes that more must be done against discrimination and wants both to strengthen government agencies' work and add new grounds to hate crime legislation, and strengthen the discrimination ban and the status of minority languages.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that more must be done against discrimination and wants both to strengthen government agencies' work and add new grounds to hate crime legislation, and strengthen the discrimination ban and the status of minority languages. The party programme commits the party to combat all structures that discriminate, regardless of ground. An investigation into how the law can be developed for skin colour, language, and religion, and for intersecting grounds, is thus in the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att mer måste göras mot diskriminering och vill både stärka myndigheternas arbete och lägga till nya grunder i hatbrottslagstiftningen, samt stärka diskrimineringsförbudet och minoritetsspråkens ställning. Partiprogrammet förbinder partiet att bekämpa alla strukturer som diskriminerar, oavsett grund. En utredning om hur lagen kan utvecklas för hudfärg, språk och religion och för samverkande grunder ligger därmed i planens riktning.
- expanded discrimination protectiondecisive»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen government agencies' work against discrimination and increase compensation for those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
- strengthened discrimination ban»Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning, och grundlagsskydda rätten till abort och reproduktiv hälsa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen, among other things, property rights, the discrimination ban, minority protection, and the status of minority languages, and constitute-protect the right to abortion and reproductive health.”
- combat discriminatory structures»Alla människor har lika rätt och värde, alla har samma grundläggande rättigheter och skyldigheter. Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“All people have equal rights and value, all have the same fundamental rights and responsibilities. We combat all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate against people.”
- combat structural racism»Diskriminering, strukturell rasism och intolerans, i alla dess former, ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination, structural racism, and intolerance, in all its forms, must be combated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly requires that the Discrimination Act be modernized and that the state vigorously combat all forms of racism, discrimination and intolerance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires that the Discrimination Act be modernized and that the state vigorously combat all forms of racism, discrimination and intolerance. An investigation of how the law can be better applied to discrimination based on skin colour, language or religion is precisely such modernization work. The plan also establishes that the person who is discriminated against shall receive help to obtain redress and that discrimination must have a price.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att diskrimineringslagen moderniseras och att staten med kraft bekämpar all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans. En utredning av hur lagen kan tillämpas bättre vid diskriminering på grund av hudfärg, språk eller religion är precis ett sådant moderniseringsarbete. Planen slår också fast att den som diskrimineras ska få hjälp till upprättelse och att det ska kosta att diskriminera.
- modernized Discrimination Actdecisive»Vi vill modernisera diskrimineringslagen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernize the Discrimination Act”
- vigorous fight against discrimination»Därför ska staten med kraft bekämpa all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the state shall vigorously combat all forms of racism, discrimination and intolerance.”
- redress for discrimination»Den som drabbas av diskriminering ska kunna få hjälp att få upprättelse och det ska kosta att diskriminera.« (party programme ↗)“The person affected by discrimination shall be able to receive help to obtain redress and discrimination must have a price.”
- open and tolerant country»Sverige ska vara ett öppet och tolerant land. Fördomar och diskriminering ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be an open and tolerant country. Prejudice and discrimination shall be combated.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that there be legislation against discrimination and that the constitution ensures that no one is discriminated against on grounds of, among other things, ethnic origin or religion.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that there be legislation against discrimination and that the constitution ensures that no one is discriminated against on grounds of, among other things, ethnic origin or religion. The status of minority languages shall be strengthened and the public shall support minorities' own efforts, which speaks for examining language as a grounds for discrimination. An investigation into how legislation can develop where it falls short thus lies in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det finns en lagstiftning mot diskriminering och att grundlagen säkerställer att ingen diskrimineras på grund av bland annat etniskt ursprung eller religion. Minoritetsspråkens ställning ska stärkas och det offentliga ska stödja minoriteters egna insatser, vilket talar för att pröva språk som diskrimineringsgrund. En utredning av hur lagstiftningen kan utvecklas där den brister ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- legislation against discriminationdecisive»Därför behöver det finnas en lagstiftning mot diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, there must be legislation against discrimination.”
- broad anti-discrimination»på grund av kön, ålder, funktionsvariationer, etniskt ursprung, religion, sexuell identitet, politisk eller« (party programme ↗)“on grounds of sex, age, functional variations, ethnic origin, religion, sexual identity, political or”
- support to minorities»Det är en central offentlig uppgift att stödja minoriteters egna insatser« (party programme ↗)“It is a central public task to support minorities' own efforts”
- effective anti-discrimination protection»Väl fungerande lagar mot all diskriminering i arbetslivet ska finnas.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning laws against all discrimination in working life shall exist.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The programme states that everyone has the right to be assessed based on their person and their actions and that freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never to collectives.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The programme states that everyone has the right to be assessed based on their person and their actions and that freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never to collectives. It also explicitly opposes the collectivism of identity politics. An investigation that expands the grounds for discrimination and adds an intersectional group perspective to legislation goes against that line.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet slår fast att alla har rätt att bedömas utifrån sin person och sina handlingar och att fri- och rättigheter tillhör individer och aldrig kollektiv. Det tar också uttrycklig strid mot identitetspolitikens kollektivism. En utredning som bygger ut diskrimineringsgrunderna och lägger ett intersektionellt gruppperspektiv till lagstiftningen går emot den linjen.
- assessment based on actionsdecisive»men också för allas rätt att bli bedömda utifrån sin person« (party programme ↗)“but also for everyone's right to be assessed based on their person”
- rights are individual»ett jämställt samhälle. Fri- och rättigheter tillhör individer och aldrig« (party programme ↗)“an equal society. Freedoms and rights belong to individuals and never”
- opposition to identity politics»Denna identitetspolitikens kollektivism strider mot« (party programme ↗)“This collectivism of identity politics goes against”
The plan's guiding principle is that equality is achieved through equality before the law and measures against what limits the individual, not through politics based on group membership.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's guiding principle is that equality is achieved through equality before the law and measures against what limits the individual, not through politics based on group membership. The counter-proposal's demand for expanded grounds for discrimination and an intersectional perspective is instead based on group categories, which the plan rejects together with identity-theoretical starting points. The plan opposes discrimination, but without expanding the regulatory framework in this way.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande princip är att jämlikhet nås genom likhet inför lagen och åtgärder mot det som begränsar den enskilde, inte genom politik som utgår från grupptillhörighet. Motförslagets krav på utvidgade diskrimineringsgrunder och ett intersektionellt perspektiv bygger tvärtom på gruppkategorier, vilket planen avvisar tillsammans med identitetsteoretiska utgångspunkter. Planen vänder sig mot diskriminering, men utan att bygga ut regelverket på detta sätt.
- individual before group membershipdecisive»Riktig jämställdhet nås inte genom att vidta politiska åtgärder för att på gruppnivå skapa samma utfall mellan män och kvinnor, utan genom att ta krafttag mot samhällsfenomen som begränsar den enskilde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“True equality is not achieved by taking political measures to create the same outcome at the group level between men and women, but by taking forceful action against social phenomena that limit the individual.”
- equality before the law»Sverigedemokraterna slår vakt om alla människors jämlikhet i den svenska kulturen och lagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats stand guard over all people's equality in Swedish culture and law.”
- rejects identity theory»Vi tror på vetenskap och inser att förvirrande genusteorier får förödande konsekvenser när de omsätts i praktiken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We believe in science and realize that confusing gender theories have devastating consequences when put into practice.”
- against differential treatment»Motverka diskriminering och särbehandling p.g.a. kön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Counter discrimination and differential treatment because of sex”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:AU7)
- Committee report full text (HA01AU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1076 — Nolltolerans mot hederskulturens brott av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1120 — Nordiskt samarbete av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1122 — Regelförenkling för bättre styrning och service och ökat företagande av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1188 — Internationell solidaritet - en stark röst för hbtq-plus-personers rättigheter av Anna Wallentheim m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1214 — Åtgärder för de nationella minoriteterna och minoritetsspråken av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1217 — Åtgärder med syfte att stoppa våldskulturen av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:122 — Mäns ekonomiska våld mot kvinnor av Aida Birinxhiku (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1232 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1461 — Införande av jämlikhetsdata av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1474 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1635 — Företag inom besöksnäringen av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1674 — Förbättrad situation för personer i behov av ledar- eller assistanshund av Rickard Nordin och Ulrika Heie (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1680 — Situationen för kvinnor som tvingas leva gömda av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1688 — Politisk åsikt som diskrimineringsgrund i svensk diskrimineringslagstiftning av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1693 — Ett sexuellt kulturskifte i förorterna av Robert Hannah och Juno Blom (båda L)
- Motion 2022/23:181 — Stärk demokratin och de mänskliga rättigheterna av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1882 — En starkare liberal demokrati av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2034 — En nollvision för mäns våld mot kvinnor av Olle Thorell m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2053 — Utgiftsområde 13 Jämställdhet och nyanlända invandrares etablering av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament