2026-06-032025/26:FöU17 · p.2FöUDefence
Dependence on American military equipment
Dependence on U.S.-made war materiel
What's at stake: A large share of the military support reaching Ukraine, both bilaterally and through other countries' purchases, ultimately originates in the United States. The question is whether Sweden should pursue an explicit policy of reducing this dependence in favour of European-made materiel, or whether Ukraine's urgent needs alone should determine where the materiel comes from.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The reservation called for Sweden to actively work to reduce Europe's and Ukraine's dependence on U.S.-made war materiel, while the committee held that support to Ukraine should instead be guided by what is most effective in meeting Ukraine's needs.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that Europe needs to take greater responsibility for its own security and that a strong European defence industry matters, but considers that support to Ukraine must primarily be shaped by what is most effective in meeting Ukraine's needs, and that the existing export-control regime already handles questions of war-materiel exports, and therefore rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (V)
The reserving party (V) backs all military support to Ukraine but wants Sweden to actively work to reduce Europe's — and, over time, Ukraine's — dependence on U.S.-made war materiel, pointing to the risk that U.S. unpredictability in foreign and security policy could affect the entire chain of military support, and wants Sweden to press EU countries to offer alternatives where possible.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 106/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | Yes | Yes 23/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 19/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 70/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motion 2025/26:4006 by Hanna Gunnarsson et al. (V) claim 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4006 av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: Parliament has considered a communication in which the government reports on the military support that Sweden has provided to Ukraine since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022. The military support consists of equipment, financial support, training initiatives and support for investments in defence industry and defence research. Since 2022, Sweden has decided on 21 military support packages to Ukraine totalling approximately 103 billion kronor. In the communication, the government also describes how the military support is coordinated in an international context, how the support is monitored and how lessons learned from the war in Ukraine are addressed, as well as the government's assessment of the effects of Swedish support. The Defence Committee notes that military support to Ukraine is a central part of Swedish security and defence policy and that Sweden shall support Ukraine as long as it is needed. The Committee's view is, as previously, that a long-term financial framework makes the support more predictable and effective. Parliament laid the communication on the table, that is closed the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to prioritize weapon exports to Ukraine over exports to other countries and ban exports to dictatorships and states that violate human rights. (V) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's guiding principle is that Sweden should be able to act independently from great powers such as the USA and not be drawn into geopolitical conflicts, which supports the demand for reduced dependence on American military equipment.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's guiding principle is that Sweden should be able to act independently from great powers such as the USA and not be drawn into geopolitical conflicts, which supports the demand for reduced dependence on American military equipment. At the same time, the plan opposes militarization and deepened military cooperation within the EU, which makes support conditional and uncertain. The committee's reasoning about appropriateness for Ukraine's needs and existing export controls is not addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande princip är att Sverige ska kunna agera självständigt från stormakter som USA och inte dras in i geopolitiska konflikter, vilket stöder kravet på minskat beroende av amerikansk krigsmateriel. Samtidigt vänder sig planen mot militarisering och mot fördjupat militärt samarbete inom EU, vilket gör stödet villkorat och osäkert. Utskottets skäl om ändamålsenlighet för Ukrainas behov och befintlig exportkontroll behandlas inte i planen.
- independent of great powersdecisive»Det är viktigt att Sverige kan agera självständigt från stormakter som« (party programme ↗)“It is important that Sweden can act independently from great powers such as”
- peace before militarization»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that Sweden should be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization.”
- against deepened military EU cooperation»Därför är Vänsterpartiet motståndare till Sveriges allt djupare militära samarbete med NATO och EU, och vi är det enda riksdagspartiet som konsekvent värnar och vill återupprätta svensk alliansfrihet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the Left Party is opposed to Sweden's increasingly deep military cooperation with NATO and the EU, and we are the only Riksdag party that consistently protects and wants to restore Swedish non-alignment.”
- against arms race»Vi vänder oss emot militarisering och kapprustning.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose militarization and arms race.”
The plan wants to see a strong and unified Europe that takes greater responsibility for its own security and stronger European defense cooperation, and emphasizes that a strong domestic defense industry increases security.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see a strong and unified Europe that takes greater responsibility for its own security and stronger European defense cooperation, and emphasizes that a strong domestic defense industry increases security. Actively working to reduce dependence on American military equipment and offering European alternatives follows from this, while the plan requires that Sweden in all cases stands up for Ukraine.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se ett starkt och enat Europa som tar större ansvar för sin egen säkerhet och ett starkare europeiskt försvarssamarbete, och framhåller att en stark inhemsk försvarsindustri ökar säkerheten. Att aktivt verka för minskat beroende av amerikansk krigsmateriel och erbjuda europeiska alternativ följer av detta, samtidigt som planen kräver att Sverige i alla lägen står upp för Ukraina.
- European security responsibilitydecisive»Ett starkt och enat Europa som tar ett större ansvar för sin egen säkerhet.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and unified Europe that takes greater responsibility for its own security.”
- European defense cooperation»Starkare europeiskt försvarssamarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Stronger European defense cooperation.”
- own defense industry»En stark inhemsk försvarsindustri ökar Sveriges« (party programme ↗)“A strong domestic defense industry increases Sweden's”
- continued support for Ukraine»Sverige måste i alla lägen stå upp för Ukraina och mot det ryska invasionskriget.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must in all cases stand up for Ukraine and against the Russian war of invasion.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that Sweden's NATO membership is reconciled with an independent foreign and security policy and that Sweden does not adapt its policy to other powers' demands.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that Sweden's NATO membership is reconciled with an independent foreign and security policy and that Sweden does not adapt its policy to other powers' demands. A reduced European dependence on a single supplier's military equipment follows from that line, as does the plan's requirement for increased self-sufficiency of critical goods. At the same time the plan stands behind military materiel support to a country attacked in violation of international law.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att Sveriges Nato-medlemskap förenas med en självständig utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik och att Sverige inte anpassar sin politik efter andra makters krav. Ett minskat europeiskt beroende av en enskild leverantörs krigsmateriel följer av den linjen, liksom av planens krav på ökad självförsörjning av kritiska varor. Samtidigt står planen bakom militärt materielstöd till ett land som angripits i strid med folkrätten.
- independent security policydecisive»Sveriges medlemskap i Nato måste förenas med en självständig utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's NATO membership must be reconciled with an independent foreign and security policy.”
- no adaptation to other powers»inte att Sverige ska anpassa sin utrikespolitik efter auktoritära staters krav för kunna att bli medlem i Nato och Sverige ska inte börja sälja vapen till Turkiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“not that Sweden should adapt its foreign policy to authoritarian states' demands in order to be able to become a NATO member and Sweden should not start selling weapons to Turkey.”
- increased self-sufficiency»För att klara framtida krissituationer måste vi öka vår självförsörjningsgrad av viktiga och nödvändiga produkter - till exempel livsmedel, läkemedel, kritiska råmaterial och viktig teknologi.« (party programme ↗)“To manage future crisis situations we must increase our self-sufficiency rate of important and necessary products - for example foodstuffs, medicines, critical raw materials and important technology.”
- military support to attacked country»Att med militärt materiel solidariskt bistå ett land som blivit angripet är en del i att försvara folkrätten.« (party programme ↗)“To with military materiel supportively assist a country that has been attacked is a part in defending international law.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto's overarching commitment on defence is to equip the military defence quickly, forcefully, and long-term, and the plan explicitly rejects protectionism in favour of free trade and international cooperation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's overarching commitment on defence is to equip the military defence quickly, forcefully, and long-term, and the plan explicitly rejects protectionism in favour of free trade and international cooperation. To steer equipment supply away from a supplier on origin grounds is difficult to reconcile with both. The plan instead supports European and Nordic defence cooperation, which points in the opposite direction and makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestets bärande åtagande på försvarsområdet är att rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt, och planen avvisar uttryckligen protektionism till förmån för frihandel och internationellt samarbete. Att styra materielförsörjningen bort från en leverantör på ursprungsgrunder är svårförenligt med båda. Planen stöder däremot europeiskt och nordiskt försvarssamarbete, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och gör slutsatsen osäker.
- quick and forceful rearmamentdecisive»Sverige ska försvaras. Vi vill rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be defended. We want to equip the military defence quickly, forcefully, and long-term.”
- free trade before protectionism»Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders.”
- European defence cooperation»bygger säkerhet i Norden, Europa och världen genom ett eget försvar samt genom nära militärt samarbete med« (party programme ↗)“builds security in the Nordic region, Europe, and the world through its own defence and through close military cooperation with”
The plan makes transatlantic cooperation with the USA the cornerstone of Swedish security policy and wants to defend Sweden together with the USA and our European neighbours.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes transatlantic cooperation with the USA the cornerstone of Swedish security policy and wants to defend Sweden together with the USA and our European neighbours. Actively working to reduce dependence on American military equipment goes against this line and against the plan's rejection of protectionism. The plan binds itself instead to Ukraine receiving increased support, without reservation regarding the supplier country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör det transatlantiska samarbetet med USA till hörnstenen i svensk säkerhetspolitik och vill försvara Sverige tillsammans med USA och våra europeiska grannar. Att aktivt verka för minskat beroende av amerikansk krigsmateriel går emot den linjen och emot planens avvisande av protektionism. Planen binder sig i stället vid att Ukraina ska ges ökat stöd, utan förbehåll om leverantörsland.
- transatlantic cooperationdecisive»Nato är den absolut viktigaste samarbetsorganisationen för säkerhet och ömsesidigt försvar i Europa, och är hörnstenen i det transatlantiska samarbetet mellan Europa och USA.« (party programme ↗)“NATO is the absolutely most important cooperation organization for security and mutual defence in Europe, and is the cornerstone of transatlantic cooperation between Europe and the USA.”
- defence together with the USA»Därför ska Sverige gå med i Nato och tillsammans med USA, Kanada och våra europeiska grannar försvara både Sverige och vår del av världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore Sweden shall join NATO and together with the USA, Canada and our European neighbours defend both Sweden and our part of the world.”
- no to protectionism»Nationalism, protektionism och stängda gränser ska höra till historien.« (party programme ↗)“Nationalism, protectionism and closed borders shall belong to history.”
- increased support for Ukraine»En ny regering ska vara garanten för att Ukraina ges ökat ekonomiskt, politiskt och militärt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A new government shall be the guarantor that Ukraine receives increased economic, political and military support.”
The plan requires defense material competence within the country and a domestic defense industry, and establishes that Sweden develops European defense cooperation as support for Swedish defense policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires defense material competence within the country and a domestic defense industry, and establishes that Sweden develops European defense cooperation as support for Swedish defense policy. That bears the counter-proposal's requirement for reduced dependence on a single supplier and European alternatives. That NATO is given a crucial role for transatlantic security qualifies but does not contradict the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en försvarsmateriell kompetens inom landet och en inhemsk försvarsindustri, och slår fast att Sverige utvecklar det europeiska försvarssamarbetet som stöd för svensk försvarspolitik. Det bär motförslagets krav på minskat beroende av en enskild leverantör och på europeiska alternativ. Att Nato tillmäts en avgörande roll för den transatlantiska säkerheten kvalificerar men motsäger inte kravet.
- domestic defense industrydecisive»Som en följd av försvarets uppgifter krävs en försvarsmateriell kompetens inom landet, vilket förutsätter en inhemsk försvarsindustri.« (party programme ↗)“As a consequence of the defense's tasks, defense material competence within the country is required, which presupposes a domestic defense industry.”
- European defense cooperation»Genom ett europeiskt försvarssamarbete stöds också den svenska försvarspolitiken som syftar till fred och frihet.« (party programme ↗)“Through European defense cooperation, Swedish defense policy aimed at peace and freedom is also supported.”
- European defense capability»Vidare ingår Sverige i EU och är med och utvecklar det europeiska säkerhets- och försvarspolitiska samarbetet.« (party programme ↗)“Furthermore, Sweden is part of the EU and participates in developing European security and defense policy cooperation.”
- transatlantic security»Givet nämnda kriterier spelar NATO härvid en avgörande roll för den transatlantiska säkerheten« (party programme ↗)“Given the mentioned criteria, NATO plays a crucial role for transatlantic security”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds security together with others in NATO and wants to intensify military cooperation in Europe and across the Atlantic, not reduce dependence on a central ally.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds security together with others in NATO and wants to intensify military cooperation in Europe and across the Atlantic, not reduce dependence on a central ally. Instead, it wants Swedish defence industry to benefit all NATO and for support to Ukraine to continue with weapons deliveries. According to the plan's logic, actively working for reduced dependence on American military equipment risks splitting Western unity.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger säkerheten tillsammans med andra i Nato och vill intensifiera det militära samarbetet i Europa och över Atlanten, inte minska beroendet av en central allierad. Den vill i stället att svensk försvarsindustri kommer hela Nato till del och att stödet till Ukraina fortsätter med vapenleveranser. Att aktivt verka för minskat beroende av amerikansk krigsmateriel riskerar enligt planens logik att splittra västlig sammanhållning.
- military cooperation across the Atlanticdecisive»Sverige behöver intensifiera det militära samarbetet i Europa« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs to intensify military cooperation in Europe”
- Swedish defence industry in NATO»Verka för att Sveriges teknologiska kunnande och kompetenta försvarsindustri kommer hela Nato till del« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for Sweden's technological knowledge and competent defence industry to benefit all NATO”
- continued military support to Ukraine»Sverige ska helhjärtat stå upp för Ukraina, även med fortsatta vapenleveranser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should wholeheartedly stand up for Ukraine, including with continued weapons deliveries.”
- unity in the West»Stora auktoritära länder ska inte kunna spela ut enskilda små västerländska demokratier mot varandra.« (party programme ↗)“Large authoritarian countries should not be able to set individual small Western democracies against each other.”
The plan requires that the Swedish defense industry be strengthened through investments in domestic defense technology and that the strategic interest of domestic suppliers be valued more clearly in weapons procurement, and that self-sufficiency in critical goods increases.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the Swedish defense industry be strengthened through investments in domestic defense technology and that the strategic interest of domestic suppliers be valued more clearly in weapons procurement, and that self-sufficiency in critical goods increases. The counter-proposal's requirement for reduced dependence on American military equipment and European alternatives is based on the same vulnerability analysis as the plan's warning about dependence on international supply chains. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's substance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den svenska försvarsindustrin stärks genom satsningar på inhemsk försvarsteknologi och att det strategiska intresset av egna leverantörer värderas tydligare vid materielinköp, samt att självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska varor ökar. Motförslagets krav på minskat beroende av amerikansk krigsmateriel och europeiska alternativ vilar på samma sårbarhetsanalys som planens varning för beroende av internationella leveranskedjor. Planen stöder därför motförslagets sak.
- domestic defense industrydecisive»Svensk försvarsindustri ska också stärkas genom att fortsatt satsa på inhemsk försvarsteknologi och att tydligare värdera det strategiska intresset av svenska leverantörer vid inköp av försvarsmateriel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish defense industry should also be strengthened by continuing to invest in domestic defense technology and more clearly valuing the strategic interest of Swedish suppliers in weapons procurement.”
- increased self-sufficiency»Öka den svenska självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska produkter och varor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish self-sufficiency in critical products and goods”
- vulnerable supply chains»Den globala ekonomin, där leveranskedjor är beroende av internationell handel och import, gör oss utsatta även för kriser som kan inträffa långt från Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The global economy, where supply chains depend on international trade and imports, makes us vulnerable even to crises that can occur far from Sweden.”
- new security policy situation»Rusta Sverige inför en ny säkerhetspolitisk situation i vårt närområde« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Arm Sweden for a new security policy situation in our region”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FöU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01FöU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4006 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:162 Sveriges militära stöd till Ukraina av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2025/26:162 — Sveriges militära stöd till Ukraina
Source: The Swedish Parliament