2025-11-052025/26:NU7 · p.3NUBusiness & energy
The Municipal Veto
The municipal veto over uranium mining
What's at stake: The decision affects how much say municipalities have before small-scale uranium-related mining activity can proceed nearby: supporters of narrowing the review say it affects only a handful of operations and removes overlapping regulation, while opponents fear it is a first step toward a broader erosion of local self-government's influence over mining.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's proposal to narrow the mandatory suitability review under the Environmental Code - thereby removing the municipal veto for facilities handling small quantities of uranium - should go ahead, or whether that veto should be preserved for such facilities, as the motions and reservation demand.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee sides with the government, noting that the change only affects a small number of operations handling small quantities of uranium, that the government can already waive the mandatory suitability review for minor operations under existing law, that municipalities retain a strong position through planning and building legislation, and that the narrower municipal veto is proportionate with no major consequences for local self-government.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (S, V, C, MP)
The reservation (S, V, C, MP) warns that narrowing the review weakens the municipal veto and could be a first step toward a more substantial erosion of local self-government and the veto against uranium mines. It disputes the claim that municipalities will retain a strong position, argues that planning and building legislation is not sufficient, points to concern in local communities about uranium mining's environmental impact, and wants the municipal veto kept for facilities handling small quantities of uranium.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S, V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/15 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:208 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) claim 3 and 2025/26:216 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) claim 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:208 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:216 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal on uranium extraction in Sweden. The decision means that it will be permitted to extract uranium in Sweden and that uranium is classified as a concession mineral, that is, a mineral that is particularly important to society. The decision also means that operations handling small amounts of uranium shall not be subject to permit requirements and shall not be subject to the municipal veto. The municipal veto means that municipalities through a local political decision can determine whether the activity should be allowed or not in the municipality. The law changes enter into force on 1 January 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to maintain the ban on uranium extraction. (S, V, C, MP) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that municipal self-government is a meaningful part of Swedish democracy and rejects nuclear power expansion as a way out of fossil dependency, which removes the reason to facilitate uranium handling.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that municipal self-government is a meaningful part of Swedish democracy and rejects nuclear power expansion as a way out of fossil dependency, which removes the reason to facilitate uranium handling. Mining should according to the plan be operated with a long-term comprehensive perspective that looks to local natural values. Preserving the municipal veto also for activities with small amounts of uranium therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av den svenska demokratin och avvisar kärnkraftsutbyggnad som väg ut ur fossilberoendet, vilket tar bort skälet att underlätta uranhantering. Gruvbrytning ska enligt planen drivas med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som ser till lokala naturvärden. Att bevara det kommunala vetot även för verksamheter med små mängder uran ligger därför i linje med planen.
- municipal self-governmentdecisive»Det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av den svenska demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-government is a meaningful part of Swedish democracy.”
- no to nuclear power expansion»Vänsterpartiet avvisar planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som en väg ut ur fossilberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party rejects plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil dependency.”
- consideration of local natural values»Den behöver drivas med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som ser till såväl de globala behoven som lokala naturvärden och den ekonomiska utvecklingen i närområdet.« (party programme ↗)“It needs to be conducted with a long-term comprehensive perspective that looks to both global needs and local natural values and the economic development of the neighboring area”
The plan establishes municipal and regional self-governance and that self-governance creates proximity in decision-making.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes municipal and regional self-governance and that self-governance creates proximity in decision-making. Preserving municipal veto even for activities handling small quantities of uranium follows from this, as does the requirement for sustainable extraction of natural resources and a toxin-free environment with clean water. The counter-proposal is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast kommunalt och regionalt självstyre och att självstyret skapar närhet i beslutsfattandet. Att bevara det kommunala vetot även för verksamheter som hanterar små mängder uran följer av detta, liksom av kravet på hållbar utvinning av naturresurser och en giftfri miljö med rent vatten. Motförslaget stöds.
- municipal self-governancedecisive»Kommunalt och regionalt självstyre med beskattningsrätt.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal and regional self-governance with the right to tax.”
- sustainable natural resource extraction»Hållbar utvinning och användning av naturresurser, med ekonomisk kompensation till« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable extraction and use of natural resources, with economic compensation to”
- toxin-free environment»Giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“A toxin-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden.”
- protection of natural values»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and aquatic environments.”
The plan establishes that uranium mining shall be prohibited and that there shall always be local rootedness in the extraction of natural resources.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that uranium mining shall be prohibited and that there shall always be local rootedness in the extraction of natural resources. It also lifts decentralization as a counterweight to concentration of power and that decisions shall be made close to the people affected. The counter-proposal's requirement that the municipal veto be retained even for activities with small amounts of uranium follows directly from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att uranbrytning ska vara förbjuden och att det alltid ska finnas lokal förankring vid utvinning av naturresurser. Den lyfter dessutom decentralisering som motvikt till maktkoncentration och att beslut ska tas nära de människor som berörs. Motförslagets krav på att det kommunala vetot bevaras även för verksamheter med små mängder uran följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- prohibited uranium miningdecisive»inga nya tillstånd för torvbrytning ska ges och uranbrytning ska vara« (party programme ↗)“no new permits for peat mining shall be granted and uranium mining shall be”
- local rootedness in extraction»Det ska alltid finnas lokal förankring vid utvinning av naturresurser.« (party programme ↗)“There shall always be local rootedness in the extraction of natural resources.”
- decentralized decision-making»Decentralisering skapar motvikt till maktkoncentration.« (party programme ↗)“Decentralization creates a counterweight to concentration of power.”
- decisions close to those affected»Därför bör beslut tas så nära människor som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, decisions should be made as close to people as possible”
The plan demands that power be decentralised and that decisions be made close to those affected, and establishes that the green transformation requires local anchoring.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that power be decentralised and that decisions be made close to those affected, and establishes that the green transformation requires local anchoring. To restrict the municipal veto for activities handling uranium moves, conversely, decision-making power away from the local community that bears the environmental consequences. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand that the veto be retained.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att makten decentraliseras och att beslut fattas nära dem som berörs, och slår fast att den gröna omställningen kräver lokal förankring. Att inskränka det kommunala vetot för verksamheter som hanterar uran flyttar tvärtom beslutsmakt bort från lokalsamhället som bär miljökonsekvenserna. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på att vetot bevaras.
- decentralised decision-makingdecisive»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralise more. People should be able to decide more themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
- local anchoring of the transformation»Den gröna omställningen kräver lokal förankring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The green transformation requires local anchoring.”
- decisions stay at local level»Beslut som endast berör en mer lokal nivå, eller bara individen själv, bör inte flyttas upp till en högre nivå,« (party programme ↗)“Decisions that only concern a more local level, or just the individual themselves, should not be moved up to a higher level,”
- natural resource values remain local»Mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser — exempelvis vindkraft, vattenkraft och gruvor — ska stanna kvar lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value created from natural resources — such as wind power, hydropower, and mines — should remain local.”
The plan wants to expand nuclear power and modernize regulations so that expansion is facilitated, and it establishes that nuclear power is needed for climate's sake.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to expand nuclear power and modernize regulations so that expansion is facilitated, and it establishes that nuclear power is needed for climate's sake. The counter-proposal instead wants to preserve municipal veto even for activities handling small amounts of uranium, which creates an obstacle. The plan explicitly reserves municipal veto for wind power, not for the nuclear fuel chain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill bygga ut kärnkraften och modernisera regelverken så att utbyggnaden underlättas, och den slår fast att kärnkraften behövs för klimatets skull. Motförslaget vill i stället bevara det kommunala vetot även för verksamheter som hanterar små mängder uran, vilket lägger ett hinder i vägen. Planen förbehåller uttryckligen det kommunala vetot åt vindkraften, inte åt kärnbränslekedjan.
- expanded nuclear powerdecisive»I stället vill vi möjliggöra fler nya reaktorer på fler ställen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead we want to enable more new reactors in more locations”
- modernized regulations»modernisera regelverken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“modernize regulations”
- nuclear power for climate»Kärnkraften behövs för klimatets skull och för att minska världens utsläpp.« (party programme ↗)“Nuclear power is needed for climate's sake and to reduce the world's emissions.”
- municipal veto only for wind power»Det kommunala vetot mot vindkraft ska bestå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipal veto against wind power shall remain.”
The election manifesto requires that energy expansion occurs with respect for local democracy and the party programme that municipal self-governance is strong and constitutionally established, with the burden of proof on the one who wants to deprive a lower level of its function.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that energy expansion occurs with respect for local democracy and the party programme that municipal self-governance is strong and constitutionally established, with the burden of proof on the one who wants to deprive a lower level of its function. The counter-proposal's requirement to retain the municipal veto for activities dealing with uranium follows from this. The plan's investment in nuclear power does not change where the decision shall be made.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att energiutbyggnad sker med respekt för den lokala demokratin och principprogrammet att den kommunala självstyrelsen är stark och grundlagsreglerad, med bevisbördan hos den som vill beröva en lägre nivå dess funktion. Motförslagets krav på att behålla det kommunala vetot vid verksamheter som hanterar uran följer av detta. Planens satsning på kärnkraft ändrar inte var beslutet ska fattas.
- respect for local democracydecisive»Bygg ut vindkraften men med respekt för den lokala demokratin och anpassa storleken efter lokala villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand wind power but with respect for local democracy and adapt the size to local conditions.”
- strong municipal self-governance»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark och tydligt reglerad i grundlagen.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-governance shall be strong and clearly established in the constitution.”
- burden of proof in power transfer upwards»Denna princip innebär att bevisbördan vilar på dem som vill beröva en mindre gemenskap på lägre nivå dess funktion och därmed dess frihet och ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“This principle means that the burden of proof rests on those who want to deprive a smaller community at a lower level of its function and thus its freedom and responsibility.”
- investment in nuclear power»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas. Förläng befintliga reaktorers drift och bygg ut med nya reaktorer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions for development. Extend the operation of existing reactors and expand with new reactors.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that Sweden's rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and that obstacles to nuclear power should be removed, including bans that limit where and how many reactors can exist.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden's rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and that obstacles to nuclear power should be removed, including bans that limit where and how many reactors can exist. Preserving a municipal veto even for activities with small amounts of uranium would retain precisely such an obstacle. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sveriges rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och att hinder mot kärnkraft ska rivas, bland annat förbud som begränsar var och hur många reaktorer som får finnas. Att bevara ett kommunalt veto även för verksamheter med små mängder uran skulle behålla just ett sådant hinder. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- responsible mineral extractiondecisive»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's rich mineral resources shall be able to be extracted responsibly and sustainably long-term.”
- removed nuclear power bans»Avskaffa förbudet mot att bygga reaktorer på andra platser än vid de befintliga kärnkraftverken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the ban on building reactors at places other than at existing nuclear power plants”
- continued mineral extraction»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska även fortsättningsvis kunna utvinnas på ett« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's rich mineral resources shall continue to be able to be extracted at”
- faster permit assessment»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten the authorities' processing times through an outer time limit”
The plan wants to make it easier and faster to open mines and streamline permit processes for mining, and sees mineral resources as an asset for rural areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make it easier and faster to open mines and streamline permit processes for mining, and sees mineral resources as an asset for rural areas. The counter-proposal wants to retain a municipal veto that blocks uranium handling activities, which adds precisely the obstacle the plan wants to remove. The plan's veto commitment explicitly concerns wind power establishments, not mining.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra det enklare och snabbare att öppna gruvor och effektivisera tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäringen, och ser mineralvärdena som en tillgång för landsbygden. Motförslaget vill behålla ett kommunalt veto som blockerar verksamheter med uranhantering, vilket lägger till just det hinder planen vill ta bort. Planens vetoåtagande gäller uttryckligen vindkraftsetableringar, inte gruvdrift.
- easier to open minesdecisive»Det behöver också bli enklare och gå snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs för exempelvis tillverkning av batterier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It also needs to become easier and faster to open mines for the minerals needed for example for battery manufacturing.”
- effective mining permits»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in permit processes for mining, electricity network expansion and industry”
- municipal veto against wind power»Värna det kommunala vetot vid etablering av vindkraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect the municipal veto for wind power establishment”
- municipal self-determination»Vi betraktar det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin« (party programme ↗)“We consider municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU7)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:208 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:216 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:272 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C)
- Motion 2025/26:56 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Proposition 2024/25:203 — Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort
Source: The Swedish Parliament