2024-04-182023/24:SfU12 · p.3SfUMigration & social insurance

Reserved Days

Reserved days in parental insurance

What's at stake: The decision affects how parental benefit days are distributed between parents and thereby the conditions for equal parenting, as well as families' freedom to decide over their own leave themselves.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the reserved days in parental insurance - days tied to each individual parent that cannot be transferred - should be abolished so that families can freely allocate the days themselves, or whether the current reservation should be retained.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions calling for the reserved days to be abolished. The committee points to family policy, as currently designed, contributing to equal parenting by increasing the ability of both men and women to combine family life and working life, and sees no reason to propose further changes to the basic structure of parental insurance beyond changes already adopted or under preparation.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 8 (SD)

The reservation (SD) calls for abolishing the reserved days in parental insurance and instead giving families the right to decide for themselves how parental insurance should be allocated. The reasoning is that every family has its own circumstances and is best placed to decide how the days should be distributed.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesAbstain 0/0/19/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
SYesAbstain 0/0/90/16departs from the planconfidence: highderived
MPYesAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
MNoYes 57/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDown reservationNoNo 0/63/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:395 by Daniel Persson et al. (SD) motion 8, 2023/24:883 by Markus Wiechel (SD), 2023/24:2052 by Annika Strandhäll (S), 2023/24:2340 by Isabell Mixter et al. (V) motion 9, 2023/24:2604 by Martin Ådahl (C), 2023/24:2624 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) motion 2, 2023/24:2664 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (MP) motion 40 and 2023/24:2705 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) motion 39.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:395 av Daniel Persson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 8, 2023/24:883 av Markus Wiechel (SD), 2023/24:2052 av Annika Strandhäll (S), 2023/24:2340 av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V) yrkande 9, 2023/24:2604 av Martin Ådahl (C), 2023/24:2624 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 2, 2023/24:2664 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkande 40 och 2023/24:2705 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 39.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 90 proposals in motions on economic family policy received during the regular motion period of 2023. The motions dealt with, among other things, the reserved days in the parental insurance, transfer of parental benefit, the multi-child supplement in child benefit and housing allowance. The Riksdag refers to planned and already taken measures as well as to ongoing work in the field.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The party programme points out an individualized parental insurance as a strategically important reform to increase gender equality both in family life and in the labor market, and establishes that social insurance must be individual and tied to individuals instead of to families.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme points out an individualized parental insurance as a strategically important reform to increase gender equality both in family life and in the labor market, and establishes that social insurance must be individual and tied to individuals instead of to families. The counter-proposal requires the exact opposite: that the reserved days are abolished and families themselves distribute the days freely. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirements.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet pekar ut en individualiserad föräldraförsäkring som en strategiskt viktig reform för att öka jämställdheten både i familjelivet och på arbetsmarknaden, och slår fast att socialförsäkringarna ska vara individuella och knutna till individen i stället för till familjen. Motförslaget kräver raka motsatsen: att de reserverade dagarna avskaffas och att familjerna själva fördelar dagarna fritt. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • individualized parental insurancedecisive»individualiserad föräldraförsäkring och en stärkt lagfäst rätt till heltid,« (party programme ↗)“individualized parental insurance and a strengthened statutory right to full-time,”
  • individual social insurance»Socialförsäkringarna ska vara individuella och ge människor en inkomstrelaterad ersättning vid sjukdom, arbetslöshet, föräldraledighet,« (party programme ↗)“Social insurance must be individual and provide people with income-related benefits for sickness, unemployment, parental leave,”
  • rights tied to individuals»rättigheter kopplade till individer istället för familjer eller arbetsplatser« (party programme ↗)“rights tied to individuals instead of families or workplaces”
  • equal distribution of household work»En arbetstidsförkortning skulle vara ett viktigt steg för ökad jämställdhet eftersom det också skulle möjliggöra för en mer jämställd fördelning av det obetalda hemarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduced working hours would be an important step toward increased gender equality because it would also enable a more equal distribution of unpaid household work.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The party programme's requirement is that women and men should be able to take equal responsibility for home, family and children and equally share unpaid household work, with parental insurance that provides equal opportunities; the party is explicitly feminist.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme's requirement is that women and men should be able to take equal responsibility for home, family and children and equally share unpaid household work, with parental insurance that provides equal opportunities; the party is explicitly feminist. The election manifesto highlights parental insurance as an equality reform and says no to proposals that lock women in the home. Abolishing the reserved days would undermine this, which is why the plan rejects the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammets krav är att kvinnor och män ska kunna ta lika ansvar för hem, familj och barn och jämnt fördela det obetalda hemarbetet, med en föräldraförsäkring som ger lika möjligheter; partiet är uttalat feministiskt. Valmanifestet framhåller föräldraförsäkringen som en jämställdhetsreform och säger nej till förslag som låser fast kvinnor i hemmet. Att avskaffa de reserverade dagarna skulle motverka detta, varför planen avvisar kravet.

  • equally shared parental responsibilitydecisive»måste få möjlighet att ta lika ansvar för hem, familj och barn och att jämnt fördela det« (party programme ↗)“must have opportunity to take equal responsibility for home, family and children and equally distribute the”
  • parental insurance as equality reform»I Sverige har viktiga jämställdhetsreformer som förskola och föräldraförsäkring möjliggjort kvinnors självständighet och frihet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In Sweden, important gender equality reforms such as preschool and parental insurance have enabled women's independence and freedom.”
  • no to reforms that lock women in the home»vi säger nej till alla förslag om vårdnadsbidrag eller barnomsorgspeng, som låser fast utlandsfödda kvinnor i hemmet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“we say no to all proposals for care allowances or childcare allowances, which lock foreign-born women in the home”
  • feminist party»Med denna grundsyn är socialdemokratin ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“With this basic view, social democracy is a feminist party.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires that each parent must take out at least one-third of the parental days and that the fathers' take-up is doubled; the party programme advocates a three-part insurance with earmarked days.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that each parent must take out at least one-third of the parental days and that the fathers' take-up is doubled; the party programme advocates a three-part insurance with earmarked days. Abolishing the reserved days and letting families distribute freely is the direct opposite of that commitment. The plan justifies the earmarking by saying that increased take-up by men strengthens women's position on the labour market.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att varje förälder ska ta ut minst en tredjedel av föräldradagarna och att pappornas uttag dubbleras; partiprogrammet förordar en tredelad försäkring med öronmärkta dagar. Att avskaffa de reserverade dagarna och låta familjerna fördela fritt är raka motsatsen till det åtagandet. Planen motiverar öronmärkningen med att mäns ökade uttag stärker kvinnors position på arbetsmarknaden.

  • earmarked parental daysdecisive»dubblera pappornas uttag av föräldraledighet — varje förälder ska ta ut minst en tredjedel av föräldradagarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“double the fathers' take-up of parental leave — each parent must take out at least one-third of the parental days.”
  • three-part parental insurance»En tredelad föräldraförsäkring, där en tredjedel av dagarna öronmärks för respektive vårdnadshavare och resten kan fördelas fritt, är ett sätt att bryta med gamla mönster« (party programme ↗)“A three-part parental insurance, where one-third of the days are earmarked for each guardian and the rest can be distributed freely, is a way to break with old patterns”
  • women's position on the labour market»När mäns uttag av föräldraledigheten ökar stärks dessutom kvinnors position på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“When men's take-up of parental leave increases, women's position on the labour market is also strengthened.”
  • shared responsibility for children and home»Vi vill se ett samhälle där ägandet är jämnt fördelat mellan män och kvinnor, precis som ansvaret för barn och hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see a society where ownership is evenly distributed between men and women, just as the responsibility for children and home.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto wants to modernise parental insurance so that it becomes more equal and more women can enter work and pursue careers, and establishes that parenthood must not be an economic trap for women.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to modernise parental insurance so that it becomes more equal and more women can enter work and pursue careers, and establishes that parenthood must not be an economic trap for women. Abolishing the reserved days and leaving the entire division to the family would, according to the plan's own problem description, reinforce the unequal division. The party programme's writing on the best interests of family and children points in the opposite direction, but the election manifesto's gender equality line carries most weight.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill modernisera föräldraförsäkringen så att den blir mer jämställd och fler kvinnor kan komma i arbete och göra karriär, och slår fast att föräldraskap inte ska vara en ekonomisk fälla för kvinnor. Att avskaffa de reserverade dagarna och överlåta hela fördelningen till familjen skulle med planens egen problembeskrivning förstärka den ojämna fördelningen. Partiprogrammets skrivning om familjens och barnens bästa drar åt motsatt håll, men valmanifestets jämställdhetslinje väger tyngst.

  • more equal parental insurancedecisive»Vi vill modernisera föräldraförsäkringen så att fler kvinnor kan komma i arbete och göra karriär, bland annat genom att införa en kraftigt förstärkt jämställdhetsbonus.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernise parental insurance so that more women can enter work and pursue careers, partly through introducing a significantly strengthened gender equality bonus.”
  • parenthood must not penalise women»Att föda barn ska inte stå i vägen för karriären och föräldraskap ska inte vara en ekonomisk fälla för kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Having children must not stand in the way of careers and parenthood must not be an economic trap for women.”
  • feminist fundamental stance»Centerpartiet är ett feministiskt parti, som utmanar och bryter rådande maktförhållanden och kollektiva orättvisor.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party is a feminist party that challenges and breaks down prevailing power relations and collective injustices.”
  • the family's own choice»Föräldraförsäkringen ska utformas efter familjens och barnens bästa.« (party programme ↗)“Parental insurance shall be designed according to the best interests of family and children.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The party programme explicitly establishes that three months shall be reserved for each custodian.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme explicitly establishes that three months shall be reserved for each custodian. The counter-proposal requires that the reserved days be abolished entirely, which is the direct opposite. The plan certainly wants to increase choice in parental insurance, but only within a model that at the same time strengthens gender equality in the labour market and is built on shared responsibility for home and children.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att tre månader ska vara öronmärkta åt varje vårdnadshavare. Motförslaget kräver att de reserverade dagarna avskaffas helt, vilket är raka motsatsen. Planen vill visserligen öka valfriheten i föräldraförsäkringen, men bara inom en modell som samtidigt stärker jämställdheten på arbetsmarknaden och bygger på delat ansvar för hem och barn.

  • reserved monthsdecisive»Tre månader ska vara öronmärkta åt varje vårdnadshavare.« (party programme ↗)“Three months shall be reserved for each custodian.”
  • choice with gender equality»Vi vill se ny föräldraförsäkring som både värnar valfriheten och stärker jämställdheten på arbetsmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see new parental insurance that both values choice and strengthens gender equality in the labour market.”
  • shared parental responsibility»Jämställdhet förutsätter delat ansvar för hem och barn.« (party programme ↗)“Gender equality requires shared responsibility for home and children.”
  • expanded transfer rights»familjer ser olika ut ska rätten att överlåta dagar till tredje person ökas.« (party programme ↗)“families look different the right to transfer days to a third party shall be increased.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that the state shall not go in and decide in the family's stead and that support to families with children shall be organized so that it can be used flexibly, with the children's and families' needs as starting point.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the state shall not go in and decide in the family's stead and that support to families with children shall be organized so that it can be used flexibly, with the children's and families' needs as starting point. Reserved days lock instead a part of parental insurance to a state-determined distribution. Equality between parents shall according to the plan be driven with opinion-forming work, not through control of use. The plan thus supports the demand to abolish the reserved days.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att staten inte ska gå in och bestämma i familjens ställe och att stödet till barnfamiljer ska vara organiserat så att det kan användas flexibelt, med barnens och familjernas behov som utgångspunkt. Reserverade dagar låser i stället en del av föräldraförsäkringen till en av staten bestämd fördelning. Jämställdheten mellan föräldrar ska enligt planen drivas med opinionsbildande arbete, inte genom styrning av uttaget. Planen stöder därmed kravet att avskaffa de reserverade dagarna.

  • family freedom from state controldecisive»eller staten inte ska gå in och bestämma i familjens ställe.« (party programme ↗)“or the state shall not go in and decide in the family's stead.”
  • flexible support to families with children»måste samhällets stöd till barnfamiljer vara organiserat så att det kan användas på ett flexibelt sätt.« (party programme ↗)“must society's support to families with children be organized so that it can be used flexibly.”
  • the family's needs drive family policy»Barnens och familjernas behov är utgångspunkten« (party programme ↗)“The children's and families' needs are the starting point”
  • shared responsibility through opinion-forming»med opinionsbildande arbete stimulera föräldrar att« (party programme ↗)“use opinion-forming work to encourage parents to”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto commits to increasing flexibility in parental insurance, and the party programme states that equality is achieved through strengthened self-determination and empowerment, not through requirements for exact outcomes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto commits to increasing flexibility in parental insurance, and the party programme states that equality is achieved through strengthened self-determination and empowerment, not through requirements for exact outcomes. Allowing the family to itself dispose of the days follows that line. The plan at the same time wants to prevent women from becoming trapped at home, which pulls in the other direction, but the explicit commitment in the election manifesto concerns increased flexibility.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet åtar sig att öka flexibiliteten i föräldraförsäkringen, och partiprogrammet slår fast att jämställdhet nås genom stärkt självbestämmande och egenmakt, inte genom krav på exakta utfall. Att låta familjen själv disponera dagarna följer den linjen. Planen vill samtidigt motverka att kvinnor fastnar i hemmet, vilket drar åt andra hållet, men det uttryckliga åtagandet i valmanifestet gäller ökad flexibilitet.

  • increased flexibility in parental insurancedecisive»• Öka flexibiliteten i föräldraförsäkringen och göra fler dagar till dubbeldagar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Increase flexibility in parental insurance and make more days dual days”
  • equality through self-determination»Vägen till ökad jämställdhet handlar om att stärka självbestämmandet och möjligheterna till egenmakt.« (party programme ↗)“The path to increased equality is about strengthening self-determination and opportunities for empowerment.”
  • right to choose»Rätten att välja väg tillhör alla.« (party programme ↗)“The right to choose a path belongs to everyone.”
  • women's employment»• Avskaffa flerbarnstillägget från och med barn fyra så att inte kvinnor i stora familjer fastnar i hemmet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Abolish the multi-child supplement from child four onwards so that women in large families do not get trapped at home”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly states that parental insurance should be flexible and family-friendly and that reserved months should be removed, and that family policy should move away from coercive reforms that limit families' scope for action.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that parental insurance should be flexible and family-friendly and that reserved months should be removed, and that family policy should move away from coercive reforms that limit families' scope for action. The counter-proposal's demand to abolish the reserved days and let families themselves have control of the insurance is precisely this commitment. The plan therefore supports the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår uttryckligen fast att föräldraförsäkringen ska vara flexibel och familjevänlig och att reserverade månader ska bort, och att familjepolitiken ska bort från tvingande reformer som begränsar familjernas handlingsutrymme. Motförslagets krav på att avskaffa de reserverade dagarna och låta familjerna själva disponera försäkringen är precis detta åtagande. Planen stöder därför kravet.

  • abolish reserved monthsdecisive»Föräldraförsäkringen ska vara flexibel och familjevänlig och reserverade månader ska bort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parental insurance should be flexible and family-friendly and reserved months should be removed.”
  • flexible parental insurance»Skapa en flexibel och familjevänlig föräldraförsäkring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create a flexible and family-friendly parental insurance”
  • away with coercive reforms»Den ekonomiska familjepolitiken behöver ändra kurs från tvingande reformer som begränsar handlingsutrymme och välmående, till en mer familjefrämjande attityd där fokus ligger på att organisera arbetslivet kring familjens och barnens behov snarare än efter politikernas egna önskemål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Economic family policy needs to change course from coercive reforms that limit scope for action and well-being, to a more family-promoting attitude where focus lies on organizing working life around the family's and children's needs rather than politicians' own wishes.”
  • family's self-determination»Familjer ska vara fria att fatta egna beslut om sin vardag där barn ska ha tillgång till båda sina föräldrar och förhållandena vara goda.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Families should be free to make their own decisions about their daily life where children should have access to both parents and conditions should be good.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament