2024-06-182023/24:JuU24 · p.1JuUJustice
Rejection of the proposition
Rejection of the bill on preventive coercive measures
What's at stake: The decision concerns how far the state should be allowed to go in using secret surveillance, house searches and similar methods against people who are not suspected of any specific crime, affecting the personal privacy of anyone who could be subject to them, including people who later turn out to be uninvolved in any crime.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The vote is about whether parliament should reject the government's entire bill on expanded preventive coercive measures, or adopt the proposal as a reasonable balance between law enforcement and personal privacy.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees with the government's assessment that there is a clear need for expanded powers to use coercive measures for crime-prevention purposes. The committee considers that the proposals taken together represent a reasonable balance between effective law enforcement and the individual's right to protection of personal privacy, and therefore recommends rejecting the motion to reject the bill.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V)
The Left Party wants to reject the bill. The party shares the concern of consultation bodies and the Council on Legislation that the pace of legislation in this area makes it difficult to assess the need, and considers that a comprehensive review of coercive-measures legislation should be carried out before new powers, such as secret room surveillance and house searches for preventive purposes, are introduced.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 283–20Ja 247–56
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motion 2023/24:2865 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) request 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2865 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Law enforcement agencies get expanded opportunities to use preventive coercive measures. Parliament said yes to the government's proposal for legislative changes aimed at strengthening the conditions to prevent and stop serious crime. The legislative changes concern, among other things, that certain information about electronic communications can be obtained for more types of crime more coercive measures and enforcement measures, for example secret room surveillance and house search, should be allowed to be used remote search, for example search of external servers, should be allowed to be used in alien affairs with qualified security aspects the legal security of the individual should be strengthened, among other things through expanded prohibitions on eavesdropping and surveillance. The legislative changes come into force on 1 September 2024. Several of the legislative changes are limited to the end of September 2028.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject the government's proposal on preventive coercive measures. (V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme states that all people have a right to protection of their personal integrity, that presumption of innocence is fundamental, and that legal certainty is maintained through transparency and independent scrutiny.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that all people have a right to protection of their personal integrity, that presumption of innocence is fundamental, and that legal certainty is maintained through transparency and independent scrutiny. The election manifesto warns that repression and a harder line are put forward instead of addressing problems seriously. The counter-proposal's requirement for rejection and a joint review before secret room surveillance and preventive house searches are introduced follows these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet, att oskyldighetspresumtionen är grundläggande och att rättssäkerheten upprätthålls genom insyn och oberoende granskning. Valmanifestet varnar för att repression och hårdare tag lyfts fram i stället för att problemen tas på allvar. Motförslagets krav på avslag och en samlad översyn innan hemlig rumsavlyssning och preventiv husrannsakan införs följer dessa åtaganden.
- protection of personal integritydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have a right to protection of their personal integrity.”
- innocent until proven guilty»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad är grundläggande i det.« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until proven otherwise is fundamental in”
- repression does not solve problems»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Far too often repression and a harder line are put forward as solutions instead of addressing the problems seriously.”
- transparency and independent scrutiny»insyn och oberoende granskning.« (party programme ↗)“transparency and independent scrutiny.”
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that the police need more tools, such as better possibilities for wiretapping and house searches, and that the fight against crime should be uncompromising.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that the police need more tools, such as better possibilities for wiretapping and house searches, and that the fight against crime should be uncompromising. The counter-proposal wants to reject the entire proposition and await a comprehensive review before preventive room wiretapping and house searches are introduced, which is the opposite of the plan's commitment. That the plan also values personal integrity does not change the main line. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att polisen behöver fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan, och att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. Motförslaget vill avslå hela propositionen och avvakta en samlad översyn innan preventiv rumsavlyssning och husrannsakan införs, vilket är motsatsen till planens åtagande. Att planen också värnar den personliga integriteten ändrar inte huvudlinjen. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav.
- more coercive measures for the policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better possibilities for wiretapping and house searches.”
- uncompromising crime-fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime must be uncompromising.”
- tear down barriers for police work»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities must be torn down so that the police and other professions can do their jobs.”
- protection of personal integrity»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute obligation to protect freedom and personal integrity”
The party programme explicitly states that the party opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate interference in privacy and that crime prevention must not take place at the expense of human rights.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly states that the party opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate interference in privacy and that crime prevention must not take place at the expense of human rights. Secret room surveillance and house searches for preventive purposes, without preliminary investigation, are precisely such expanded surveillance powers that the plan requires politics to guard against. That the plan at the same time wants to give the judiciary tools against organized crime lowers the security somewhat.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet säger uttryckligen att partiet motsätter sig alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter. Hemlig rumsavlyssning och husrannsakan i preventivt syfte, utan förundersökning, är just sådana utökade övervakningsbefogenheter som planen kräver att politiken värjer sig mot. Att planen samtidigt vill ge rättsväsendet verktyg mot organiserad brottslighet drar ned säkerheten något.
- no to disproportionate interferencedecisive»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that constitute disproportionate interference in privacy.”
- crime prevention within the human rights framework»Brotts- och terrorbekämpning är viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crime and terrorism prevention is important but must not take place at the expense of human rights.”
- protect privacy against surveillance»De ökade möjligheterna till övervakning kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors möjlighet att värna sin integritet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased possibilities for surveillance require that politics guard the possibility of people protecting their privacy.”
- no improper surveillance»Ingen otillbörlig registrering eller övervakning baserad på politiska åsikter eller demokratisk verksamhet får förekomma.« (party programme ↗)“No improper registration or surveillance based on political views or democratic activity may occur.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly says no to preventive wiretapping and to reversed burden of proof and collective punishment, with reference to the fact that the rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state must be defended.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly says no to preventive wiretapping and to reversed burden of proof and collective punishment, with reference to the fact that the rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state must be defended. The party programme requires that all legislation is tested against its impact on personal integrity and that the restriction is proportionate to the purpose. The counter-proposal's demand to reject the government bill on secret room wiretapping and house searches for preventive purposes is therefore the plan's own position, even though the party elsewhere wants to tighten efforts against gangs.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till preventiv avlyssning och till omvänd bevisbörda och kollektiv bestraffning, med hänvisning till att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Idéprogrammet kräver att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten och att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet. Motförslagets krav att avslå propositionen om hemlig rumsavlyssning och husrannsakan i preventivt syfte är därmed planens egen position, trots att partiet i övrigt vill skärpa insatserna mot gängen.
- no to preventive wiretappingdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state must be defended. We therefore say no to patrol zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- proportionality against integrityweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet. Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity. There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the law's purpose.”
- strong integrity protection»Ett starkt integritetsskydd är därför en omistlig del av ett öppet och demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Strong integrity protection is therefore an indispensable part of an open and democratic society.”
- action against gangs»För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To defeat them requires better measures that prevent recruitment, more resources for police, prosecutors, courts and the prison service and stricter penalties.”
flags: citat_svagt
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly requires that secret coercive measures shall be able to be used for more crimes and after court decision against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that secret coercive measures shall be able to be used for more crimes and after court decision against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime. To reject the proposition and await a comprehensive review is the opposite of that commitment. The plan requires at the same time that infringement of privacy only happens when countervailing interest weighs demonstrably heavier, but that does not lead to rejection but to the balance being tested.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas vid fler brott och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke. Att avslå propositionen och avvakta en samlad översyn är motsatsen till det åtagandet. Planen kräver samtidigt att integritetsintrång bara görs när motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre, men det leder inte till avslag utan till att avvägningen prövas.
- preventive secret coercive measuresdecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Telephone tapping and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both for suspicion of more crimes than today and after court decision against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
- more tools for police»För att stoppa upplopp och kravaller ska polisen kunna använda mer effektiv och modern utrustning så att fler kan gripas och lagföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To stop riots and disturbances, the police shall be able to use more effective and modern equipment so that more can be arrested and prosecuted.”
- strengthened privacy protection»Skyddet för den enskildes integritet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Protection for the individual's privacy shall be strengthened.”
- evaluation of privacy laws»påverkan på den personliga integriteten ska regelbundet utvärderas.« (party programme ↗)“impact on personal privacy shall be regularly evaluated.”
The election manifesto's commitment is that security shall be restored and that the justice system shall receive new tools, including a comprehensive review of confidentiality rules and anonymous witnesses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's commitment is that security shall be restored and that the justice system shall receive new tools, including a comprehensive review of confidentiality rules and anonymous witnesses. Rejecting expanded crime prevention coercive measures pending a comprehensive review goes against this. The plan's strong protection for personal integrity, however, requires balance, which the committee strikes.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestets åtagande är att tryggheten ska återupprättas och att rättsväsendet ska få nya verktyg, bland annat en total översyn av sekretessreglerna och anonyma vittnen. Att avslå utökade brottsförebyggande tvångsmedel i väntan på en samlad översyn går emot detta. Planens starka skydd för den personliga integriteten kräver dock avvägning, vilket utskottet gör.
- restore securitydecisive»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas, brottslingar dömas och brottsoffer få upprättelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security on streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened, offenders convicted and crime victims get redress.”
- new tools for crime prevention»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Complete review of confidentiality rules, so that authorities can share information between themselves to prevent and solve crime.”
- more tools against gang crime»Inför anonyma vittnen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce anonymous witnesses.”
- strong integrity protection»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong”
The plan states that gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists and that legislation must be adapted accordingly, and it promises new tools such as search zones, anonymous witnesses and significantly more surveillance cameras.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists and that legislation must be adapted accordingly, and it promises new tools such as search zones, anonymous witnesses and significantly more surveillance cameras. To reject a proposal for expanded preventive coercive measures pending a comprehensive review goes directly against that line. The plan sees freedom and security as united, not opposed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister och att lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter, och den lovar nya verktyg som visitationszoner, anonyma vittnen och kraftigt fler övervakningskameror. Att avslå ett förslag om utökade preventiva tvångsmedel i avvaktan på en samlad översyn går rakt emot den linjen. Planen ser frihet och trygghet som förenade, inte motsatta.
- adapted legislation against gangsdecisive»Gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister – och lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists – and legislation must be adapted accordingly so that more are held accountable and disappear from the streets.”
- expanded powers»Införa visitationszoner så att Polisen får bättre möjligheter att leta efter vapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce search zones so that the Police have better opportunities to search for weapons”
- more surveillance»Kraftigt öka antalet övervakningskameror« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase the number of surveillance cameras”
- security requires freedom»Frihet och trygghet går hand i hand.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom and security go hand in hand.”
The plan requires that the justice system receive more effective tools against gang crime, explicitly through information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping, and that procedural obstacles for increased prosecution are removed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the justice system receive more effective tools against gang crime, explicitly through information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping, and that procedural obstacles for increased prosecution are removed. The counter-proposal wants to reject the entire bill on expanded preventive coercive measures, which goes directly against the plan's stance that few measures are too far-reaching when gangs are to be pushed back.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att rättsväsendet får mer effektiva verktyg mot gängbrott, uttryckligen genom informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning, och att processuella hinder för ökad lagföring undanröjs. Motförslaget vill avslå hela propositionen om utökade preventiva tvångsmedel, vilket går rakt emot planens hållning att få åtgärder är för långtgående när gängen ska pressas tillbaka.
- coercive measures against gang criminalsdecisive»Åtgärder ska vidtas för att bättre kunna kartlägga gängaktiva genom t.ex. underrättelsearbete och informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures shall be taken to better map gang members through for example intelligence work and information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping.”
- removed procedural obstacles»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enable increased prosecution must also be removed.”
- far-reaching measures against gangs»Sverigedemokraterna anser att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående när det kommer till att pressa tillbaka både de kriminella gängen och den kultur som gör att de får fäste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to pushing back both criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to gain a foothold.”
- tools for the justice system»Ge rättsväsendet resurser och verktyg för att bekämpa gängen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the justice system resources and tools to combat gangs”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:JuU24)
- Committee report full text (HB01JuU24)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2865 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:117 Preventiva tvångsmedel för att förebygga och förhindra allvarliga brott av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2871 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:117 Preventiva tvångsmedel för att förebygga och förhindra allvarliga brott av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2876 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:117 Preventiva tvångsmedel för att förebygga och förhindra allvarliga brott av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2879 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:117 Preventiva tvångsmedel för att förebygga och förhindra allvarliga brott av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2023/24:117 — Preventiva tvångsmedel för att förebygga och förhindra allvarliga brott
Source: The Swedish Parliament