2025-02-132024/25:SoU13 · p.15SoUHealth & social services

Tobacco Prevention Work, etc.

Tobacco prevention: awaiting the pending inquiry or acting now

What's at stake: Acting now could strengthen protection for children and young people against tobacco and nicotine products more quickly, whereas waiting means any measures would be coordinated with the broader review of alcohol, tobacco and nicotine legislation before they are potentially implemented.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should already now take stronger measures against tobacco and nicotine use among children and young people - such as guidelines against the tobacco industry's influence, an exposure ban, plain packaging and targeted cessation support - or whether to wait for the ongoing government inquiry and the Public Health Agency's continuous work.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee opposes the motions and considers that the Riksdag should not act now, pointing out that a government inquiry into nicotine, alcohol and tobacco issues is already being processed within the Government Offices and that the Public Health Agency continuously works on information, education and targeted tobacco and nicotine cessation support.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 18 (V, MP)

The reservation holds that Sweden should go further in tobacco prevention: draw up guidelines based on Article 5.3 of the tobacco convention to protect health policy from the tobacco industry's influence, introduce a total display ban for tobacco and nicotine products in shops, examine plain packaging, and ensure accessible cessation support tailored to children and young people.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 18 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/6follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoYes 87/0/0/19departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/14/0/4follows the planconfidence: highderived
CYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 54/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDYesYes 62/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:2325 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S) demands 1 and 2 as well as 2024/25:3055 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) demands 99, 100, 102-104 and 108.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:2325 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2024/25:3055 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 99, 100, 102-104 och 108.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 150 proposals in motions on, among other things, alcohol, narcotics and tobacco from the general motion period 2024. Primarily with reference to ongoing work. The motions dealt with, among other things, alcohol legislation, narcotics policy and tobacco and tobacco-free nicotine products.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The party programme requires restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco and explicitly points out tobacco companies as an actor to be politically isolated.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco and explicitly points out tobacco companies as an actor to be politically isolated. The counter-proposal's requirements for guidelines that protect public health policy from tobacco industry influence, exposure prohibitions, and review of neutral packaging follow directly from these commitments. The plan also sees healthcare as part of broader public health work and wants to invest broadly in healthcare quality, which carries the requirement for accessible cessation support for children and young people.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver en restriktiv reglering av alkohol och tobak och pekar uttryckligen ut tobaksbolagen som en aktör som ska isoleras politiskt. Motförslagets krav på riktlinjer som skyddar folkhälsopolitiken från tobaksindustrins inflytande, exponeringsförbud och utredning av neutrala förpackningar följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Planen ser också vården som en del av ett bredare folkhälsoarbete och vill investera brett i vårdens kvalitet, vilket bär kravet på tillgängligt avvänjningsstöd för barn och unga.

  • restrictive tobacco regulationdecisive»Vi vill se en restriktiv reglering av alkohol och tobak.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco.”
  • isolate tobacco companies politically»spelar en destruktiv roll, som fossilkapitalet eller tobaksbolagen.« (party programme ↗)“plays a destructive role, like fossil capital or tobacco companies.”
  • broad public health policy»Vården behöver ses som en del i det bredare arbetet med folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Healthcare needs to be seen as part of the broader work on public health.”
  • accessible care support»investera brett i vården så att den håller hög kvalitet i alla delar.« (party programme ↗)“invest broadly in healthcare so it maintains high quality in all parts.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address tobacco regulation, but the party programme gives all children and young people the right to upbringing free from drugs and establishes that democracy takes precedence over the market.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address tobacco regulation, but the party programme gives all children and young people the right to upbringing free from drugs and establishes that democracy takes precedence over the market. The programme also imposes on political bodies joint responsibility to prevent all improper influence, which supports the counter-proposal's demands for guidelines against tobacco industry influence and for exposure bans. The basis is principled, which is why certainty is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte tobaksregleringen, men partiprogrammet ger alla barn och unga rätt till en uppväxt fri från droger och slår fast att demokratin har företräde före marknaden. Programmet ålägger också de politiska organen ett gemensamt ansvar att med all kraft förhindra otillbörlig påverkan, vilket bär motförslagets krav på riktlinjer mot tobaksindustrins inflytande och på exponeringsförbud. Underlaget är principiellt, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • upbringing free from drugsdecisive»och till en trygg uppväxt fri från droger och våld.« (party programme ↗)“and to a secure upbringing free from drugs and violence.”
  • against improper influence»ett gemensamt ansvar att med all kraft förhindra all form av otillbörlig påverkan.« (party programme ↗)“joint responsibility to with all force prevent all forms of improper influence.”
  • democracy before the market»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore takes precedence over the market.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to protect public health policy from the tobacco industry's influence and restrict exposure and packaging design, and ensure withdrawal support for young people.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to protect public health policy from the tobacco industry's influence and restrict exposure and packaging design, and ensure withdrawal support for young people. The plan's line is that the marketing of addictive products must be restricted, especially against children and young people, and that effective treatment must be offered early. The plan does not mention exposure prohibition, but the direction follows from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill skydda folkhälsopolitiken från tobaksindustrins inflytande och begränsa exponering och förpackningsdesign samt säkra avvänjningsstöd för unga. Planens linje är att marknadsföringen av beroendeframkallande produkter ska begränsas, särskilt mot barn och unga, och att verksam behandling ska erbjudas tidigt. Planen nämner inte exponeringsförbud, men riktningen följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • restricted marketingdecisive»Vi vill begränsa reklamens utbredning, särskilt bland barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“We want to restrict the spread of advertising, especially among children and young people.”
  • prohibition of certain advertising»Sexistisk reklam och reklam riktad mot barn under tolv år ska vara förbjudet, liksom reklam för spel och alkohol.« (party programme ↗)“Sexist advertising and advertising directed at children under twelve years must be prohibited, as well as advertising for gambling and alcohol.”
  • protect children from harmful products»fasa ut giftiga ämnen omgående, speciellt från produkter för barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out toxic substances immediately, especially from products for children.”
  • withdrawal and treatment»Alla som har behov av det ska i ett tidigt skede erbjudas verksam behandling för att kunna bryta sitt missbruk.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone who needs it must be offered effective treatment at an early stage to be able to break their abuse.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's public health line is built on society giving conditions for the individual to take responsibility for their health and lifestyle, and the party defends freedom from paternalism and wants to clear away rules for business.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's public health line is built on society giving conditions for the individual to take responsibility for their health and lifestyle, and the party defends freedom from paternalism and wants to clear away rules for business. The counter-proposal's demands for total exposure ban and neutral packaging are just such detailed regulation. The demand for protection against industry influence lies however close to the plan's lobbying register, which makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planens folkhälsolinje bygger på att samhället ger förutsättningar för individen att ta ansvar för sin hälsa och livsstil, och partiet försvarar friheten från förmynderi och vill rensa i regelträsket för företag. Motförslagets krav på totalt exponeringsförbud och neutrala förpackningar är just sådan detaljreglering. Kravet på skydd mot industrins inflytande ligger däremot nära planens lobbyregister, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • personal responsibility for lifestyledecisive»förutsättningar för att individer ska kunna ta ansvar för sitt välbefinnande, sin hälsa och livsstil.« (party programme ↗)“conditions for individuals to be able to take responsibility for their wellbeing, their health and lifestyle.”
  • freedom from paternalism»vi försvarar alla människors frihet från förmynderi« (party programme ↗)“we defend all people's freedom from paternalism”
  • less red tape»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear away the regulatory undergrowth for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
  • lobbying register and transparency»Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that tobacco preventive work shall be conducted purposefully and recruitment held back, among other things through a ban on tobacco advertising, and that everyone using tobacco shall have access to tobacco cessation via healthcare.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that tobacco preventive work shall be conducted purposefully and recruitment held back, among other things through a ban on tobacco advertising, and that everyone using tobacco shall have access to tobacco cessation via healthcare. The counter-proposal's requirement for exposure restrictions, plain packaging and accessible cessation support for young people is in line with this. The plan requires that public health work rest on knowledge, which also speaks for protecting policy from industry influence.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att det tobakspreventiva arbetet ska bedrivas målmedvetet och nyrekryteringen hållas tillbaka, bland annat genom förbud mot tobaksreklam, och att alla som använder tobak ska ha tillgång till tobaksavvänjning via hälso- och sjukvården. Motförslagets krav på exponeringsförbud, neutrala förpackningar och tillgängligt avvänjningsstöd för unga ligger i linje med detta. Planen kräver att folkhälsoarbetet vilar på kunskap, vilket också talar för att skydda politiken från industrins inflytande.

  • hold back recruitmentdecisive»Det tobakspreventiva arbetet ska bedrivas målmedvetet och nyrekryteringen hållas tillbaka« (party programme ↗)“Tobacco preventive work shall be conducted purposefully and recruitment held back”
  • ban on tobacco advertising»förbud mot tobaksreklam« (party programme ↗)“ban on tobacco advertising”
  • access to tobacco cessation»använder tobak ska ha tillgång till tobaksavvänjning via hälso- och sjukvården.« (party programme ↗)“use tobacco shall have access to tobacco cessation via healthcare.”
  • knowledge-based public health policy»Folkhälsoarbetet och de förebyggande hälsoinsatserna ska vila på kunskap« (party programme ↗)“Public health work and preventive health measures shall rest on knowledge”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan bases addiction policy on general and specific measures such as information, active pricing policy and restrictive legislation to reduce harm, with prevention efforts for children and young people as priority and age limits for tobacco.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan bases addiction policy on general and specific measures such as information, active pricing policy and restrictive legislation to reduce harm, with prevention efforts for children and young people as priority and age limits for tobacco. Exposure bans, neutral packaging and guidelines against industry influence are precisely such restrictive measures. The plan moreover wants to counteract aggressive marketing methods.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger beroendepolitiken på generella och särskilda åtgärder som information, aktiv prispolitik och restriktiv lagstiftning för att minska skadeverkningarna, med förebyggande insatser för barn och unga som prioritet och åldersgränser för tobak. Exponeringsförbud, neutrala förpackningar och riktlinjer mot industrins inflytande är just sådana restriktiva åtgärder. Planen vill dessutom motverka aggressiva marknadsföringsmetoder.

  • restrictive legislation against harmdecisive»aktiv prispolitik, försäljningsmonopol och en restriktiv lagstiftning, skapas förutsättningar för att minska« (party programme ↗)“active pricing policy, sales monopoly and restrictive legislation, conditions are created to reduce”
  • children and young people prioritized»I det förebyggande arbetet ska insatser för barn och« (party programme ↗)“In prevention work, efforts for children and”
  • age limits for tobacco»ungdomar prioriteras. Det ska finnas åldersgränser för« (party programme ↗)“young people are prioritized. There shall be age limits for”
  • counteract aggressive marketing»aggressiva marknadsföringsmetoder ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“aggressive marketing methods shall be counteracted.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal requires a total display ban in shops, investigation of neutral packaging and guidelines against industry influence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal requires a total display ban in shops, investigation of neutral packaging and guidelines against industry influence. The plan's position is the opposite: it rejects paternalism in everyday choices, wants to strengthen the shop owner's own right to determine who can be in the premises and reduce red tape for business, and the party programme states that freedom in Sweden is great and must remain so. The documents do not directly address tobacco regulation, which is why the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver totalt exponeringsförbud i butik, utredning av neutrala förpackningar och riktlinjer mot industrins inflytande. Planens hållning är den motsatta: den avvisar pekpinnar i vardagens val, vill stärka butiksägarens egen bestämmanderätt över lokalen och minska regelkrånglet för företag, och partiprogrammet slår fast att friheten i Sverige är stor och ska så förbli. Dokumenten behandlar inte tobaksreglering direkt, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • no to paternalistic politicsdecisive»Där miljöbovar betalar för sig, men du kan unna dig en plastpåse när du veckohandlar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where environmental sinners pay for themselves, but you can treat yourself to a plastic bag when you do your weekly shopping.”
  • shop owner's right to determine»Ge butiksägare rätt att bestämma vem som får vistas i butikslokalen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give shop owners the right to determine who is allowed to be in shop premises”
  • great personal freedom»I Sverige är friheten stor och ska så förbli.« (party programme ↗)“In Sweden, freedom is great and shall remain so.”
  • less red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of businesses' administrative costs and one-third of red tape”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto states that every individual shall be free to make their own choices without the public controlling them, and the party programme rejects a one-sided focus on punishing unwanted ways of living.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that every individual shall be free to make their own choices without the public controlling them, and the party programme rejects a one-sided focus on punishing unwanted ways of living. A complete display ban in shops and neutral packaging is precisely such control, and also places regulatory burden on retail without benefit matching cost. The plan gives no commitment to stricter tobacco regulation.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att varje individ ska stå fri att göra sina egna val utan att det offentliga styr dem, och partiprogrammet avvisar ett ensidigt fokus på bestraffningar av oönskade levnadssätt. Ett totalt exponeringsförbud i butik och neutrala förpackningar är just sådan styrning, och lägger dessutom regelbörda på handeln utan att nyttan motsvarar kostnaden. Planen ger inget åtagande om skärpt tobaksreglering.

  • the individual's free choicedecisive»Varje individ ska stå fri att göra sina egna val och forma sina egna liv, utan att det offentliga ska styra dessa val.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every individual shall be free to make their own choices and shape their own lives, without the public controlling these choices.”
  • not punish ways of living»inte genom ett ensidigt fokus på bestraffningar av oönskade levnadssätt hos enskilda« (party programme ↗)“not through a one-sided focus on punishing unwanted ways of living among individuals”
  • away with unnecessary rules»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing companies it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs for companies do not match the benefit for society.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament