2026-01-212025/26:KU18 · p.11KUConstitution
Media support
Level of media subsidies and media diversity
What's at stake: Smaller newspapers that have not received support risk closing down, which could reduce the diversity of news voices locally, regionally and among student media. The question is whether support should be increased now or whether to wait for the authority's evaluation of the new system.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The reserving party (V) wanted the government to increase media subsidies to safeguard media diversity and consider dedicated support for student media, while the committee held that the matter should await the ongoing review of the two-year-old media subsidy system.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the law on media subsidies has only been in force for two years and that the Swedish Media Authority has been tasked with following up the system's effects, and does not want to preempt that review by increasing support now, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (V)
The reserving party (V) argues that the new media subsidy has led to reduced media diversity because several smaller newspapers have not received support and risk closing, and wants the government to increase support and amend the law so that media diversity is safeguarded as highly as local and regional news coverage, and to investigate dedicated press support for student media.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:323 by Nadja Awad et al. (V) proposal 10, 2025/26:936 by Jamal El-Haj (-) proposals 1-3, 2025/26:1313 by Per-Arne Håkansson (S), 2025/26:1501 by Jamal El-Haj (-) proposal 1, 2025/26:2790 by Jessica Wetterling et al. (V) proposal 19, 2025/26:3183 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) proposal 20, 2025/26:3583 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) proposal 24, 2025/26:3612 by Malin Danielsson (L) and 2025/26:3775 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) proposals 76 and 77.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:323 av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V) yrkande 10, 2025/26:936 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:1313 av Per-Arne Håkansson (S), 2025/26:1501 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 1, 2025/26:2790 av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V) yrkande 19, 2025/26:3183 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 20, 2025/26:3583 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 24, 2025/26:3612 av Malin Danielsson (L) och 2025/26:3775 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 76 och 77.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 60 proposals in motions on freedom of the press and expression and mass media matters that were submitted during the general motion period in 2025. Among other things, the proposals concern freedom of expression on the internet and regulation of tech giants, personal data and digital search services, security for opinion makers and media companies, illegal IP-TV, media support and limiting the spread of pornography and depictions of serious violence. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is underway in several matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to increase media support to preserve media diversity and provide targeted support for student media. (V) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands a rich media landscape with comprehensive journalistic coverage on national, regional, and local levels, which is supported by the fact that also smaller newspapers can survive.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands a rich media landscape with comprehensive journalistic coverage on national, regional, and local levels, which is supported by the fact that also smaller newspapers can survive. Raising media support and protecting media diversity directly answer that commitment. The election manifesto underscores that a free culture and independent media are crucial for democracy in a time when right-populist forces want to steer information.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett rikt medielandskap med heltäckande journalistisk bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå, vilket bärs upp av att också mindre tidningar kan överleva. Att höja mediestödet och värna mediemångfalden svarar direkt mot det åtagandet. Valplattformen understryker att en fri kultur och oberoende medier är avgörande för demokratin i en tid då högerpopulistiska krafter vill styra information.
- comprehensive local journalismdecisive»bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå.« (party programme ↗)“coverage on national, regional, and local levels.”
- independent media»Vi vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a strong, broad, and independent role for”
- invest in independent media»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att satsa på och utveckla folkbiblioteken, folkbildningen och public services oberoende ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore it is especially important to invest in and develop public libraries, public education, and public service's independent position.”
- free culture strengthens democracy»En fri kultur är avgörande för en stark demokrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A free culture is crucial for a strong democracy.”
The plan establishes that media support should provide conditions for independent and locally anchored news reporting throughout the country and demands media diversity with broader perspectives.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that media support should provide conditions for independent and locally anchored news reporting throughout the country and demands media diversity with broader perspectives. Support that leads to smaller newspapers being closed undermines this, which is why increased support and strengthened diversity are in line with the plan. The plan, however, specifies no support levels.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att mediestödet ska ge förutsättningar för oberoende och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling i hela landet och kräver mediemångfald med bredare perspektiv. Ett stöd som leder till att mindre tidningar läggs ned motverkar detta, varför höjt stöd och stärkt mångfald ligger i planens riktning. Planen anger däremot inga stödnivåer.
- media support for the whole countrydecisive»Mediestödet ska ge förutsättningar för oberoende och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media support shall provide conditions for independent and locally anchored news reporting throughout the country.”
- media diversity»Mediemångfald med bredare perspektiv i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Media diversity with broader perspectives throughout the country.”
- independent media»Fri och oberoende media.« (party programme ↗)“Free and independent media.”
- jointly financed public service»Bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service som är gemensamt finansierad.« (party programme ↗)“Broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to supporting independent media across the country and to safeguard a diversity of commercial media to guarantee a diversity of opinions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to supporting independent media across the country and to safeguard a diversity of commercial media to guarantee a diversity of opinions. Increased media support that saves smaller newspapers and raises media diversity is a direct application of that commitment. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att stödja oberoende medier i hela landet och att slå vakt om en mångfald av kommersiella medier för att garantera en mångfald av åsikter. Ett höjt mediestöd som räddar mindre tidningar och lyfter mediemångfalden är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- support for independent mediadecisive»förstärka yttrandefriheten och stödja oberoende medier i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen freedom of expression and support independent media across the country.”
- media diversity as a goal»Miljöpartiet slår vakt om ett brett och oberoende public service och en mångfald av kommersiella medier, för att garantera en mångfald av åsikter.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party safeguards a broad and independent public broadcasting service and a diversity of commercial media, to guarantee a diversity of opinions.”
- free media as a foundation for democracy»Fria medier och journalister som granskar makten och informerar invånarna är en förutsättning för att demokratin ska utvecklas och frodas.« (party programme ↗)“Free media and journalists who scrutinize power and inform residents are a prerequisite for democracy to develop and flourish.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is decisive for democracy and that press freedom shall be protected.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is decisive for democracy and that press freedom shall be protected. That smaller newspapers risk closure and that media diversity decreases goes straight against that commitment. The plan therefore gives support to the counter-proposal's demand for increased support and that media diversity be valued equally with local news distribution.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att en allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin och att pressfriheten ska skyddas. Att mindre tidningar riskerar nedläggning och att mediemångfalden minskar går rakt emot det åtagandet. Planen ger därför stöd åt motförslagets krav på höjt stöd och att mediemångfalden värnas lika högt som den lokala nyhetsförmedlingen.
- vigorous media monitoring throughout the countrydecisive»En allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin. Pressfriheten ska skyddas och oberoende public service försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is decisive for democracy. Press freedom shall be protected and independent public service defended.”
- the free press as an institution»Våra demokratiska institutioner och principer — oberoende domstolar, äganderätten, den fria pressen, likheten inför lagen och många fler — ska stå starka oavsett politiskt styre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our democratic institutions and principles — independent courts, property rights, the free press, equality before the law and many more — shall stand strong regardless of political rule.”
- independent media's monitoring»är en avgörande del av demokratin och av granskningen av makten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“is a decisive part of democracy and of monitoring of power in society.”
- arm's length distance but good conditions»Den akademiska och konstnärliga friheten liksom den fria kulturen är grundbultar i ett vitalt civilsamhälle. Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic and artistic freedom as well as free culture are cornerstones in a vital civil society. Policy shall contribute to good conditions but maintain arm's length distance.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to reshape press and media support with a view to local investigative quality journalism and set a final time limit for the current press support, with an independent fund as a replacement.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reshape press and media support with a view to local investigative quality journalism and set a final time limit for the current press support, with an independent fund as a replacement. The counter-proposal's requirement for raised support levels within the existing system points in the opposite direction. The plan's concern for media independence, however, speaks partly for the diversity argument, hence uncertainty is great.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra om press- och mediestödet med sikte på lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik och slå fast en bortre tidsgräns för det nuvarande presstödet, med en fristående fond som ersättning. Motförslagets krav på höjda stödnivåer inom det befintliga systemet går åt motsatt håll. Planens omsorg om mediernas oberoende talar dock delvis för mångfaldsargumentet, varför osäkerheten är stor.
- time limit for press supportdecisive»En bortre tidsgräns för det nuvarande presstödet ska slås fast. En fristående fond ska inrättas för att stödja granskande journalistik.« (party programme ↗)“A final time limit for the current press support shall be set. An independent fund shall be established to support investigative journalism.”
- reshaped media support»Vi vill göra om press- och mediestödet för att främja en lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to reshape press and media support to promote local investigative quality journalism across the country.”
- independent scrutinising media»Mediernas oberoende roll och kritiska granskning är grunden i varje demokrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media independence and critical scrutiny are the foundation of every democracy.”
- valued media independence»Mediernas oberoende måste värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Media independence must be valued.”
The plan emphasizes strong protection for freedom of expression and communication, that a rich cultural life vitalizes democracy and that the state is responsible for cultural infrastructure throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan emphasizes strong protection for freedom of expression and communication, that a rich cultural life vitalizes democracy and that the state is responsible for cultural infrastructure throughout the country. Smaller newspapers being eliminated and diversity declining goes against this. The plan says nothing about media support levels, however, so support for the counter-proposal's demands is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen betonar ett starkt skydd för yttrande- och meddelarfriheten, att ett rikt kulturliv vitaliserar demokratin och att staten ansvarar för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet. Att mindre tidningar slås ut och mångfalden minskar går emot detta. Planen säger dock inget om mediestödets nivåer, varför stödet för motförslagets krav är härlett och osäkert.
- freedom of expression and communicationdecisive»Ett starkt skydd för yttrande- och meddelarfriheten samt anonymitetsskyddet, liksom för« (party programme ↗)“Strong protection for freedom of expression and communication, as well as anonymity protection, as well as”
- cultural infrastructure throughout the country»brukar benämnas en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“usually called cultural infrastructure, throughout the country.”
- cultural life vitalizes democracy»Ett rikt kulturliv vitaliserar även demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“A rich cultural life also vitalizes democracy.”
- independent news coverage»Public service ska tillhandahålla oberoende och saklig nyhetsförmedling« (party programme ↗)“Public service shall provide independent and factual news coverage”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to reform media support, not increase it, and the party programme explicitly warns that public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk for the media.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reform media support, not increase it, and the party programme explicitly warns that public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk for the media. The goal is independent institutions that stand free from state and politics and a broad range of media in competition. Increased support levels and new targeted support therefore go against the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill reformera mediestödet, inte höja det, och partiprogrammet varnar uttryckligen för att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk för medierna. Målet är självständiga institutioner som står fria från stat och politik och ett brett medieutbud i konkurrens. Höjda stödnivåer och nya riktade stöd går därför emot planens linje.
- reformed media supportdecisive»Reformera mediestödet för att stödja den digitala transformationen och omställningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reform media support to support the digital transformation and transition”
- risk with public media financing»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk.« (party programme ↗)“public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk.”
- media free from the state»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.« (party programme ↗)“The goal shall be independent institutions that in their operations stand free from state and politics.”
- diversity through competition»Moderaternas mediepolitik har som mål att skapa förutsättningar för ett brett utbud av medier i olika format som kan verka fritt, självständigt och i konkurrens med varandra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates' media policy aims to create conditions for a broad range of media in different formats that can operate freely, independently and in competition with each other.”
The plan requires that the public's economic control over the media sphere decrease and that media independence increase through reduced political control.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the public's economic control over the media sphere decrease and that media independence increase through reduced political control. The counter-proposal's requirement for increased support levels and a new targeted support for student media instead expand the public economic dependency. The plan's requirement for diversity speaks partly in the other direction, but is according to the plan carried by less state control rather than larger subsidies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över mediesfären minskar och att mediernas oberoende ökar genom minskad politisk styrning. Motförslagets krav på höjda stödnivåer och ett nytt riktat stöd till studentmedier utökar tvärtom det offentliga ekonomiska beroendet. Planens krav på mångfald talar delvis åt andra hållet, men bärs enligt planen av mindre statlig styrning snarare än större bidrag.
- less public media controldecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the public's economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”
- independent media and diversity»Mediernas oberoende ska öka genom minskad politisk styrning från statsmakten och åtgärder för en ökad mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media independence shall increase through reduced political control from the state and measures for increased diversity.”
- restraint with public spending»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scale back unnecessary public expenditure”
- results requirements for public investments»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU18)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1036 — Risker med Tiktok och kinesiskt statligt inflytande av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1231 — Begränsning av ungas tillgång till digital nätporr av Åsa Eriksson och Eva Lindh (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1310 — EU-standard för frivillig "verified human"-märkning på digitala plattformar av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1313 — Centrum för undersökande journalistik av Per-Arne Håkansson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1413 — Begränsning av personuppgifter i digitala söktjänster av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1433 — Sociala medier-plattformar och grundläggande demokratiska villkor av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1434 — Störande ljudnivåer vid reklamavbrott i radio och tv av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1435 — Anonyma konton på sociala medier av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1501 — Åtgärder mot populism, desinformation och mediekoncentration för att stärka demokratin av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1558 — Skydd av personuppgifter av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:219 — Avskaffande av svenskt presstöd av Elsa Widding (-)
- Motion 2025/26:2624 — Stärkt arbete för att motverka spridning av våldsam pornografi - ett digitalt barnskydd av Helena Vilhelmsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2747 — Mäns våld mot kvinnor av Annika Strandhäll (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2790 — Konstitutionella frågor av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2900 — Förstärkt skydd för enskilda individer av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2991 — Stärkta krav på åldersverifiering för porrsajter av Marléne Lund Kopparklint m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3183 — Kultur, civilsamhälle och medier av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:323 — En politik för studenter av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3238 — Tryggare digital uppväxtmiljö - barns rättigheter online av Marléne Lund Kopparklint m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3405 — Ökad civil försvarsförmåga och stärkt krisberedskap av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament