2023-09-132022/23:JuU31 · p.3JuUJustice
Evaluation of the Preventive Act
Evaluation of the expanded preventive-measures law
What's at stake: The decision affects how closely and how soon the new, far-reaching powers to use secret coercive measures for preventive purposes are reviewed, which matters for legal certainty and personal privacy for everyone who may be placed under surveillance.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should return with an earlier and more thorough evaluation of the expanded scope for preventive coercive measures, or whether the proposed five-year evaluation limit is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for an earlier or more thorough evaluation, pointing out that the regulation on the expanded scope for preventive coercive measures is already time-limited to five years and that the proposals overall are judged to strike a reasonable balance between law enforcement and personal privacy.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (V, C, MP)
The dissenters believe a thorough evaluation of the expanded preventive-measures law is needed as soon as possible to examine how it is applied against, among other things, the proportionality principle, the European Convention on Human Rights and personal privacy, arguing that the government's proposed five-year evaluation limit is too generous given how far-reaching the legislation is.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 246–56Ja 234–68
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/14 | match | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motions 2022/23:2402 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) point 1 and 2022/23:2404 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) point 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:2402 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2022/23:2404 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposed amendments concerning secret coercive measures. The proposal aims to provide law enforcement authorities with more effective tools in preventing, investigating and prosecuting serious crimes. Parliament's decision means that law enforcement authorities will be able to use so-called secret coercive measures, such as for example wiretapping, camera surveillance, room surveillance and data interception to a greater extent than today. The legislative amendments come into force on October 1, 2023.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject the government's proposals for expanded preventive coercive measures. (V, C, MP) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan rejects special terrorism legislation, guards personal integrity and fundamental rule-of-law principles and wants to counteract growing surveillance and registration.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan rejects special terrorism legislation, guards personal integrity and fundamental rule-of-law principles and wants to counteract growing surveillance and registration. A thorough and prompt evaluation of preventive coercive measures against the proportionality principle, the European Convention, and integrity is precisely the scrutiny the plan presupposes. A five-year limit appears against the plan's commitments as far too permissive.
Original (Swedish)
Planen avvisar särskild terroristlagstiftning, slår vakt om den personliga integriteten och fundamentala rättsstatliga principer och vill att växande övervakning och registrering motverkas. En grundlig och snar utvärdering av preventiva tvångsmedel mot proportionalitetsprincipen, Europakonventionen och integriteten är just den granskning planen förutsätter. En femårsgräns framstår mot planens åtaganden som alltför tillåtande.
- against special terrorism legislationdecisive»avvisar en särskild terroristlagstiftning« (party programme ↗)“rejects special terrorism legislation”
- personal integrityweak support»Alla människor har rätt till en bred privat sfär« (party programme ↗)“All people have a right to a broad private sphere”
- rule-of-law principles»personliga integriteten och fundamentala principer i en rättsstat« (party programme ↗)“personal integrity and fundamental principles in a state governed by law”
- presumption of innocence»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until proven otherwise”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan's stated line is that the police should have more tools, including better possibilities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime should be uncompromising.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's stated line is that the police should have more tools, including better possibilities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime should be uncompromising. The counter-proposal assumes that legislation is too intrusive and demands earlier and more comprehensive review of it, which runs counter to the plan's direction. The party programme's requirement to protect personal integrity pulls in the other direction, which is why the assessment is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planens uttalade linje är att polisen ska få fler verktyg, bland annat bättre möjligheter till avlyssning, och att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. Motförslaget utgår från att lagstiftningen är alltför ingripande och kräver en tidigare och mer omfattande granskning av den, vilket går emot planens riktning. Partiprogrammets krav på skydd för den personliga integriteten drar åt andra hållet, varför bedömningen är osäker.
- more tools for the policedecisive»Kraftigt öka antalet poliser på våra gator och torg. Vi vill säkra och stärka polisnärvaron i hela landet. Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Greatly increase the number of police on our streets and squares. We want to secure and strengthen police presence throughout the country. The police also need more tools, such as better possibilities for wiretapping and house searches.”
- uncompromising crime-fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. Samhällets fulla kraft ska mobiliseras för att trycka tillbaka de kriminella, kapa återväxten in i kriminaliteten och öka tryggheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime must be uncompromising. Society's full force must be mobilized to push back the criminals, cut regrowth into crime and increase security.”
- protection of personal integrity»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute obligation to protect freedom and personal integrity”
The plan opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into privacy and requires that policy protects people's privacy as surveillance capabilities increase.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into privacy and requires that policy protects people's privacy as surveillance capabilities increase. The counter-proposal's requirement for a thorough and prompt evaluation against the principle of proportionality, the European Convention and personal privacy is a direct consequence of that commitment. The plan also establishes that crime prevention must not be conducted at the expense of human rights and that citizens must always be able to scrutinize power.
Original (Swedish)
Planen motsätter sig alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors integritet när övervakningsmöjligheterna ökar. Motförslagets krav på en grundlig och snar utvärdering mot proportionalitetsprincipen, Europakonventionen och den personliga integriteten är ett direkt utflöde av det åtagandet. Planen slår också fast att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter och att medborgarna alltid ska kunna granska makten.
- against disproportionate intrusionsdecisive»alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i« (party programme ↗)“all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into”
- protect privacy in surveillance»kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors« (party programme ↗)“requires that policy protects people's”
- crime prevention within human rights»viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“important but must not be conducted at the expense of human”
- scrutiny of power»kunna granska makten.« (party programme ↗)“be able to scrutinize power.”
The plan explicitly says no to preventive tapping and requires that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state be defended.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says no to preventive tapping and requires that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state be defended. All legislation should be assessed against its impact on personal integrity and there must be proportionality between the restriction and the purpose. A swift and thorough evaluation of preventive legislation against the proportionality principle and the European Convention directly follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen nej till preventiv avlyssning och kräver att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter mot staten försvaras. All lagstiftning ska prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten och det måste finnas proportionalitet mellan inskränkningen och syftet. En snar och grundlig utvärdering av preventivlagen mot proportionalitetsprincipen och Europakonventionen följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- no to preventive tappingdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and individuals' rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive tapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- proportionality requirementweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet. Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be assessed against its impact on people's personal integrity. There must be proportionality between the legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the legislation's purpose.”
- strong integrity protection»Ett starkt integritetsskydd är därför en omistlig del av ett öppet och demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Strong integrity protection is therefore an essential part of an open and democratic society.”
- rights assessment of legislation»En författningsdomstol är viktig för att värna bland annat dessa rättigheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A constitutional court is important to value among other things these rights.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan requires that protection for the individual's privacy be strengthened, that all new legislative proposals be analysed from a privacy perspective and that already-implemented laws with strong privacy impact be regularly evaluated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that protection for the individual's privacy be strengthened, that all new legislative proposals be analysed from a privacy perspective and that already-implemented laws with strong privacy impact be regularly evaluated. Intrusive measures are according to the plan justified only if a countervailing interest weighs demonstrably heavier and the measure is effective — which can only be determined through evaluation. The counter-proposal's requirement for thorough and early evaluation is therefore the plan's own stance, even though the plan in substance wants to expand the secret coercive measures.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skyddet för den enskildes integritet stärks, att alla nya lagförslag analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt och att redan införda lagar med stark påverkan på integriteten regelbundet utvärderas. Ingripande åtgärder är enligt planen bara berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv – vilket bara kan avgöras genom utvärdering. Motförslagets krav på en grundlig och tidig utvärdering är därför planens egen ståndpunkt, även om planen i sak vill utöka de hemliga tvångsmedlen.
- evaluate privacy-sensitive lawsdecisive»integriteten ska regelbundet utvärderas.« (party programme ↗)“privacy shall be regularly evaluated.”
- proportionality assessment»är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“are justified only if a countervailing interest weighs demonstrably heavier and the measure is effective.”
- privacy analysis of bills»lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“legislative proposals shall be analysed from a privacy perspective.”
- expanded coercive measures in substance»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Telephone tapping and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both for suspicion of more crimes than today and after court decision against organised gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires strong protection of personal integrity and that criminal investigation powers are clearly defined, while evaluation and control are important political tasks.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires strong protection of personal integrity and that criminal investigation powers are clearly defined, while evaluation and control are important political tasks. A thorough evaluation of intrusive preventive coercive measures follows from this. The plan's requirement that all crimes are effectively prosecuted at the same time argues that the tools are needed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett starkt skydd för den personliga integriteten och att brottsbekämpande befogenheter är tydligt avgränsade, samtidigt som utvärdering och kontroll är viktiga politiska uppgifter. En grundlig utvärdering av ingripande preventiva tvångsmedel följer av detta. Planens krav på att alla brott effektivt beivras talar samtidigt för att verktygen behövs.
- strong integrity protectiondecisive»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity must have a strong”
- defined powers»Det europeiska polissamarbetet ska vara väl utvecklat samtidigt som dess befogenheter ska vara tydligt avgränsade« (party programme ↗)“European police cooperation should be well developed while its powers should be clearly defined”
- monitoring and control»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost tracking and quality control are therefore important political”
- effective crime prevention»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that legislation be adapted so that more gang criminals are held accountable and disappear from the streets, and it wants to introduce new powerful tools such as long-term surveillance with ankle monitors and search zones.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that legislation be adapted so that more gang criminals are held accountable and disappear from the streets, and it wants to introduce new powerful tools such as long-term surveillance with ankle monitors and search zones. An earlier and more comprehensive evaluation aimed at testing the preventive powers against integrity requirements goes against that line, even though the plan also protects personal integrity. The elevated terror threat strengthens the need for the tools to work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att lagstiftningen anpassas så att fler gängkriminella ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan, och den vill införa nya ingripande verktyg som långtidsövervakning med fotboja och visitationszoner. En tidigare och mer omfattande utvärdering med syfte att pröva de preventiva befogenheterna mot integritetskrav går emot den linjen, även om planen också värnar den personliga integriteten. Det höjda terrorhotet skärper behovet av att verktygen får verka.
- adapted crime-fighting legislationdecisive»Gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister – och lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists – and legislation must be adapted accordingly so that more are held accountable and disappear from the streets.”
- new preventive tools»Införa en helt ny möjlighet till långtidsövervakning med fotboja« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a completely new possibility for long-term surveillance with ankle monitors”
- powerful authorities»Införa visitationszoner så att Polisen får bättre möjligheter att leta efter vapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce search zones so that the Police get better opportunities to search for weapons”
- protected personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska värnas, såväl från intrång« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall be protected, both from intrusion”
Worldstate weighed in: Terror threat level raised to high threat for an extended period — Strengthens the plan's requirement for effective preventive authorities
The election manifesto's line is that the justice system shall get more effective tools against serious crime, with expanded surveillance, information gathering, camera monitoring and wiretapping, and that procedural barriers shall be removed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's line is that the justice system shall get more effective tools against serious crime, with expanded surveillance, information gathering, camera monitoring and wiretapping, and that procedural barriers shall be removed. The counter-proposal instead wants to accelerate a review of preventive legislation with a view to proportionality and personal integrity, which pulls in the opposite direction. With the terrorist threat level raised to high the plan's requirements for effective measures against security threats weigh even more heavily.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestets linje är att rättsväsendet ska få mer effektiva verktyg mot grov brottslighet, med utökad spaning, informationsinhämtning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning, och att processuella hinder ska undanröjas. Motförslaget vill i stället skynda på en granskning av den preventiva lagstiftningen med sikte på proportionalitet och personlig integritet, vilket drar åt motsatt håll. Med terrorhotnivån höjd till hög väger planens krav på verkningsfulla åtgärder mot säkerhetshot än tyngre.
- expanded surveillance and wiretappingdecisive»Åtgärder ska vidtas för att bättre kunna kartlägga gängaktiva genom t.ex. underrättelsearbete och informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures shall be taken to better map gang-active persons through, for example, intelligence work and information gathering, surveillance, camera monitoring and wiretapping.”
- more effective tools against gang crime»Framförallt behöver rättsväsendet få mer effektiva verktyg för att bekämpa gängbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Above all the justice system needs more effective tools to combat gang crime.”
- remove procedural barriers»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural barriers to enable increased prosecution must also be removed.”
- strict measures against security threats»Införa hårda restriktioner och förvar för säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce strict restrictions and detention for security threats present in Sweden.”
Worldstate weighed in: Terrorist threat level raised to high — Reinforces the plan's requirements for effective preventive tools against security threats.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:JuU31)
- Committee report full text (HA01JuU31)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:2402 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:126 Hemliga tvångsmedel - effektiva verktyg för att förhindra och utreda allvarliga brott av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2403 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:126 Hemliga tvångsmedel - effektiva verktyg för att förhindra och utreda allvarliga brott av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2404 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:126 Hemliga tvångsmedel - effektiva verktyg för att förhindra och utreda allvarliga brott av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2022/23:126 — Hemliga tvångsmedel - effektiva verktyg för att förhindra och utreda allvarliga brott
Source: The Swedish Parliament