2024-12-172024/25:FöU2 · p.8FöUDefence
Military service
Timeline for expanded conscript training
What's at stake: The timing affects how quickly the Armed Forces get the personnel the war organisation needs, while a faster ramp-up places greater demands on training capacity, equipment and exercise areas before the volumes can be reached.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the goal of 12,000 conscripts in basic training per year should be reached within the 2032-2035 window, as the government proposes, or whether the Riksdag should establish that the goal must be met already by 2032, in line with the earlier defence agreement.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees with the government and the Armed Forces that basic-training volumes should be increased gradually, in balance with production and training conditions, with the aim of reaching 12,000 conscripts within the 2032-2035 period. At the same time, the committee shares the Defence Commission's position that the worsened security situation requires a substantial increase in ambition and wants the Armed Forces to develop options for holding, as far as possible, to the target of 12,000 conscripts a year from 2032, but rejects the motion calling for 2032 to be fixed as a binding end year.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (S)
The reservation (S) wants to hold to 2032 as the year by which 12,000 conscripts should be in training, in line with the earlier defence agreement, instead of the government's proposed 2032-2035 window. The reasoning is that shifting the deadline should have been tied to a specific agreement with clear explanations and reasons, which the reservation says has not happened, and the Riksdag should therefore inform the government that the goal of 12,000 conscripts must be reached by 2032 at the latest.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3254 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) amendment 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3254 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposals for an overarching goal for total defence new goals for military and civil defence the direction of the Armed Forces' war organization. The government's proposal means a significant strengthening of total defence, which consists of both military and civil activities.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure a conscription training capacity of 12,000 persons. (S) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants to see a modern total defence built on universal military service with broad capacity to meet different crises.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to see a modern total defence built on universal military service with broad capacity to meet different crises. Holding to 2032 as the year when 12,000 conscripts shall be trained, rather than a sliding interval, concerns the implementation of precisely that military service line. The plan is meanwhile opposed to militarisation in general, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt med bred förmåga att möta olika kriser. Att hålla fast vid 2032 som året då 12 000 värnpliktiga ska utbildas, i stället för ett glidande intervall, gäller genomförandet av just den värnpliktslinjen. Planen är samtidigt emot militarisering i stort, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- universal military service as foundationdecisive»Vi vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a modern total defence built on universal military service”
- broad defence capacity»bred förmåga att möta olika former av kriser Sverige kan ställas inför.« (party programme ↗)“broad capacity to meet different forms of crises Sweden can face.”
- against militarisation»Vi vänder oss emot militarisering och kapprustning.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose militarisation and arms race.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto says that the pace of rearmament shall increase further and that increased appropriations shall be allocated to, among other things, more conscripts, with the deadline of two per cent of GDP by 2028 at the latest.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto says that the pace of rearmament shall increase further and that increased appropriations shall be allocated to, among other things, more conscripts, with the deadline of two per cent of GDP by 2028 at the latest. The counter-proposal's requirement to keep to 2032 for 12,000 conscripts instead of a range until 2035 follows this line on pace and clear timeframes. The plan gives no volume figures, so the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger att takten i upprustningen ska öka ytterligare och att ökade anslag ska omsättas i bland annat fler värnpliktiga, med tidsgränsen två procent av BNP senast 2028. Motförslagets krav på att hålla fast vid 2032 för 12 000 värnpliktiga i stället för ett intervall till 2035 följer denna linje om tempo och tydliga tidsgränser. Planen anger inga volymsiffror, varför bedömningen är härledd.
- increased rearmament pacedecisive»Takten i upprustningen ska öka ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The pace of rearmament shall increase further.”
- more conscripts»Vi vill att ökningen ska omsättas i bland annat fler värnpliktiga, modern materiel samt förstärkt militär närvaro över hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want the increase to be allocated to, among other things, more conscripts, modern equipment and strengthened military presence across the country.”
- clear deadline for rearmament»Det ska ske så fort det är praktiskt möjligt och senast år 2028.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“This shall happen as soon as practically possible and by 2028 at the latest.”
- strong national defence»Sverige behöver bygga ett starkt folkförsvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to build a strong national defence.”
The counter-proposal wants to accelerate the build-up of conscription volumes so that 12,000 is reached by 2032.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to accelerate the build-up of conscription volumes so that 12,000 is reached by 2032. The plan's line is the opposite prioritization: participation in military defence shall be based on voluntariness, a civilian service shall complement conscription and a larger share of defence spending shall go to civil defence. The plan specifies no volumes or dates, so the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill skynda på uppbyggnaden av värnpliktsvolymerna så att 12 000 nås senast 2032. Planens linje är den motsatta prioriteringen: deltagande i det militära försvaret ska bygga på frivillighet, en civiltjänstgöring ska komplettera värnplikten och en större andel av försvarets pengar ska gå till det civila försvaret. Planen anger inga volymer eller årtal, så slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.
- voluntariness ahead of obligationdecisive»Deltagande i det militära försvarets verksamheter ska bygga på frivillighet.« (party programme ↗)“Participation in military defence activities shall be based on voluntariness.”
- civil defence is prioritized»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase allocations to crisis preparedness.”
- civilian service as complement»införa en civiltjänstgöring som komplement till värnplikten för att ge fler den kunskap och träning som behövs i kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a civilian service as a complement to conscription to give more people the knowledge and training needed in crisis.”
- military disarmament»Sverige ska bidra till militär nedrustning i världen.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall contribute to military disarmament in the world.”
The election manifesto commits to strengthening military defence quickly, forcefully and long-term and that Sweden shall be strengthened quickly and in a focused manner.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to strengthening military defence quickly, forcefully and long-term and that Sweden shall be strengthened quickly and in a focused manner. The counter-proposal's requirement that the goal of 12,000 conscripts shall be achieved by 2032 at the latest instead of a range until 2035 is the faster path and thus is in line with the plan. However, the plan specifies no volumes or dates for conscription.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt och att Sverige ska rustas snabbt och fokuserat. Motförslagets krav att målet om 12 000 värnpliktiga ska vara uppnått senast 2032 i stället för ett intervall till 2035 är den snabbare vägen och ligger därmed i linje med planen. Planen anger dock inga volymer eller årtal för värnplikten.
- rapid and forceful strengtheningdecisive»Sverige ska försvaras. Vi vill rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt. Sverige behöver satsa två procent av BNP på försvaret så snart det är praktiskt möjligt och gå med i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall be defended. We want to strengthen military defence quickly, forcefully and long-term. Sweden needs to invest two per cent of GDP in defence as soon as practically possible and join NATO.”
- rapid strengthening against external threats»Sverige måste rustas snabbt och fokuserat; ingen ska kunna ta vårt demokratiska samhälle ifrån oss.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be strengthened quickly and in a focused manner; no one shall be able to take our democratic society from us.”
- own territorial defence»Sverige måste därför kunna försvara sitt eget territorium.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must therefore be able to defend its own territory.”
- raised defence capability now»Kommande mandatperiod kommer på många sätt att präglas av att föra Sverige in i Nato och höja vår försvarsförmåga, säkra vår energiförsörjning, men också hanteringen av en hög inflation och stigande kostnader för hushållen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The coming term of office will in many ways be characterized by bringing Sweden into NATO and raising our defence capability, securing our energy supply, but also handling high inflation and rising household costs.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that the number of employees and conscripts in the war organization shall increase and that more weapons-bearing than today shall undergo military basic training, with a stated time pressure: the defence appropriation shall reach two percent of GDP already in 2025.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that the number of employees and conscripts in the war organization shall increase and that more weapons-bearing than today shall undergo military basic training, with a stated time pressure: the defence appropriation shall reach two percent of GDP already in 2025. The counter-proposal's demand that the goal of 12,000 conscripts shall be reached by at latest 2032, instead of an interval to 2035, lies in line with this tempo ambition. The plan gives no volume figures or dates for conscription, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka och att fler vapenföra än i dag ska genomgå militär grundutbildning, med en uttalad tidspress: försvarsanslaget ska nå två procent av BNP redan 2025. Motförslagets krav att målet om 12 000 värnpliktiga ska vara nått senast 2032, i stället för ett intervall till 2035, ligger i linje med denna tempoambition. Planen anger dock inga volymsiffror eller årtal för värnplikten, varför stödet är härlett.
- more conscriptsdecisive»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the war organization shall increase, new materiel be added and civil defence be strengthened at the same pace as the military.”
- more in military basic training»För att stärka Sveriges samlade försvarsförmåga ska fler vapenföra än i dag genomgå en grundläggande militär utbildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To strengthen Sweden's combined defence capability, more weapons-bearing than today shall undergo basic military training.”
- fast defence buildup»Vi vill därför redan 2025 se ett försvarsanslag om 2 procent av BNP och därmed skapa tillräckliga förutsättningar att stärka både armen, marinen och flygvapnet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore want to see a defence appropriation of 2 percent of GDP already in 2025 and thereby create sufficient conditions to strengthen both the army, the navy and the air force.”
- significantly stronger defence»Sverige behöver ett betydligt starkare militärt försvar än i dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs a significantly stronger military defence than today.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan bases defence on a general total defence obligation and requires an armed force that can act as a deterrent during security crises in the region, with sufficient resources for national defence.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan bases defence on a general total defence obligation and requires an armed force that can act as a deterrent during security crises in the region, with sufficient resources for national defence. This argues for the goal of 12,000 conscripts being reached as soon as possible, at the latest by 2032. However, the plan provides no timetable and wants military training to be based on voluntary participation as far as possible, which is why the evidence is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger försvaret på en allmän totalförsvarsplikt och kräver en försvarsmakt som kan verka krigsavhållande vid säkerhetspolitiska kriser i närområdet, med tillräckliga resurser till totalförsvaret. Det talar för att målet om 12 000 värnpliktiga bör nås så snart som möjligt, alltså senast 2032. Planen anger dock ingen tidtabell och vill att militärutbildningen så långt möjligt bygger på frivillighet, varför underlaget är svagt.
- general total defence obligationdecisive»Alla svenska medborgare ska omfattas av en total« (party programme ↗)“All Swedish citizens should be covered by a total”
- deterrent capability»kan verka krigsavhållande vid säkerhetspolitiska kriser« (party programme ↗)“can act as a deterrent during security crises”
- sufficient national defence resources»Det samlade totalförsvaret måste ha tillräckliga re« (party programme ↗)“The overall national defence must have sufficient re”
- voluntary participation in military training»Militärutbildning bör så långt som möjligt bygga på frivillighet« (party programme ↗)“Military training should as far as possible be based on voluntary participation”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan drives rapid military buildup: appropriations should reach 2 percent of GDP already in 2025 and the army, air force and navy should be strengthened in capability and materiel, with the reasoning that a country that cannot defend itself can lose its freedom any day.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan drives rapid military buildup: appropriations should reach 2 percent of GDP already in 2025 and the army, air force and navy should be strengthened in capability and materiel, with the reasoning that a country that cannot defend itself can lose its freedom any day. The counter-proposal's requirement to stick to 2032 for 12,000 conscripts, instead of a range until 2035, follows that spirit of the times. The plan specifies no conscript volumes, so the conclusion is derived from the ambition level.
Original (Swedish)
Planen driver på för snabb uppbyggnad av försvaret: anslagen ska nå två procent av BNP redan 2025 och armén, flygvapnet och marinen ska stärkas i förmåga och materiel, med motiveringen att det land som inte kan försvara sig kan förlora sin frihet vilken dag som helst. Motförslagets krav att hålla fast vid 2032 för 12 000 värnpliktiga, i stället för ett intervall till 2035, följer den tidsandan. Planen anger inga värnpliktsvolymer, så slutsatsen är härledd ur ambitionsnivån.
- rapid military buildupdecisive»Verka för att försvarsanslagen uppgår till motsvarande 2 procent av BNP redan år 2025« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for defence appropriations to amount to 2 percent of GDP already in 2025”
- defence is urgent»Det land som inte kan försvara sig, kan vilken dag som helst förlora sin frihet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A country that cannot defend itself can lose its freedom any day.”
- strengthened defence capability(2022 manifesto)
- strong defence»Sverige ska ha ett starkt försvar och förmåga att freda våra« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have a strong defence and capability to defend our”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the restoration of Swedish defence capability is proceeding significantly more slowly than the dismantling did, and that total defence shall be restored and prepared for war.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the restoration of Swedish defence capability is proceeding significantly more slowly than the dismantling did, and that total defence shall be restored and prepared for war. A requirement that the target of 12,000 conscripts shall be achieved by 2032 instead of sometime by 2035 follows from that urgency. The plan also bases personnel supply on a mix of professional soldiers and conscripts, which presupposes growing conscription volumes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att återupprättandet av svensk försvarsförmåga går betydligt långsammare än nedmonteringen gjorde, och att totalförsvaret ska återupprättas och rustas för krig. Ett krav på att målet 12 000 värnpliktiga ska vara uppnått senast 2032 i stället för någon gång till 2035 följer av den otåligheten. Planen bygger dessutom personalförsörjningen på en blandning av yrkessoldater och värnpliktiga, vilket förutsätter växande värnpliktsvolymer.
- reconstruction proceeds too slowlydecisive»Återupprättandet av svensk försvarsförmåga går betydligt långsammare än vad den gick att avveckla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The restoration of Swedish defence capability is proceeding significantly more slowly than the dismantling did.”
- conscription in personnel supply»Personalförsörjningen inom försvaret behöver säkerställas genom en blandning av yrkessoldater och värnpliktiga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Personnel supply within the defence force needs to be secured through a mix of professional soldiers and conscripts.”
- total defence prepared for war»Återupprätta ett totalförsvar som är rustat för krig« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Restore a total defence that is prepared for war”
- duty to defend freedom»Den som åtnjuter ett lands frihet skall också vara beredd att försvara denna frihet.« (party programme ↗)“The one who enjoys a country's freedom shall also be prepared to defend that freedom.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FöU2)
- Committee report full text (HC01FöU2)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1044 — Prövning av nedläggningshotade flygplatser för Sveriges civila och militära beredskap av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:116 — Etablering av ett luftvärnsregemente i Kalmar av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1162 — Översyn av infrastrukturen i Västsverige utifrån ett säkerhetspolitiskt perspektiv av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:123 — Säkerställande av samhällsviktig verksamhet och militär infrastruktur vid Säve flygplats av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1394 — Kemikaliepolitik av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1405 — Totalförsvarsmotion av Lars Wistedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1406 — Militärt försvar av Lars Wistedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1407 — Civilt försvar av Björn Söder m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1433 — Säkerhetspolitik av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1436 — Rymdstrategi av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1442 — Arktis av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1501 — Biologiska smittor av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:202 — De gröna näringarna och äganderätten av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2023 — Stärkt sydsvenskt försvar av Ludvig Ceimertz m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2331 — Försörjningsberedskap av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2383 — Gotland är värt att försvara av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2486 — Vatten, hav och fiske av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:25 — Fortsatt stöd till Ukraina av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2664 — Beredskapslager för säkrad livsmedelstillgång av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2710 — Stärkt civilt försvar av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament