2026-04-152025/26:SfU16 · p.1SfUMigration & social insurance
Migration and asylum policy
Prioritizing work to identify security risks among people seeking to come to Sweden
What's at stake: The decision concerns the ability to detect early on individuals who pose a security risk among those seeking to come to Sweden, for example as asylum seekers, which matters both for national security and for the fairness of the migration process.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should be instructed by parliament to prioritize the Migration Agency's and the Security Service's work to detect individuals who may pose a security risk among those coming to Sweden, or whether current work and the direction of migration policy are already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion, pointing out that large-scale immigration has already fallen sharply, to the lowest number of asylum seekers in nearly three decades, while the reception system and return work have been tightened. The committee currently sees no need for a specific instruction to prioritize work on identifying security risks.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (C)
The reservation (C) wants the government to ensure that the Migration Agency's and the Security Service's work to detect individuals who may pose a risk to national security, for example among those seeking asylum, is prioritized.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 149–20Ja 88–81
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:137 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:931 by Jamal El-Haj (-) provision 3, 2025/26:1032 by Jamal El-Haj (-) provisions 1, 2 and 5, 2025/26:1277 by Josefin Malmqvist (M) provision 2, 2025/26:1697 by Staffan Eklöf (SD), 2025/26:1751 by Boriana Åberg (M), 2025/26:2798 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) provisions 5, 6 and 31, 2025/26:3190 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) provision 15 and 2025/26:3556 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) provision 103.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:137 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:931 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 3, 2025/26:1032 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkandena 1, 2 och 5, 2025/26:1277 av Josefin Malmqvist (M) yrkande 2, 2025/26:1697 av Staffan Eklöf (SD), 2025/26:1751 av Boriana Åberg (M), 2025/26:2798 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) yrkandena 5, 6 och 31, 2025/26:3190 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 15 och 2025/26:3556 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 103.
Riksdag decision: Parliament voted no on 157 proposals in motions on migration matters from the general motion period 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, family immigration and the asylum process. Parliament refers, among other things, to ongoing work in the areas that the proposals address.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to prioritize security screening of persons seeking asylum in Sweden. (C) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan is explicitly anti-racist and opposes immigrants being singled out and suspected as a group; asylum seekers shall be guaranteed an individual and legally secure examination.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is explicitly anti-racist and opposes immigrants being singled out and suspected as a group; asylum seekers shall be guaranteed an individual and legally secure examination. A formal request to the government that particularly highlights asylum seekers as a source of security risks makes precisely that connection the starting point. The plan does not deny the need for security work, but its principle speaks against directing it at asylum seekers as a group.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är uttalat antirasistisk och vänder sig mot att invandrade pekas ut och misstänkliggörs som grupp; asylsökande ska garanteras en individuell och rättssäker prövning. Ett tillkännagivande som särskilt lyfter asylsökande som källa till säkerhetsrisker gör just den kopplingen till utgångspunkt. Planen förnekar inte behovet av säkerhetsarbete, men dess princip talar emot att rikta det mot asylsökande som grupp.
- rejects singling out immigrantsdecisive»högerns politik går ut på att angripa invandrare, sjuka, arbetslösa och personer med funktionsnedsättning och att begränsa vår tillgång till välfärden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“the right's policy is to attack immigrants, the sick, the unemployed and people with disabilities and to limit our access to welfare”
- individual legally secure examination»Här ska den som söker asyl garanteras« (party programme ↗)“Here the asylum seeker shall be guaranteed”
- defend the right to asylum»Asylrätten undergrävs just nu i land efter land.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to asylum is being undermined right now in country after country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires order in refugee reception with increased state control and a continued strict migration policy, and also commits to preventing terrorist attacks and violent extremism.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires order in refugee reception with increased state control and a continued strict migration policy, and also commits to preventing terrorist attacks and violent extremism. Prioritising authorities' work to identify people who could pose a security risk follows directly from these two commitments. However, the plan does not explicitly mention security vetting in the asylum process.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ordning och reda i flyktingmottagandet med ökad statlig kontroll och en fortsatt stram migrationspolitik, och åtar sig samtidigt att förhindra terrordåd och våldsbejakande extremism. Att prioritera myndigheternas arbete med att upptäcka personer som kan utgöra en säkerhetsrisk följer direkt av dessa två åtaganden. Planen nämner dock inte säkerhetsprövning i asylprocessen uttryckligen.
- state control in receptiondecisive»Ordning och reda i flyktingmottagandet, genom ökad statlig kontroll, styrning och« (party programme ↗)“Order in refugee reception, through increased state control, governance and”
- prevented terrorist attacks»Bekämpande av våldsbejakande extremism och förhindrande av terrordåd.« (party programme ↗)“Combating violent extremism and preventing terrorist attacks.”
- strict migration policy»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line is firm.”
- strict and sustainable migration policy»Långsiktigt hållbar svensk migrationspolitik som under överskådlig tid behöver vara« (party programme ↗)“Long-term sustainable Swedish migration policy that for the foreseeable future needs to be”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the right to seek asylum and have one's application individually assessed is a human right, and explicitly opposes immigrants as a group being made scapegoats for social problems.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the right to seek asylum and have one's application individually assessed is a human right, and explicitly opposes immigrants as a group being made scapegoats for social problems. A special statement about prioritizing the search for security risks among asylum seekers targets the group in just that way. The plan simultaneously acknowledges the need for preparedness against threats, which is why the uncertainty is great.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att rätten att söka asyl och få sin ansökan individuellt prövad är en mänsklig rättighet, och vänder sig uttryckligen mot att invandrare som kollektiv görs till syndabockar för samhällsproblem. Ett särskilt uttalande om att prioritera sökandet efter säkerhetsrisker bland asylsökande pekar ut gruppen på just det sättet. Planen erkänner samtidigt behovet av beredskap mot hot, varför osäkerheten är stor.
- asylum as a human rightdecisive»Asylrätten ska värnas i Sverige och i resten av EU och världen« (party programme ↗)“The right to seek asylum shall be valued in Sweden and in the rest of the EU and the world”
- against collective suspicion»Idag ser vi hur invandrare som kollektiv allt oftare klandras för samhällsproblem och görs« (party programme ↗)“Today we see how immigrants as a group are increasingly blamed for social problems and made”
- preparedness against threats»Miljöpartiet har en bred syn på säkerhet och trygghet.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party has a broad view of security and safety.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes it a main priority to strengthen the social contract and security from the country's borders to the neighbourhood, and requires that defence capability be adapted to new threats to the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes it a main priority to strengthen the social contract and security from the country's borders to the neighbourhood, and requires that defence capability be adapted to new threats to the country. That authorities prioritize work on identifying people who may pose a security risk follows from that, without infringing on the plan's openness on asylum issues. However, the plan does not explicitly mention security vetting in the asylum process.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör det till en huvudprioritering att stärka samhällskontraktet och tryggheten från landets gränser till kvarteret, och kräver att försvarsförmågan anpassas efter nya hot mot landet. Att myndigheterna prioriterar arbetet med att upptäcka personer som kan utgöra en säkerhetsrisk följer av det, utan att inkräkta på planens öppenhet i asylfrågan. Planen nämner dock inte säkerhetsprövning i asylprocessen uttryckligen.
- security from border to neighbourhooddecisive»Vi ska stärka samhällskontraktet för ett tryggare och starkare Sverige, från landets gränser till ditt kvarter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will strengthen the social contract for a safer and stronger Sweden, from the country's borders to your neighbourhood.”
- adaptation to new threats»Därför måste vi också anpassa vår försvarsförmåga efter nya hot mot landet.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore we must also adapt our defence capability to new threats to the country.”
- strengthened security preparedness»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence too is vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The election manifesto makes combating Islamists and criminal gangs a main issue and wants to see a significantly strengthened external border security with maintained legal security.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes combating Islamists and criminal gangs a main issue and wants to see a significantly strengthened external border security with maintained legal security. Asylum rights shall be protected so that the one with grounds stays and the one without grounds leaves the country, which presupposes that the authorities can identify persons who pose a security risk. The counter-proposal's demands for prioritized work with security risks thus lie in the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör kampen mot islamister och kriminella klaner till en huvudfråga och vill se ett kraftigt stärkt yttre gränsskydd med bibehållen rättssäkerhet. Asylrätten ska värnas så att den med skäl stannar och den utan skäl lämnar landet, vilket förutsätter att myndigheterna kan identifiera personer som utgör en säkerhetsrisk. Motförslagets krav på prioriterat arbete med säkerhetsrisker ligger därför i planens riktning.
- counter Islamism and gangsdecisive»Islamister och kriminella klaner spär på segregationen och hotar sammanhållningen i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Islamists and criminal gangs fuel segregation and threaten cohesion in Sweden.”
- strengthened border security»För att stärka det yttre gränsskyddet och rättssäkerheten behöver EU på sikt helt ta över ansvaret för kontrollen av unionens yttre gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To strengthen external border security and legal security, the EU in the long term needs to completely take over responsibility for controlling the union's external borders.”
- legally secure asylum assessment»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Asylum rights shall be protected where the one with asylum grounds shall stay and the one without grounds leaves the country.”
- more in detention»Fler som väntar på både utvisning och avvisning ska hållas i förvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More who await both deportation and rejection shall be held in detention.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires Sweden to be able to meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and points out in the election manifesto that Islamist extremists have decisive influence in certain areas.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires Sweden to be able to meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and points out in the election manifesto that Islamist extremists have decisive influence in certain areas. Prioritising work to detect security risks among asylum seekers follows from this and from the requirement for strict migration policy and countering irregular migration. At the same time, the plan requires legal certainty in the asylum process, which is a limit for how the work may be designed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att Sverige kan möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism och pekar i valmanifestet ut att islamistiska extremister har avgörande påverkan i vissa områden. Att prioritera arbetet med att upptäcka säkerhetsrisker bland asylsökande följer av detta och av kravet på stram migrationspolitik och motverkad irreguljär migration. Planen kräver samtidigt rättssäkerhet i asylprocessen, vilket är en gräns för hur arbetet får utformas.
- protection against terrorismdecisive»Sverige måste kunna möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism,« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must be able to meet attacks from international crime, terrorism,”
- strict migration policy»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is necessary to address integration problems and social exclusion.”
- counter irregular migration»Vi vill motverka irreguljär migration, motverka människosmuggling och ha ett« (party programme ↗)“We want to counter irregular migration, prevent human smuggling and have a”
- legally certain asylum process»För den som söker asyl i Sverige måste hela processen vara utformad så att rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“For the person seeking asylum in Sweden, the entire process must be designed so that legal certainty”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires orderly processes and control over borders as the basis for all openness, and wants to strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect democracy and all citizens.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires orderly processes and control over borders as the basis for all openness, and wants to strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect democracy and all citizens. It goes further than the counter-proposal by requiring national honour screening of asylum-seeking families and deportation of foreign gang members. Prioritizing the authorities' work in identifying security risks among asylum seekers follows directly from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ordnade processer och kontroll över gränserna som grund för all öppenhet, och vill stärka Säkerhetspolisens förmåga att skydda demokratin och alla medborgare. Den går redan längre än motförslaget genom att kräva nationell hedersscreening av asylsökande familjer och utvisning av utländska gängmedlemmar. Att prioritera myndigheternas arbete med att upptäcka säkerhetsrisker bland asylsökande följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- strengthened security servicedecisive»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and all citizens of the country”
- screening of asylum seekers»Verka för att en nationell hedersscreening införs för asylsökande familjer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a national honour screening to be introduced for asylum-seeking families”
- orderly processes and border control»Vår öppenhet mot omvärlden ska alltid bygga på ordnade« (party programme ↗)“Our openness to the world should always be based on orderly”
- deport security threats»Utvisa gängmedlemmar, som inte är svenska medborgare, oavsett om de dömts för brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deport gang members who are not Swedish citizens regardless of whether they have been convicted of crime”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires strict restrictions and detention for security threats present in Sweden and that security threats shall be monitored and deported.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires strict restrictions and detention for security threats present in Sweden and that security threats shall be monitored and deported. To prioritize the work of detecting individuals who may pose a risk to the nation's security, including among asylum seekers, is a direct application of that commitment, in line with the plan's requirement for more controls in the migration field.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen hårda restriktioner och förvar för säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige och att säkerhetshot ska kontrolleras och utvisas. Att prioritera arbetet med att upptäcka personer som kan utgöra en risk för rikets säkerhet, bland annat bland asylsökande, är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet, i linje med planens krav på fler kontroller inom migrationsområdet.
- harsh measures against security threatsdecisive»Införa hårda restriktioner och förvar för säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce strict restrictions and detention for security threats present in Sweden.”
- monitoring and deportation of security threats»De säkerhetshot som verkar inom dessa miljöer ska kontrolleras, och utvisas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security threats operating in these environments shall be monitored and deported.”
- more controls in migration»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow society and illegal migration with more controls and more deportations”
- strengthened national security»Rusta Sverige inför en ny säkerhetspolitisk situation i vårt närområde« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Equip Sweden for a new security political situation in our neighboring region”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SfU16)
- Committee report full text (HD01SfU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1000 — Konsekvenser av massflyktsdirektivets upphörande av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1004 — Skydd för kristna i världen av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1032 — En långsiktigt hållbar invandringspolitik för tillväxt, välfärd och sammanhållning av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1064 — Ett slutligt avskaffande av EBO av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1182 — Avskaffande av EBO av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1215 — Avskaffande av EBO-lagen av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:126 — Frivillig lojalitetsförklaring för nya naturaliserade medborgare av Rashid Farivar och Staffan Eklöf (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1277 — Sexualbrott av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:137 — Pushfaktorer för invandrare att frivilligt lämna Sverige av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1452 — Kortare väntetider för att kunna få jobb i Sverige av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1465 — Rättssäkerhet för barn som växer upp i Sverige av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1520 — Utvärdering och förtydligande av religionsfrihetens gränser för att motverka normkollisioner och värna det öppna samhället av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1555 — Obligatoriskt PCR-prov där samhället så kräver av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1642 — Medborgarskapsceremoni och lojalitetsförklaring av Stefan Olsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1664 — Säkerställ verkställighet av utvisningsbeslut av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1697 — En sanningskommission om migrationspolitiken av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1750 — Förändring av svensk och europeisk asylpolitik av Jan Ericson och Boriana Åberg (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1751 — Automatisk utvisning av utländska brottslingar av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1752 — Reformering av flyktingkonventionen av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2025/26:198 — EU:s migrationspolitik av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament